• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Matrox working on new GPU?

Darksaber

W1zzard's Sidekick
Staff member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
2,642 (0.58/day)
Likes
1,074
Location
Gmunden, Austria
System Name Core i7 Overclocked - Main Workstation
Processor Core i7 940 at 3.66 GHz
Motherboard Asus P6T Deluxe
Cooling Noktua U14P Super Silent
Memory 3x2GB OCZ 1600 MHz CL8
Video Card(s) 2x MSI Cyclone Radeon 6850 1GB in Crossfire - tuned to be silent
Storage G.Skill 240GB Sandforce SSD, 1x 640GB Samsung F1, 2x500GB Samsung Spinpoint, 1.5TB External Samsung
Display(s) Samsung 305T 30" 2560x1600 DVI LCD
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2X PCIe
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 750W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
#1
Here is something for the rumor mill: Seems like Matrox is up to something - maybe a new GPU? Mosaid Memorize, a memory controller development firm, said that Matrox Graphics would incorporate DDR IP (intellectual property) memory interface and controller product “into future Matrox Graphics 90nm professional graphics controllers”. So what does that mean? Is Matrox working on a Vista ready part with at least Shader Model 2.0? Maybe they will go straight for DirectX 10 and Shade Model 4.0. Only time will tell.

Show full news post
 

XeoNoX

New Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
127 (0.03/day)
Likes
0
#2
i dont get it. what makes some of their video cards so expensive in the $500 plus range??
i always thought ATI and NVDIA are better, then why pay that much for a matrox? what makes them so special?
 

DaMulta

My stars went supernova
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
16,159 (3.89/day)
Likes
1,416
Location
Oklahoma T-Town
System Name Work in progress
Processor AMD 955---4Ghz
Motherboard MSi GD70
Cooling OcZ Phase/water
Memory Crucial2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR3 PC3-16000
Video Card(s) CrossfireX 2 X HD 4890 1GB OCed to 1000Mhz
Storage SSD 64GB
Display(s) Envision 24'' 1920x1200
Case Using the desk ATM
Audio Device(s) Sucky onboard for now :(
Power Supply 1000W TruePower Quattro
#3
S3 is comming
 
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
4,677 (1.10/day)
Likes
86
Location
Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
Processor DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME))
Motherboard ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1)
Cooling PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM)
Memory 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz
Video Card(s) BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled
Storage Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive
Display(s) SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color
Case Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans)
Audio Device(s) RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!)
Power Supply Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply
Software Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers)
#4
i dont get it. what makes some of their video cards so expensive in the $500 plus range??
Performance: It's like buying a "high-end" engine for a car more-or-less... you pay for performance, because in both cars & computers, imo @ least? Speed = MONEY!

i always thought ATI and NVDIA are better, then why pay that much for a matrox? what makes them so special?
Matrox was ALWAYS great @ 2d display... imo, ever since the "Millenium I & II" series back circa Windows 3.x - 2000, when I last ran those (around 1992-2000) video cards? They had the BEST 2d display, bar-none!

Now, w/ this? They MAY have an "opportunity" to 'seize the bull by the horns' on VISTA & do great things in the 3d world as well... you never know!

APK

P.S.=> It's not like this company doesn't have "muscle & know-how" for R&D... they do, but they have to tackle 2 giants in the gaming area in NVidia & ATI... apk
 

Ketxxx

Heedless Psychic
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
11,507 (2.67/day)
Likes
562
Location
Kingdom of gods
System Name Prowler. V9.
Processor Intel i5 3570k @ 4.6GHz 1.2v
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme6
Cooling Modded CoolIT ECO ALC, 3x 120mm Coolermaster Sickleflow fans
Memory 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws @ 2133MHz 10-10-10-25 1N (T)
Video Card(s) HD7950 Vapor-X @ 1.25GHz 1.05v, 6GHz 1.5v
Storage WD Caviar Black 640GB, 32MB cache, SATA
Display(s) 22" LG Flatron W2242S
Case NZXT Apollo
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX 7.1 PCI-E
Power Supply Corsair HX850w modular
Software Windows 7 x64
#5
Now, w/ this? They MAY have an "opportunity" to 'seize the bull by the horns' on VISTA & do great things in the 3d world as well... you never know!
For that, they will have to shoot for stellar SM3 performance off the bat, no excuses. otherwise nobody would buy it. i dont seen anything in the slightest wrong with sm2 once everything is set as it should, in fact u cant even see the difference in sm2 vs sm3, but thesedays despite knowing this not even i would buy a card that "only" supports sm2.
 

bruins004

New Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,479 (0.56/day)
Likes
74
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (939)
Motherboard MSI Neo K8n Neo4-F with Nforce 4
Cooling ThermalTake Venus12 + 3 case fans + PCI slot cooler for GPU
Memory 2x 512mb Kingston PC-3200
Video Card(s) XFX GeForce 7800GT
Storage Western Digital 160GB
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2025WM
Case Logisys Dracula Case (Black)
Audio Device(s) Onboard Sound, Logitech X-530 Surround Sound Speakers
Power Supply OCZ PowerStream 520W
Software Window XP Pro, Office Suite, Tons of Games
#6
I wouldnt be suprised to see quite a few DVI outputs on these new video cards either. Matrox cards have always had 2 of them at least.

Also, dont be suprised to see a new DualHead2Go or TripleHead2Go for DVI since I remember reading on their site (sorry dont remember the link) that once DVI became more mainstream they were going to make ones for DVI.

I agree they are a good company, but to compete and give their products a good run, they have to lower their prices. They have always been a lil too expensive.
 

XeoNoX

New Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
127 (0.03/day)
Likes
0
#7
Performance: It's like buying a "high-end" engine for a car more-or-less... you pay for performance, because in both cars & computers, imo @ least? Speed = MONEY!



Matrox was ALWAYS great @ 2d display... imo, ever since the "Millenium I & II" series back circa Windows 3.x - 2000, when I last ran those (around 1992-2000) video cards? They had the BEST 2d display, bar-none!

Now, w/ this? They MAY have an "opportunity" to 'seize the bull by the horns' on VISTA & do great things in the 3d world as well... you never know!

APK

P.S.=> It's not like this company doesn't have "muscle & know-how" for R&D... they do, but they have to tackle 2 giants in the gaming area in NVidia & ATI... apk

I guess people must really like their 2D performance then to pay that huge amount of money, every time a new Millenium Card came out it always seemed inferior to the 3dfx,ATI, and Nvidia cards in 3d performance and the new matrox cards would always be more.

What are they paying that much money for the matrox??..... high speeds in 2d Performance?
come on now.......seemed kinda pointless to me.
 
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
4,677 (1.10/day)
Likes
86
Location
Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
Processor DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME))
Motherboard ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1)
Cooling PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM)
Memory 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz
Video Card(s) BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled
Storage Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive
Display(s) SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color
Case Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans)
Audio Device(s) RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!)
Power Supply Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply
Software Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers)
#8
I guess people must really like their 2D performance then to pay that huge amount of money, every time a new Millenium Card came out
I did back during the Win3.x-Win9x transition MOSTLY... best you had, circa 1991-1997 was "Windows Accelerators" @ best in Win3.x!

So here in Win3.x? It was really the best you could hope for... 2d proficiency.

OpenGL/DirectX 3-6 on 9x/NT was only really taking hold once 3dFx took over in the 3d display realm (1997-2000) typically & available to all, but not really until 9x/2000 init. period around 1997 onwards...

So, from 1992-1997, Matrox helped in 2d, but later 3dFx &/or NVidia did a better job on 3d by far, & decently close on 2d to Matrox, imo @ least.

What are they paying that much money for the matrox??..... high speeds in 2d Performance?
Yes, as I said above: There was a time it was ALL you really had in Windows (3.x mostly)...

come on now.......seemed kinda pointless to me.
Who knows what they're up to now, but the fact is, they had great 2d display in the past, & need to concentrate on 3d... maybe, this is their "challenge" to the ATI/NVidia "hegemony of industry dominance"...

APK
 
Last edited:

XeoNoX

New Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
127 (0.03/day)
Likes
0
#9
well back in those day my trident held up fine, i never really saw a need for speed in 2d. mainley what im getting to is that i rembmer a couple years ago around 1998-200 when they still had high prices for 2D video cards when 3d was already starting to dominate the market. Im surprised really matrox is still around, they better do something soon or they'll end up like 3dfx.

Either way, i hope they come out with something worth while, that will take the video card industry by surprise, i love surprises!
 
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
4,677 (1.10/day)
Likes
86
Location
Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
Processor DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME))
Motherboard ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1)
Cooling PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM)
Memory 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz
Video Card(s) BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled
Storage Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive
Display(s) SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color
Case Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans)
Audio Device(s) RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!)
Power Supply Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply
Software Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers)
#10
well back in those day my trident held up fine, i never really saw a need for speed in 2d.
Oh, I did, because they were w/ out a doubt, faster!

E.G.-> On ISA bus 486 SX/25 machine I had, I ended up updating/upgrading it to a Diamond Stealth 24 ISA "Windows Accelerator" w/ 1mb of RAM on it (up from the 256k SVGA Trident I had (probably same as yours))...

Then, when VLB hit (VESA LOCAL BUS), I updating from the Diamond Stealth 24 ISA to a Diamond SpeedStar 64 (w/ 2mb of WRAM on it) Vesa Local Bus model...

Faster still, & the benchmark I used to use (WinTune 20 (16-bit) - WinTune 97 (32-bit)) bore that out for me, everytime, especially vs. the old Trident 256k ISA card I stepped that system up from!

Fact is/funniest part: I still have & occasionally USE that latter machine...

(An old 486 Dx/4 133mhz CPU, 32mb FastPage 70ns 30-pin RAM, & Dual WD "Caviars" 424mb each in RAID 0 via TekRam VLB 16mb Caching IDE disk controller + VLB Diamond SpeedStar 64 Windows Accelerated Video... running Windows NT 3.51 fully patched!)

mainley what im getting to is that i rembmer a couple years ago around 1998-200 when they still had high prices for 2D video cards when 3d was already starting to dominate the market. Im surprised really matrox is still around, they better do something soon or they'll end up like 3dfx.
I never even looked @ them again, surprisingly enough, after 3dFx came onto the scene: They were my FIRST cards, away from Matrox in fact (when the 3d gaming wave started around 1997)... then, NVidia was my fav., once they bought out 3dFx from 2001-current time!

Either way, i hope they come out with something worth while, that will take the video card industry by surprise, i love surprises!
I agree... change can be GOOD: BUT, it's going to be 'tough sledding' imo, vs. NVidia &/or ATI in the 3d market... but still, I hope they do 'upset the applecart', because it makes the others (big others) try even harder imo!

APK