• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Ships 0x129 Microcode Update for 13th and 14th Generation Processors with Stability Issues

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,543 (0.96/day)
Intel has officially started shipping the "0x129" microcode update for its 13th and 14th generation "Raptor Lake" and "Raptor Lake Refresh" processors. This critical update is currently being pushed to all OEM/ODM partners to address the stability issues that Intel's processors have been facing. According to Intel, this microcode update fixes "incorrect voltage requests to the processor that are causing elevated operating voltage." Intel's analysis shows that the root cause of stability problems is caused by too high voltage during operation of the processor. These increases to voltage cause degradation that increases the minimum voltage required for stable operation. Intel calls this "Vmin"—it's a theoretical construct, not an actual voltage, think "speed for an airplane required to fly". The latest 0x129 microcode patch will limit the processor's voltage to no higher than 1.55 V, which should avoid further degradation. Overclocking is still supported, enthusiasts will have to disable the eTVB setting in their BIOS to push the processor beyond the 1.55 V threshold. The company's internal testing shows that the new default settings with limited voltages with standard run-to-run variations show minimal performance impact, with only a single game (Hitman 3: Dartmoor) showing degradation. For a full statement from Intel, see the quote below.




Microcode (0x129) Update for Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen Desktop Processors said:
Intel is currently distributing to its OEM/ODM partners a new microcode patch (0x129) for its Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors which will address incorrect voltage requests to the processor that are causing elevated operating voltage.

For all Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processor users: This patch is being distributed via BIOS update and will not be available through operating system updates. Intel is working with its partners to ensure timely validation and rollout of the BIOS update for systems currently in service.

Instability Analysis Update - Microcode Background and Performance Implications

In addition to extended warranty coverage, Intel has released three mitigations related to the instability issue - commonly experienced as consistent application crashes and repeated hangs - to help stabilize customer systems with Intel Core 13th and 14th gen desktop processors:
1. Intel default settings to avoid elevated power delivery impact to the processor (May 2024)
2. Microcode 0x125 to fix the eTVB issue in i9 processors (June 2024)
3. Microcode 0x129 to address elevated voltages (August 2024)

Intel's current analysis finds there is a significant increase to the minimum operating voltage (Vmin) across multiple cores on affected processors due to elevated voltages. Elevated voltage events can accumulate over time and contribute to the increase in Vmin for the processor.

The latest microcode update (0x129) will limit voltage requests above 1.55V as a preventative mitigation for processors not experiencing instability symptoms. This latest microcode update will primarily improve operating conditions for K/KF/KS processors. Intel is also confirming, based on extensive validation, all future products will not be affected by this issue.

Intel is continuing to investigate mitigations for scenarios that can result in Vmin shift on potentially impacted Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors. Intel will provide updates by end of August.

Intel's internal testing - utilizing Intel Default Settings - indicates performance impact is within run-to-run variation (eg. 3DMark: Timespy, WebXPRT 4, Cinebench R24, Blender 4.2.0) with a few sub-tests showing moderate impacts (WebXPRT Online Homework; PugetBench GPU Effects Score). For gaming workloads tested, performance has also been within run-to-run variation (eg. Cyberpunk 2077, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: Warhammer III - Mirrors of Madness) with one exception showing slightly more impact (Hitman 3: Dartmoor). However, system performance is dependent on configuration and several other factors.

For unlocked Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors, this latest microcode update (0x129) will not prevent users from overclocking if they so choose. Users can disable the eTVB setting in their BIOS if they wish to push above the 1.55V threshold. As always, Intel recommends users proceed with caution when overclocking their desktop processors, as overclocking may void their warranty and/or affect system health. As a general best practice, Intel recommends customers with Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors utilize the Intel Default Settings.

In light of the recently announced extended warranty program, Intel is reaffirming its confidence in its products and is committed to making sure all customers who have or are currently experiencing instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors are supported in the exchange process. Users experiencing consistent instability symptoms should reach out to their system manufacturer (OEM/System Integrator purchase), Intel Customer Support (boxed processor), or place of purchase (tray processor) further assistance.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,597 (4.67/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
For Hitman 3 to lose performance but not Cinebench (and saying this from experience), that must be one heck of an oddity
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2018
Messages
534 (0.23/day)
What about performance degradation on not-"Intel Default Settings" which was the shipping configuration for most, if not all, consumer motherboards until recently?
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
2,194 (0.43/day)
For Hitman 3 to lose performance but not Cinebench (and saying this from experience), that must be one heck of an oddity

Single core, max boost or max voltage.

Ah well - i'm not sure if this ever was a bug or not, or silicon being pushed to the extreme just to be on top of the charts.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,597 (4.67/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Single core, max boost or max voltage.

Ah well - i'm not sure if this ever was a bug or not, or silicon being pushed to the extreme just to be on top of the charts.

Nope, none of it changed. Check the ASUS announcement thread, post a bunch of stuff regarding it there
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,452 (2.46/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
What if the motherboard supplies a higher voltage than the CPU requests?
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,730 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
What if the motherboard supplies a higher voltage than the CPU requests?
Then this mechanism will not work. i.e. if you set voltage offset +0.1 V, it should still go above 1.55 V
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2023
Messages
881 (1.44/day)
System Name BarnacleMan
Processor 14700KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760 Aorus Elite Ax DDR5
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 240 + P12 Max Fans
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury Beast
Video Card(s) Asus Tuf 4090 24GB
Storage 4TB sn850x, 2TB sn850x, 2TB Netac Nv7000 + 2TB p5 plus, 4TB MX500 * 2 = 18TB. Plus dvd burner.
Display(s) Dell 23.5" 1440P IPS panel
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH Performance Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z623
Power Supply Gigabyte 850w
Is it just me or could the title be misinterpreted to sound like 129 is going to fix instability issues on cpus already experiencing them, rather than just preventing it on those that aren't ( as intel has said) ?

Also noticed this line

"Intel's analysis shows that the root cause of stability problems is caused by too high voltage during operation of the processor."

Did they say that? I remember them saying this in the July press statement:

"Intel is delivering a microcode patch which addresses the root cause of exposure to elevated voltages."

Which is not quite the same thing. But I could be mistaken, maybe they said that at a different time.
 
Joined
May 26, 2023
Messages
38 (0.07/day)
Highly doubt this will do anything useful. 1.55v is still a heck of a lot for this process node.

Anyone running these would be best advised to limit voltage requests in the BIOS, to at most 1.4v. Even that I wouldn't feel safe with, for CPUs running many hours per day.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,597 (4.67/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Highly doubt this will do anything useful. 1.55v is still a heck of a lot for this process node.

Anyone running these would be best advised to limit voltage requests in the BIOS, to at most 1.4v. Even that I wouldn't feel safe with, for CPUs running many hours per day.

The problem with that is that 1.4 V is an incredibly conservative voltage and it is not enough to hit advertised clocks on at least 98% of samples, regardless of SKU type. Let's go with the 13900KS which is what I have most experience with, this is obviously a preselected, relatively high-quality i9-13900K.


My personal i9-13900KS's 6 GHz V/F point is 1.463 according to my Apex Encore. and this is apparently a resoundingly average chip amongst its kind - at SP 108, 118 P and 89 E, it's smack in the middle of all bell curves from the Igor's Lab article and meets the exact median and average results of all of their samples, according to the same, for a 13th Gen i9 CPU to be considered a KS quality, its 6000 MHz point must be <= 1.49 V, so while it isn't the best, it's also far from the worst and the textbook "it is expected that it should behave exactly like this" chip.

The 13900K/KF, 14900K/KF and 14900KS processors have a different SP scale, but their V/F curve is not that far off -the i9-14900KS in particular has a 6200 MHz V/F point all the other SKUs do not - and it's common for those to be in the ~1.525 range. Now let's think outliers, such as stinker 13900K samples... yep
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,730 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Is it just me or could the title be misinterpreted to sound like 129 is going to fix instability issues on cpus already experiencing them, rather than just preventing it on those that aren't ( as intel has said) ?

Also noticed this line

"Intel's analysis shows that the root cause of stability problems is caused by too high voltage during operation of the processor."

Did they say that? I remember them saying this in the July press statement:

"Intel is delivering a microcode patch which addresses the root cause of exposure to elevated voltages."

Which is not quite the same thing. But I could be mistaken, maybe they said that at a different time.
"Intel's current analysis finds there is a significant increase to the minimum operating voltage (Vmin) across multiple cores on affected processors due to elevated voltages. Elevated voltage events can accumulate over time and contribute to the increase in Vmin for the processor."

This is just confusing wording to say "high voltage causes something to happen, which, over time, makes the processor unstable at default voltage, so it would only work if we gave it higher voltage"
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
766 (0.23/day)
Location
Earth's Troposphere
System Name 3 "rigs"-gaming/spare pc/cruncher
Processor R7-5800X3D/i7-7700K/R9-7950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VI Extreme/Asus Ranger Z170/Asus ROG Crosshair X670E-GENE
Cooling Bitspower monoblock ,custom open loop,both passive and active/air tower cooler/air tower cooler
Memory 32GB DDR4/32GB DDR4/64GB DDR5
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX6900XT Alphacooled/AMD RX5700XT 50th Aniv./SOC(onboard)
Storage mix of sata ssds/m.2 ssds/mix of sata ssds+an m.2 ssd
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2410 , HP 24x
Case mb box/Silverstone Raven RV-05/CoolerMaster Q300L
Audio Device(s) onboard/onboard/onboard
Power Supply 3 Seasonics, a DeltaElectronics, a FractalDesing
Mouse various/various/various
Keyboard various wired and wireless
VR HMD -
Software W10.someting or another,all 3
Congratulations,you broke it. Too late?
What did Intel expect from turbo boosting the thermal velocity boost the turbo boost in the first place to achieve?
 
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
432 (0.16/day)
Processor Ryzen 5700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Arous Elite V2
Cooling Thermalright PA120
Memory Kingston FURY Renegade 3600Mhz @ 3733 tight timings
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 6800
Storage 36TB
Display(s) Samsung QN90A
Case be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900
Audio Device(s) Khadas Tone Pro 2, HD660s, KSC75, JBL 305 MK1
Power Supply Coolermaster V850 Gold V2
Mouse Roccat Burst Pro
Keyboard Dogshit with Otemu Brown
Software W10 LTSC 2021
wonder how many 14700k and 14900k are gonna hit advertised 5.6hz and 6ghz now hahahahaha
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
370 (0.32/day)
Seen a lot of posts on twitter/X saying they can't get chips past 5ghz with the new micro code. Will be interesting to know if these chips are already degraded or that's the norm now.
 

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,390 (0.74/day)
Location
USA
Here I was thinking that Microcode would patch the vcore down to like 1.4v. I've seen 1.55 before, that seems already way to high. Yet the patch limits to 1.55v.... so not a patch a all. Just Intel pretending everything is okay.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
113 (0.03/day)
Processor Intel i7 13700K
Motherboard ASUS PROArt Z690 Creator WiFi
Cooling Liquid Freezer II - 280
Memory Kingston 32GB DDR5 @ 6200 MT/s
Video Card(s) Palit RTX3070 GamingPRO
Storage TrueNAS CORE
Case Phanteks ECLIPSE P600S
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster AE-5
Power Supply SEASONIC CONNECT 750W
ASUS' BIOS release for Z790 Creator is broken in some way

with Intel profile I get around 13k score in R23 (13700K) and it should've been around 29-30k
 
Joined
May 26, 2023
Messages
38 (0.07/day)
The problem with that is that 1.4 V is an incredibly conservative voltage and it is not enough to hit advertised clocks on at least 98% of samples, regardless of SKU type. Let's go with the 13900KS which is what I have most experience with, this is obviously a preselected, relatively high-quality i9-13900K.


My personal i9-13900KS's 6 GHz V/F point is 1.463 according to my Apex Encore. and this is apparently a resoundingly average chip amongst its kind - at SP 108, 118 P and 89 E, it's smack in the middle of all bell curves from the Igor's Lab article and meets the exact median and average results of all of their samples, according to the same, for a 13th Gen i9 CPU to be considered a KS quality, its 6000 MHz point must be <= 1.49 V, so while it isn't the best, it's also far from the worst and the textbook "it is expected that it should behave exactly like this" chip.

The 13900K/KF, 14900K/KF and 14900KS processors have a different SP scale, but their V/F curve is not that far off -the i9-14900KS in particular has a 6200 MHz V/F point all the other SKUs do not - and it's common for those to be in the ~1.525 range. Now let's think outliers, such as stinker 13900K samples... yep

Sure but say 6 to 5.8GHz is a 3.4% drop, though the drop in voltage would probably be important for reliability (That article lists 1.38v for 5.8 in that particular CPU). It is probably even less at the end of the scale, when it comes to actual code that doesn't fit the caches, pushes the TLB, etc.
I imagine people would not even notice a small drop in performance and could RMA the chips if they have an especially bad CPU. I reckon 99% of the people would take that over not having their PC for a week or however long it takes to RMA the thing.

I don't have any of these but looking at benchs, even if lightly loaded, the diff from 13900K to 14900K is less than 2%. Other stuff is below 3%. I would really not risk issues or an RMA for such a small bump. If you're an overclocker, I guess these are not the chips you want.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,881 (1.47/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x-5600x | 9600k
Motherboard B450 AORUS M | Z390 UD
Cooling EK AIO 360 - 6 fan action | AIO
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB) | Samsung DDR4 (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) Pixio PX279 Prime
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT | Black bench
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W | EVGA 700 Gold
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
Saw somewhere there is billion$$$ lawsuits coming to intel.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,597 (4.67/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Sure but say 6 to 5.8GHz is a 3.4% drop, though the drop in voltage would probably be important for reliability (That article lists 1.38v for 5.8 in that particular CPU). It is probably even less at the end of the scale, when it comes to actual code that doesn't fit the caches, pushes the TLB, etc.
I imagine people would not even notice a small drop in performance and could RMA the chips if they have an especially bad CPU. I reckon 99% of the people would take that over not having their PC for a week or however long it takes to RMA the thing.

I don't have any of these but looking at benchs, even if lightly loaded, the diff from 13900K to 14900K is less than 2%. Other stuff is below 3%. I would really not risk issues or an RMA for such a small bump. If you're an overclocker, I guess these are not the chips you want.

On a SP 115 chip that's the second best out of the 199 chip sample according to that data lol
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
1,348 (3.77/day)
Location
Nowhere
System Name I don't name my rig
Processor 14700K
Motherboard Asus TUF Z790
Cooling Air/water/DryIce
Memory DDR5 G.Skill Z5 RGB 6000mhz C36
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Super
Storage 980 Pro
Display(s) Some LED 1080P TV
Case Open bench
Audio Device(s) Some Old Sherwood stereo and old cabinet speakers
Power Supply Corsair 1050w HX series
Mouse Razor Mamba Tournament Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910
VR HMD Quest 2
Software Windows
Benchmark Scores Max Freq 13700K 6.7ghz DryIce Max Freq 14700K 7.0ghz DryIce Max all time Freq FX-8300 7685mhz LN2
It's current limit measured in amps.

Why is everyone hung on a v-core reading.

You can pull 120 amp at 1.45v or you could pull 100 amp at 1.45v....
 
Joined
May 26, 2023
Messages
38 (0.07/day)
"Intel's current analysis finds there is a significant increase to the minimum operating voltage (Vmin) across multiple cores on affected processors due to elevated voltages. Elevated voltage events can accumulate over time and contribute to the increase in Vmin for the processor."

This is just confusing wording to say "high voltage causes something to happen, which, over time, makes the processor unstable at default voltage, so it would only work if we gave it higher voltage"

Yeah, this is just PR speak for degradation. Boards were requesting so much voltage this will help. Though on some chips (hopefully the good ones), the difference is minimal at best.

Don't really think this will prevent issue with the worst binned CPUs, but people are still able to set the max voltage peaks on the BIOS. That seems to be the way to go but I wouldn't want such a power hungry chip either way. Or just go with AMD or a more reasonable 13600K/14600K, if you really want a Raptor Lake die.

On a SP 115 chip that's the second best out of the 199 chip sample according to that data lol

Yeah sure, what I'm saying is that they should really set a conservative voltage and let people RMA the bad ones if they care enough.

From another Igor article, lots of 14900K samples run Fmax at 1.47v maximum, so the rest would take a small performance hit but still be way below 1.55v, which seems very excessive for long term reliability.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,315 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
In two weeks Intel will be OK.

YouTubers will test the patch and see minimal impact in performance, while promoting what Intel wants to be promoted. That this fix addresses the problem completely.

For the next 3-6 months any report of Intel CPU failing will be treated as a case where it was already too late to save the CPU. Intel will be accepting most RMAs and things will be looking fine.

After that period the new intel platform will be out and everyone will be looking at benchmark numbers. Even if 13th/14th series CPUs keep failing, the focus of people will be on LGA 1851 and whether 9800X3D is fast enough to help AMD to keep the performance crown in games. In apps Intel will be probably winning and that will be one more reason for people to just stop looking at 13th/14th gen fails. People reporting that theirs 13th/14th gen failed even with the fix, will start getting replies saying "Just RMA the CPU and if you don't feel fine with it, just sell it and upgrade to a different platform".

Intel is fine.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,341 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Highly doubt this will do anything useful. 1.55v is still a heck of a lot for this process node.

Anyone running these would be best advised to limit voltage requests in the BIOS, to at most 1.4v. Even that I wouldn't feel safe with, for CPUs running many hours per day.
1.55v is insanity on a consumer chip for the better part of the last dozen process nodes lol

Heck even 1.4v is quite the push already. Its crazy that these chips can even do this on stock. Conservative... lmao

Feels like people have been those frogs in a slowly warmed pot of water. Oblivious to the fact they're about to melt as the limits slowly got pushed up, and up.

It's current limit measured in amps.

Why is everyone hung on a v-core reading.

You can pull 120 amp at 1.45v or you could pull 100 amp at 1.45v....
Because that's also where Intel sets its limits, or used to. I remember them saying 1.5v and beyond is no go territory. And it always used to align quite well with the practical outcomes too.

In two weeks Intel will be OK.

YouTubers will test the video and see minimal impact in performance, while promoting what Intel wants to be promoted. That this fix addresses the problem completely.

For the next 3-6 months any report of Intel CPU failing will be treated as a case where it was already too late to save the CPU. Intel will be accepting most RMAs and things will be looking fine.

After that period the new intel platform will be out and everyone will be looking at benchmark numbers. Even if 13th/14th series CPUs keep failing, the focus of people will be on LGA 1851 and whether 9800X3D is fast enough to help AMD to keep the performance crown in games. In apps Intel will be probably winning and that will be one more reason for people to just stop looking at 13th/14th gen fails. People reporting that theirs 13th/14th gen failed even with the fix, will start getting replies saying "Just RMA the CPU and if you don't feel fine with it, just sell it and upgrade to a different platform".

Intel is fine.
Fine, but not great, and that's where they need to be, because their competition is.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
172 (0.07/day)
System Name Carbon-14900K
Processor Intel i9-14900K
Motherboard MSI Z790 Carbon Wifi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360mm AIO
Memory G-Skill Trident Z5 4 x 16GB DDR5 6800
Video Card(s) Palit Game Rock RTX 4090
Storage Western digital Black SN850X 1&2TB - PCIe Gen 4 M.2-2 Western Digital Blue 1TB SN750 PCIe Gen 3
Display(s) MSI Optix MPG341CQR Ulta-wide 3440x1440p 144Hz and a Samsung 50 inch TV 4K TV
Case NZXT H7 Flow
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X4
Power Supply NZXT C1200w Gold
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro Mouse
Keyboard Corsair STRAFE MK2 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 = 41070 Multicore test
The problem with that is that 1.4 V is an incredibly conservative voltage and it is not enough to hit advertised clocks on at least 98% of samples, regardless of SKU type. Let's go with the 13900KS which is what I have most experience with, this is obviously a preselected, relatively high-quality i9-13900K.


My personal i9-13900KS's 6 GHz V/F point is 1.463 according to my Apex Encore. and this is apparently a resoundingly average chip amongst its kind - at SP 108, 118 P and 89 E, it's smack in the middle of all bell curves from the Igor's Lab article and meets the exact median and average results of all of their samples, according to the same, for a 13th Gen i9 CPU to be considered a KS quality, its 6000 MHz point must be <= 1.49 V, so while it isn't the best, it's also far from the worst and the textbook "it is expected that it should behave exactly like this" chip.

The 13900K/KF, 14900K/KF and 14900KS processors have a different SP scale, but their V/F curve is not that far off -the i9-14900KS in particular has a 6200 MHz V/F point all the other SKUs do not - and it's common for those to be in the ~1.525 range. Now let's think outliers, such as stinker 13900K samples... yep
Not sure I understand this and maybe it is just me but I have always ignored the absurd auto voltage settings and gone for a fixed or adaptive with a 1.350v limit. My 14900K with a fixed vcore at 1.350v lets my CPU hit two caores at 6GHz with an all core 5.6GHz and totally stable. When running Cinebench R23 the voltage hits 1.360v and yet provides a 41K score and totally stable. Only when I leave vcore voltage at auto does it go into stupid territory at 1.4 to 1.5v+ during certain points but drops under load. I never lliked this and thus always kept my limit at 1.350v which actually gives me all the performance I could want...Maybe I am doing something wrong but 14900K has been runnning trouble free and that includes temps.

On the motherboard side, ASUS was the worst at pushing absurd voltages if left to it's own devices, moved to MSI Z790 Carbon Wifi which was better but still I went the fixed vcore route. Update the new BIOS yesterday and no problems whatsoever. I did contact Intel who responded fast and told me if I have any issues just RMA and within 5 to 7 days I will get a new one....With the extended warranty I will keep an eye on any issues and if they crop up, just get a new one...Intel deserve a kicking but it will come down to how the handle this for those affected and if they do the right thing and replace any 13th and 14th gen for customers then all good.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,597 (4.67/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Not sure I understand this and maybe it is just me but I have always ignored the absurd auto voltage settings and gone for a fixed or adaptive with a 1.350v limit. My 14900K with a fixed vcore at 1.350v lets my CPU hit two caores at 6GHz with an all core 5.6GHz and totally stable. When running Cinebench R23 the voltage hits 1.360v and yet provides a 41K score and totally stable. Only when I leave vcore voltage at auto does it go into stupid territory at 1.4 to 1.5v+ during certain points but drops under load. I never lliked this and thus always kept my limit at 1.350v which actually gives me all the performance I could want...Maybe I am doing something wrong but 14900K has been runnning trouble free and that includes temps.

Either god sample or it's ignoring your voltage setting. More likely it's the latter.
 
Top