• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Stuck with 14nm Processors Till Holiday 2019

Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,824 (0.91/day)
So once again what are we talking about here as just saying 14,12,10,7nm says nothing.
Global Foundries 12nm processes is inferior to the above 14nm processes by all accounts save for the minimum feature size which is the magical 12nm which we obsess over.
Unless anyone here knows the ins and outs of Global Foundries 7nm* node then you can't compare and say who is ahead of what.
Yes, it's impressive how "everyone" knows that TSMC and Samsung "7nm" will be fantastic. Not only have all the previous iterations struggled a lot, even with volume shipments in Q1 2019, we still not know the shipping quantities and how large chips will get decent yields. Additionally people seem to swallow the PR material, forgetting that these are theoretical figures, and that the full potential will only be reached towards the end of the node life cycle.

Which actually means "Paper Launch December 2019 at the earliest." These probably will be laptop and low-power only like Broadwell.
They already have, it's called Cannon Lake.

There's nothing they CAN DO after they launch the 8/16 "i9" @ 5GHz. That's their last hurrah for 2 years.

New architectures take time to make, and they can't even really nail one down until they get 10nm working.
They already have their next architecture ready; Ice Lake. And despite all the terrible delays, it should allow Intel to tweak it prior to release more than they have for any architecture the past decade.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,737 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Dunno if this move won't actually be worse for Intel later on, on the 10nm node. I'm of the opinion that this is part of the current problem with 10nm already, besides the yield issues ofc.

Think about it: if they keep refining 14nm further, it will only be harder for 10nm to surpass it later on, in speed and / or efficiency and / or power usage with the same / more cores and with / without HT, unless they come up with some kind of "new Sandy Bridge" which can give them the possibility to leapfrog the difference between a super-refined process VS an early smaller process (it's not impossible, but it's unlikely).

Intel seems to be digging a bigger and bigger hole ...
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
476 (0.24/day)
Location
Fort Sill, OK
Processor Intel 7700K 5.1Ghz (Intel advised me not to OC this CPU)
Motherboard Asus Maximus IX Code
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i Platinum
Memory 48GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 3200 Dual Channel (2x16 & 2x8)
Video Card(s) nVIDIA Titan XP (Overclocks like a champ but stock performance is enough)
Storage Intel 760p 2280 2TB
Display(s) MSI Optix MPG27CQ Black 27" 1ms 144hz
Case Thermaltake View 71
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 1000 Platinum2
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro (not recommded, I am on my second mouse with same defect)
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 1803
Benchmark Scores Yes I am Intel fanboy that is my benchmark score.
"10 nm process will arrive only by Holiday 2019"
Is that the 13th month for those of us not in the U.S.?
That is paper launch by Fall 2019. We might not see high performing processors in our desktops till 2020. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,824 (0.91/day)
Dunno if this move won't actually be worse for Intel later on, on the 10nm node. I'm of the opinion that this is part of the current problem with 10nm already, besides the yield issues ofc.

Think about it: if they keep refining 14nm further, it will only be harder for 10nm to surpass it later on, in speed and / or efficiency and / or power usage with the same / more cores and with / without HT, unless they come up with some kind of "new Sandy Bridge" which can give them the possibility to leapfrog the difference between a super-refined process VS an early smaller process (it's not impossible, but it's unlikely).

Intel seems to be digging a bigger and bigger hole ...
Well, there aren't much more potential to gain from 14nm, so any tweaks would be in the CPU design itself.

Even if Intel's 10nm isn't good enough for a full lineup one year from now, they still have one option; use 10 nm on select models, and 14 nm on the rest. They should prioritize 6-/8-core desktop and some mobile CPUs for 10nm, and with Intel's manufacturing volume they should be able to, even if the yields are so low they might have terrible margins on select products. Even if needed, Intel can take a loss on select models for a year. It's easy to forget that most of the shipped volume doesn't have to be on 10 nm immediately.

We should expect clocks to be lower on initial Ice Lake CPUs, but primarily on the boost side. Remember that Ice Lake is a major architecture unlike Zen2, so we should expect some IPC gains to offset the lower clock speed. Also remember that Zen2 will not reach the full gains of "7nm" by Q3 2019, AMD might get closer to Intel in core speed, but is extremely unlikely to surpass them.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,592 (3.03/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
Inauguration Day
:rolleyes: I sure don’t get that day off. :laugh:

Specifically, when the term “the holidays” is used in the U.S., it typically refers to the Christmas-New Year time period.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,536 (0.69/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
Specifically, when the term “the holidays” is used in the U.S., it typically refers to the Christmas-New Year time period.
Yeah but for example, Christmas in my country is on 7th of January. So the 2019 New year-Christmas holiday, by my mindset is in January of 2019 instead of December. It always takes me a while to reevaluate the calendar in my brain whenever I hear or read "Holiday" season.
It's one of the reasons I hate the term.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,592 (3.03/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
It's one of the reasons I hate the term.
Me too, because it really depends on where you use the term, and can be confusing in an international setting. I was just explaining it though, by my best guess.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
5,395 (1.99/day)
Location
Memphis, TN
System Name Black Prometheus
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASRock B350 Pro4
Memory Oloy 16GB(2x8GB) DDR4 3200MHz
Storage Sandisk X300 512GB + Seagate 2TB
Display(s) 4K Display
Case DeepCool Matrexx 55 w/ 3x120mm Intake + 4x120mm Exhaust
Audio Device(s) Samsung 5.1 Setup
Mouse Logitech Trackman
Keyboard Dell OEM
Software Windows 10 EDU x64
Intel may never get 10nm implemented
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,737 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Well, there aren't much more potential to gain from 14nm, so any tweaks would be in the CPU design itself.

Even if Intel's 10nm isn't good enough for a full lineup one year from now, they still have one option; use 10 nm on select models, and 14 nm on the rest. They should prioritize 6-/8-core desktop and some mobile CPUs for 10nm, and with Intel's manufacturing volume they should be able to, even if the yields are so low they might have terrible margins on select products. Even if needed, Intel can take a loss on select models for a year. It's easy to forget that most of the shipped volume doesn't have to be on 10 nm immediately.

We should expect clocks to be lower on initial Ice Lake CPUs, but primarily on the boost side. Remember that Ice Lake is a major architecture unlike Zen2, so we should expect some IPC gains to offset the lower clock speed. Also remember that Zen2 will not reach the full gains of "7nm" by Q3 2019, AMD might get closer to Intel in core speed, but is extremely unlikely to surpass them.
According to this, from which the following pic is taken, you're wrong dude:



In the performance readiness part of the pic, you can clearly see that 14nm++ is ahead of even 10nm+ in performance, albeit slightly, and the performance increase over "regular" 14nm is quite substantial. If they end up refining 14nm++ into 14nm+++, it's possible that it can be close enough to dent the 10nm++, which is why i said:

Dunno if this move won't actually be worse for Intel later on, on the 10nm node.
Intel is in serious trouble here. On one hand, if they release 10nm as is, it will have lower clocks then the current refined 14nm and the lower yields make it costlier to produce so it's a lose - lose situation but, on the other hand, if they opt for an even more refined14nm process again, they'll be taking a serious chunk from the advantages of the newer 10nm by having this 14nm part perform as well if not slightly better, though @ a higher power envelope, so Intel will be in this exact situation later and that makes it also a lose - lose situation.

This is exacerbated by the arrival of the Zen architecture because, if AMD hadn't "rysen from the dead" (pun intended), Intel wouldn't be as pressured as it is now.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,824 (0.91/day)
According to this, from which the following pic is taken, you're wrong dude:
Well, there aren't much more potential to gain from 14nm, so any tweaks would be in the CPU design itself.
In the performance readiness part of the pic, you can clearly see that 14nm++ is ahead of even 10nm+ in performance, albeit slightly, …
I know that very well, but that's not what I meant at all, also you should have read the end of my post:
We should expect clocks to be lower on initial Ice Lake CPUs, but primarily on the boost side. Remember that Ice Lake is a major architecture unlike Zen2, so we should expect some IPC gains to offset the lower clock speed.
To get back to my first point, Intel can't squeeze much more out of 14nm++, so if they want more, it would have to be in the CPU design itself.
A good backup plan for 2018 would have been to backport Ice Lake to 14nm, but that's too late now.

Intel is in serious trouble here. On one hand, if they release 10nm as is, it will have lower clocks then the current refined 14nm and the lower yields make it costlier to produce so it's a lose…
Intel claims 10nm yields is "on track" for 2H 2019.
Q2-18-Earnings-Deck-7.26-FINAL-page-003.jpg
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
7,165 (3.81/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2680 10c/20t 2.8GHz @ 3.0GHz
Motherboard Asrock X79 Extreme 11
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory G. Skill 16Gb (4x4Gb) 2133Mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 710
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,824 (0.91/day)
But it's been derailed before …..
Sure, plans can always change, and unforeseen major events (like a flood affecting harddrive production).
But the yields are at least improving.

At this point it should be clear that whatever Intel's claiming is a lie, not that other corporations are much different but if you've been following Intel, they sound like you know who.
But we should clearly take everything AMD says as hard truth…
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,183 (3.83/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Intel i7-7820x
Motherboard MSI X299 Raider
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 32GB (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) Powercolor Vega 64
Storage Intel 900p 280GB, 660p 2TB, Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2457, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
I understand not liking them, but the amount of doubt on a company as old as Intel is just silly. You're treating them like amateur electricians who work at a flea market or something. I think they understand timing their products better than anyone.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
110 (0.07/day)
I understand not liking them, but the amount of doubt on a company as old as Intel is just silly. You're treating them like amateur electricians who work at a flea market or something. I think they understand timing their products better than anyone.
AFAIK this isn't a matter of timing. They struggling to kickstart 10nm production on the necessary performance, cost and yield. If they can't find a solution to whatever problem they don't expected, somewhere, something will be lost. Well, if we're looking it realisticly some loss is already made because the previous deraile. All they can do is keep working on it and calculate what they want to loose.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,536 (0.69/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
I understand not liking them, but the amount of doubt on a company as old as Intel is just silly. You're treating them like amateur electricians who work at a flea market or something. I think they understand timing their products better than anyone.
While everything you said stands correct, 10nm was originally scheduled for 2015. It's 4 years late. You could argue they overestimated by a year and a half, tops... but 4?!
One would have assumed that a company like Intel with billions to pour into R&D could overcome the issue.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
281 (0.12/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
Processor AMD 1700X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Memory F4-3200C14D-16GFX
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 960 Pro
Display(s) PG279Q
Case HAF X
Power Supply Silencer MK III 850
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Intel is in serious trouble here.
It's a good thing Intel has an 80% market share and earned revenue of 62.8 billion last year. And 16.96 billion last quarter putting them on pace for 68 billion this year. I am not sure the bean counters even know what node process is as it doesn't seem to mean anything to $$$. People keep buying the best.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,684 (1.10/day)
They already have, it's called Cannon Lake.
CNL is MIA, it has exactly 1 working SKU IIRC, in a Lenovo laptop & is so bad that the IGP is dysfunctional.
If we're talking about mass production, Intel scale, that's like saying the Tesla can mass produce model X just because they did fulfil their last minute promise of weekly model 3 deliveries.
Sure, plans can always change, and unforeseen major events (like a flood affecting harddrive production).
But the yields are at least improving.


But we should clearly take everything AMD says as hard truth…
This is the exact reason why I said ~
not that other corporations are much different
And yet here we are!
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,737 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
I know that very well, but that's not what I meant at all, also you should have read the end of my post:

To get back to my first point, Intel can't squeeze much more out of 14nm++, so if they want more, it would have to be in the CPU design itself.
A good backup plan for 2018 would have been to backport Ice Lake to 14nm, but that's too late now.


Intel claims 10nm yields is "on track" for 2H 2019.
View attachment 104533
Intel's 10nm is very very late, dude:

Screenshot from 2018-07-28 13-20-21.png

The above pic is taken from this: as can be seen in the pic's subtitle, Intel's 5nm was expected to arrive in 2019 @ the time of the article (2012), with 7nm in between 10nm and 5nm.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,824 (0.91/day)
Intel's 10nm is very very late, dude:
Please be more serious than this.
And how is this relevant? We all know it's delayed compared to the original plans, plans which have been revised many times and are no longer relevant.

Intel have been shipping very low volumes of 10 nm since April, and since they say yields are now on track for a volume launch 2H 2019, it means they are slowly improving.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,737 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Please be more serious than this.
And how is this relevant? We all know it's delayed compared to the original plans, plans which have been revised many times and are no longer relevant.

Intel have been shipping very low volumes of 10 nm since April, and since they say yields are now on track for a volume launch 2H 2019, it means they are slowly improving.
Each of these delays have cost money, and a lot of it: nearly 4 years is almost 2 "full architectures" worth of time. Intel won't go bankrupt obviously but that doesn't mean this doesn't severely affect them and i wouldn't be surprised if the money lost thus far from these delays, in total (directly and indirectly) surpassed the $20B already.

They could manage to sort out their 10nm problems even before 2H 2019 for all we know but Intel saying it won't reassure most due to the consecutive delays: if it were board manufacturers saying it, it could potentially have more credibility, @ this point.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
216 (0.07/day)
Location
Pekanbaru - Riau - Indonesia - Earth - Universe
System Name My Best Friend...
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Motherboard Made By Xiaomi
Cooling Air and My Hands :)
Memory 3GB LPDDR3
Video Card(s) Adreno 510
Storage Sandisk 32GB SDHC Class 10
Display(s) 5.5" 1080p IPS BOE
Case Made By Xiaomi
Audio Device(s) Snapdragon ?
Power Supply 2A Adapter
Mouse On Screen
Keyboard On Screen
Software Android 6.0.1
Benchmark Scores 90339
Hmmm, this is why AMD stock price getting higher ?
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,737 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
1,122 (0.24/day)
Processor E5-1680 V2
Motherboard Rampage IV
Storage (1) 300 g.b. 10k rpm raptors
Case antec 1200
Power Supply 1100 watt atz series
Software windows 7 64 bit
Benchmark Scores 29,433 3dmark06 score
What. This is not even about AMD, its about process and fab development more than anything else. AMD is not even playing that game to begin with. And that 'choice' is starting to pay off for them now, while it did hurt them until recently.

Even so its not like Intel suddenly cannot compete when AMD puts out product on 7nm. Their 14nm isn't thát far off to make it obsolete. They are going to have to play the pricing game.
Hmmm pricing game...who had to play that one last and how did it work out for them? Not so well, just ask AMD selling their dirt cheap processors that couldn't touch x79 until present day, where now tables are turned and yeah Intel will live but this won't be fun for them, period.
 
Top