• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Officially Sinks the Itanic, Future of IA-64 Architecture Uncertain

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,636 (8.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Intel has unceremoniously, through a product change notification (PCN), discontinued the Itanium family of microprocessors. The Itanium 9700 "Kittson," which was released in 2017, is the final generation of Itanium, and its sales to new customers have stopped according to the PCN. The series has been marked "end of life" (EOL). Existing customers of Itanium who already have their IT infrastructure built around Itanium 9700 series, have an opportunity to determine their remaining demand of these processors, and place their "Last Product Discontinuance" order with Intel. The final LPD shipments would go out mid-2021.

With this move, Intel has cast uncertainty over the future of the IA-64 microarchitecture. IA-64 was originally conceived by Intel to replace 32-bit x86 at the turn of the century, as an industry-standard 64-bit processor architecture. AMD laid the foundation for its rival standard AMD64, which could go on to become x86-64. AMD64 won the battle for popularity over IA-64, as it maintained complete backwards-compatibility with x86, and could seamlessly run 32-bit software, saving enterprises and clients billions in transition costs. Intel cross-licensed it as EM64T (extended memory 64-bit technology), before standardizing the name x86-64. Itanium dragged on for close to two decades serving certain enterprise and HPC customers.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,823 (1.80/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Last generation was Itanium 9700 "released" in 2017. Same old 8 cores at 32nm. Previous generation was Itanium 9500 released in 2012. Itanium in itself was not bad and at one time it was reasonably well performing solution for the niche it was deployed in. Wider adoption was not expected, at least not at first. Itanium, after all, was a brand new architecture along with its own instruction set - IA-64.

This is something to ponder on - Intel with all its inertia and 800-pound gorilla might was not able to successfully push out a new instruction set to enterprise.
There were HP Itanium servers, there was software - obviously Linux support but also Windows Server and Microsoft even created things like Visual Studio and SQL Server for it.
Itanium's main downfall was x86-64...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,550 (4.38/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Itanium was on life support for ages. Just like it was the case with Xeon Phi, they failed to grasp what the industry needed.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,728 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Am i the only one that read that title as "Intel Officially sinks the Titanic"?

On a more serious note, i didn't even know Itanium was still being made: i thought it had been "retired" long ago.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
27,831 (6.16/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
I guess future iterations will be Xeons
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
147 (0.16/day)
System Name Dell Dimension P120
Processor Intel Pentium 120 MHz 60Mhz FSB
Motherboard Dell Pentium
Memory 24 MB EDO
Video Card(s) Matrox Millennium 2MB
Storage 1 GB EIDE HDD
Display(s) Dell 15 inch crt
Case Dell Dimension
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster
Mouse Microsoft mouse, no scroll wheel
Keyboard Dell 1995
Software Windows 95 + Office 95
think the first time I heard of itanium was some 15yrs ago then not much at all
and now all of the sudden its declared dead...
its like an elusive rare animal that people knew about but then assumed extinct and then many years later officially declared extinct
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
147 (0.16/day)
System Name Dell Dimension P120
Processor Intel Pentium 120 MHz 60Mhz FSB
Motherboard Dell Pentium
Memory 24 MB EDO
Video Card(s) Matrox Millennium 2MB
Storage 1 GB EIDE HDD
Display(s) Dell 15 inch crt
Case Dell Dimension
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster
Mouse Microsoft mouse, no scroll wheel
Keyboard Dell 1995
Software Windows 95 + Office 95
(T)itanic - there she goes!
Nope :D
they must have managed to make a 1picometer cpu and predicted the future of an alternate universe in which intel went out of business because a certain individual aboard the Titanic didn't go down with the ship and later on became the ceo of Cyrix that created much better cpus and put intel out of business

this should be the plot for Titanic 2
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,483 (0.67/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
Wanted to say "So long, you shall be missed", but it never reached general public so there wouldn't be anything to miss :ohwell:
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
1,734 (1.77/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Super Computer
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H55 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Crucial/Micron Ballistix Sport DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) ASUS GeForce GTX1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB SATA SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) HP 2311x and Acer G206HQL
Case CoolerMaster MasterBox Lite 5 RGB
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G3 Gold
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Logitech Wave K350
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Itanium's main downfall was x86-64...
Pretty much this. There's far too much legacy software in the industry that can't just be recompiled to work on Itanium. Sure, x86 can be emulated on Itanium but performance sucked.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,778 (0.90/day)
Itanium's main downfall was x86-64...
Pretty much this. There's far too much legacy software in the industry that can't just be recompiled to work on Itanium.
Itanium's downfall was the fact that it didn't scale well compared to Athlon64 among others. It needed a tremendous amount of resources to keep up with more efficient superscalar x86 implementations.

Itanium remains a good example of overengineering; a product which may sound good on paper, but performs poorly in reality.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
1,734 (1.77/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Super Computer
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H55 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Crucial/Micron Ballistix Sport DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) ASUS GeForce GTX1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB SATA SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) HP 2311x and Acer G206HQL
Case CoolerMaster MasterBox Lite 5 RGB
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G3 Gold
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Logitech Wave K350
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Itanium's downfall was the fact that it didn't scale well compared to Athlon64 among others.
A lot of that came from the fact that the compilers had to do all the hard work. Little do people know but in your common x86-64 chip there's a lot of optimization of the CPU instructions going on behind the scenes at the silicon level before even one instruction is executed. There was none of that happening with Itanium, all of that had to be done at the compiler level which they generally weren't able to do.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,778 (0.90/day)
A lot of that came from the fact that the compilers had to do all the hard work. Little do people know but in your common x86-64 chip there's a lot of optimization of the CPU instructions going on behind the scenes at the silicon level before even one instruction is executed. There was none of that happening with Itanium, all of that had to be done at the compiler level which they generally weren't able to do.
Not really. First of all, Itanium is a very different ISA, and requires completely rewritten code. All the runtime optimizations and compiler optimizations in the world could never help that. But despite this problem, even the software written for Itanium didn't scale well, so it wouldn't have mattered even if they had more adpotion.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
1,734 (1.77/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Super Computer
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H55 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Crucial/Micron Ballistix Sport DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) ASUS GeForce GTX1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB SATA SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) HP 2311x and Acer G206HQL
Case CoolerMaster MasterBox Lite 5 RGB
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G3 Gold
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Logitech Wave K350
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
requires completely rewritten code.
I wouldn't go so far as to say "completely rewritten code" because in the end C(++) is C(++), it doesn't matter. It's the compilers that make the magic really happen, it's what transforms the human readable code into machine code. Without the compilers and the optimizations that those compilers do it doesn't matter what ISA you have, your code will run like shit. x86-64 has the benefit that pretty much everyone knows how to optimize for it, not only that but there's a lot of architecture optimizations that are being done at the silicon level.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,778 (0.90/day)
I wouldn't go so far as to say "completely rewritten code" because in the end C(++) is C(++), it doesn't matter. It's the compilers that make the magic really happen, it's what transforms the human readable code into machine code. Without the compilers and the optimizations that those compilers do it doesn't matter what ISA you have, your code will run like shit. x86-64 has the benefit that pretty much everyone knows how to optimize for it, not only that but there's a lot of architecture optimizations that are being done at the silicon level.
Actually not. Itanium features explicit parallel instructions, and compilers are limited to working with just a few instructions within a scope, there is no way a compiler could be able to properly structure the code and memory to leverage this. It's kind of similar to SIMD(like AVX), the compiler can vectorize small patterns of a few instructions, but can never restructure larger code, so if you want proper utilization of SIMD you need to use intrinsics which are basically mapped directly to assembly. No compiler will ever be able to do this automatically.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
303 (0.34/day)
Location
SoCal
System Name unnamed currently :*(
Processor Intel Core i7-5960x
Motherboard ASUS ROG RAMPAGE V EDITION 10
Cooling EKWB/Bitspower CPU, motherboard & GPU WB
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 4x4gb ddr4 2666
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 Ti FE 11GB
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 1 TB M.2 SSD & WD Black 5TB HDD
Display(s) Asus SwiftROG PG278Q & Asus PB277Q
Case Corsair 900D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair Axi1200
Mouse Steel Series Sensei RAW
Keyboard Corsair K70
Benchmark Scores 4.8 ghz @ 1.37 - 5930k - old cpu 4.6 GHZ @ 1.3 - 5960X - current cpu
I heard a few years ago that Intel wanted to EOL it for years but couldn’t due to contracts with giants like HP who had their databases running these cpus and would cost them billions to switch over. I guess the contract is finally up? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,242 (1.31/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
in the end C(++) is C(++), it doesn't matter
Not really. Although I am little rusty on my C, I do not believe system calls are abstracted in libc or the STL in C++. Sytem calls very much depend on the system.

Edit: Disregard, I misread your statement.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,664 (0.80/day)
I heard a few years ago that Intel wanted to EOL it for years but couldn’t due to contracts with giants like HP who had their databases running these cpus and would cost them billions to switch over. I guess the contract is finally up? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's ended in year 2017 if I remember correctly. But that's not all of it, HP actualy paid intel to continue manufacturing them, intel could have declined.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
25,520 (6.30/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire NITRO+ RX 590 Special Edition 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Sad. Intel should have tried to sell Apple Itaniums for Mac instead of Core and Xeon. There was no backwards compatibility argument there and Intel could have evolved the product to be more attractive to consumers with Apple's revenue. I don't like that it is being axed because that's another competitor gone but I understand why they are.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,240 (0.49/day)
Sad. Intel should have tried to sell Apple Itaniums for Mac instead of Core and Xeon. There was no backwards compatibility argument there and Intel could have evolved the product to be more attractive to consumers with Apple's revenue. I don't like that's being axed because that's another competitor gone but I understand why they are.
Itanium is just as much a "competitor" for CPUs as VIA is right now, AKA completely worthless.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,242 (1.31/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,778 (0.90/day)
Sad. Intel should have tried to sell Apple Itaniums for Mac instead of Core and Xeon. There was no backwards compatibility argument there and Intel could have evolved the product to be more attractive to consumers with Apple's revenue. I don't like that's being axed because that's another competitor gone but I understand why they are.
I don't recall them having any Itanium version even close to efficient enough to consider that.

Who are they a competitor to?
x86, Intel and AMD
Power, IBM (alive, but barely)
Sparc, Sun (dead)
Alpha, DEC (dead)
PA-RISC, HP (dead)
MIPS (really dead, no market share, but other companies keep MIPS variants still in "active" development)
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,242 (1.31/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
ah, so competitor in name only, not really a competitor
 
Top