- Joined
- Feb 5, 2011
- Messages
- 77 (0.02/day)
- Location
- Greece
System Name | Mikes PC! |
---|---|
Processor | AMD 5800X3D @4.55Ghz |
Motherboard | ASUS B550 F Gaming |
Cooling | Arctic Cooling 360 |
Memory | HYPERX 32gb 4000Mhz C17 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | WD SN850 BLACK 1TB + Kingston KC2000 1 TB |
Display(s) | LG OLED C1 48" 4K120Hz |
Case | Lian Li O11 EVO |
Audio Device(s) | FiiO k5 Pro + HyperX |
Power Supply | CoolerMaster 1KW |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Lightspeed |
Keyboard | Logitech |
Software | Win11 64bit |
I want to know if anyone here has first used 144Hz monitor at 144FPS and then used 144Hz monitor with Gsync or Freesync at 144FPS and if they saw any difference.
I feel some of the people flipping out about it stepped up from 60hz panels. Moving from a normal 60hz to a normal 144hz panel is a huge change alone. I wonder if some are giving more credit to these technologies then they deserve.I am not trying to discredit the technologies I am just curious if some of the hype is just peoples first experience with 144hz.
Very clear question, and one i was wondering also before getting my latest gsync monitor.
So here is the short version:
YES there is a big benefit in gaming with Gsync enabled @144Hz.
You basically don't get screen tearing (if you compare to no Vsync) and NO stutters (compared to Vsync) and this is a huge difference since latest games appear to be unstable.
144Hz is a great middle ground for those without Gsync, since it tends to "cover" some of the tearing but don't fool yourself the tearing is obvious even @144Hz.
Did i forget to mention the healthy FPS gain going from Vsync to Gsync?
And did i also forget to mention that Gsync is a gift for people with SLI since it keeps the great performance but hides the sometimes erratic behaviour of the technology?
The above is my personal experience having used my Acer 1440P IPS@144Hz Gsync monitor combined with GTX 970SLI and now with 980ti G1.