• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Maximum OC Memory Clock Speed of Several Upcoming ASUS Z690 Leaked

Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
While we wait for Intel's official launch of its Alder Lake platform, more leaks are making their way onto the internet and this time we get a sneak peek at the maximum memory speed at four different motherboards from ASUS. The model names of the boards leaked a couple of weeks ago, which makes this leak slightly more interesting, as we can get the full model names of the board this way, since the leaker was a bit sloppy here.

Two of the boards, the TUF Gaming Z690-Plus D4 and what we presume is the ROG Strix Z690-A Gaming D4, but the Wi-Fi version, as there are no Prime gaming boards, top out at 5,333 MHz. However, this shouldn't come as a surprise, as both boards rely on DDR4 and the highest memory speed is on par with ASUS' current Z590 boards.



Next we have the Prime Z690-A, which seems to be a mid-range non ROG board and it looks like it'll top out at 6,000 MHz. The last model appears to be a board that hasn't leaked as yet, but which we presume is the ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming, as there's a DDR4 version of this board. Here memory speeds are slightly higher at 6,400 MHz, but this still seems fairly low, as there have been leaks of a board from Gigabyte with memory clocks of 8,000 MHz, so either ASUS is playing it conservatively on its lower-end boards, or these are not the final overclockable memory speeds for these boards.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
3,333 (1.06/day)
Location
Right on Shitsown Rd, 8.378 miles to your house
System Name The Little One
Processor i5-8279u
Motherboard AZW Speed S
Cooling Fan w/heat pipes + side & rear vents
Memory 32GB Crucial DDR4-3200 (2x 16GB)
Video Card(s) Iris Plus 655
Storage WD Black SN750 2TB m.2 + WD 2TB external nvme
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" LCD's @1440p
Case Practically identical to a mac mini, just purrtier in slate blue, & with 3x usb ports on the front !
Audio Device(s) Yamaha ATS-1060 Bluetooth Soundbar & Subwoofer
Power Supply 65w brick
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shitzu turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores PDQ - all things considered !
hummm... leaky sneeky peeky squeeky....this really won't be all that interesting UNTIL we see some actual boards being tested & reviewed, then the fun will start, trying to figure out what boards will run what memory at what speeds and how much headroom there is for overclocking, if any at all, AND how many arms, legs, kidneys, beloved pets, and 1st born children all this is gonna cost us :)

a snoozerfester until then......
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
213 (0.05/day)
Location
Denmark
System Name Bongfjaes
Processor AMD 3700x
Motherboard Assus Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill FlareX 3200MT/s CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Adata SX8200 Pro 1TB + Lots of spinning rust
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2268wm
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster AE-5
Power Supply Seasonic TTR-1000
Mouse Pro Intellimouse
Keyboard SteelKeys 6G
those are generally much lower end than the gigabyte tachyon, which should be a 2dimm board on top.
like.. low/mid vs extreme high end for memory oc

best asus for memory should be Apex, but.. didnt see a release for it
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
those are generally much lower end than the gigabyte tachyon, which should be a 2dimm board on top.
like.. low/mid vs extreme high end for memory oc

best asus for memory should be Apex, but.. didnt see a release for it
I guess it could also be because nothing faster than 6400MHz is expected for now, so why bother tuning the UEFI for crazy high speeds.
But yes, I did forget the Tachyon was HiCookie's special design, although at the same time, at every new chipset/CPU launch, we tend to get a list of more or less unattainable memory clock options in the UEFI, which doesn't seem to be the case from Asus this time around.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
272 (0.05/day)
Location
Saigon city
System Name Kurise PC
Processor i7 5820k 4,7ghz / Ryzen 1700x 4ghz / 8700k
Motherboard Asus X99 deluxe / MSI x370 gaming pro carbon / z370i strix
Cooling EK evo, xspc slim 360 rad, D5 pump, dual alpha cool GPU mono block, dual xspc 240 radiator, DDC 18w
Memory Crucial sport white 16gb x 8 128gb 2666mhz/ Crucial sport white 16gb x 4 64gb 2933 / ddr4 chinese 32
Video Card(s) GTX 1080Ti SLI / HP gtx 1080 SLI 1850/1520 / 2080ti ref
Storage Lite on 512GB x 3 / Plextor m2 256gb / samsung 970 evo
Display(s) AOC I2769Vm, AOC U3477PQU, AOC I2769Vm / Koios 40''/ eizo EV2730QFX 1:1
Case Xigmatek Elysium / Corsair 750D / Bitfenix prodigy M
Audio Device(s) creative blaster ZX / Blaster ZXR / Blaster x7 lmt + burson v5i upgraded
Power Supply Be Quiet 1200 / Thermaltake toughpower 1200w / chinese 750w sfx PSU
Mouse Asus Echelon/ steelseries black ops II/ james donkey
Keyboard Cm storm quickfire pro / Fire rose steampunk kb/ corsair k70
Software Windows 10
the price of ddr5 16gb 4800 without heatsink is 200$ and 85$ for 8gb
12900k es currently 4500¥ which is 740$ the mobo cost around 350$ at base model up to 700$+
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Messages
282 (0.46/day)
Location
Greece
It seems rog strix series will also (according to this leak) support DDR5 from the beginning, few days ago they were listed only as DDR4 boards. We shall know soon.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
905 (0.28/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Current gaming rig + others...
Processor Core i7-11700K@5.0GHz all core / R5-2600X@stock / FX-8350@stock
Motherboard MSI Z590 Unify / MSI B450 Gaming pro carbon AC / Asus Sabertooth 990FX R2.0
Cooling Cryorig R1 Ultimate+2xCorsair ML140 / AMD stock cooler / Thermaltake NiC F4
Memory 32GB kit NeoForza@4600 CL19 / Teamgroup 16GB kit @ 2933 / 8GB kit Patriot viper 7 @ 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700 XT Evoke OC edition / Sapphire R9 Nano / 2 x Sapphire HD7870 GHz edition
Storage M.2 NVME - WD 750 black & Corsair MP510 / Lots of SSDs...
Display(s) Samsung 32" Odyssey G5 / Numerous Philips LCD panels...
Case Nanoxia Deep Silence 5 Rev.B / Lots of nice cheap cases!
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar AE 7.1, Razer Tiamat 7.1/ Onboard for the rest of them...
Power Supply Corsair RM750x / Silverstone ST60F-Ti / Silverstone SST-ST55F-G
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS300 + Lots of optical mice!
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Stealth
Software Win10 64bit x 3
Benchmark Scores PCMark10 because its best benchmark ALL of system. https://www.3dmark.com/pcm10b/1336
Interesting, but like what has been commented on before, its only words atm.
Personally, I'm bored with AM4 atm, & are in 2 minds about jumping onto rocket lake or hanging out for alder lake. I have fond memories of early adopters trap with new tech & I really don't wanna have to go there again.
So wait n' see eh?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Interesting, but like what has been commented on before, its only words atm.
Personally, I'm bored with AM4 atm, & are in 2 minds about jumping onto rocket lake or hanging out for alder lake. I have fond memories of early adopters trap with new tech & I really don't wanna have to go there again.
So wait n' see eh?
The trap this time is going to be cost...
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
905 (0.28/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Current gaming rig + others...
Processor Core i7-11700K@5.0GHz all core / R5-2600X@stock / FX-8350@stock
Motherboard MSI Z590 Unify / MSI B450 Gaming pro carbon AC / Asus Sabertooth 990FX R2.0
Cooling Cryorig R1 Ultimate+2xCorsair ML140 / AMD stock cooler / Thermaltake NiC F4
Memory 32GB kit NeoForza@4600 CL19 / Teamgroup 16GB kit @ 2933 / 8GB kit Patriot viper 7 @ 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700 XT Evoke OC edition / Sapphire R9 Nano / 2 x Sapphire HD7870 GHz edition
Storage M.2 NVME - WD 750 black & Corsair MP510 / Lots of SSDs...
Display(s) Samsung 32" Odyssey G5 / Numerous Philips LCD panels...
Case Nanoxia Deep Silence 5 Rev.B / Lots of nice cheap cases!
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar AE 7.1, Razer Tiamat 7.1/ Onboard for the rest of them...
Power Supply Corsair RM750x / Silverstone ST60F-Ti / Silverstone SST-ST55F-G
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS300 + Lots of optical mice!
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Stealth
Software Win10 64bit x 3
Benchmark Scores PCMark10 because its best benchmark ALL of system. https://www.3dmark.com/pcm10b/1336
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
4,106 (3.47/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
DDR5-4800 40-40-40-77 at $$$$ with flaky launch-generation support, numerous patches, BIOS flashes, and rapid obsolescence

or

DDR4-4400 19-19-19-39 which is dirt cheap (e.g.Viper Steel) and close to double the performance in all metrics except raw bandwidth, where it still has over 90%....
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
2,403 (1.97/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon-B Mk. 3
Processor Intel Core i7-11700 @ ASUS Optimized (200 W)
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming B560M-Plus (WiFi)
Cooling be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280 mm
Memory 2x 16 GB Kinston Fury Beast RGB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Black 8 GB @ 200 W
Storage 1 TB Crucial P5, 1 TB Crucial P5 Plus
Display(s) Samsung C24F390, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Corsair Crystal 280X black
Audio Device(s) Genius SP-HF160, AKG Y50
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 550W
Mouse Cherry MW 8 Advanced
Keyboard MagicForce 68
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 multi core: 13,800, single core: 1,500. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 5,250.
I'm sure these DDR5 speeds will be reached with extremely high latencies at first. I'm also sure modules supporting these speeds will be extremely expensive. I think for people running 9-10-11th gen Intel, or Ryzen 3000 or 5000 series, it'll be worth to wait a couple more generations until these speeds are supported as JEDEC standard. Early adopters pay a disproportionately high price, as usual.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
4,106 (3.47/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I'm sure these DDR5 speeds will be reached with extremely high latencies at first. I'm also sure modules supporting these speeds will be extremely expensive. I think for people running 9-10-11th gen Intel, or Ryzen 3000 or 5000 series, it'll be worth to wait a couple more generations until these speeds are supported as JEDEC standard. Early adopters pay a disproportionately high price, as usual.
More of the industry-standard "paying beta testers" mentality.

Intel's last platform launch was a buggy, hurried mess at great expense to early adopters. Intel has deleted the trust they had, and have to re-earn it. I'm sure some fanboys will buy without hesitation anyway, but I think the majority of people have learned that in this two-horse race, Intel aren't as careful and motherboard vendors aren't given anywhere near as much time as they used to get back when Intel was the only real option.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
2,403 (1.97/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon-B Mk. 3
Processor Intel Core i7-11700 @ ASUS Optimized (200 W)
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming B560M-Plus (WiFi)
Cooling be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280 mm
Memory 2x 16 GB Kinston Fury Beast RGB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Black 8 GB @ 200 W
Storage 1 TB Crucial P5, 1 TB Crucial P5 Plus
Display(s) Samsung C24F390, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Corsair Crystal 280X black
Audio Device(s) Genius SP-HF160, AKG Y50
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 550W
Mouse Cherry MW 8 Advanced
Keyboard MagicForce 68
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 multi core: 13,800, single core: 1,500. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 5,250.
More of the industry-standard "paying beta testers" mentality.

Intel's last platform launch was a buggy, hurried mess at great expense to early adopters. Intel has deleted the trust they had, and have to re-earn it. I'm sure some fanboys will buy without hesitation anyway, but I think the majority of people have learned that in this two-horse race, Intel aren't as careful and motherboard vendors aren't given anywhere near as much time as they used to get back when Intel was the only real option.
Well, I have a Core i7-11700 with a B560 motherboard, and I haven't experienced any of the "buggy mess" every media outlet was writing about at launch. I think it all comes down to 1. motherboard choice and quality, and 2. the media writing about every small thing like it was the end of the world just to gain readers/viewers.

It's easy to hate on the latest Intel products without trying them first hand. I've had several Ryzen 3000 and 5000 series CPUs, as well as my 11700 right now, and I'm actually happier with Intel. It is easier to cool in a SFF case with limited airflow, its BIOS options are much clearer and easier to understand, it doesn't need any stupid chipset software to run properly like the Ryzen 3000 series does, and it behaves much better during idle by just adapting to Windows power settings.

Edit: About the "paying beta tester" mentality: I agree that it's at play here, and it's wrong. People tend to advocate choosing a fresh platform with a fresh socket for long-term compatibility. As for me, I tend to go with the last generation of a specific platform to make sure I get something that's well-tested by the public and all issues have been ironed out.
 
Last edited:

Noreng

New Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2020
Messages
14 (0.02/day)
those are generally much lower end than the gigabyte tachyon, which should be a 2dimm board on top.
like.. low/mid vs extreme high end for memory oc

best asus for memory should be Apex, but.. didnt see a release for it
The Tachyon was a single DIMM at extremely loose timings. It's entirely possible that DDR5-7200 or 7533 with proper subtimings will be the limit at launch
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Well, I have a Core i7-11700 with a B560 motherboard, and I haven't experienced any of the "buggy mess" every media outlet was writing about at launch. I think it all comes down to 1. motherboard choice and quality, and 2. the media writing about every small thing like it was the end of the world just to gain readers/viewers.

It's easy to hate on the latest Intel products without trying them first hand. I've had several Ryzen 3000 and 5000 series CPUs, as well as my 11700 right now, and I'm actually happier with Intel. It is easier to cool in a SFF case with limited airflow, its BIOS options are much clearer and easier to understand, it doesn't need any stupid chipset software to run properly like the Ryzen 3000 series does, and it behaves much better during idle by just adapting to Windows power settings.

Edit: About the "paying beta tester" mentality: I agree that it's at play here, and it's wrong. People tend to advocate choosing a fresh platform with a fresh socket for long-term compatibility. As for me, I tend to go with the last generation of a specific platform to make sure I get something that's well-tested by the public and all issues have been ironed out.
I think you forget about one thing, precedence. Intel has always been known as the company that delivered really stable platforms at launch and it's pretty unheard of that Intel launches a really buggy platform. Have there been buggy boards from its partners in the past? Hell yes, there have been some truly horrible boards, but it was never due to Intel.

AMD on the other hand has a history of buggy product launches, some worse than others, so it's less of a surprise when it happens again and again.

What you're saying about the UEFI, well, some of it comes down to the fact that Intel hides a lot of knobs, so you can't turn them, most likely because there's no reason for you to turn them, whereas AMD left every knob and dial user accessible, for better or worse. You do in fact not need to touch most of it imho, so it's not a huge issue. Some of it also comes down to the motherboard vendor, as I can't stand the current mess of a UEFI UI/UX that MSI has created. It's just impossible to navigate and the layout makes zero sense.

As for paying beta testers, it's gotten a lot worse over the past, maybe five years, to the extend that almost every company ships half finished products from a software perspective and in best case it gets fixed six months down the line or so, worst case, never. In fairness to both Intel and AMD here, they do a lot better job than some companies.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
2,403 (1.97/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon-B Mk. 3
Processor Intel Core i7-11700 @ ASUS Optimized (200 W)
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming B560M-Plus (WiFi)
Cooling be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280 mm
Memory 2x 16 GB Kinston Fury Beast RGB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Black 8 GB @ 200 W
Storage 1 TB Crucial P5, 1 TB Crucial P5 Plus
Display(s) Samsung C24F390, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Corsair Crystal 280X black
Audio Device(s) Genius SP-HF160, AKG Y50
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 550W
Mouse Cherry MW 8 Advanced
Keyboard MagicForce 68
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 multi core: 13,800, single core: 1,500. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 5,250.
I think you forget about one thing, precedence. Intel has always been known as the company that delivered really stable platforms at launch and it's pretty unheard of that Intel launches a really buggy platform. Have there been buggy boards from its partners in the past? Hell yes, there have been some truly horrible boards, but it was never due to Intel.
Still, I haven't experienced any of the bugginess everyone was so on about. My experience of 11th gen has been stable as usual. The only new thing for me is when I change some settings in the BIOS and save it, I get a hard restart. If things like this are issues for some people, they shouldn't buy a PC, really.

AMD on the other hand has a history of buggy product launches, some worse than others, so it's less of a surprise when it happens again and again.
It's true that they've improved a lot lately. I remember memory support on Athlon 64 was horrendous, and the way whole motherboards (chipset + VRM) overheated on FX was unheard of. Though I also can't forget the disaster that Pentium 4 was.

What you're saying about the UEFI, well, some of it comes down to the fact that Intel hides a lot of knobs, so you can't turn them, most likely because there's no reason for you to turn them, whereas AMD left every knob and dial user accessible, for better or worse. You do in fact not need to touch most of it imho, so it's not a huge issue. Some of it also comes down to the motherboard vendor, as I can't stand the current mess of a UEFI UI/UX that MSI has created. It's just impossible to navigate and the layout makes zero sense.
My Asus Tuf B560M-Plus doesn't hide any of the knobs. It just sorts the things that 99% of users don't need into menus like "advanced CPU settings" and has them on auto. The Asus Tuf A520M-Plus and B550M-Plus that I've tried on the other hand, have CPU settings in the overclocking menu, advanced menu, and there's things like AMD CBS and whatnot that aren't explained anywhere, and they're mostly just duplicate options that nobody needs to be there. All three BIOSes are stable and fairly logical, but the B560M-Plus wins for me because it doesn't have duplicate options in several different menus.

Also, Intel's power options are simpler and more logical. You also don't have to play with them to suit your cooling (at least on 65 W CPUs), which is a huge plus.

As for paying beta testers, it's gotten a lot worse over the past, maybe five years, to the extend that almost every company ships half finished products from a software perspective and in best case it gets fixed six months down the line or so, worst case, never. In fairness to both Intel and AMD here, they do a lot better job than some companies.
That is unfortunately true. That's why I never adopt a platform too early. You can also find better deals on platforms that are slowly being phased out.
 
Last edited:

Noreng

New Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2020
Messages
14 (0.02/day)
What you're saying about the UEFI, well, some of it comes down to the fact that Intel hides a lot of knobs, so you can't turn them, most likely because there's no reason for you to turn them, whereas AMD left every knob and dial user accessible, for better or worse.

This is just wrong, AMD doesn't expose nearly as many settings to the user as Intel does. However, Intel also allows motherboard manufacturers to tweak and adjust a lot more than AMD.

AGESA locks down a lot with AGESA, the most obvious one being tREFI, but control over stuff like Precision Boost is also very lacking. On Intel you can adjust Turbo Boost up or down, AMD allows you to raise the PBO frequency by 200 MHz (with minimal control over the V/F curve with curve optimizer)
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Asus Tuf B560M-Plus doesn't hide any of the knobs. It just sorts the things that 99% of users don't need into menus like "advanced CPU settings" and has them on auto.
How do you know this when they're hidden from all users? Intel BIOSes and UEFIes have always had features hidden from the end user that we've not been able to access. You may think there are things that aren't hidden, but there are plenty of knobs and dials Intel doesn't want consumers to mess with.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
527 (0.19/day)
Location
Scotland
Processor 5800x
Motherboard b550-e
Cooling full - custom liquid loop
Memory cl14 - 16gb
Video Card(s) 6800xt
Storage nvme 1TB + ssd 750gb
Display(s) S3220DGF
Case h630 - modificated
Power Supply 750W - gold
Software 10
So now we get every day a new post about alder Lake?
Price
Benchmark
Packed
Ram speed
What next?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
This is just wrong, AMD doesn't expose nearly as many settings to the user as Intel does. However, Intel also allows motherboard manufacturers to tweak and adjust a lot more than AMD.
Yes, Intel allows the board makers to change settings that the end users don't have access to, AMD not so much, although board makers can clearly hide further options as we've seen.

AGESA locks down a lot with AGESA, the most obvious one being tREFI, but control over stuff like Precision Boost is also very lacking. On Intel you can adjust Turbo Boost up or down, AMD allows you to raise the PBO frequency by 200 MHz (with minimal control over the V/F curve with curve optimizer)
You sure all this is actually implemented in a way that it could be user accessible? The AGESA isn't exactly a great piece of software from what I understand.

So now we get every day a new post about alder Lake?
Price
Benchmark
Packed
Ram speed
What next?
Didn't bother with all the pictures...
If you're not interested, don't read it, problem solved.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
2,403 (1.97/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon-B Mk. 3
Processor Intel Core i7-11700 @ ASUS Optimized (200 W)
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming B560M-Plus (WiFi)
Cooling be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280 mm
Memory 2x 16 GB Kinston Fury Beast RGB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Black 8 GB @ 200 W
Storage 1 TB Crucial P5, 1 TB Crucial P5 Plus
Display(s) Samsung C24F390, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Corsair Crystal 280X black
Audio Device(s) Genius SP-HF160, AKG Y50
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 550W
Mouse Cherry MW 8 Advanced
Keyboard MagicForce 68
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 multi core: 13,800, single core: 1,500. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 5,250.
How do you know this when they're hidden from all users? Intel BIOSes and UEFIes have always had features hidden from the end user that we've not been able to access. You may think there are things that aren't hidden, but there are plenty of knobs and dials Intel doesn't want consumers to mess with.
Point taken. Let's just say that there's no setting that I miss from my motherboard's BIOS.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Messages
282 (0.46/day)
Location
Greece
@TheLostSwede wrote"...as there have been leaks of a board from Gigabyte with memory clocks of 8,000 MHz, so either ASUS is playing it conservatively on its lower-end boards, or these are not the final overclockable memory speeds for these boards."
BTW those 8000 MT/s are controlled by Gear 2, if I'm not wrong. Gear 2 or 4 and latency are going to be a hot topic until (or even after) launch. Anyway it's very good to already see 6000-6400 RAM speed with more or less the standard timings and 8000 with primary timing 50.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,979 (1.72/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Point taken. Let's just say that there's no setting that I miss from my motherboard's BIOS.
Which is fair enough and I think that applies to most, if not all of us.
 

Noreng

New Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2020
Messages
14 (0.02/day)
@TheLostSwede wrote"...as there have been leaks of a board from Gigabyte with memory clocks of 8,000 MHz, so either ASUS is playing it conservatively on its lower-end boards, or these are not the final overclockable memory speeds for these boards."
BTW those 8000 MT/s are controlled by Gear 2, if I'm not wrong. Gear 2 or 4 and latency are going to be a hot topic until (or even after) launch. Anyway it's very good to already see 6000-6400 RAM speed with more or less the standard timings and 8000 with primary timing 50.
Note that 8000 was achieved with a single DIMM, som it's hardly representative of what we can expect.

I'll be surprised if we can push more than 7500 with 2 DIMMs
 
Top