• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Says AMD Did a Great Job (with Ryzen 3000), But Intel CPUs are Still Better

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
21,887 (4.13/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Icarus Mk.VI
Processor Intel 8600k@4.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F
Cooling CPU: BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Memory 32GB XPG Gammix D10 {2x16GB}
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080Ti Gaming OC|Accelero Xtreme IV
Storage Samsung 970Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD Blue 1TB SSD|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27"
Case Corsair 760T (White)
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900/G502
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Next thing, Intel will issue another press release saying "my dad will fight your dad" - Stay tuned for more DrAmA
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
225 (0.19/day)
The fun part to me is that the Ryzen 7 3700x compared to the i9 9900k costs 2/3 (66%) the price but it is only 3-4% slower in CPU relative performance and 5-7% slower in gaming performace.
A total win if you ask me!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
219 (0.05/day)
Location
Finland
Processor 4690K @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-P
Cooling CRYORIG H7
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) HyperX Fury, DDRS 1600MH2
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1070 SC Black Edition
Storage Lots
Display(s) 24" Predator GN246HL, 1080p, 144Hz
Case Phanteks P300
Power Supply Corsair CX650
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 1/0 0.o
what else could they say to protect their over-priced cpu's ?

I find it funny that by these statements and boasts they believe they are creating confidence in their products. But for anyone in the business with a brain, the effect is the opposite.
 
Joined
May 2, 2016
Messages
130 (0.07/day)
Key word: "gaming". I'd say low res hi fps gaming, competitive online only. For everything else they are completely blown.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
15,880 (5.25/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Software Android 4.4.4R5 Custom
I find this funny, now intel's talking crap because they are stuck. Childish bs from them.
I don't know that I would go so far as to call it "Childish" per se, but it is the typical marketing spiel.

@AleksandarK's conclusion about Intel's claim being only applicable to certain games is correct. Every review I've read from reputable sources show the same result. If you're gaming and have lots of money, go Intel. If you're doing literally anything else, regardless of budget, go AMD. If you want to game, but have a limited budget, go AMD. This is true as of the time of this comment.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
2,633 (0.75/day)
System Name MSI GP76
Processor intel i7 11800h
Cooling 2 laptop fans
Memory 32gb of 3000mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Nvidia 3070
Storage x2 PNY 8tb cs2130 m.2 SSD--16tb of space
Display(s) 17.3" IPS 1920x1080 240Hz
Power Supply 280w laptop power supply
Mouse Logitech m705
Keyboard laptop keyboard
Software lots of movies and Windows 10 with win 7 shell
Benchmark Scores Good enough for me
Hey, I'm happy because we actually have competitors now. We, the consumers, win in this environment.
hell yea, just 2 years ago I was on a laptop with 4 cores and now its 8 cores.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
3,047 (3.15/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x16 GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 Rev E
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 6GB SSC
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB273GP
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 300
Keyboard MK Typist (Kailh Box White)
Hey, I'm happy because we actually have competitors now. We, the consumers, win in this environment.
Except Intel is stuck in their logic of "our product is the best for gaming and you WILL pay for it" and refuses to adjust their prices. We saw what? A single price drop of $20, only recently, on 9600K, since Zen 2 launched.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Messages
662 (0.83/day)
System Name Custom
Processor i9 9900k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 arous master
Cooling corsair h150i
Memory 4x8 3200mhz corsair
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 EX Gamer White OC
Storage 500gb Samsung 970 Evo PLus
Display(s) MSi MAG341CQ
Case Lian Li Pc-011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro Wireless
Power Supply 850w Seasonic Focus Platinum
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G110
As a consumer point of view, both current cpu offerings from both parties are good.
If you compare at price point, amd offers more cores and threads at $499 and is a damn good cpu for productivity that utilizes all those cores.
Intel on the other side their $499 cpu offers great cpu performance in the gaming side but The ryzen is no slouch when it comes to gaming as well.
Buy either platform and you will have a fast desktop.

Competition is great, as consumers we have more choices now. I just hope we can see slightly lower prices as ... $499 for mainstream high end cpu is rather steep :(
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,147 (5.50/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse 8 GiB
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Except Intel is stuck in their logic of "our product is the best for gaming and you WILL pay for it" and refuses to adjust their prices. We saw what? A single price drop of $20, only recently, on 9600K, since Zen 2 launched.
2009-2017: ~$350 would only get you a 4c/8t processor from Intel
early 2017: AMD launched Ryzen 1700 for $329, an 8c/16t processor.
late 2017: Intel launched 8700K in response: 6c/12t for $360
early 2018: AMD launched 2700 for $300, an 8c/16t processor.
late 2018: Intel followed it up with a 9700K: 8c/8t for $374

Because of AMD, Intel went from 8 years of releasing the same damn 4c/8t processor over and over on smaller processes (saving them money) to 8c/8t in just two years...all for roughly the same price! We're getting double the processors from both vendors at no extra cost (actually less, because inflation)! Win for everyone! :D Except Intel. Who has been milking the market dry for over a decade.

My ~$425 spent in 2015 on the 6700K (4c/8t) goes twice as far at AMD and Intel because of AMD bringing the competition again.


I don't really care which you buy right now. They're both a good choice. The market finally has some balance again.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
17 (0.01/day)
Location
Sydney, Australia
System Name GTX1080Ti-i74790K
Processor i7-4790K (4c/8t, 4.0-4.4)
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X G1 Gaming Black Edition
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB) Corsair Vengeance Pro 2133mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Aorus GTX 1080 Ti Xtreme
Storage 480GB HyperX Predator SSD // 2x1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD // 4TB Samsung 870 EVO // 2x4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Razer Raptor 27" IPS @ 144hz // Asus MG279Q 27" IPS @ 144hz // Oculus Rift S
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Core3D driving Razer Leviathan & Kraken Tournament Edition
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Basilisk Ultimate
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Elite
Software Win10 Pro
Wow, the smell of desperation from Intel is almost overpowering.

Intel wants my money, but AMD has earned it.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,901 (0.76/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
This is like Intel going through the stages of grief lol
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
121 (0.13/day)
I don't understand how this is childish on Intel's part. All they did is point out that they still hold a small advantage in single thread. They said nothing about multi thread performance or performance per dollar or performance per watt. They did exactly what they should do. You take the area where you have and advantage and you market the hell out of it. AMD did it with Bulldozer (first 5ghz cpu, higher module counts) and they try and do it with their GPUs.

Did people really expect Intel to say "Ok guys, AMD put out great CPU's. Time to fold up shop, we are never going to sell another chop again."
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
916 (0.27/day)
Location
Netherlands
System Name TheDeeGee's PC
Processor Intel Core i7 11700
Motherboard ASRock Z590 Steel Legend
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory Crucial Ballistix RGB 3200/C16 32GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 AERO OC
Storage Crucial P5 1TB, Crucial BX500 1TB, Crucial BX500 2TB
Display(s) EIZO CX240
Case Fractal Design Define 7
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic Fanless TX-700
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores None, don't care. As long as my games runs smooth.
If they had any common sense they would have made the 10th Gen use the same socket.

But Intel logic will be Intel logic.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
142 (0.05/day)
System Name Ryzen shine, Mr Freeman
Processor 3700X
Motherboard ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory Ballistix LT 2x16GB white 3200
Video Card(s) eVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra
Storage 500GB-970EVOplus, 256GB-850Pro, 1TB-860EVO
Display(s) LG OLED 55B8
Case Fractal Meshify C White TG
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STU, Mackie MR5+MR10S, HD598
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850W
Mouse GPW
Keyboard G815
I don't understand how this is childish on Intel's part. All they did is point out that they still hold a small advantage in single thread. They said nothing about multi thread performance or performance per dollar or performance per watt. They did exactly what they should do. You take the area where you have and advantage and you market the hell out of it. AMD did it with Bulldozer (first 5ghz cpu, higher module counts) and they try and do it with their GPUs.

Did people really expect Intel to say "Ok guys, AMD put out great CPU's. Time to fold up shop, we are never going to sell another chop again."

Its just trendy to bash intel nowadays. Whether its logical or not.
AMD fanbois (playing with cinebench) can take revenge after all these years. Kind of understandable.

If i was only after gaming, i would have bought a 9700k. But didnt want a dead-end motherboard, that gets no more processors, so i ended up with 3700X. Wich is slower in games, by some percents. Which i can probably regain by overclocking the RAM and IF. End of story.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
535 (0.25/day)
Location
Here
System Name Skypas
Processor Intel Core i7-6700
Motherboard Asus H170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X Turbo
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 6GB
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) LG 22EA63V
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2 w/ Deepcool XFan 120
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 Pro (to be replaced by 2025)
Yes yes yes your CPUs are great now get back to the lab and give us 10nm
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Messages
825 (0.75/day)
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,901 (0.76/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.

Wut? Your info is pretty faulty.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
2,100 (1.50/day)
Location
Buenos Aires, Argentina
System Name System V
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth // a bunch of 120 mm Xigmatek 1500 RPM fans (2 ins, 3 outs)
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage SHFS37A240G / DT01ACA200 / WD20EZRX / MKNSSDTR256GB-3DL / LG BH16NS40 / ST10000VN0008
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Mouse Microsoft Trackball Optical 1.0
Keyboard HP Vectra VE keyboard (Part # D4950-63004)
Software Whatever build of Windows 11 is being served in Dev channel at the time.
Benchmark Scores Corona 1.3: 3120620 r/s Cinebench R20: 3355 FireStrike: 12490 TimeSpy: 4624
But in those "Real World" tests 9900K has no advantage over 9700K - why did they make 8 core, 16 thread processor then, and are planning a 10 core, 20 thread one in beginning of 2020?

To say that the only thing that really uses many cores is Cinebench R20 is frankly pathetic. Who are they targeting with this information? The enthusiastic Microsoft Office extreme overclocking crowd?


Hey!! Those spreadsheets are stupidly complex and pretty much alive with data and macros! I need to overclock the crap out of the CPU to get things done in time /s
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
118 (0.04/day)
Processor AMD Threadripper 3690x
Motherboard MSI TRX40 Pro 10G
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB (2x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Turbo OC
Storage 2x 1TB Intel 970 Pro NVM
Display(s) Dell U2415m x2
Case Fractal Define XL R2
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Hyper X G6
Power Supply 800 Watt Fractal Design Newton R3
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX-3.0 - Black Keys
Software Win 10 Edu
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.

Be that as it may - the AMD from 20 years ago is nowhere near the same as it is today... I am glad to see that Intel is resorting to their usual shenanigans and that we finally have full competition.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
101 (0.04/day)
Funny they didn't mention Security anywhere except in the fine print in their graphics which states" Benchmarks may not have been run with all current available security patches."
I wonder if they still win benches with all updates installed?
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
787 (0.24/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Noctua NH-U12-S Chromax.Black
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /Samsung 960 evo 256 Gb/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG 25UM58
Case Cooler Master NR200p
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply bequiet SFX L power 600w
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 10 pro
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.
the Core 2 Duo wasn't intel first dual core, the pentium D was (two pentium 4 glued together), and AMD released (at least for reviewers) the athlon 64 x2 just a few weeks later (who was actually 2 core on the same die). But yes, since AMD had the performance crown, they asked for more money.

This article is giving some insight of the context of 2005, AMD and Intel had dual core in their mind for a long time, they just had to wait for the manufacturing process to mature before making them a reality:
 
Last edited:

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,121 (1.85/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Poor Intel. I feel sorry for them...........

Not!

They were arrogant and greedy when on top for so many years. Charging for a 4 core 8 thread CPU what they should have been charging for a 6 core 12 thread CPU. Funny how they managed to do that after Ryzen came out. Putting crappy TIM under the heat spreader on their unlocked CPUs to save a few pennies instead of using solder. When overclockers complained about the poor overclocking potential without causing instability Intel's response was, "Then don't overclock".
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
1,198 (0.72/day)
Location
Tanagra
the Core 2 Duo wasn't intel first dual core, the pentium D was (two pentium 4 glued together), and AMD released (at least for reviewers) the athlon 64 x2 just a few weeks later (who was actually 2 core on the same die). But yes, since AMD had the performance crown, they asked for more money.

This article is giving some insight of the context of 2005, AMD and Intel had dual core in their mind for a long time, they just had to wait for the manufacturing process to mature before making them a reality:
Prescott was also a poor performing product, so Athlon64 was already a better product. Intel knew AMD was about to go dual-core, and they engineered the Pentium D using MCM. Core came along later as an evolution of Pentium M. Pricing usually isn’t as competitive when one product is clearly better, at least at the high end. It’s why nvidia sells $1200 GPUs.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
5,690 (2.15/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
I'd like to know what intel considers "real world" or is this just some more intel trolling AMD again?
 
Top