• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Updates Desktop CPU Roadmap, Haswell-E, Broadwell, Devil's Canyon Blip

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
35,263 (8.95/day)
Likes
17,897
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Crypto-plague Survival Kit
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB + Intel SSD320 120GB + Patriot WildFire 120GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
#1
At GDC, Intel announced a backpedal from its plans to eventually reshape desktop CPUs into components that come hardwired to the motherboards across the line, by announcing three new CPU families. It includes the Haswell-E HEDT platform, Broadwell performance platform, and Devil's Canyon. The three are expected to launch in reverse order, beginning with Devil's Canyon. A variant of existing "Haswell" silicon in the LGA1150 package, Devil's Canyon is codename for a breed of hand-picked chips with "insane" overclocking potential. In addition to binned dies, the chips feature a performance-optimized TIM between the die and the integrated heatspreader (IHS). The dies will be placed on special "high tolerance" packages, with equally "special" LGA contact points. The chips will be designed with higher voltage tolerance levels. Devil's Canyon is expected to branded under the existing Core i7-4xxx series, possibly with "Extreme" brand extension. It will be compatible with motherboards based on the Z97 chipset.

Next up, is "Broadwell." A successor to Haswell, Broadwell is its optical shrink to Intel's new 14-nanometer silicon fab process, with minor improvements to IPC, new power-management features, and likely added instruction sets, much like what "Ivy Bridge" was to "Sandy Bridge." It will take advantage of the new process to step up CPU and iGPU clock speeds. Broadwell is expected to launch in the second half of 2014. Lastly, there's Haswell-E. Built in the company's next-gen LGA2011 socket (incompatible with the current LGA2011), this HEDT (high-end desktop) processor will feature up to eight CPU cores, up to 15 MB of L3 cache, a 48-lane PCI-Express 3.0 root complex, and a quad-channel DDR4 integrated memory controller (IMC). Intel is also planning to launch a socketed variant of the Core i7-4770R, which is based on the company's Haswell GT3e silicon, which features the Iris Pro 5200 graphics core, with 40 execution units, and 128 MB of L4 cache.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.11/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#2

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,402 (9.21/day)
Likes
13,989
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name OCD (Overclocking Compulsive Disorder)
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.7Ghz 1.25V
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon (really nice board, bad vdroop under load w/ an 8 core)
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro (yay for maglev fans!)
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 @ 3600 C18 (Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro)
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (+60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 32" HP 1440p
Case Fractal Design R5 White Gold edition + corsair RGB lighting
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G703 + PowerPlay mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#4
not bad that they're pushing out extreme products.


basic models for every day users
K chips for people who want a mild OC
insanely priced chips with huge OC advantages

works for me, i'll happily go the middle option there.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.47/day)
Likes
1,279
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
#5
Maybe my potential upgrade will come from those. lol
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
83 (0.04/day)
Likes
16
#7
Intel better wake up and smell the coffee, bcoz all the API`s are reducing CPU overhead which is bad for Intel. But on the plus side are going Mulit-Core.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,732 (4.53/day)
Likes
5,849
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#9

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,402 (9.21/day)
Likes
13,989
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name OCD (Overclocking Compulsive Disorder)
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.7Ghz 1.25V
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon (really nice board, bad vdroop under load w/ an 8 core)
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro (yay for maglev fans!)
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 @ 3600 C18 (Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro)
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (+60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 32" HP 1440p
Case Fractal Design R5 White Gold edition + corsair RGB lighting
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G703 + PowerPlay mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#10
Intel better wake up and smell the coffee, bcoz all the API`s are reducing CPU overhead which is bad for Intel. But on the plus side are going Mulit-Core.

i had a massive FPS boost moving from a 'modern' AMD AM3 setup, to my current intel. JC316 noticed similar from his AM3+ -> 1150 update.

just because its heading that way, doesnt mean we'll get there any time soon. intels performance per core is going to be an advantage for some time to come.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
134 (0.06/day)
Likes
55
#11
Still rockin' my Sandy Bridge i7-2700K and see no need to upgrade anytime soon.
I feel the same way. Bought my i7-2600K for $100 through Intel's Retail Edge program when I worked at Best Buy part-time during the summer 3 years ago. I've upgraded my GPU's twice and still haven't felt any itch to upgrade my CPU. Talk about value town!
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,024 (0.45/day)
Likes
170
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel i7 920 oc to 3.5ghz
Motherboard MSI x58 Platinum
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory G.Skill 6gb ddr3 1333mhz 7-7-7-18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce 3X GV-N670OC-2GD
Storage Samsung EVO SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic 1440x900 5ms
Case CoolMaster HAF 932
Power Supply Coolmax 950w
Software Win 7 64bit
#12
So Intel is saying there is a desktop Broadwell coming? Nothing to do with the Haswell +100 MHz refresh?
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
14,465 (3.39/day)
Likes
4,319
System Name VHOST01 | Desktop
Processor i7 980x | i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard Gigabyte x58 Extreme | AsRock MicroATX Z170M Exteme4
Cooling Prolimatech Megahelams | Stock
Memory 6x4 GB @ 1333 | 2x 8G Gskill Aegis DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GT 210 | Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
Storage 4x2 TB Enterprise RAID5 | Samsung nVME 512
Display(s) N/A | Dell 27" 1440p 8bit GSYNC
Case Lian Li ATX Mid Tower | Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) NA | On Board
Power Supply SeaSonic 500W Gold | Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse N/A | Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard N/A | Code V2B
Software Centos 7 | Windows 10
#13
meh, my q6600 still plays games real niiiiiiiiiiiice.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
259 (0.16/day)
Likes
137
#14
yea what about that stupid Haswell refresh ("the new" 4th generation :D). I could not care less about that useless refresh, but from big buisness view point it would make no sence to put out a "brand new 4th generation" and 5th generation it the same time in the same price categories... so those wo are waiting for broadwell (me included) probably will be facing a some sort of "delay" for at least another 2 Q's, if not more :(. and that "new" 4th generation is coming that is for sure (just read headlines of the board manufacturer PR releases)
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,354 (2.25/day)
Likes
4,224
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Working on it ;)
Processor I7-4790K (Stock speeds right now)
Motherboard MSI Z97 U3 Plus
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64 (Non Reference)
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x2Tb WD Black
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440)
Case Rosewill Challenger
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750 (love it)
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10 upgraded from Win 7 Pro
#15
meh, my q6600 still plays games real niiiiiiiiiiiice.
Hell, my E8600 too.

I'm really interested in:
  • How they are going to market and price the insanity chip.
  • What's the potential of the graphics core update. When are they going to tackle 4K playback, lols
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,828 (3.75/day)
Likes
11,250
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#16
  • How they are going to market and price the insanity chip.
They just did. They also just said "stop OC'ing the current Haswells, they aren't made for it"


  • What's the potential of the graphics core update. When are they going to tackle 4K playback, lols
Well, the chips themselves seem to rival NVidia's huge graphics cores, but of course, there's that 128MB of cache to take most of that space. So what would an XBOX360 (which had 10 MB only) with 128 MB of CACHE be able to do? I imagine 4K should be no problem.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
6,646 (1.81/day)
Likes
9,102
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
#17
I've been saying that there has been no real update to the desktop since Z68/USB3/SATA3. (notice the people in this thread saying they're perfectly fine with their second generation i7's)Hopefully the sleeping giant has awaken. The fact that SATA-express is not in the 9 series chipset shows that Intel has been distracted. Sorry AMD, the hare has awoken.

Edit::oops: I don't like doing this and I think it's "bad form", but the write up on this over at The Tech Report is much more informative, IMHO.
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,732 (4.53/day)
Likes
5,849
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#18
Hell, my E8600 too.

I'm really interested in:
  • How they are going to market and price the insanity chip.
  • What's the potential of the graphics core update. When are they going to tackle 4K playback, lols
Hasn't 4k video playback been supported since IVB (HD 4000)? I thought I remember reading something about Intel having tackled that already.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,402 (9.21/day)
Likes
13,989
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name OCD (Overclocking Compulsive Disorder)
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.7Ghz 1.25V
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon (really nice board, bad vdroop under load w/ an 8 core)
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro (yay for maglev fans!)
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 @ 3600 C18 (Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro)
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (+60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 32" HP 1440p
Case Fractal Design R5 White Gold edition + corsair RGB lighting
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G703 + PowerPlay mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#19
meh, my q6600 still plays games real niiiiiiiiiiiice.

you must play different games to me

i went Q6600 -> Xeon E3120 (roughly an E8400) -> x6 1080T -> i5, and every single step of the way was a massive improvement to performance.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,450 (0.92/day)
Likes
1,878
#20
Anyone else read this and immediately think that Intel is taking away individual people binning chips, and then adding a price premium? Not sure if good for the unlucky, or bad because premiums will basically allow you to buy two regular chips for the same price.

The rest of this crap is rather routine. Yes, Haswell will have an enthusiast chip. Yes, Haswell will have a successor. Yes, Intel is backing away from the decision to make everything tied irreparably into a motherboard choice. I'm less excited about that, though confirmation is good.


I'm also looking at this, and wondering exactly what is going to be used on those heat spreaders. It makes precious little sense to have a specific overclocking line, when you're cutting OCs by using cheap thermal paste. At the same time, Intel cutting costs by demonstrating viable chips with only paste will be a hard thing to get bean counters to back away from. That PCMA is interesting, but way more expensive than the thermal pastes they seem to already utilize. Whatever they choose, that kind of thing costs money and if AMD doesn't provide some high level competition then we're kinda screwed as consumers. Intel isn't shy about making consumers pay for their products.

Call me cautiously optimistic that Intel is promising reasonable tech in their future. I would be less than pleased if the SB-e (specifically the X79 chipset) style under-delivered final product was a recurring thing. I'm still looking for the 12 SATA III and 8 USB 3.0 ports on a board less than $1000, if it's being offered at all. Before someone comments, no I don't accept having 48 PCI-e lanes as a justifiable replacement. It's great for multi-gpu rigs, but when a new PCH has less native connectivity than the ICH10R south bridge there are some rather difficult questions to answer.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,732 (4.53/day)
Likes
5,849
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#21
Anyone else read this and immediately think that Intel is taking away individual people binning chips, and then adding a price premium? Not sure if good for the unlucky, or bad because premiums will basically allow you to buy two regular chips for the same price.

The rest of this crap is rather routine. Yes, Haswell will have an enthusiast chip. Yes, Haswell will have a successor. Yes, Intel is backing away from the decision to make everything tied irreparably into a motherboard choice. I'm less excited about that, though confirmation is good.


I'm also looking at this, and wondering exactly what is going to be used on those heat spreaders. It makes precious little sense to have a specific overclocking line, when you're cutting OCs by using cheap thermal paste. At the same time, Intel cutting costs by demonstrating viable chips with only paste will be a hard thing to get bean counters to back away from. That PCMA is interesting, but way more expensive than the thermal pastes they seem to already utilize. Whatever they choose, that kind of thing costs money and if AMD doesn't provide some high level competition then we're kinda screwed as consumers. Intel isn't shy about making consumers pay for their products.

Call me cautiously optimistic that Intel is promising reasonable tech in their future. I would be less than pleased if the SB-e (specifically the X79 chipset) style under-delivered final product was a recurring thing. I'm still looking for the 12 SATA III and 8 USB 3.0 ports on a board less than $1000, if it's being offered at all. Before someone comments, no I don't accept having 48 PCI-e lanes as a justifiable replacement. It's great for multi-gpu rigs, but when a new PCH has less native connectivity than the ICH10R south bridge there are some rather difficult questions to answer.
...or maybe the PCH only does such much and even more so on skt2011 (which was derived from the Xeon workflow,) so more often than not if you're building a server, you use the PCH if you have to, but as soon as you need to do something important, you're using a RAID controller or extra network cards. Thanks to all of those PCI-E lanes 2011 offers.

Everytime someone says how skt2011 is useful for gaming is disappointing considering 2011 wasn't designed to be a gaming platform. So people need to stop treating it as such. skt2011 is more of a server platform than it is a gaming platform.

People seem to have the hardest time understanding that the PCH is the beginning to get you started, not the end and that in most cases, sysadmins won't even use the PCH if a RAID card is handy.

All in all, if you ask yourself what you use your computer for and you answer is "gaming" skt2011(-3) is not for you and you really should stick with 1150.

Also, saturating DMI is easier than one might think, another reason to not give the PCH more than it can bite off.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
10,195 (2.79/day)
Likes
14,292
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6G LE
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 2x 2TB WD Black; 1x4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 25VX 25" IPS @ 1920 x 1080
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
#22
"Devil's Canyon" - Basically the chip made properly like it should have been made from the beginning!
LOL, my first thought exactly! That's the TIM that they stopped after SB. So basically, they are making the formerly normal way of doing business and making products the "high end."
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,450 (0.92/day)
Likes
1,878
#23
...or maybe the PCH only does such much and even more so on skt2011 (which was derived from the Xeon workflow,) so more often than not if you're building a server, you use the PCH if you have to, but as soon as you need to do something important, you're using a RAID controller or extra network cards. Thanks to all of those PCI-E lanes 2011 offers.

Everytime someone says how skt2011 is useful for gaming is disappointing considering 2011 wasn't designed to be a gaming platform. So people need to stop treating it as such. skt2011 is more of a server platform than it is a gaming platform.

People seem to have the hardest time understanding that the PCH is the beginning to get you started, not the end and that in most cases, sysadmins won't even use the PCH if a RAID card is handy.

All in all, if you ask yourself what you use your computer for and you answer is "gaming" skt2011(-3) is not for you and you really should stick with 1150.

Also, saturating DMI is easier than one might think, another reason to not give the PCH more than it can bite off.
We've had this debate before. I'll cover the highlights.

1) If you bought into the X79 chipset two years ago it was the enthusiast option. There was no Xeon server option for work loads. That and 1155 was the only other socket. If you are comparing a decision several years ago to the options today you are missing reality.
2) Initial slides promised huge connectivity from the PCH. It was not delivered. This is evident because some boards enabled this additional connectivity, though Intel did not officially support it. Talk about a mixed standard.
3) There is not a single PCH for socket 2011. People seem to forget, but C606 came out after X79. C606 seems far more geared toward workstations, than what one might call an enthusiast.

4) You can always add expansion cards. Fantastic. Why am I paying $300+ for an entry level board ($600+ for anything that is meant to be more robust) that has a PCH based on 45nm fabrication, with more cooling considerations than older tech? Doubling or tripling the PCI-e lanes is great, but that means less is coming from the board. Perhaps I'm missing something, but shouldn't that mean I'm paying less for the board?


If I were buying a gaming rig today, as you seem to think I'm implying, then yes I'd get a socket 1150 board with a Z87 PCH. If it was November/December 2011, my option beyond the X79 chipset was Z77. There was no Xeon option, nothing but Ivy-bridge in socket 1155, and that is why I believe the X79 PCH underperformed. Intel knew AMD couldn't compete, pushed out a compromised solution, and because of the high price tag basically forgot that it existed. There is no X89 to address the shortcoming, despite IB-e being on the market. Intel seems to be focusing on the next enthusiast platform, and the pin incompatible "upgrade" of socket 2011. If there is a greater testament to compromised vision I do not know what it is.

This is why I'm hoping that the X99, or whatever Intel introduces for Haswell-e, is awesome. It's been more than 3 years, so looking forward to the level of connectivity that was expected for X79 doesn't seem unreasonable. If you'd like to continue defending X79 (which it doesn't need, from one X79 owner to another) then go ahead. I'm looking toward a brighter potential future.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,732 (4.53/day)
Likes
5,849
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#24
We've had this debate before. I'll cover the highlights.

1) If you bought into the X79 chipset two years ago it was the enthusiast option. There was no Xeon server option for work loads. That and 1155 was the only other socket. If you are comparing a decision several years ago to the options today you are missing reality.
2) Initial slides promised huge connectivity from the PCH. It was not delivered. This is evident because some boards enabled this additional connectivity, though Intel did not officially support it. Talk about a mixed standard.
3) There is not a single PCH for socket 2011. People seem to forget, but C606 came out after X79. C606 seems far more geared toward workstations, than what one might call an enthusiast.

4) You can always add expansion cards. Fantastic. Why am I paying $300+ for an entry level board ($600+ for anything that is meant to be more robust) that has a PCH based on 45nm fabrication, with more cooling considerations than older tech? Doubling or tripling the PCI-e lanes is great, but that means less is coming from the board. Perhaps I'm missing something, but shouldn't that mean I'm paying less for the board?


If I were buying a gaming rig today, as you seem to think I'm implying, then yes I'd get a socket 1150 board with a Z87 PCH. If it was November/December 2011, my option beyond the X79 chipset was Z77. There was no Xeon option, nothing but Ivy-bridge in socket 1155, and that is why I believe the X79 PCH underperformed. Intel knew AMD couldn't compete, pushed out a compromised solution, and because of the high price tag basically forgot that it existed. There is no X89 to address the shortcoming, despite IB-e being on the market. Intel seems to be focusing on the next enthusiast platform, and the pin incompatible "upgrade" of socket 2011. If there is a greater testament to compromised vision I do not know what it is.

This is why I'm hoping that the X99, or whatever Intel introduces for Haswell-e, is awesome. It's been more than 3 years, so looking forward to the level of connectivity that was expected for X79 doesn't seem unreasonable. If you'd like to continue defending X79 (which it doesn't need, from one X79 owner to another) then go ahead. I'm looking toward a brighter potential future.
Intel didn't beef up their server-grade PCHs much beyond X79 either. My point is that Intel expects you to add functionality when you need it on a skt2011 machine. Also adding anything to a board makes it more expensive. 2011 pins means a lot more traces than your run of the mill 1155/1150 board. For that reason, the board does cost more to produce. It's not like the PCH costs all that much in retrospect, but beefing it up does expect DMI 2.0 to be adequate and it does expect that the increased price of the motherboard will result in better sales for this segment, neither of which I think would turn out to be true. Just my 2 cents.

Meanwhile, go use some of the PCI-E lanes when you start feeling the PCH is inadequate, that's whey they're there and why there are 40 of them no less. I don't know about you, but i don't plan on replacing my 2011 rig just because of the PCH.

I'm not trying to say X79 is good. I'm trying to say that if you need more than what it offers, you should be looking at expansion anyways. Cost-wise, replacing everything doesn't make sense to just add some more drives or to get USB 3.0. Anything along those lines.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,063 (0.77/day)
Likes
1,030
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
#25
I see cruise control is in full swing.

There will be no reason to go to broadwell b/c it should overclock worse and heat up more. Yay.

I'd rather go back to 2004.
 
Top