• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Is my build good for HD video editing?

Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,197 (1.12/day)
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
If you want to do "HD video editting", then YES, you need to upgrade your system:

1./ The CPU is OK if you work in uncompressed video... and then only encode to HD compressed format after all editting is done. You phenom is more than enough. UNLESS you were merging multiple video streams, in which case, you need an intel quad, or your system wont be able to process so much live data. Or, if you want to work directly with compressed video, you will need the intel quad, in fact, i would recommend a dual xeon for 8 cores if you want to *directly* edit compressed video formats.

2./ Your HDD is seriously underpowered and undersized. I suggest you get an exclusive HDD for your video material... both source data, and edits. A samsung F1 750GB or 1GB is an excellent budget, high speed HDD.

3./ If you are going to do intensive editing, like post production of a movie, then a single HDD will not cut the mustard. You will need to set up a simple RAID 0 on SATA for a medium amount of video work, e.g. 2x Samsung F1, or a RAID 0 array on SCSI320 if you are doing intensive editing work, e.g. 2x or 4x SCSI320 @10K RPM. The controller and the HDD will be expensive. But less expensive that SDD. Actually, video editing on 2x SSD RAID is probably as good as 4xSCSI320. So check your budget. 1 drive, 2 drives + cheap controller, or 4 expensive drives and expensive controller.

>> Your bottleneck is the HDD

>> As you know, professional video editing is based on serious HDD RAID systems
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
3,051 (0.52/day)
Location
Pontaic Michigan
System Name The Netbook
Processor Intel Atom n270
Memory 1GB DDR2 533mhz
Video Card(s) Intel G945
Storage 250GB
Display(s) 10.1" LCD
Software Microsoft Windows 7 Starter x86
I don't think any of my projects for school will be more than 30 minutes. Right now a buddy of mine is using his WD 500GB External for all of his video storage and he actually has the same HD as me on his PC, he seems to be doing fine, but he's been downsampling all of his videos to 480i.
Really what we'll be doing is shooting in 1280p and then converting it after editing and post.
I guess I just want to save all my material in HD for the day I can afford a blu-ray burner.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
2,758 (0.46/day)
I don't think any of my projects for school will be more than 30 minutes. Right now a buddy of mine is using his WD 500GB External for all of his video storage and he actually has the same HD as me on his PC, he seems to be doing fine, but he's been downsampling all of his videos to 480i.
Really what we'll be doing is shooting in 1280p and then converting it after editing and post.
I guess I just want to save all my material in HD for the day I can afford a blu-ray burner.

what are format are you recording in?
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,197 (1.12/day)
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
Given your project and budget, I would suggest getting the F1 SATA/300 drive and using it as your exclusive video drive. Do not use an external drive for storage. It is way too slow.

http://www.assimilateinc.com/tools1.html



Try comparing your existing 320GB drive to those figures.
 

Rurouni Strife

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
124 (0.02/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 Windsor @ 2.81 (Artic Cooling Freezer 64)
Motherboard ECS Black 780G
Cooling 4 case fans, AC 64 Pro on Proc.
Memory 2 GB Kingston Ram
Video Card(s) Diamond Radeon 3850 stock (OC 740/930)
Storage 250 GB Segate SATA 2, 160 Samsung
Display(s) BenQ T705 17", SynchMaster 19"
Case generic
Audio Device(s) Something that makes sounds...by IDT
Power Supply 550W Corsair
Software XP Pro
Benchmark Scores 13000 3DM05
Buy another Internal HDD. Something in the range of...500 GB? Video takes up a rediculus amount of space. If your capturing in HD like resolutions, you are gonna definately want lots of space. RAID might improve performance, but its up to you on how you wanna do that. Personally, I dont want to mess with RAID drivers and setups, and I have 2 differing HD sizes too. 1 250 and 1 160. One for 3D and school projects and games, one for music/movies. My external is for backup.
Good Luck!
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
7,704 (1.21/day)
System Name Back to Blue
Processor i9 14900k
Motherboard Asrock Z790 Nova
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 64GB Corsair Dominator DDR5-6400 @ 6600
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 Ultra FTW3
Storage 4TB WD 850x NVME, 4TB WD Black, 10TB Seagate Barracuda Pro
Display(s) 1x Samsung Odyssey G7 Neo and 1x Dell u2518d
Case Lian Li o11 DXL w/custom vented front panel
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Senn PX38X -> SB AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Logitech G502x
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 11 x64 Pro
Benchmark Scores 31k multicore Cinebench - CPU limited 125w
Using an internal decently fast hard drive is a good idea, but with a no offense slow machine, its not worth the raid. If you were running dual Xeon quads or something it would be a different story.

By the way I don't mean your machine is slow, but its too slow to really gain off a really fast raid 0 setup. A single fast dedicated drive wouldn't be a bad idea though.
 
Top