• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Maxon Sends Legal Threats to PC Enthusiast Websites Hosting Portable Cinebench R20 Downloads

Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
587 (0.16/day)
System Name Fistborkus
Processor R5 1600 3850MHz
Motherboard GA-AX370-GAMING K5
Cooling TPC-612
Memory RipjawsV 3333CL14
Video Card(s) RX 570 4GB 1435/2100
Storage VPN100 NVMe
Display(s) Samsung UE590
Case HAF XB
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z623
Power Supply LEADEX II
Mouse Logi
Keyboard Logi
Software 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores See HWBOT
Well thanks I already snagged the file from you last week, just in time I guess :lovetpu:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,457 (1.25/day)

That doesn't look like "marked as not for resale"
That's product overview web-page.

Maxon R20 EULA said:
The End User is not entitled to rent out, lease, or lend the Software to third parties without MAXON’s permission, especially for purposes directly or indirectly related to any form of compensation. You are also not entitled to process or modify the Software without MAXON’s permission,
If the product was for those distributions platforms and thus modified to circumvent it. It is in violation of the EULA.

Can't really be upset with Maxon. They are protecting their Software. If people go against the EULA and then get called on it, that's on them. You could always ask for permission and see what they tell you.

I do like how the majority of the community responds in kind by advocating Software piracy.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
721 (0.20/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
Yeah... they really need to stop claiming Win 7 Support if they are not going to allow 3rd party downloads like they did with R15.
That or just you know, Ask them for permission to redistribute a windows 7 only edition.
Already have portable edition for testing on windows server...
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,489 (3.22/day)
I do like how the majority of the community responds in kind by advocating Software piracy.
It's not piracy. It's not even unauthorized modification. The files are taken straight from the installed folder and run as-is. The software is freeware. No money is being charged to anyone for use. Unauthorized/unapproved distribution? Ok. One could argue that point. Those are not the same things however.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
2,707 (1.55/day)
Location
On The Highway To Hell \m/
If the product was for the those distributions platforms and thus modified to circumvent it. It is in violation of the EULA.
I'm not saying it's any more, or any less, a violation of the EULA. But it wasn't modified to circumvent it. When you install the software "legitimately" you get a working portable version. It's just a matter of copy and paste. I don't know why W1z went to the trouble of adding the msvcp140.dll. It was totally unnecessary to do so. And inclusion of the Readme, though a helpful addition, was also completely unnecessary.
I do like how the majority of the community responds in kind by advocating Software piracy.
You can't pirate something that's free. Plain and simple.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
19,785 (3.49/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
It was totally unnecessary to do so
Except that people who don't have those VC runtimes installed get an error message and don't know what to do. Usually they start googling and end up on a malware site
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
721 (0.20/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
Heck, post Download EULAs have been ruled non-binding in all but NY... because they were not agreed to when you acquired it (the sale or download marking contract)... but foist on you after. Hence why Nvidia has a Eula ready and available when you download it, click here to view it, if you click download you are agreeing to it...
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,627 (1.09/day)
How about exclude CB from benchmark numbers, maybe that'll persuade Maxon or MS about their approach?
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
269 (0.32/day)
Cinebench is not a good indicator of CPU performance anyways. We've seen that with the 1800x vs 6900k during Ryzen 1st gen launch. 1800x "beats" 6900k in Cinebench, then proceeds to lose in everything outside of it.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,489 (3.22/day)
Except that people who don't have those VC runtimes installed get an error message and don't know what to do. Usually they start googling and end up on a malware site
And this does not constitute modification either. Including required libraries that are freely available anyway is not breaking any rules as long as the files themselves are not changed/altered in any way.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,627 (1.09/day)
Cinebench is not a good indicator of CPU performance anyways. We've seen that with the 1800x vs 6900k during Ryzen 1st gen launch. 1800x "beats" 6900k in Cinebench, then proceeds to lose in everything outside of it.
That's how benchmarks work & not necessarily because they're bad. AMD also smashes Intel in many AES & SHA1 benches, are all of them bad as well?
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,509 (3.03/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
It's not piracy. It's not even unauthorized modification. The files are taken straight from the installed folder and run as-is. The software is freeware. No money is being charged to anyone for use. Unauthorized/unapproved distribution? Ok. One could argue that point. Those are not the same things however.
As the creators of the program, they have every right to control how, where and when their intellectual property is distributed. Just because it is free doesn’t make it ok.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,457 (1.25/day)
It was stated that the origin of the files for the portable where the MS App store.

Microsoft App store Terms of Use said:
Notice Specific to Software Available on this Website
Any software that is made available to download from the Services ("Software") is the copyrighted work of Microsoft and/or its suppliers. Use of the Software is governed by the terms of the end user license agreement, if any, which accompanies or is included with the Software ("License Agreement"). An end user will be unable to install any Software that is accompanied by or includes a License Agreement, unless he or she first agrees to the License Agreement terms. Third party scripts or code, linked to or referenced from this website, are licensed to you by the third parties that own such code, not by Microsoft.
The Software is made available for download solely for use by end users according to the License Agreement. Any reproduction or redistribution of the Software not in accordance with the License Agreement is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible.
WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, COPYING OR REPRODUCTION OF THE SOFTWARE TO ANY OTHER SERVER OR LOCATION FOR FURTHER REPRODUCTION OR REDISTRIBUTION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED, UNLESS SUCH REPRODUCTION OR REDISTRIBUTION IS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED BY THE LICENSE AGREEMENT ACCOMPANYING SUCH SOFTWARE.
Not only are they violating Maxon they are also violating MS ToU
 

OneMoar

There is Always Moar
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,867 (2.24/day)
Location
Rochester area
System Name RPC MK2
Processor Intel Core i5 9600K@ 4.8Ghz 1.32V
Motherboard Asrock z390 phantom gaming 4
Cooling Enermax ets-t50
Memory CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 16GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC ULTRA GAMING
Storage 512GB Intel 545s ssd 500GB ADATA SU800 ssd 1TB WD blue
Display(s) Cheap VA panel
Case Phanteks P300
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply HX 750i
Mouse M65 Pro RGB
Keyboard K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 +startisback
technically extracting a appx file is not modification of ANY software thats a Microsoft provided package not a piece of executable code
legally they probably have shakey ground at best here,

either way they have just shot them selves in the foot and drank a gallon of bleach
they are done nobody will use there software ever again, you don't threaten the press and you don't piss off your user base they have managed todo both in one fell swoop
RIP maxon

GUIDE: How to make your own portable version of Cinebench R20
  1. Download the MAXONComputerGmbH.Cinebench_20.0.4.0_x64__rsne5bsk8s7tj.appx as described in post #44 of this thread.(Thanks @OneMoar :))
  2. Use the .appx to install the app(left click on it and select Install).
  3. Go to C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\MAXONComputerGmbH.Cinebench_20.0.4.0_x64__rsne5bsk8s7tj and copy the bin folder.
  4. Paste the bin folder wherever you want to keep your portable version(needs to be saved somewhere else if you're going to uninstall the app afterwards, which will delete it).
  5. OPTIONAL: Rename the bin folder to whatever you want and uninstall Cinebench R20 via Settings > Apps > Apps & features.
For some reason you need to install it with the .appx to get a working portable version. It doesn't work as portable if you extract the bin folder from the .appx. You need to get the bin folder after installing it(as I described above). But, temporarily installing it is a reasonable compromise IMO. Until someone figures out what gets changed in the bin folder during install. I couldn't find anything with a quick look see.

EDIT: Same basic process applies if you install it from the Microsoft Store.
they added encryption to the appx manifest
problem is nobody at maxon seems to understand that once you install it its decrypted. encryption is for deploying a UWP app which this is not :roll:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,489 (3.22/day)
As the creators of the program, they have every right to control how, where and when their intellectual property is distributed. Just because it is free doesn’t make it ok.
That's still not piracy though.

either way they have just shot them selves in the foot and drank a gallon of bleach
they are done nobody will use there software ever again, you don't threaten the press and you don't piss off your user base they have managed todo both in one fell swoop
RIP maxon
While that's a bit extreme, it seems clear that they have done themselves needless damage. While they have the right, why was it needed? There is very little logic to this other than a Microsoft collusion to migrate people to the Windows Store, which many dislike.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
33 (0.05/day)
If the EULA does not contain any language that you violate by distribution then can they do anything?
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,740 (2.21/day)
What a sad day. Here we have a "PC enthusiast" community that doesn't respect the work of software developers.
Guys, why do you hate computers so much? :)

It doesn't matter if you call it piracy or not. It doesn't matter if it's free or not.
Someone made a program you like. They don't ask for money, or fame, or organs, or even a funky badge on a forum.
They simply asked you to take it from an official download location and not to modify the files. Is that really so difficult to accept?

More importantly, half of this discussion is not even about Cinebench, but about lack of understanding how software copyright works. Which is pretty bizarre considering what this community is about.

Furthermore, in case you haven't noticed (and I can see that's true), they have similar rules on their site. So you weren't allowed to modify or share the files you got from www.maxon.net as well.

And just a short notice for all the people that foresee an end of Maxon.
Maxon is a large and respected provider of 3D tools. Cinebench is not their product. It's just a small package containing their rendering engine, a simple model and a script for running the test. It wasn't designed with gamers in mind and it will still serve it's purpose if all the gamers decide to leave.
 

devjunkie

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
7 (0.03/day)
I am not a huge fan of the store version either but it's their right to publish it where they want to and you don't know why they did that. But someone who puts together such a software has their reason why. Computer games are often first released on one platform and later for a broader audience. Ever thought of that?

They simply asked you to take it from an official download location and not to modify the files.
well said! Even if they were not modified, they want to give their users a save certified download.

disclaimer: i am a dev myself and work in the hardware industry
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,489 (3.22/day)
What a sad day. Here we have a "PC enthusiast" community that doesn't respect the work of software developers.
The discord being expressed isn't about respect. It's a free benchmark utility and the websites in question were providing a portable version.
Guys, why do you hate computers so much? :)
We don't. We find short-sighted, illogical, nitwited actions like the one Maxon made here irritating as hell.
They simply asked you to take it from an official download location and not to modify the files. Is that really so difficult to accept?
First, no one modified the files, they were extracted as-is. Second, the download location requires users to (1) have Windows 8, 8.1 or 10, (2) setup Microsoft account and (3) use the Windows store. Think about that in the context of benchmarking.
Cinebench is not their product. It's just a small package containing their rendering engine, a simple model and a script for running the test.
Which makes this move seem even more asinine and illogical.
I am not a huge fan of the store version either but it's their right to publish it where they want to and you don't know why they did that. But someone who puts together such a software has their reason.
To which we can say "No Thank You" and give them the two fingered salute. They will lose exposure which will likely result in lost revenue. This was a boneheaded move regardless of reason.
 

devjunkie

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
7 (0.03/day)
To which we can say "No Thank You
I agree! Then you should say that you would like to have a non-store version. My only point is, I understand why a company still wants to keep control over where and how their (certified) software is available.

disclaimer: i am a dev myself and work in the hardware industry
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,509 (3.03/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
Why should we need to when a portable version has been available for previous versions? It's a bonehead move, plain and simple.
It doesn’t matter. You have no “right” to the software. It is theirs to say how they want it distributed, no matter how shortsighted that decision may be, noticed yours. I honestly thought you were not from the generation that feels like everything is owed to them. Please prove me right. This is about respect for other people’s property and wishes.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
62 (0.09/day)
I wonder why the people defending Maxon here are forgetting that previous versions of Cinebench have always been available for download on TPU and Guru3D. What is the actual reason for the change? You people act like Maxon is doing you a favor by making Cinebench, there are plenty of alternatives to choose from.
 

devjunkie

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
7 (0.03/day)
Why should we need to when a portable version has been available for previous versions? It's a bonehead move, plain and simple.
So they see and get their users feedback. As you said, a previous version was portable, but not this one. Maybe they have an exclusive contract, we all don't know. And if they went this way, it's their right. That's how software license agreements work
 
Top