• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Is Arctic Cooling MX-4 a good purchase?

Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
396 (0.13/day)
Likes
61
System Name Just A Gaming Rig.
Processor AMD FX-8320 @4.1GHz, 1.268V
Motherboard ASUS M5A97 Evo R2.0
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Club 3D R9 280X 3GB royalQueen, @1115/1615MHz
Storage OS+Often used stuff: Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB, Mass storage: WD Blue 1TB
Case Zalman Z3 Plus
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply Corsair CX600M
Software Windows 8.1 64-bit
#1
So I've been a bit disappointed with my CPU temperatures: I have a FX-8320 and a Hyper 212 EVO with push/pull config, with the second fan being a CM Sickle Flow, and I can't even push 1.3V without temps getting close to 70 degrees after an hour of Prime. I doubt that I bodged the installation, and my case airflow should be sufficient. What I've heard recently is that the supplied thermal paste is a bit rubbish, and have been recommended to buy some Arctic Cooling MX-4, which apparently is the best performing thermal paste out there. I just wanted to hear some of your guys' opinion and previous experiences with stock vs. aftermarket thermal paste, if it's a worthy purchase.
 

sneekypeet

Unpaid Babysitter
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
24,613 (5.78/day)
Likes
9,338
System Name His
Processor Intel i7 5930K
Motherboard Asus Maximus V Extreme
Cooling Thermalright True Spirit 140 BW Rev.A
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 SLI with EVGA Hybrid coolers.
Storage Samsung 960 Pro / Crucial MX300 750GB / Seagate 1TB Spinner
Display(s) Sony 43" 4K 60hz
Case SilverStone Temjin TJ11
Audio Device(s) Realtek on board > Sony receiver > Cerwin Vega's
Power Supply Thermaltake TPSG 1050W
Mouse Always Changing
Keyboard Always Changing
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
#2
If two or three degrees is all you are looking for sure, but this is why you never see me recommend the 212 in any form unless using it as a stock replacement. It is not capable of real overclocks. My suggestion would be to get a more capable cooler for a larger thermal gap to allow more overclocking.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
4,479 (2.09/day)
Likes
3,640
Location
Boca Raton, Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.7 GHz - NB 3.0 GHz | Xeon E3-1290
Motherboard MSI 970 Gaming | Asus Sabertooth Z77
Cooling TRUE 120 |Deep Cool Assassin
Memory Gskill Ripjaws X - 16GB DDR3 (4x4GB)
Video Card(s) MSI 7970 Twin Frozr III BE OC - 1100/1500
Storage Crucial MX300 525GB + Multiple Mechs
Display(s) SyncMaster 2343BWX 23" 2048x1152 / Dell 1909W 19" 1440x900
Case Sunbeam Transformer Silver - frame is built like a tank
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Extreme Music | X-Fi Titanium - Bookshelf system
Power Supply Corsair TX650 v1
Software Windows XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores Xeon E3-1290 cpuz world record
#3
aftermarket paste is highly recommended. It's a worthy purchase

MX4 is pretty good. want to get a tube.

Using Ceramique2 currently.
 

sneekypeet

Unpaid Babysitter
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
24,613 (5.78/day)
Likes
9,338
System Name His
Processor Intel i7 5930K
Motherboard Asus Maximus V Extreme
Cooling Thermalright True Spirit 140 BW Rev.A
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 SLI with EVGA Hybrid coolers.
Storage Samsung 960 Pro / Crucial MX300 750GB / Seagate 1TB Spinner
Display(s) Sony 43" 4K 60hz
Case SilverStone Temjin TJ11
Audio Device(s) Realtek on board > Sony receiver > Cerwin Vega's
Power Supply Thermaltake TPSG 1050W
Mouse Always Changing
Keyboard Always Changing
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
#4
aftermarket paste is highly recommended. It's a worthy purchase

MX4 is pretty good.
Also I do fully agree with this statement! Since you are looking for more headroom and the cooler you have is getting saturated, I still stand by my first point for this specific thread.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
1,625 (0.35/day)
Likes
552
Location
The Pico Mundo Grill
System Name Commercial towing vehicle Nostromo
Processor R7 1700X Base Clock @4.000.000.000 Hz
Motherboard Crosshair Hero VI (BIOS 1701)
Cooling Hydro H110i V2 High Performance
Memory 2x8 GB Dominator CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 v4.31
Video Card(s) 970 STRIX
Storage 960 EVO M2 500 GB w. EKWB EK-M.2 NVMe nickel heatsink / UV400 480 GB / Red PRO 4 TB
Display(s) VG248QE
Case HAF XB
Audio Device(s) Onboard / JDS Labs O2 AMP / K550 headphones
Power Supply AX 860
Mouse KANA
Keyboard K60
Software Win 10 Pro x64 / KIS 2018
Benchmark Scores 2141 lightyears per hour.......
#5
MX4 is an okay paste - but as sneekypeet said - another cooler might be the best.
I have a FX-9590 and a Corsair Hydro H110 Extreme with Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra - keeps the beast cool at 5.3 GHz :)
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
396 (0.13/day)
Likes
61
System Name Just A Gaming Rig.
Processor AMD FX-8320 @4.1GHz, 1.268V
Motherboard ASUS M5A97 Evo R2.0
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Club 3D R9 280X 3GB royalQueen, @1115/1615MHz
Storage OS+Often used stuff: Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB, Mass storage: WD Blue 1TB
Case Zalman Z3 Plus
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply Corsair CX600M
Software Windows 8.1 64-bit
#6
If two or three degrees is all you are looking for sure, but this is why you never see me recommend the 212 in any form unless using it as a stock replacement. It is not capable of real overclocks. My suggestion would be to get a more capable cooler for a larger thermal gap to allow more overclocking.
I knew when buying the cooler that I won't be able to OC too much, but right now I'm at 4.1 GHz and 1.26875 volts, which is barely higher than what the CPU is rated for, since at stock it will turbo up to 4.0 GHz.

That's what I suspected, that the difference in thermal pastes will be less than 5 degrees, so it's not going to tip the temps much. Probably going to save a bit of money and get a new cooler. Looked at the review of the Phanteks PH-TC12 you guys did and it beats the Hyper 212 with 20 degrees? Seems a bit extreme. What I might do is first buy some MX-4, and if that's not enough, then I'll save up for a new cooler. Thanks for the input.
 

sneekypeet

Unpaid Babysitter
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
24,613 (5.78/day)
Likes
9,338
System Name His
Processor Intel i7 5930K
Motherboard Asus Maximus V Extreme
Cooling Thermalright True Spirit 140 BW Rev.A
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 SLI with EVGA Hybrid coolers.
Storage Samsung 960 Pro / Crucial MX300 750GB / Seagate 1TB Spinner
Display(s) Sony 43" 4K 60hz
Case SilverStone Temjin TJ11
Audio Device(s) Realtek on board > Sony receiver > Cerwin Vega's
Power Supply Thermaltake TPSG 1050W
Mouse Always Changing
Keyboard Always Changing
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
#7
May seem a bit extreme, but that is the way it works! Better designed coolers can have a huge advantage on something that is made fast, economically, and without much attention to the details. Also keep in mind that those results I had were on a 2600K @ 4.5, but I don't recall needing to slam the voltage to do it either. Honestly a lot of coolers out there will be some 10 degrees cooler than what you are running now, even an older generation AIO on the cheap may be a solid way to go.