M4A89GTD PRO Specs Column 1 0 CPU AMD Socket AM3 ;Phenom™II /Athlon™II /Sempron™ 100 Series Processors 1 Chipset AMD 890GX/SB850 2 System Bus 5200 MT/s HyperTransport™ 3.0 3 Memory 4 x DIMM, Max. 16 GB, DDR3 2000(O.C.)/1333/1066 ECC,Non-ECC,Un-buffered 4 Expansion Slots 2 x PCIe 2.0 x16 support ATI CrossFireX™ technology(@dual x8 speed) 5 VGA Integrated ATI Radeon™ HD 4290 GPU 6 6 xSATA 6.0 Gb/s ports Support RAID 0,1,5,10 7 LAN Realtek® 8111E Gigabit LAN controller featuring AI NET2 8 Audio ALC 892 8-Channel High Definition Audio CODEC 9 IEEE 1394 VIA® 6308P controller supports 2 x 1394a port(s) 10 USB 14 USB 2.0/1.1 ports (8 ports at mid-board, 6 ports at back panel) 11 Form Factor ATX Form Factor 12 inch x 9.6 inch ( 30.5 cm x24.4 cm ) Ok, so today i got the motherboard. It is hot, slick and powerful. The only thing is that it has some stupid things too. Overall it is good. I did only 1 bench as i only had 1 game at all! Just kidding, but with others it was all the same story as with m4n68 so nothing too much to apprechiate. It has the onboard 4290, but that is nothing to apprechiate when you have, even a 9500GT. 9500GT outperformed the integrated card with 1.5x in games like Tomb Raider Legend and 2.5x times with deus ex. I did not do photos, because it had some problems with the print screen on these games, i don't know why. Assasin's creed ran at 25fps with 9500GT and 16fps with 4290. So if you think that 4290 is cool, i don't think so. I even think that my old 7600GS was faster. Since i am waiting for another card, can i use it in pair with 9500GT??? Also, the board i had and this one, are identical in power, don't buy this one if you think it is just more powerful! It is the same. When it comes to 4 rams and double cards, than it is ok. It has 6 more usb places than m4n68. This benchmark is not very detailed, as i only did it for someone who was suspicious i wont buy things in the threads..... Here is a pic: Another one: Another: AnOtHeR: Ugh: Here are the dirt showdown bench m4n68: m4a89gtd pro: On the second test, the car was first, while in the first, the car was positioned 4th. It has to do with the position of the car of course, because it takes more graphic processing to run with 4 cars, instead of a single car. This is why the results are a bit weird. Anyway, the board had the same power.