Leader Board Show your RealBench score

[mrthanhnguyen]

Im gonna shunt mod my 3090 and see how much I can push it. Hope Im not going to destroy it.

 

[ThrashZone]

Im gonna shunt mod my 3090 and see how much I can push it. Hope Im not going to destroy it.

Hi,
That will be sick

 

[xkm1948]

xkm1948
261340



Mildly overclocked 3090 paired with mildly overclocked 6950X

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Does that mean you're mildly done
I'll give you a couple days to see if you increase it mildly more

 

[xkm1948]

Hi,
Does that mean you're mildly done
I'll give you a couple days to see if you increase it mildly more

Nah I am done

 

[bigstig]

BigStig---228,542

Just to add to this. My cpu voltage is set to auto and its using the level 3 oc setting + 100mhz pbo only, When loading all cores the voltage doesnt go above 1.3

 

[NoJuan999]

NoJuan999 - 199,364
3700x with PBO on Auto, RAM OC'd to 3733 and 2060 Super at Stock Settings.
These are my 24/7 settings.

 

[Athlonite]

Athlonite - 190,347
3700x PBO auto, Ram at stock 3200MHz Cl16-18-18-18 and RX5700 stock no OC
same basic hardware as my last post except for a new mobo and Asus ROG Strix X570F-Gaming vs X470F-Gaming

 

[Spark9]

 

[ThrashZone]

@Spark9
Nice score follow the posting instruction to be added as #2 spot .

 

[EarthDog]

Earthdog - 280,680

(Custom Water, 4.5 GHz with HT disabled. Likely still a lot more in the tank like this... not sure if HT matters on this CPU in this test with so many cores/threads....)

 

[ThrashZone]

Earthdog - 280,680

(Custom Water, 4.5 GHz with HT disabled. Likely still a lot more in the tank like this... not sure if HT matters on this CPU in this test with so many cores/threads....)

View attachment 175227

Hi,
Yeah you should probably be around 360k not 280k but looks like you're walking not running as usual seeing you're not even at your turbo clock yet which is 4.6 and turbo boost 3 is 4.8 lol

 

[EarthDog]

Hi,
Yeah you should probably be around 360k not 280k but looks like you're walking not running as usual seeing you're not even at your turbo clock yet which is 4.6 and turbo boost 3 is 4.8 lol

My scores are fine for the settings I use. As posted, I've got all cores and threads at 4.5 GHz...that's how I run daily. Please note that ALL CORE BOOST on this CPU is 3.8 GHz...I'm running at 4.5 GHz.

Please note, I'm not trying to win, just adding results. I highly doubt 360K is in the cards unless this benchmark is heavily multi-threaded (outside of the MT section). I wonder if I put this thing at stock would I beat that score................lol (doubt it).

You also say I'm 'walking not running as usual', however this is the first time I've been 'walking'. Using your definition, the 7960x was over its maximum boost (4.2 GHz) the first time. Here, you are correct... but let's not say per usual. If I wanted to win this thing, I'd put my chip under LN2 and call it a day.

I don't know how RB responds to more cores and threads. But seeing as how a 5.5 GHz 10900K scored 360K with 10c/20t, I'm guessing this doesn't use a lot of multi-threading outside of that one test.... but more than the two cores that boost to 4.8 GHz and few that boost to 4.6.

 

[ThrashZone]

My scores are fine for the settings I use. As posted, I've got all cores and threads at 4.5 GHz...that's how I run daily. Please note that ALL CORE BOOST on this CPU is 3.8 GHz...I'm running at 4.5 GHz.

Please note, I'm not trying to win, just adding results. I highly doubt 360K is in the cards unless this benchmark is heavily multi-threaded (outside of the MT section). I wonder if I put this thing at stock would I beat that score................lol (doubt it).

You also say I'm 'walking not running as usual', however this is the first time I've been 'walking'. Using your definition, the 7960x was over its maximum boost (4.2 GHz) the first time. Here, you are correct... but let's not say per usual. If I wanted to win this thing, I'd put my chip under LN2 and call it a day.

I don't know how RB responds to more cores and threads. But seeing as how a 5.5 GHz 10900K scored 360K with 10c/20t, I'm guessing this doesn't use a lot of multi-threading outside of that one test.... but more than the two cores that boost to 4.8 GHz and few that boost to 4.6.

Hi,
I'll give you credit for going the long way around the barn on that reply lol

 

[lazord00d]

lazord00d - Score 230063

R9 3900X at 4.1GHz@1.220v Manual OC
2x RX590
32GB DDR-3200
512GB Samsung 970 EVo Plus Nvme storage
MSI X470 Gaming Plus mobo

 

[steevebacon]

steevebacon - 263 888

 

[EarthDog]

Hi,
I'll give you credit for going the long way around the barn on that reply lol

Sometimes it needs to be spelled out. It should prevent further misunderstandings.

 

[Rombbb]

Rombbb --- 323.464

Yes, Vcore idle is a bit high, but on heavy load it drops in between 1.35-1.4-ish

And it downclocks when not under load, (printscreen was at idle with Performance Power Plan to prevent downclock to show max core). Plus max V is 1.55 or so for 10900k and I read it are pretty sturdy chips so am not too worried it'll go up in flames.

5.2 All Core, Auto Vcore (x51 +0.095 offset), AVX -1, 1.28 IO, 1.30 SA, Ring Auto
MSI Unify
Team Group DDR4 4300 16-17-17-38
3090 Rog Strix (+40 / +1000)
Fractal S24 Prisma AIO with 5x Industrial Noctua fans (2x140 in , 3x120 out)
HX1000 PSU

Handles all stress tests (Linpack 50 runs, P95 Small 1 hour, Blend 4+ hours, HCI 1000%, Memtest86 8 hours, Aida 4 hours and others), with mostly 3 cores throttling under heavy AVX load but no big deal as in daily life, gaming only, that is never hit.

Check max temp in the screenshot, throttling doing its job nicely

But... today it randomly crashed while watching Youtube ?!

OCing is so time consuming, too many variables ...

 

[Det0x]

Det0x - 398085 points

24/7 settings

Very flimsy benchmark, much run to run difference

 

[Rombbb]

Det0x - 398085 points

24/7 settings
View attachment 180119
Very flimsy benchmark, much run to run difference

Nice one. AMD does look impressive. But heard latency is quite bad, what is you mem latency in Aida64 ? Click Benchmark, then only click the word Memory, it takes like 10 seconds to bench. Mine is 40,4ns. I think it can go lower but didn't manage that with 3600-16-16-39 running at 4300-16-17-17-38. Had to up TRFC which ups latency as well.

Nice one. AMD does look impressive. But heard latency is quite bad, what is you mem latency in Aida64 ? Click Benchmark, then only click the word Memory, it takes like 10 seconds to bench. Mine is 40,5ns. I think it can go lower but didn't manage that with 3600-16-16-39 running at 4300-16-17-17-38. Had to up TRFC which ups latency as well.

 

[Det0x]

Nice one. AMD does look impressive. But heard latency is quite bad, what is you mem latency in Aida64 ? Click Benchmark, then only click the word Memory, it takes like 10 seconds to bench. Mine is 40,4ns. I think it can go lower but didn't manage that with 3600-16-16-39 running at 4300-16-17-17-38. Had to up TRFC which ups latency as well.

Did a memtest 1000% run after which it also passed.. Happy with the results for a dual CCX cpu with 4*8gigs memory sticks.
Is there no gaming benchmark threads on this forum ? (fallout 4/cyberpunk/tombraider/stellaris etc)

 

[ThrashZone]

Det0x - 398085 points

24/7 settings
View attachment 180119
Very flimsy benchmark, much run to run difference

Hi,
Nice took the #1 spot from that mean 10900k system

 

[Rombbb]

Did a memtest 1000% run after which it also passed.. Happy with the results for a dual CCX cpu with 4*8gigs memory sticks.
Is there no gaming benchmark threads on this forum ? (fallout 4/cyberpunk/tombraider/stellaris etc)

Nice, 53ns is much better than I expected. Don't know much about amd but was expecting way worse latency. Well deserved nr 1 !

 

[Nickraz2]

Newbie here with my first ever build, no idea what a good score is to be honest.

 

[Rombbb]

Newbie here with my first ever build, no idea what a good score is to be honest.

Nice !