• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Lenovo's Online Shop Stops Selling Atom-Powered Netbooks

Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
4,785 (2.17/day)
Likes
1,187
Location
Still on the East Side
#1
While it won't confirm an exit from the netbook market, Lenovo has distanced itself from this platform by deciding to stop selling netbooks through its online store. Lenovo's Atom-powered machines can still be found through resellers but the company's website is currently only selling some AMD-based models like the (11.6-inch) IdeaPad S205 and ThinkPad X130e.

Spokesman Ray Gorman revealed that Lenovo's Atom netbooks are "not being replaced in the near future" so it seems Cedar Trail is a no-go for yet another PC maker (Dell also said no to the platform and to netbooks in general).

Show full news post
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2011
Messages
143 (0.06/day)
Likes
23
System Name Fortress8
Processor AMD FX 8320 4.0GHz 4.5GHz Tubo (undervolted)
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Corsair H60
Memory G.Skill 32GB RipjawX @ 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire OC 7870 2GB
Storage 1x OCZ Arc 100,2x WD 3TB Green
Display(s) LG 23" IPS full hd and 2x Acer G22 LCD Monitor
Case Silverstone LC-17 Black | Silverstone FT-03B
Audio Device(s) Stock
Power Supply Silverstone Strider 550W ST55F-G
Mouse shopping around
Keyboard shopping around
Software MS Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
#2
About time the atom-powered netbooks were always horrible to work with. Just leave them in NAS units and low-power file servers.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.65/day)
Likes
510
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
#3
Atom has failed to improve in performance. The Atoms today are only 20-30% faster than those released 3 and a half years ago (released mid 2008). They should be 2-3x faster, not 20-30% faster.

And those silly handicaps that Intel placed on the platform: underperforming chipset with high power consumption, poor graphics, graphics limited in resolution... making their use when attached to secondary external displays very poor, and the relatively high price of the Atom platform. Intel deserves to hurt for product mismanagement.

Intel tried so hard to make sure Atom didnt cannibalize its premium laptop chipsets that it was overzealous in keeping Atom down. It believed there was no competition and that it had a monopoly on netbook x86, and ARM (and tablets) were no threat. How vainglorious.

If Atom has failed, Intel has failed. AMD has a great netbook chipset. ARM has stepped into the low-power market.

Let heads roll!
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
7,642 (2.71/day)
Likes
1,983
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel G4400
Motherboard MSI B150M Bazooka D3
Cooling Stock ( Lapped )
Memory 16 Gb Team Xtreem DDR3
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX460
Storage Seagate 1 TB, 5oo Gb and SSD A-Data 128 Gb
Display(s) LG 19 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case HP dx6120 MT
Audio Device(s) Stock
Power Supply Be Quiet 600 Watt
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
#4
since tablets arise, netbook's market goes smaller so this is maybe a realistic way for lenovo
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
754 (0.18/day)
Likes
136
Location
Australia
System Name max
Processor Ming Mecca
Software Torah
Benchmark Scores 884509627386359275033751967 943067599621731590401694134 434007629683591574337516791 1976157334751953
#5
I can`t say I will miss the atom based lenovo`s
The AMD based Lenovo netbooks are great though..
I have no idea who`s alienware that is.... I most certainly WAS NOT watching movies or sharing files.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
216 (0.07/day)
Likes
19
Processor Xeon E5 1650 V4
Motherboard MSI X99A SLI PLUS
Cooling HYPER 212 EVO
Memory 64gb DDR4 2133
Video Card(s) XFX RADEON RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung PM951 512GB NVMe SSD
Display(s) LG 34" Ultrawide + AOC 27"
Power Supply EVGA 750 Watt
Mouse Logitech M280
Keyboard Dell SK-8135
#6
to me cedar trial looks great on paper, i havent seen the performance numbers, although on the graphics front im sure a c-50 would still win, ill go look for a n2600 review and get back, dual core quad thread has to count for something

edit: looked it up and it barely beats the c-60 in cinebench cpu test, i expected better intel
 
Last edited:

mtosev

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,462 (0.31/day)
Likes
144
Location
Maribor, Slovenia
Processor Core i7 930
Motherboard Asus P6X58D Premium
Memory 6gb SuperTalent WB200UX6G8
Video Card(s) xfx radeon hd 5970 black edition
Storage Intel X25-M 80
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp 2209wa
Case Haf 932
Audio Device(s) Integreted sound card
Software w7
#7
my fathers nettop computer has an atom 330 cpu and it runs windows 7 32bit just okay for him. the atom gets a WHI score of 3.3. atoms are okay for basic stuff. i would freak out if i had to use it for more than light web browsing or watching a video that is more than 720p