• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Says AMD Did a Great Job (with Ryzen 3000), But Intel CPUs are Still Better

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
19,645 (4.33/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Icarus Mk.V
Processor Intel 8600k@4.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F
Cooling Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 16 Corsair Vengeance White LED DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080Ti Gaming OC|Accelero Xtreme IV
Storage Samsung 970Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD Blue 1TB SSD|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27"
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1x140mm NF-P14s|1xCorsair ML120 Pro|4xML140 Pro}
Audio Device(s) Creative SB Z {AVR:Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150}
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900/G502
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Next thing, Intel will issue another press release saying "my dad will fight your dad" - Stay tuned for more DrAmA
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
142 (0.32/day)
The fun part to me is that the Ryzen 7 3700x compared to the i9 9900k costs 2/3 (66%) the price but it is only 3-4% slower in CPU relative performance and 5-7% slower in gaming performace.
A total win if you ask me!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
210 (0.05/day)
Location
Finland
Processor 4690K @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-P
Cooling CRYORIG H7
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) HyperX Fury, DDRS 1600MH2
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1070 SC Black Edition
Storage Lots
Display(s) 24" Predator GN246HL, 1080p, 144Hz
Case Phanteks P300
Power Supply Corsair CX650
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 1/0 0.o
what else could they say to protect their over-priced cpu's ?
I find it funny that by these statements and boasts they believe they are creating confidence in their products. But for anyone in the business with a brain, the effect is the opposite.
 
Joined
May 2, 2016
Messages
40 (0.03/day)
Key word: "gaming". I'd say low res hi fps gaming, competitive online only. For everything else they are completely blown.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,304 (3.22/day)
Location
USA
I find this funny, now intel's talking crap because they are stuck. Childish bs from them.
I don't know that I would go so far as to call it "Childish" per se, but it is the typical marketing spiel.

@AleksandarK's conclusion about Intel's claim being only applicable to certain games is correct. Every review I've read from reputable sources show the same result. If you're gaming and have lots of money, go Intel. If you're doing literally anything else, regardless of budget, go AMD. If you want to game, but have a limited budget, go AMD. This is true as of the time of this comment.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
1,566 (0.56/day)
System Name MSI GE75 Raider 9SG
Processor i9-9880h
Cooling 2 laptop fans
Memory 32gb of 2666mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Nvidia 2080
Storage x2 Samsung 970 plus 2tb, Seagate FireCuda 2tb SSHD
Display(s) 17.3" IPS 1920x1080 144Hz
Power Supply 280w laptop power supply
Mouse Logitech m705
Keyboard laptop keyboard
Software lots of movies and Windows 10 with win 7 shell
Benchmark Scores High enough for me
Hey, I'm happy because we actually have competitors now. We, the consumers, win in this environment.
hell yea, just 2 years ago I was on a laptop with 4 cores and now its 8 cores.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
578 (2.74/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 3200 CL16 @ 3466 CL 14
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 6GB SSC
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) BenQ BL2411PT
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 300
Keyboard Generic Dell
Hey, I'm happy because we actually have competitors now. We, the consumers, win in this environment.
Except Intel is stuck in their logic of "our product is the best for gaming and you WILL pay for it" and refuses to adjust their prices. We saw what? A single price drop of $20, only recently, on 9600K, since Zen 2 launched.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Messages
25 (0.61/day)
System Name Custom
Processor i7 6700k
Motherboard Asus Z270-F
Cooling AIO cooler master h60
Memory 16GB DDR2666
Video Card(s) GTX 1070ti
Storage 512GB Crucial BX100
Display(s) 1080P
Case NZXT H500
Audio Device(s) onboard :(
Power Supply 750W PSU Corsair RM750x
As a consumer point of view, both current cpu offerings from both parties are good.
If you compare at price point, amd offers more cores and threads at $499 and is a damn good cpu for productivity that utilizes all those cores.
Intel on the other side their $499 cpu offers great cpu performance in the gaming side but The ryzen is no slouch when it comes to gaming as well.
Buy either platform and you will have a fast desktop.

Competition is great, as consumers we have more choices now. I just hope we can see slightly lower prices as ... $499 for mainstream high end cpu is rather steep :(
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
25,282 (6.33/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire NITRO+ RX 590 Special Edition 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Except Intel is stuck in their logic of "our product is the best for gaming and you WILL pay for it" and refuses to adjust their prices. We saw what? A single price drop of $20, only recently, on 9600K, since Zen 2 launched.
2009-2017: ~$350 would only get you a 4c/8t processor from Intel
early 2017: AMD launched Ryzen 1700 for $329, an 8c/16t processor.
late 2017: Intel launched 8700K in response: 6c/12t for $360
early 2018: AMD launched 2700 for $300, an 8c/16t processor.
late 2018: Intel followed it up with a 9700K: 8c/8t for $374

Because of AMD, Intel went from 8 years of releasing the same damn 4c/8t processor over and over on smaller processes (saving them money) to 8c/8t in just two years...all for roughly the same price! We're getting double the processors from both vendors at no extra cost (actually less, because inflation)! Win for everyone! :D Except Intel. Who has been milking the market dry for over a decade.

My ~$425 spent in 2015 on the 6700K (4c/8t) goes twice as far at AMD and Intel because of AMD bringing the competition again.


I don't really care which you buy right now. They're both a good choice. The market finally has some balance again.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
Location
Sydney, Australia
System Name i7-4790K-RADEON
Processor i7-4790K Devil's Canyon
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X G1 Gaming Black Edition
Cooling CPU: Corsair H110 // Case: Corsair AF120, AF140 Fans
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB) Corsair Vengeance Pro 2133mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) XFX R9 295X2 8GB & XFX R9 290X 4GB Double Dissipation (3 x Hawaii/Vesuvius XT 4GB Crossfire)
Storage 2 x 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD // 2 x 4TB WD Black // 1 x 6TB WD Green
Display(s) Asus MG279Q 27" 144hz IPS Freesync
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Sound Core3D (Onboard) driving Logitech Z-5500D 5.1
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Corsair Sabre RGB (Tramp Stamp Edition)
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB Cherry MX Red (Tramp Stamp Edition)
Software Win10 Pro // DooM // Star Citizen // DCS,Falcon BMS // Oblivion,Skyrim,Fallout,F.E.A.R.,Deus Ex
Wow, the smell of desperation from Intel is almost overpowering.

Intel wants my money, but AMD has earned it.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,636 (0.83/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
This is like Intel going through the stages of grief lol
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
108 (0.65/day)
I don't understand how this is childish on Intel's part. All they did is point out that they still hold a small advantage in single thread. They said nothing about multi thread performance or performance per dollar or performance per watt. They did exactly what they should do. You take the area where you have and advantage and you market the hell out of it. AMD did it with Bulldozer (first 5ghz cpu, higher module counts) and they try and do it with their GPUs.

Did people really expect Intel to say "Ok guys, AMD put out great CPU's. Time to fold up shop, we are never going to sell another chop again."
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
551 (0.21/day)
Location
Netherlands
System Name TheDeeGee's PC
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 AERO OC
Storage Crucial M4 256GB, 2x Western Digital 1TB 2,5"
Display(s) EIZO CX240
Case Antec P280
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic P-760
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
If they had any common sense they would have made the 10th Gen use the same socket.

But Intel logic will be Intel logic.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
79 (0.04/day)
System Name Ryzen shine, Mr Freeman
Processor 3700X
Motherboard ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory Ballistix LT 2x16GB white 3200
Video Card(s) GeForce GTX 1070FE
Storage 500GB-970EVOplus, 256GB-850Pro, 1TB-860EVO
Display(s) LG OLED 55B8
Case Fractal Meshify C White TG
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STU, Mackie MR5+MR10S, HD598
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850W
Mouse GPW
Keyboard Fnatic Streak
I don't understand how this is childish on Intel's part. All they did is point out that they still hold a small advantage in single thread. They said nothing about multi thread performance or performance per dollar or performance per watt. They did exactly what they should do. You take the area where you have and advantage and you market the hell out of it. AMD did it with Bulldozer (first 5ghz cpu, higher module counts) and they try and do it with their GPUs.

Did people really expect Intel to say "Ok guys, AMD put out great CPU's. Time to fold up shop, we are never going to sell another chop again."
Its just trendy to bash intel nowadays. Whether its logical or not.
AMD fanbois (playing with cinebench) can take revenge after all these years. Kind of understandable.

If i was only after gaming, i would have bought a 9700k. But didnt want a dead-end motherboard, that gets no more processors, so i ended up with 3700X. Wich is slower in games, by some percents. Which i can probably regain by overclocking the RAM and IF. End of story.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
421 (0.30/day)
Location
Here
System Name Skypas
Processor Intel Core i7-6700
Motherboard Asus H170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X Turbo
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 6GB
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) LG 22EA63V
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2 w/ Deepcool XFan 120
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 Pro
Yes yes yes your CPUs are great now get back to the lab and give us 10nm
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Messages
159 (0.46/day)
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,636 (0.83/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.
Wut? Your info is pretty faulty.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
474 (0.74/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Desktop5
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage Kingston HyperX Fury 240 GB // Toshiba 2 TB HDD // WD 2 TB HDD // Mushkin Triactor 3DL 256 GB
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Mouse Logitech Wireless Mouse M280 // Microsoft Trackball Optical 1.0
Keyboard HP Vectra VE keyboard (Part # D4950-63004)
Software Windows 10
But in those "Real World" tests 9900K has no advantage over 9700K - why did they make 8 core, 16 thread processor then, and are planning a 10 core, 20 thread one in beginning of 2020?

To say that the only thing that really uses many cores is Cinebench R20 is frankly pathetic. Who are they targeting with this information? The enthusiastic Microsoft Office extreme overclocking crowd?

Hey!! Those spreadsheets are stupidly complex and pretty much alive with data and macros! I need to overclock the crap out of the CPU to get things done in time /s
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
103 (0.04/day)
Processor AMD FX-9370
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair V Formula Z
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB (2x 8192MB) G.Skill RipJawsX
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II OC
Storage 240GB Crucial M500 & 2000GB Seagate Desktop HDD ST2000DM001
Display(s) Dell U2412m
Case Fractal Define XL R2
Power Supply 800 Watt Fractal Design Newton R3
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX-3.0 - Black Keys
Software Win 7 Pro
Benchmark Scores 7812 Points - 3D Mark Fire Strike
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.
Be that as it may - the AMD from 20 years ago is nowhere near the same as it is today... I am glad to see that Intel is resorting to their usual shenanigans and that we finally have full competition.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
54 (0.03/day)
Funny they didn't mention Security anywhere except in the fine print in their graphics which states" Benchmarks may not have been run with all current available security patches."
I wonder if they still win benches with all updates installed?
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
326 (0.13/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling cooler master masterliquid 240
Memory Gskill Aegis 2x 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060 (3Gb)
Storage Samsung 960 evo 256 Gb Seagate 2To sandisk ultra plus 256GB; Toshiba 2TB
Display(s) LG 25UM58
Case Ncase M1
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF 600w
Mouse Corsair scimitar pro
Keyboard Corsair k55 RGB
Software win 10 pro
Funny most teens won't know this but when AMD had the performance advantage in the single core days it was Intel who made core 2 duo and started core trends and took performance advantage.let me tell you this back then AMD was asking for more money.now after almost 2 decades of being no way near competitive they made a good progress. Underlining all this is that none of these companies are morally clean.
the Core 2 Duo wasn't intel first dual core, the pentium D was (two pentium 4 glued together), and AMD released (at least for reviewers) the athlon 64 x2 just a few weeks later (who was actually 2 core on the same die). But yes, since AMD had the performance crown, they asked for more money.

This article is giving some insight of the context of 2005, AMD and Intel had dual core in their mind for a long time, they just had to wait for the manufacturing process to mature before making them a reality:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
4,035 (2.00/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Poor Intel. I feel sorry for them...........

Not!

They were arrogant and greedy when on top for so many years. Charging for a 4 core 8 thread CPU what they should have been charging for a 6 core 12 thread CPU. Funny how they managed to do that after Ryzen came out. Putting crappy TIM under the heat spreader on their unlocked CPUs to save a few pennies instead of using solder. When overclockers complained about the poor overclocking potential without causing instability Intel's response was, "Then don't overclock".
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
605 (0.66/day)
Location
Tanagra
Processor Intel i5-9600K
Motherboard ASRock H370M-ITX/ac
Cooling Gammax 300
Memory 16GB DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 570 4GB
Storage Inland 512GB NVMe
Display(s) LG 27UL500-W
Case Thermaltake Core V1
Audio Device(s) My ears
Power Supply EVGA 500W
Software Windows 10
the Core 2 Duo wasn't intel first dual core, the pentium D was (two pentium 4 glued together), and AMD released (at least for reviewers) the athlon 64 x2 just a few weeks later (who was actually 2 core on the same die). But yes, since AMD had the performance crown, they asked for more money.

This article is giving some insight of the context of 2005, AMD and Intel had dual core in their mind for a long time, they just had to wait for the manufacturing process to mature before making them a reality:
Prescott was also a poor performing product, so Athlon64 was already a better product. Intel knew AMD was about to go dual-core, and they engineered the Pentium D using MCM. Core came along later as an evolution of Pentium M. Pricing usually isn’t as competitive when one product is clearly better, at least at the high end. It’s why nvidia sells $1200 GPUs.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
2,873 (1.52/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
I'd like to know what intel considers "real world" or is this just some more intel trolling AMD again?
 
Top