• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i5-3570K vs. i7-3770K Ivy Bridge

Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
69 (0.02/day)
Processor i7 2600K 4.4ghz@1.25V
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V/Gen 3 Pro
Cooling Corsair H80
Memory 16GB Patriot Viper 1866
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 680 1.211ghz
Storage Crucial M4 256GB
Power Supply Antec HCG750W
Are we testing CPUs or GPUs? If you were testing in 1440p than in gaming tests is needed only one sentence: All games are limited by GPU, it doesn't matter which CPU you have.

Oh really, so you would pair a AMD Sempron 145 Single Core processor and GTX 680s in SLI to game at 1440p since "All games are limited by the GPU, it doesn't matter which CPU you have."

It doesn't work that way. If anything, gaming at 1440P with super high end GPUs will need a fast processor. Even the guys at PC Per found that with GTX Titan's SLI, there's a CPU bottleneck with an i7-3770K trying to drive those two massive cards.

People seem to think "low resolutions tests CPU performance" but in reality, it's both extreme ends that tests a CPU's performance. The "middle range" which is 1080p, a GTX 660Ti-670-Radeon-7870-7950, and i5-i7-FX8350 is where you can't tell a difference.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
Are we testing CPUs or GPUs? If you were testing in 1440p than in gaming tests is needed only one sentence: All games are limited by GPU, it doesn't matter which CPU you have.

If you still want to test in 1920x1080 it would be needed to test with Dual high end graphics cards (Crossfire/SLI)

Tell that to Crysis 3, where increasing core speed is the best way to increase your gpu usage.

You're arguing that we test for results that we expect to get. That doesn't tell you anything. If you test a dozen games at 1440p and only one of them scaled well with certain cpus then that's still worth the effort because at least you got one useful result. Low res testing gives you no useful results.
 

treboRR

New Member
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
62 (0.01/day)
System Name My Rig
Processor I7 2600K @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7 B3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X @ 1610MHz 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) 2xMSI GTX 580 Lightning @ SLI
Storage 2x HDD for data and 1xSSD OCZ Agility 3 128GB
Display(s) Benq XL2410T @ 120Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) SB Titanium OEM
Power Supply Corsair HX1050
Software Windows 7 64x
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,443 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
any other games that you can recommend for cpu testing?

Skyrim, Battle Field 3, Dragon Age 2, and some of the games using latest Unreal Engine. :eek:
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
478 (0.12/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 3570k
Motherboard Asrock Z77
Cooling Corsair H60
Memory G Skill 8gb 1600 mhz X 2
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon 7850 X 2
Storage 1 TB Velociraptor, 240GB 840 Samsung
Display(s) 27" Samsung LED X 2
Case Thermaltake V9
Power Supply Seasonic 620 W, CX600M on stand by
Software Win 8.1 64
Benchmark Scores Benches are silly
Dang it! I should've just paid that $30 for the 3770k.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Messages
335 (0.07/day)
I guess it all depends on the particular CPU you get and what your main purpose is. I primarily do memory overclocking/benching, and the 3570k I have trounced the 3770k I bought and subsequently got rid of. The 3570k can do 2800 at least, the 3770 was limited to 2666. Luck of the draw as to how good the IMC is. Also my 3570k can do 4.5GHz with only 1.20v.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
7,704 (1.22/day)
System Name Back to Blue
Processor i9 14900k
Motherboard Asrock Z790 Nova
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 64GB Corsair Dominator DDR5-6400 @ 6600
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 Ultra FTW3
Storage 4TB WD 850x NVME, 4TB WD Black, 10TB Seagate Barracuda Pro
Display(s) 1x Samsung Odyssey G7 Neo and 1x Dell u2518d
Case Lian Li o11 DXL w/custom vented front panel
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Senn PX38X -> SB AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Logitech G502x
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 11 x64 Pro
Benchmark Scores 31k multicore Cinebench - CPU limited 125w
You say this...but these extra threads/cores give you a HUGE advantage in many of the games we play each day. Benchmarks alone are testing a very specific environment that are not very CPU dependent. Games like MMO's, online-FPS's, etc all require significant CPU grunt and the difference in both threads, clocks, cache, etc make significant gains, ESPECIALLY in minimum FPS. The old "put a rig together and throw a benchmark run of a singleplayer game" only tests the GPU horsepower, it does almost nothing to test real-world CPU stresses.

I understand all this, however a strong well done test of performance will show the varying degrees of performance. So you play GameTitleA and your min FPS = 40 with your i7, however with the same system but an i3 your min FPS = 38, now you have a better understanding of exactly what you are spending money for.

That being said, I have a 3770K overclocked, you can see my system specs, I get nearly no difference in Min, Avg, Max FPS rates in D3, SC2, BF3, Bad Company 2 with HT On vs Off, nothing worth noting and no general system performance increase that would make me spend the extra money on the i7.

However I have my i7, because I run at any given time 1-4 VMs and often have audio/video work going on in the background while I'm playing a game, in which cases leaving HT on can make a noticeable difference.

Most people are surprised not by the fact i7 is faster than an i5, but how little the difference is in reality for their situation.

IME most people are very pleased with the gaming performance of their i3 and gpu no matter the title.

(Granted most people are not rollin GTX 680s either...) :toast:
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
4,665 (0.74/day)
Location
Washington, US
System Name Rainbow
Processor Intel Core i7 8700k
Motherboard MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC
Cooling Corsair H115i, 2x Noctua NF-A14 industrialPPC-3000 PWM
Memory G. Skill TridentZ RGB 4x8GB (F4-3600C16Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity
Storage 2x Samsung 950 Pro 256GB | 2xHGST Deskstar 4TB 7.2K
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Xigmatek Aquila
Power Supply Seasonic 760W SS-760XP
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K95
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 4 trillion points in GmailMark, over 144 FPS 2K Facebook Scrolling (Extreme Quality preset)
Hexus PiFast is a single-thread Pi calculation software, which makes Hyper-Threading useless while running it. The results confirm that, since the i5-3570K beat the i7-3770K @ 4.5 GHz.

I would REALLY like to see how the 3770K performs with hyper-threading turned off in a lot of these tests. Just to see how much the extra cache helps and how much hyper-threading decreases single-threaded performance.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
7,704 (1.22/day)
System Name Back to Blue
Processor i9 14900k
Motherboard Asrock Z790 Nova
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 64GB Corsair Dominator DDR5-6400 @ 6600
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 Ultra FTW3
Storage 4TB WD 850x NVME, 4TB WD Black, 10TB Seagate Barracuda Pro
Display(s) 1x Samsung Odyssey G7 Neo and 1x Dell u2518d
Case Lian Li o11 DXL w/custom vented front panel
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Senn PX38X -> SB AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Logitech G502x
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 11 x64 Pro
Benchmark Scores 31k multicore Cinebench - CPU limited 125w
I would REALLY like to see how the 3770K performs with hyper-threading turned off in a lot of these tests. Just to see how much the extra cache helps and how much hyper-threading decreases single-threaded performance.

HT doesn't hurt much, you could probably expect it to balance out with the 3570 nearly identically, the extra cache will help a bit in general responsiveness but I doubt much more.

I can probably get my hands on a 3570 to do some of this testing in otherwise identical hardware because with numbers so close that's going to matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xvi

Krneki

New Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
23 (0.01/day)
Regarding gaming performance.

This CPUs are GPU limited. Use a 2 or 3 way SLI to check the difference (if there is any) between an i5 and i7.
 

Krneki

New Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
23 (0.01/day)
I would REALLY like to see how the 3770K performs with hyper-threading turned off in a lot of these tests. Just to see how much the extra cache helps and how much hyper-threading decreases single-threaded performance.

HT helps in some game and hurts in others, but we are talking at max 5% difference. No, the reason hard-core OC turn it off is to gain extra stability and higher clocks on the CPU.
 

brandonwh64

Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
19,542 (3.68/day)
Krneki, Please do not double or triple post. Use the multiqoute button.
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
188 (0.04/day)
Location
VT
System Name Recent Rig
Processor 10700k
Motherboard MSI MPG Z490 Gaming Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 chromax.Black
Memory 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance C16 DDR43200
Video Card(s) EVGA FTW 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung M2 500GB, Samsung 860 1TB, Crucial M500 1TB, Samsung 920 Evo M2 2TB
Display(s) LG 27GL83A-B 27" 1440 IPS Gsync, LG 24GN650-B 24" 1080 IPS Gsync (both 144hz)
Case Fractal Design Define 7 Black Brushed Aluminum
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Ducky One 3 TKL
HT helps in some game and hurts in others, but we are talking at max 5% difference. No, the reason hard-core OC turn it off is to gain extra stability and higher clocks on the CPU.

I am confused as to where you get this information.

There are lots of games that benefit heavily from HT. 5% is an arbitrary number..
 

leylek

New Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
i would like to know if there is any difference between smoothnesses of the gameplays. Frametime in Msi Afterburner can be a good criteria.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
I am confused as to where you get this information.

There are lots of games that benefit heavily from HT. 5% is an arbitrary number..

I have to agree with Krneki on this one. While there are some games where you can find more significant gains, the average is indeed around 5% or less.
The reason is that 3 cores are usually enough to serve most of the current game engines, and that's why HT gives much more significant performance gains on dualcore CPUs compared to quads.
On the other hand, HT optimization also advanced in the last few years, so engines tend to get out more from HT than how it was before.

I spent a huge amount of time performing various benches on my L4D2 server which has a dualcore HT enabled CPU. While the Source client is heavily multi-threaded, the dedicated server binaries are not, they are "only" optimized for HT (well, the network load can be assigned to a separate core if available, but it doesn't make much difference in the bench results). I spawned different number of zombies on the server in the same scenarios (from a few to thousands!), and I can tell you that HT helped a lot. Source is one of the most optimized engines currently out there, and it's proves that proper optimization for HT is indeed provides better performance. I also found similar results while testing performance in bf:bc2 which is - apparently - also well optimized for HT.

But still, in this case (i5 vs i7), saying "only" 5% is probably the right number, or perhaps it's even too high.
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
188 (0.04/day)
Location
VT
System Name Recent Rig
Processor 10700k
Motherboard MSI MPG Z490 Gaming Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 chromax.Black
Memory 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance C16 DDR43200
Video Card(s) EVGA FTW 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung M2 500GB, Samsung 860 1TB, Crucial M500 1TB, Samsung 920 Evo M2 2TB
Display(s) LG 27GL83A-B 27" 1440 IPS Gsync, LG 24GN650-B 24" 1080 IPS Gsync (both 144hz)
Case Fractal Design Define 7 Black Brushed Aluminum
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Ducky One 3 TKL
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,443 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Games were GPU limited. You need to lower resolution a little or use a SLI or 3 SLI setup for this... ;)
 
Last edited:

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,936 (3.72/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Games were GPU limited. You need to lower resolution a little and also use a SLI or 3 SLI setup for this... ;)

do you play your games at lower resolution with a triple sli setup?
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
91 (0.02/day)
Location
Aotearoa, the land of the thieving bees
System Name Enmitynz
Processor Ivy i5 3570k @ 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Corsair H100
Memory 8GB Mushkin Frostbyte 1600mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) 2 x Sapphire 7970 Vapor-X 3GB in Crossfire
Storage 128GB OCZ Vertex 4 system drive,90GB Vertex 2, 1TB HDD, 3 320GB HDDs
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster XL2370 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Stryker
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DGX + Sennheiser HD485's/Beats by dre Solos
Power Supply Corsair HX850V2
Software Win 7 Ultimate x64
do you play your games at lower resolution with a triple sli setup?

This, they test this way to show us, the consumers, what real world differences we are going to see at resolutions that we play at. Yes, we all know lowering the resolution will exaggerate the differences in cpu power and clearly outline which cpu has the most raw grunt, but what good is it if at 1080p the difference between cpu a and cpu b is 1 fps. This is what you need to understand.

If you play at 800x600 then sure that would be more valid.
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
88 (0.01/day)
Location
Slovakia
Processor Core i7 5820k
Motherboard MSI x99s Mpower
Cooling Zalman Reserator 1, XSPC RX120, Koolance QDCs, Koolance MVR-40, EK Supreme HF, EK vga supreme HF
Memory 4x8GB crucial 3000MHz
Video Card(s) R9 290x 4GB with EK fullcover waterblock.
Storage Intel SSD 330 180GB, Samsung HD103UJ 1TB, Seagate ST31500341AS 1,5TB, Seagate ST4000DM000 4TB
Display(s) HP LP3065 30"
Case Silverstone Fortress FT02B
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI audio device -> Yamaha RX-V1600
Power Supply Corsair AX860 80plus platinum
Software Windows 8.1 prof. x64 eng retail.
I would REALLY like to see how the 3770K performs with hyper-threading turned off in a lot of these tests. Just to see how much the extra cache helps and how much hyper-threading decreases single-threaded performance.

Good idea!
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
Good idea!

This is highly application dependent. It will decrease performance if the two virtual cores have to stall because of each other or even the lack of HT optimization is enough sometimes, but with the case of Ivy Bridge, single threaded codes would not suffer as much as if it would with Sandy Bridge (or before). Ivy Bridge can dynamically allocate resources if only one thread is active in the core, opposed to the solution in SB (and before) where some was left unused with the static allocation. I don't really remember the exact figures, but things were only 1-2% percent slower in the few worst cases with HT disabled, while leaving HT enabled tended to increase performance in most of the multithreaded situations.
 

Krneki

New Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
23 (0.01/day)
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2249262

This was one of the forum posts that discusses it. Great data provided here. Someone who went from an i5-3570k to an i7-3770k to an i7-3930k.

I searched the topic for 5 min and I couldn't find any date supporting your claim about HT. More to it I found this replay.

Yes, I did same testing with HT off and there was just no measurable difference.

P.S: Don't take this as a personal attack, I only want to know how much HT will improve my FPS in games so I can better decide what my next CPU will be when I will need to upgrade my i5 750@4Ghz. As for now if you O/C your CPU you are better of disabling HT in order to gain a higher CPU clock.
 
Last edited:
Top