I am seeing that some games offer more viewable area when it's played at 16:9 instead of 16:10. This is because it's coded in such a way where there is more visible area to see on the left and right sides. When you compare the top and bottom they are similar between 1200 vs 1080. This is debatable as some believe that it's erroneous to allow 1080 to have more viewable area then 1200. The reason for this trend is also debatable with some blaming consolitis. So, when you look at GPU reviews for certain games are we really seeing the whole picture of performance? What if a mistake is made and one card was reviewed at 1200 while the other at 1080 for a game that offered more viewable area at 1080? For example: AvP 2010 Just Cause 2 NFS Shift Settler 7 As well as a few others out there. Should 1080 be the new high end standard for reviews?