Wile E
Power User
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2006
- Messages
- 24,318 (3.79/day)
System Name | The ClusterF**k |
---|---|
Processor | 980X @ 4Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12 |
Cooling | MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360 |
Memory | 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T |
Video Card(s) | Evga GTX 580 |
Storage | Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB |
Display(s) | HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS |
Case | Technofront Bench Station |
Audio Device(s) | Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750 |
Power Supply | ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W |
Software | Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4 |
It matters a lot for power consumption , it's not fair to compare these two cards when one is built with older tehnology , i know know you wanna spin the bad to good out of GTX480 how is not that bad , how 4870x2 consumes just as much and bla bla bla , problem is the card isn't made anymore and won't be missed by anyone as long as 5000 series is very good and offers everything the old ones plus more.
No, the process doesn't matter at all (from a consumer point of view). All that matters is how much power it consumes, how much it costs, and it's performance. If it was built on the 90nm process, but still performed exactly the same in all areas, it wouldn't matter to us as consumers at all, it's just a number.
And the 4870X2 is still relevant. There are still a ton of them out there. Hell, look at my system specs. I can't afford a 5970, and performance wise, the 5870 isn't much of an upgrade to me. The only benefit it adds is DX11 and lower power consumption, and that just isn't worth it when I get the same performance in everything else.
I guess I should have worded myself differently in that the 4870X2 isn't so much relevant, as it has a credible influence. Fermi, quite technically, would be an upgrade for a 4870X2 user in every way. It performs better, has DX11, costs substantially less than the only other card that outperforms X2, and consumes less power than the X2.
And yes, the 5k series is very good, but that still doesn't make Fermi a terrible card.
I still want to see what it can do under h2o.
EDIT: In all of this, I completely forgot about GTX295. In light of that, it does make Fermi even less attractive. It seems that 4870x2 to 5870 is almost exactly the same as 295 to fermi, in terms of performance, but the wattage roles are reversed, with Fermi consuming MORE than the former top nV card. I may have to go back to the drawing board on my thinking here. Hmmmmm.
Last edited: