• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Is NVIDIA's rebranding strategy helpful?

Is NVIDIA's rebranding strategy helpful?

  • Yes, I understand it is very hard to engineer a new GPU every 6 months

    Votes: 422 6.1%
  • Yes, there is no need to innovate with current games

    Votes: 149 2.2%
  • Yes, if an existing GPU is working good, why invent a new one?

    Votes: 377 5.5%
  • No, I want real innovation that warrants a new name

    Votes: 3,218 46.6%
  • No, I am sick of 6 month product cycles

    Votes: 1,176 17.0%
  • It doesn't affect me, I choose other brands

    Votes: 1,567 22.7%

  • Total voters
    6,909
  • Poll closed .

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,274 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,359
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#26
No, I want real innovation that warrants a new name!
What is the point if that "new inovation" yields a card that is identical to or worse than an already existing card?

You're saying that if nVidia released a new core with 120SP's, 40 TUs, 16 ROPs, and a 256-bit and called it a GTS250, you wouldn't have a problem with it? But because they re-used the G92b core, which has better specs, you don't like it?:laugh:
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (2.07/day)
Likes
799
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
#27
I wonder if they could die shrink it to get rid of the external pci-e connector.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
6,137 (1.67/day)
Likes
1,633
Location
Austin Texas
System Name silen8
Processor Intel i7 7820X Delidded @ 4.64Ghz / 3.1Ghz Mesh
Motherboard MSI X299 Tomahawk
Cooling 240mm Corsair H105 Intake
Memory 32 GB Quad 3434Mhz DDR4 15-16-16-38-300-1T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti Gaming
Storage 1Tb Samsung 960 Pro m2, 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD
Display(s) Dell 24" 2560x1440 144hz, G-Sync @ 165Hz
Case NZXT S340 Elite Black
Audio Device(s) Arctis 7
Power Supply FSP HydroG 750W
Mouse zowie ec-2
Keyboard corsair k65 tenkeyless
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores Cb: 2103 Multi, 209 Single, 10450 Timespy - 10150 GPU/11900 CPU, superpi 1M - 7.71s
#28
I wonder if they could die shrink it to get rid of the external pci-e connector.
or better yet... if youre gonna give it a new name... then die shrink it and put another connector (upping the voltage) on so it can run at 1GHz core - maybe up the ram too. :D then i'd buy just for kicks.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
7,698 (1.91/day)
Likes
747
Processor i7-5820K
Motherboard Gigabyte X99-UD4
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Crucial DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1070
Storage 240GB HyperX 3k, 500GB Samsung 850EVO, 2x WD Black 640gb, WD Black 1TB, Seagate 10TB
Display(s) 2x BenQ 24" 1920x1080
Case BitFenix Ghost
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Corsair Vengeance 2100
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 x64 Pro
#29
What is the point if that "new inovation" yields a card that is identical to or worse than an already existing card?

You're saying that if nVidia released a new core with 120SP's, 40 TUs, 16 ROPs, and a 256-bit and called it a GTS250, you wouldn't have a problem with it? But because they re-used the G92b core, which has better specs, you don't like it?:laugh:
http://hwbot.org/hardware.compare.d...308_1&id=1357_1&id=1233_1&id=1364_1&id=1355_1

While I can see the point in a better revision, I don't see enough change among the basic levels say 8800GT - 9800GT, seriously..... Now granted that's a pretty hard comparison... GTX260 to GTX260 216, I can respect that, saying it's pretty much the same card outright with a minor mod.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
5,576 (1.44/day)
Likes
864
System Name MightyX (MITX)
Processor Core i7 4770K @ 4.2ghz
Motherboard Asus Z87i-Pro
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory 16gb DDR3 1600 LP
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 OC
Storage Lots of SSD's
Display(s) AOC AGON AG352QCX
Case Raven RVZ-01
Power Supply SFX 450 G
Mouse Razer Mamba Tournament Chroma
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
#30
newtekie and darkmatter, i agree.

just know your products people, i think nvidia are smart for doing this NOW, sure the names are screwy, but as the GTS240 and 250 it will make MORE sense than now.

everyone re brands, and not everyone is in uproar about that, its just remarketing the products to suit today's market. simple and effective.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
7,662 (1.99/day)
Likes
536
Location
c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Processor C2Q6600 @ 1.6 GHz
Motherboard Anus PQ5
Cooling ACFPro
Memory GEiL2 x 1 GB PC2 6400
Video Card(s) MSi 4830 (RIP)
Storage Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB Perpendicular Recording
Display(s) Dell 17'
Case El Cheepo
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software MCE2K5
#31
No, and i hate the sixc month cycle
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
8,506 (2.34/day)
Likes
2,072
Location
Kansas City
System Name The Dove Box Rev 2.0
Processor I7 5930k
Motherboard Asus X99
Cooling Custom water loop
Memory 4 x 4GB 3000 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) 2x MSI 780 Ti's in SLI
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 PCIe SSD, 2x1TB WD Blacks, 1.2TB NAS
Display(s) 27" Asus 144Hz
Case Enermax Fulmo GT
Audio Device(s) ON BOARD FTW
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 850W
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Win 10 64x
#32
Rebranding is a tired method for marketing but it works. How else are you going to buy the near exact same thing six months from now that they sold you already? It's a sales ploy that needs to stop.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
4,829 (1.24/day)
Likes
635
System Name The Cube
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Asus Prime B350M-A/CSM AM4 mATX
Cooling Stock Wraith Spire
Memory 2x8gb Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 760
Storage 256 GB Samsung Evo 850, 1TB WD Blue
Display(s) ASUS PB278Q 27" 1440p LED
Case Thermaltake Core V21
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 550W
Software Win 10 Education
#33
It's silly but understandable. I don't like it at all, but I understand why they do it. I'll just keep shaking my head.....
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (2.07/day)
Likes
799
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
#34
I wonder if the pcb will be changed around or made shorter etc.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
415 (0.13/day)
Likes
40
Location
Pakistan
System Name Mean Machine
Processor Intel Core i5 2400 at 3.1 GHz
Motherboard Asus can't remember the model
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 103
Memory Kingston 4GB 1600 DDR3
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 6850 1 GB
Storage WD Cavier SEII 3200AAKS 320 GB and Seagate 500 GB
Display(s) HP X22 LED
Case Generic
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Audigy
Power Supply Cooler Master Real Power Pro 650W
Software Pro/E, Delcam Powermill, These things just for work.
#35
I want the real innovation like they launched the new architecture of GTX 260, and 280 like 4XXX series of ATI but re branding a previous product proves less loyalty with the previous products holder. This is just my opinion and I have right to be fair.

I have used my every card from nVIDIA side except one and I am fan of this company but what switched me from them the higher prices and the old technology and I make my way through ATI and I am happy with their latest chip.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,902 (6.25/day)
Likes
9,994
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#36
IMO, all cards that have G92, G92a, and G92b should have been labeled GeForce 9###. All the new inferior cards should land below the higher performing GeForce 9### series.

Once they created a new GPU (GT200) which overthrows what the old version could do (G92), they release a new line (2## series). This is what both ATI and NVIDIA have been doing for many years. What broke rank is the 8800 GT and 8800 GTS 512.

Simply put, it is a marketing failure on NVIDIA's behalf. They're having to sell not-so-old products at bargin bin price just because they screwed up on model numbers. People that know what's going on are annoyed while those that don't end up paying extra for parts that aren't much better than parts costing half as much. It's a bargin for those in the know, basically.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#37
What is the point if that "new inovation" yields a card that is identical to or worse than an already existing card?

You're saying that if nVidia released a new core with 120 SP's, 40 TUs, 16 ROPs, and a 256-bit and called it a GTS250, you wouldn't have a problem with it? But because they re-used the G92b core, which has better specs, you don't like it?:laugh:
Yep, either that or make a more expensive card with 144 SP, 48 TU, 16 ROPs and 256 bit that could still be slower than G92 because of the lack of TUs. Or just go overboard and release a 144 SP, 72 TU, 20 ROP and 320 bit card that would ensure the performance at a much higher price, something nobody needs.

You know what's funny? That probabaly most people complainig about the rebranding don't have a clue about why the new chips would have to have the numbers we are mentioning. Why not a 150 SP, 64 TU, 20 ROP and 128 bit GDDR5 memory interface right??
 
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
143 (0.04/day)
Likes
11
Location
Norway
System Name "My Computer", huehuehue
Processor Core i5 6600K
Motherboard ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua NH-U9B
Memory 16GB (2x8) Corsair Vengeance LPX PC2666
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce GTX 970 Phantom
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 EVO + 1TB Samsung F3 HDD + 2TB external WD USB HDD
Display(s) BenQ RL2755HM 27"
Case Fractal Design Define R5 Black
Audio Device(s) On board codec
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei Raw
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 350
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores The scouter says it's over 9000
#38
I forgave them the first time. but a second rebranding on the same product is ridiculous. Ok, fine, it's obivous it's to try to sell their old tech and not get stuck with it, which benefits noone. But they might better have called it 9850GT or 9900GT instead of GTX 240, because that lineup should be reserved for the GT200 generation chips.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
38 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
Location
Baghdad
System Name KoBe SyS
Processor Intel core2quad q6600 Oc@>>3.555
Motherboard Gigabyte EP-45 UD3P
Cooling XIGMATEK DARKNIGHT
Memory Corsair 2x2G DDR2 Bus 800 cas 4.4.4.12 stander for now
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Nvidia GTX295 OCc>>>672>>>1278>>>1449
Storage Westrendigit 500G Green
Display(s) Acer 19inch Wide
Case Gigabyte iSolo 210
Power Supply Gigabyte ODIN Pro 800W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores 3DMARK06(18587)
#39
bye Nvidia

Ithink Nvidia will Not rise again :shadedshu cuse the ATI crushed them with the 4800 series :nutkick: i mean realy since the 8800 GT Nvidia never product any Powerful GPU
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,317 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,423
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#40
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#41
Ithink Nvidia will Not rise again :shadedshu cuse the ATI crushed them with the 4800 series :nutkick: i mean realy since the 8800 GT Nvidia never product any Powerful GPU
Exactly bt. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12084&Itemid=1

I forgave them the first time. but a second rebranding on the same product is ridiculous. Ok, fine, it's obivous it's to try to sell their old tech and not get stuck with it, which benefits noone. But they might better have called it 9850GT or 9900GT instead of GTX 240, because that lineup should be reserved for the GT200 generation chips.
What most of you guys don't understand is that there's no GT200 based chip that would be better than G92. And I challenge anyone to spec one.

This is an overview of DX10 GPU architectures:



SP= Stream Processor, Ati ones have 5 ALU's each.
TU= Texture Units
SM= Shader Multiprocessor = 8 SPs + a shared L1 cache. It's the most efficient basic compute core of Nvidia.
TPC= Thread Processing Cluster. In Nvidia's arch, has one TM, a certain number of SM and a shared L2 cache.
ROP= Raster Operator
RU= 4 Rops and a 64bit memory interface make a raster unit in both Nvidia and Ati architectures.

So with those elements, which have proven to be effective in both Nvidia and Ati architectures (the way to go for a cheap, balanced and fast architecture), I challenge anyone to find a combination of those, that for the same price (die area), beats G92 = 8 TPC (2 SM each)+ 4 RU.

To keep into account is that at 55nm:

- 1 G92 TPC (*and it's associated cache and interconnects) has a die area of aproximately 24 mm^2.
- 1 GT200 TPC* = ~40 mm^2
- 1 RU* = ~10 mm^2

i.e:

GT200b = ~470 mm^2 => 40*10 TPC + 10*8 RU = 400 + 80 = 480
G92b = ~230 mm^2 => 24*8 TPC + 10*4 RU = 192 + 40 = 232

^^ Calculated from die shots, for example: http://techreport.com/r.x/geforce-gtx-280/die-shot-colored.jpg

The unpaid no prize contest starts NOW!! Good luck.
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,274 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,359
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#42
http://hwbot.org/hardware.compare.d...308_1&id=1357_1&id=1233_1&id=1364_1&id=1355_1

While I can see the point in a better revision, I don't see enough change among the basic levels say 8800GT - 9800GT, seriously..... Now granted that's a pretty hard comparison... GTX260 to GTX260 216, I can respect that, saying it's pretty much the same card outright with a minor mod.
I don't get your point with that, seriously, I'm confused. Mind explaining a little more?

Rebranding is a tired method for marketing but it works. How else are you going to buy the near exact same thing six months from now that they sold you already? It's a sales ploy that needs to stop.
They aren't trying to get people to buy the same card over again. The current 8800GT and 9800GT owners are not the target market here. And noone that already has an 8800GT or 9800GT should be buying one of these. And any idiot that buys solely on name alone deservers to just get a rebrand of the same card they already have, and probably will be totally happy with it too.

Ithink Nvidia will Not rise again :shadedshu cuse the ATI crushed them with the 4800 series :nutkick: i mean realy since the 8800 GT Nvidia never product any Powerful GPU
Odd how you say the 4800 series crushed them, yet their, now, 2 generation old card is still good enough to compete with the 4800 series. It is so good in fact that nVidia doesn't feel the need to release a new card to compete with the 4800 series. We can talk about ATi crushing nVidia when they come up with a single core that isn't matched by nVidia's 2 generation old core.
 

GPUCafe

GPU Cafe Representative
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
50 (0.01/day)
Likes
8
#43
Exactly bt. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12084&Itemid=1



What most of you guys don't understand is that there's no GT200 based chip that would be better than G92. And I challenge anyone to spec one.

This is an overview of DX10 GPU architectures:

http://img.techpowerup.org/090218/Architecture.jpg

SP= Stream Processor, Ati ones have 5 ALU's each.
TU= Texture Units
SM= Shader Multiprocessor = 8 SPs + a shared L1 cache. It's the most efficient basic compute core of Nvidia.
TPC= Thread Processing Cluster. In Nvidia's arch, has one TM, a certain number of SM and a shared L2 cache.
ROP= Raster Operator
RU= 4 Rops and a 64bit memory interface make a raster unit in both Nvidia and Ati architectures.

So with those elements, which have proven to be effective in both Nvidia and Ati architectures (the way to go for a cheap, balanced and fast architecture), I challenge anyone to find a combination of those, that for the same price (die area), beats G92 = 8 TPC (2 SM each)+ 4 RU.

To keep into account is that at 55nm:

- 1 G92 TPC (*and it's associated cache and interconnects) has a die area of aproximately 24 mm^2.
- 1 GT200 TPC* = ~40 mm^2
- 1 RU* = ~10 mm^2

i.e:

GT200b = ~470 mm^2 => 40*10 TPC + 10*8 RU = 400 + 80 = 480
G92b = ~230 mm^2 => 24*8 TPC + 10*4 RU = 192 + 40 = 232

^^ Calculated from die shots, for example: http://techreport.com/r.x/geforce-gtx-280/die-shot-colored.jpg

The unpaid no prize contest starts NOW!! Good luck.
FYI, the die-size of G92b is in the region of 270mm2. Still, your calculations are not far off. GJ. :toast:


They aren't trying to get people to buy the same card over again. The current 8800GT and 9800GT owners are not the target market here. And noone that already has an 8800GT or 9800GT should be buying one of these. And any idiot that buys solely on name alone deservers to just get a rebrand of the same card they already have, and probably will be totally happy with it too.
That is not the point, no one no matter how little knowledge they have deserves to be duped.

Odd how you say the 4800 series crushed them, yet their, now, 2 generation old card is still good enough to compete with the 4800 series. It is so good in fact that nVidia doesn't feel the need to release a new card to compete with the 4800 series. We can talk about ATi crushing nVidia when they come up with a single core that isn't matched by nVidia's 2 generation old core.
Again, not sure what you are implying here. 4870 competes well with the GTX260 (GT200) & 4850 competes well with the 9800GTX+ (G92). So in a way, RV770 has broader scope of implementation and competes well with Nvidia's latest arch.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#44
FYI, the die-size of G92b is in the region of 270mm2. Still, your calculations are not far off. GJ. :toast:
Are you sure? Hmm every comment about it's size that I have seen that actually measured the chip physicslly said around 230, but it might be. I remember the 270 figure came out before the chip shipped based on the linear reduction from 65nm to 55nm. It's 270 in the end? It doesn't really matter anyway.
 

GPUCafe

GPU Cafe Representative
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
50 (0.01/day)
Likes
8
#45
Are you sure? Hmm every comment about it's size that I have seen that actually measured the chip physicslly said around 230, but it might be. I remember the 270 figure came out before the chip shipped based on the linear reduction from 65nm to 55nm. It's 270 in the end? It doesn't really matter anyway.
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/06/19/nvidia-has-9800-gtx-55nm-g92/1

Personally my measurements came out to 275mm2 (16.6 x 16.6) to be exact. Other reviews also put in the same range. But 230mm2 is beyond what I call margin of error.
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#46
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/06/19/nvidia-has-9800-gtx-55nm-g92/1

Personally my measurements came out to 275mm2 (16.6 x 16.6) to be exact. Other reviews also put in the same range. But 230mm2 is beyond what I call margin of error.
The problem with that is that he wants to obtain that result from the start because that's what he said and wants to be right, and in a picture things can vary a lot. IMHO he takes too much pixels for the G92b and too few pixels for the G92. By my measures based in that same picture the result is 242mm^2. As you can see things can change a lot.

Another thing that I noticed is that the chips are not 100% square and that while G92 is taller than fatter, G92b is wider than taller. So those who meassure one dimension and just multiplicate it, obtain a very different result depending on which dimension they choosed to measure.

Anyway, I have a 9800GTX+ at home, my brother's card, but he doesn't let me take out off his PC, much less removing the heatsink. I'm still trying, but I've been trying to take a look at that damn card since November, with no luck.
 
Last edited:

GPUCafe

GPU Cafe Representative
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
50 (0.01/day)
Likes
8
#47
The problem with that is that he wants to obtain that result from the start because that's what he said and wants to be right, and in a picture things can vary a lot. IMHO he takes too much pixels for the G92b and too few pixels for the G92. By my measures based in that same picture the result is 242mm^2. As you can see things can change a lot.

Another thing that I noticed is that the chips are not 100% square and that while G92 is taller than fatter, G92b is wider than taller. So those who meassure one dimension and just multiplicate it, obtain a very different result depending on which dimension they choosed to measure.

Anyway, I have a 9800GTX+ at home, my brother's card, but he doesn't let me take out off his PC, much less removing the heatsink. I'm still trying, but I've been trying to take a look at that damn card since November, with no luck.
I'm sure the Richard (reviewer) measured it physically rather than deducing the size from the photo. My measurements are also taken physically.

I wouldnt suggest you take off the HSF off your brother's card as that would void the warranty.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
5,576 (1.44/day)
Likes
864
System Name MightyX (MITX)
Processor Core i7 4770K @ 4.2ghz
Motherboard Asus Z87i-Pro
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory 16gb DDR3 1600 LP
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 OC
Storage Lots of SSD's
Display(s) AOC AGON AG352QCX
Case Raven RVZ-01
Power Supply SFX 450 G
Mouse Razer Mamba Tournament Chroma
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
#48
Ithink Nvidia will Not rise again :shadedshu cuse the ATI crushed them with the 4800 series :nutkick: i mean realy since the 8800 GT Nvidia never product any Powerful GPU
Crushed? Perhaps not. Revitalized the market, absolutely. The 4800 Series was exactly what it needed to be, but in no way did ATi"crush" Nvidia with these cards.

I think both companies will rise and fall, just like it has always been.

Odd how you say the 4800 series crushed them, yet their, now, 2 generation old card is still good enough to compete with the 4800 series. It is so good in fact that nVidia doesn't feel the need to release a new card to compete with the 4800 series. We can talk about ATi crushing nVidia when they come up with a single core that isn't matched by nVidia's 2 generation old core.
Thankyou! thats what im saying! and to repeat myself the 4800 series was awesome, its exactly what the market needed, and indeed it does compete well against current generation cards too.

however. If you were sitting on an 8800GTX/Ultra, or even 8800GTX/Ultra SLi that you bought 1.5-2.5 years ago, there would be NO reason to upgrade to a 4850 or 4850CF, and even 4870's arent a HUGE amount better than an 8800Ultra, only about ~25-30%

the point is, OLD technology is still keeping up with ATi's best, and more to the point, just keeping up enough to not warrant an upgrade.

Interesting to say that buying a G80GTX/Ultra taht long ago was a genuine investment! i know i still have my 8800GTX oc, sitting in eager anticipation of its newest pixels to crunch.
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#49
I'm sure the Richard (reviewer) measured it physically rather than deducing the size from the photo. My measurements are also taken physically.

I wouldnt suggest you take off the HSF off your brother's card as that would void the warranty.
It would void the warranty only if they notice it. ;)

As for the size I don't know man, and TBH it doesn't really matter, it's just that I usually want to know things for fact. In some "local" forums here in Spain, a lot of people have measured the size physically and the results are varied. You kow when speaking about mm it's hard unless you use proffessional measuring tools. Let's say the actual lenght is 16mm, it's not too difficult that some can measure 15mm and others 17mm. And the results of ponderating them are 225 and 289 respectively.

So I really don't know what to think. I do know that G92b is smaller than RV770 though. That's undeniable when looking them at the same photo or both them against a coin, for example. And RV770 is said to be 260mm^2, so...
 

Baam

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
93 (0.03/day)
Likes
18
Location
Trucker..so all over
Processor AMD FX-8120@4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Thermalright Venomous X Black
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB
Video Card(s) ATI 5850 crossfire
Case COOLER MASTER HAF 912
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi
Power Supply Antec TPQ-850
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
#50
Its fine to do it. I think ATI should do it with there old 3800 series cards. Thanks for the 4800 series or Nvidia would still be charging 300 bucks for a 9800.