- Joined
- Apr 18, 2012
- Messages
- 389 (0.09/day)
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro |
| Cooling | Wraith Prism |
| Memory | Crucial Ballistix 3600Mhz 16GB (4x8GB) |
| Video Card(s) | - |
| Storage | Samsung 850 Evo, 860 Evo, 980 and Crucial MX500 |
| Display(s) | Samsung Neo G9 Odyssey |
| Case | Corsair 7000D |
| Power Supply | - |
| VR HMD | Quest 2 |
Recently my system performance seems to be better in terms of benchmarks (well some of them), and I decided to run Intels XTU and compare with other ppl of the same CPU/motherboard:
This is the result I got now : 1423
So at stock speeds of 4.190Mhz, Im faster than the guy whose running at 4.8Ghz.
Say roughly a month ago, my score was 1259 (which was inline with other 4.2ghz 6700ks)
Eh, what gives?
Other benchmarks:
Luxmark 3.1 Before/After
CPU:2350 / 2623
GPU:2051 / 2182
CPU+GPU:3095 / 3739
Winrar Before After:
Result: 11,003 / 12,868
Uniheaven Before After:
697 / 733
Cinebench Before After:
934 / 934
The only difference between the two tests was a BIOS update. Which made XTU act weirdly (some readings were missing and benchmark gave some error and got disabled). Reinstalling it fixed it.
This is the result I got now : 1423
So at stock speeds of 4.190Mhz, Im faster than the guy whose running at 4.8Ghz.
Say roughly a month ago, my score was 1259 (which was inline with other 4.2ghz 6700ks)
Eh, what gives?
Other benchmarks:
Luxmark 3.1 Before/After
CPU:2350 / 2623
GPU:2051 / 2182
CPU+GPU:3095 / 3739
Winrar Before After:
Result: 11,003 / 12,868
Uniheaven Before After:
697 / 733
Cinebench Before After:
934 / 934
The only difference between the two tests was a BIOS update. Which made XTU act weirdly (some readings were missing and benchmark gave some error and got disabled). Reinstalling it fixed it.
