• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Rocket Lake" an Adaptation of "Willow Cove" CPU Cores on 14nm?

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,807 (8.50/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
The "Willow Cove" CPU core design succeeds "Sunny Cove," Intel's first truly new CPU core design in close to 5 years. "Sunny Cove" is implemented in the 10 nm "Ice Lake" microarchitecture, and "Willow Cove" cores are expected to debut with the 10 nm+ "Tiger Lake." It turns out that Intel is working to adapt "Willow Cove" CPU cores onto a 14 nm microarchitecture, and "Rocket Lake" could be it.

Twitter user @chiakokhua, a retired VLSI engineer with high hit-rate on CPU microarchitecture news, made sense of technical documents to point out that "Rocket Lake" is essentially a 14 nm adaptation of "Tiger Lake," but with the iGPU shrunk significantly, to make room for the larger CPU cores. The Gen12 iGPU on "Rocket Lake-S" will feature just 32 execution units (EUs), whilst on "Tiger Lake," it has three times the muscle, with 96 EUs. "Rocket Lake" also replaces "Tiger Lake's" FIVR (fully-integrated voltage regulation) with a conventional SVID VRM architecture.



We know from an older report that the 14 nm "Rocket Lake-S" silicon has up to 8 CPU cores, even as its predecessor, "Comet Lake-S," dials core-counts up to 10. We know now that the lowered core count is a trade-off for big IPC gains. For the desktop platform, "Rocket Lake-S" could herald the first major IPC uplift on the Intel platform since "Skylake."

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,539 (1.33/day)
If this is true - this is really disastrous, and all of us should worry about this. Progression from both sides might slow down because of this.

Willow Cove on 14nm... this is not good...
 

Uroshi

New Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
2 (0.07/day)
Maybe it is good. 14nm has proven to allow higher frequencies in power "unconstrained" situations as of now. Ryzen could be an exception (and maybe could be clocked higher at Intel 14nm equivalent technology).

Who said that the constant shrinking of the transistors will also mean higher frequencies? Maybe improving IPC on a "tweaked" 14nm process could be better for pure single core performance in the future.

I say, good job, to Intel for using their money wisely and cover both options, new 14nm CPUs and new processes 10+++nm / 7nm.

Edit: Replaced IPC where I used it wrong ... ;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
429 (0.19/day)
Makes sense to me. I've said before that Intel has new arch on 10nm but the process holds them back, so the IPC gain is negated by the lower clocks and core counts. On the other hand 14nm is mature and high clocking but stuck on old arch.

So they either need to fix 10nm or backport the new arch to 14nm.
Since they are backporting Willow Cove to 14nm this sends a clear message that 10nm is unfixable on desktop and will continue to be used only in laptops.
This despite what they recently said about rumors of 10nm not coming to desktop. Remember - Intel considers their NUC's as desktop. So putting a 10nm chip in a NUC they can say we did release 10nm on desktop.

Sometimes it is telling what is not being done as opposed to what is being done when it comes to future plans.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,471 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 620 / ASUS HD7870 2GB + GT 710 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
It's because 10nm are ramping up and we will soon have a plethora of 10nm Intel CPUs for desktop PCs. Right?

Anyway, Intel will try to keep the crown for gaming and programs that don't see more than 8 cores/ 16 threads. At least they have a plan. They leave the market that needs more cores to AMD and try to keep what they can try to keep.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
183 (0.05/day)
Location
North-Rhine-Westphalia
Processor Ryzen 2700
Motherboard B450
Cooling Thermalright ARO
Memory 2x 8GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) RX 570 8GB
Storage 256GB SSD
Display(s) UHD 40" HDR TV
Case Sharkoon AM5 Window red
Audio Device(s) USB Headset
Power Supply beQuiet PurePower10 400W
Software Win10
Every 10nm (+++) product will be very very low volume. 10nm is broken and will remain so, until succeeded by 7nm whatsoever.
They only need to produce any 10nm stuff to not get sued.
It is a very logical step to minimize cost by "backporting" Willow Cove and have useable volume products, until any new process is ready.
They go a similar way like AMD by making the caches bigger and rise their associativity.
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
105 (0.02/day)
Some (most?) of you guys have a totally wrong understanding of what IPC is. IPC= instructions per clock. Higher clock frequency does zilch for IPC.

Call it single - core performance, call it raw performance, just, for the love of God, don't call it IPC!
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
319 (0.28/day)
System Name Sillicon Nightmares
Processor Intel i5 4690K (4.7GHZ 1.372vcore, 4.0GHZ 1.192vring, VCCIN 1.84v)
Motherboard Asrock Fatal1ty Z97X Killer BIOS P2.40
Cooling DEEPCOOL Gamer Storm CAPTAIN 360
Memory 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws V 2400mhz 10-14-13-32 2T, vDIMM 1.775v
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Strix 6GB OC, Core: 2190mhz, Vcore: 1.075v, Mem: 4909mhz (Sillicon Lottery Jackpot)
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD, WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430 1080p 144HZ + (2) Samsung SyncMaster 913v 1280x1024 75HZ + A Shitty TV For Movies
Case Deepcool Genome ROG Edition
Audio Device(s) Bunta Sniff Speakers From The Tip Edition
Power Supply Corsair CX430M + CableMod Cables
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Shitty Dell Office Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores 12 101 Firestrike (3rd for my hardware)
good thing that rocket lake wont have fivr, that means we get an apples to apples in clocks to see if backporting a uArch makes worse clocks
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
74 (1.48/day)
14nm WC would produce a significant uplift and remember that backporting is extremely expensive so its definitely a worthwhile decision from a performance perspective

IPC wise at the most suboptimal rates according to SPECint/FP would put it above Zen 2. It'll be nice watching that 8core STILL beating AMD's ryzen 4XXX in ST applications and the core obsession take a halt to true single-core performance
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2015
Messages
791 (0.49/day)
Intel declared profits instead of updating their R&D and now need to catch up. They're behind and will be the budget option for a while. That's how markets should work, at least nominally in a duopoly situation like this.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
371 (0.08/day)
Location
Oak Ridge, TN
System Name BorgX79
Processor i7-3930k 6/12cores@4.4GHz
Motherboard Sabertoothx79
Cooling Capitan 360
Memory Muhskin DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) Sapphire R480 8GB
Storage Chronos SSD
Display(s) 3x VW266H
Case Ching Mien 600
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Cooler Master 1000W Silent Pro
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Rosewill RK-1000
Software Win7x64
Does it have fixes for released flaws?
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,461 (5.47/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Woopsie.

I'll say it again. 10nm performance chips are not happening
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
130 (0.05/day)
14nm WC would produce a significant uplift and remember that backporting is extremely expensive so its definitely a worthwhile decision from a performance perspective

IPC wise at the most suboptimal rates according to SPECint/FP would put it above Zen 2. It'll be nice watching that 8core STILL beating AMD's ryzen 4XXX in ST applications and the core obsession take a halt to true single-core performance
Sunny Cove is already a few percent better than Zen 2. So Willow Cove should easily be a few percents better than Zen 3.

Does it have fixes for released flaws?
I really don't care about that..
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,805 (4.08/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
There's only so many ways I can say "yaaaawn".
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,881 (2.28/day)
To all "oh no, another 14nm".
The other company sells 5 times less chips - big part of which are still previous generation 14nm models.
And they still fight to save the precious 7nm by making I/O dies on older node.

Intel will keep using 14nm for many years to come. If you don't understand it, at least stop writing these boring posts under every "Intel 14nm news".

A typical example - from a honorable gentlemen and a senior member:
There's only so many ways I can say "yaaaawn".
Yes, I'm sure. But what's the point?
They're doing another generation. Slightly better performance. Some fixes. Some new features. What's wrong with that?

It doesn't tickle your "enthusiastic needs" - I understand that. But processors are running our civilization. We need a lot of them. Some will not be "fast" nor "interesting". They just have to do their job.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,805 (4.08/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Yes, I'm sure. But what's the point?
They're doing another generation. Slightly better performance. Some fixes. Some new features. What's wrong with that?

It doesn't tickle your "enthusiastic needs" - I understand that. But processors are running our civilization. We need a lot of them. Some will not be "fast" nor "interesting". They just have to do their job.
The point is, they have real work to do ;)
Would you dare someone without a PhD in CS to pick between an i5-1035G7 and an i7-10510U?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
84 (0.19/day)
Location
Germany
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard AsRock X570M Pro4
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 4 x 16 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT red 3000C15 @ 3800C16 Micron rev E
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2070 mini
Storage Corsair MP510 1.92TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J592UQU 31.5" UHD + Fujitsu P19-2 19" 1280x1024
Case Jonsbo U3 mATX
Audio Device(s) ATH-M50
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600W SFX [currently RMAed]
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard QPAD MK-50 mechanical
Software Win10Edu_64
Sunny Cove is already a few percent better than Zen 2. So Willow Cove should easily be a few percents better than Zen 3.
Cool, reviews are out then, right? Got some links for me of actual products being tested and compared like you talked about?
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
183 (0.05/day)
Location
North-Rhine-Westphalia
Processor Ryzen 2700
Motherboard B450
Cooling Thermalright ARO
Memory 2x 8GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) RX 570 8GB
Storage 256GB SSD
Display(s) UHD 40" HDR TV
Case Sharkoon AM5 Window red
Audio Device(s) USB Headset
Power Supply beQuiet PurePower10 400W
Software Win10
In the latest interview of anandtech with raja koduri, he said that the 7nm process used for ponte vecchio and gpus in general has somewhat lower requirements than for cpus.
As i said earlier, some very few "specialized" 10nm parts will happen, but very trimmed, pruned how you may call it, so the announced and still announced parts get shipped, to get not sued.
I could bet that intel has started to change some 10nm DUV facilities to 7nm EUV.
It sounded like intel will build ponte vecchio in 7nm completely on its own, but i´m not sure.
If they go all-in with gpus they need more building capacity, because the gpus and cpus won´t use the same process, thats obvious now.
Struggling with their 14nm supply tells that actually a big margin of potencially active facilities do nothing, but costing money by multiple time beeing rebuild for new (failed 10nm) processes.
Eventually the 10nm products will be available only a few days from one single facility-run and then the facility gets converted to some 7nm process, likely EUV.
 

kakandung

New Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
2 (0.01/day)
14nm++++ Lakes are way too refined and it's becoming too good (for desktop TDP), kinda like Windows XP was.
10nm desktop SKU simply won't live up to the expectation, if it compared to the well polished 14nm++++++++ (like Vista was to XP)
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,612 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Let's see, what are their options : Use the newer node but face potential performance regressions due to lower clocks and worse yields, or, use the older node, probably could squeeze more performance and better yields out of it but at the same time power consumption becomes rampant.

It's not great. I never looked forward with much excitement for anything Intel related in the last few years and this only deepens my discontent with them.
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
555 (0.35/day)
Sunny cove is 0-40% better than skylake depending on the task. 20% on average. Willow cove is up to 30% compared to sunny. So 15% on average. This means 1,2*1,15 on average and up to 1,4*1,3 compared to sky. This is like sandy bridge against pentium 4. I don't care if it is 14nm since the density of AMD chips is 50 M transistors per sq.mm for cpu and 40 for GPus and this is 10nm, not 7nm. Intel 14nm is only 37 M transistors per sq.mm. so what.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,991 (1.03/day)
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Another market they could do with a third player, hey ho.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
729 (0.20/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
The point is, they have real work to do ;)
Would you dare someone without a PhD in CS to pick between an i5-1035G7 and an i7-10510U?
I would definitely dare someone WITH a PhD in CS as pure software engineers know fuck all about hardware AND intel's line is an utter clusterfuck for hardware engineers.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,881 (2.28/day)
The point is, they have real work to do ;)
Why exactly is updating products not real work?
Would you dare someone without a PhD in CS to pick between an i5-1035G7 and an i7-10510U?
Honestly, I don't know what you meant here.
As @Patriot already said: Computer Science isn't concerned with chip design, since computers are not devices made of semiconductor chips. Computer is an abstract machine that can perform a sequence of instructions (called "a program"). :)
 
Top