• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Microsoft Rumored To Release Budget Xbox Series S Console

Uskompuf

Staff member
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
246 (2.51/day)
In a recent report by the Verge, Microsoft is reportedly planning a budget console to go along with the Xbox Series X known as the Xbox Series S. The Xbox Series S will be a successor to the popular Xbox One S, codenamed Lockhart it's set to feature the key next-generation improvements found in the Xbox Series X and provide them at a lower price point.

Sources say that the Xbox Series S will target 1080p 60FPS and 1440p 6̶0̶F̶P̶S̶ 30FPS gaming performance, this will be achieved with roughly 1/3rd of the GPU power at 4 TeraFLOPs, and 10 GB of GDDR6 RAM. The Xbox Series S console is rumored to share the same 7 nm AMD Zen 2 SoC a̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶l̶o̶w̶e̶r̶ ̶c̶l̶o̶c̶k̶ and the same ultra-fast PCIe 4.0 SSD. The console may not feature a disc drive like the Xbox One S All Digital Edition. Microsoft is yet to publicly say anything about the console, so take these rumors with a grain of salt.

Update Jun 30th: Sources tell Eurogamer that Microsoft is planning to unveil the console at an event in August.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,604 (4.13/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i5-9600KF
Motherboard NZXT N7 Z370 Black
Cooling Cooler Master 240 RGB AIO / Stock
Memory Thermaltake Toughram 16GB 4400MHz DDR4 or Gigabyte 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 or Adata 8GB 2133Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus Dual 1060 6GB
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
If it's all digital it won't need a disc drive, suckers will be stuck playing online content only unless there's a drive large enough to store all their games.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,158 (0.39/day)
System Name desktop
Processor i7-4770k
Motherboard Asus z87-plus
Cooling Corsair h80
Memory 32gb G.Skill Ares @ 2400mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC (ACX 3.0)
Storage 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster x-FI Platium, Turtle beach Elite pro 2 + superamp.
Power Supply OCZ Z Series 850W (10 years strong)
Mouse Logitech G502 hero
Keyboard Logitech G710+
So lower cost console is only 4 tflops gpu when the one x is a 6. So if current top end console of xbox can't do 60 fps what makes them thing a weaker one is gonna do it?
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
1,399 (2.80/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 3200 CL16 @ 3466 CL 14
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 6GB SSC
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) BenQ BL2411PT
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 300
Keyboard MK Typist (Kailh Box White)
So lower cost console is only 4 tflops gpu when the one x is a 6. So if current top end console of xbox can't do 60 fps what makes them thing a weaker one is gonna do it?
Maybe because it will be aiming for 1080p60 and not 4k.

Edit.
This mentions 1440p 60, riiight...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,025 (6.60/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 C19 Viper
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
1440/60 with 4tflops yeah good luck with that
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
64 (0.12/day)
If they keep the same CPU dialing down the resolution and graphics could achieve similar experience at 60fps.
It's a good idea, and gives people a cheap way for next gen without sacrificing a lot.
Hopefully they offer it with and without disk, it doesn't cost a lot anyway.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
835 (0.21/day)
System Name Desktop | Laptop
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i7 7700HQ
Motherboard X570 Phantom Gaming 4 | Neptune KLS HM175
Cooling Corsair H100x | Twin fan, fin stack & heat pipes
Memory 32GB G.Skill F4-3600C16-8GVK @ 3200MHz / 14-14-14-34-1T | 16GB DDR4 @ 2400MHz / 17-17-17-39-2T
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Ti EX | GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Storage ADATA SX8200 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB + ADATA GAMMIX S10 256GB | 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) 28" Asus PB287Q 3840x2160p | 17" IPS 1920x1080P
Case Thermaltake Urban S41 | Aspire V Nitro BE
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 750W | 150W
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma | Logitech MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
So lower cost console is only 4 tflops gpu when the one x is a 6. So if current top end console of xbox can't do 60 fps what makes them thing a weaker one is gonna do it?
While developers do a good job at masking it, I believe the old Jaguar architecture is a fairly substantial bottleneck. So, even if the Xbox Series S takes a 2TF hit, it may perform very similar to a One X. Having said that, I still think it is strange to target only 4TF. Being only 1/3 of the Series X creates quite a rift in performance. Targeting One X's 6TF or going for 8TF would make a lot more sense.
 
Joined
May 27, 2019
Messages
61 (0.15/day)
Location
Greece
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
463 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling cooler master masterliquid 240
Memory Gskill Aegis 2x 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) zotac amp GTX 1660 super
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /Samsung 960 evo 256 Gb/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG 25UM58
Case Ncase M1
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply bequiet SFX L power 500w
Mouse Logitech M590
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 10 pro
Maybe because it will be aiming for 1080p60 and not 4k.

Edit.
This mentions 1440p 60, riiight...
As usual that 1440p might be game depended. some games like dmc5 don't need much to reach 60 fps in 1440p.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
502 (0.41/day)
So lower cost console is only 4 tflops gpu when the one x is a 6. So if current top end console of xbox can't do 60 fps what makes them thing a weaker one is gonna do it?
1. Vega 64 is nearly 13 TFLOPS, RX 5700 is "only" 8 TFLOPS. Yet the latter is faster by ~5%.
2. According to the reference models, out of the whole Turing family (including the 16XX cards), the 2080Ti has the lowest boost clocks (and the 2080 Super has higher memory transfer rate than the 2080Ti) yet is the fastest card of the lineup.

1 datum doesn't mean anything in itself.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
Yes, we are talking about RDNA1 vs RDNA2 which may end up faster, but this is just lowend GPU performance, even RX 5500 XT has more TFlops than this and even memory is noticeably smaller. I don't think It's worth It to save some money to get this than It's stronger brother, when you can play on It for a couple years to come.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
414 (0.15/day)
System Name Potato PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar MAX
Cooling All stocks
Memory 16GB Team Delta RGB DDR4 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT Mech OC + AMD Radeon Pro W5100
Storage Samsung 850 Evo 500GB + 10TB Toshiba
Display(s) Viewsonic XG3240C
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) SMSL SD-793II + ATH M20X || Optical to heavily modded Logitech z5500
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Mouse Logitech G304
Keyboard Logitech G613
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
M$ caught in pants down when Sony got two version at launch :D
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
1. Vega 64 is nearly 13 TFLOPS, RX 5700 is "only" 8 TFLOPS. Yet the latter is faster by ~5%.
2. According to the reference models, out of the whole Turing family (including the 16XX cards), the 2080Ti has the lowest boost clocks (and the 2080 Super has higher memory transfer rate than the 2080Ti) yet is the fastest card of the lineup.
1. RDNA1 is 40% faster than Polaris with the same clocks and specs, so this 4TFlops RDNA2 GPU has comparable performance to Xbox One X.
2. 2080Ti is faster than 2080 Super, because It has the highest processing power(TFLOPs) and highest bandwidth(GB/s) of all Turing GPUs and this doesn't depend only on clockspeed and memory transfer rate, that's just part of It.
 
Joined
May 27, 2019
Messages
61 (0.15/day)
Location
Greece
M$ caught in pants down when Sony got two version at launch :D
there are rumors about the small exbox since last year, it's the other way around most likely:roll:

1. RDNA1 is 40% faster than Polaris with the same clocks and specs, so this 4TFlops RDNA2 GPU has comparable performance to Xbox One X.
2. 2080Ti is faster than 2080 Super, because It has the highest processing power(TFLOPs) and highest bandwidth(GB/s) of all Turing GPUs and this doesn't depend only on clockspeed and memory transfer rate, that's just part of It.
so the small xbox will have graphics equal to x1x, more powerful cpu, better ram and disk, lower power usage and ray tracing (I assume). and it's targetting 1080p players who want to experience all that without paying for 4k . it does make sense. also polaris-to-rdna comparison could probably be quite different than rdna-to-rdna2 so the small xbox might as well be better in graphics than x1x
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Messages
30 (0.05/day)
1440/60 with 4tflops yeah good luck with that
Most ACTUAL sources say 1080/60 1440/30 which is what I would expect. The 60 fps games on Xbox series x will be 1080p and the 30 fps games may bump up to 1440p or possibly stay at 1080p if the game is REALLY demanding (or poorly optimized).

there are rumors about the small exbox since last year, it's the other way around most likely:roll:


so the small xbox will have graphics equal to x1x, more powerful cpu, better ram and disk, lower power usage and ray tracing (I assume). and it's targetting 1080p players who want to experience all that without paying for 4k . it does make sense. also polaris-to-rdna comparison could probably be quite different than rdna-to-rdna2 so the small xbox might as well be better in graphics than x1x
Right GCN tflops are weaker than RDNA2 tflops. It's another reason tflops comparisons are in useful within the same architecture.

The 4tflops of series S should about equal the 6tflops of the one X.

They key differences are -

1. The new series S will have the series X's exact same cpu which is miles ahead of the one in the Xbox one x (and was its weakest part holding the entire console back even though they had enough gpu power)

2. Where the Xbox one x and its 6tflops were always shooting for 4k, the series S will use what is effectively the same gpu power and that much more powerful cpu to truly deliver the same experiences as the series x (just at a PURPOSEFULLY lower resolution of 1080 for 60fps games and possibly 1440 for the ones set to run at 30 fps on the series X).


It makes total sense and because the cpu is the EXACT same it will in no way hold back games as the difference in gpu power required to do 1080p to 4k is 4x less. For games that are stuck at 30 fps on the series X drop to a 1440p bump is still possible and within that 3x lower processing power. Again some games may still need to go 1080p (or something in between via VRS and DRS).

Thanks, updated.
You didn't update the 1440p/30 fps part you left it quoting 1440p/60 and why many are questioning the article still.

While developers do a good job at masking it, I believe the old Jaguar architecture is a fairly substantial bottleneck. So, even if the Xbox Series S takes a 2TF hit, it may perform very similar to a One X. Having said that, I still think it is strange to target only 4TF. Being only 1/3 of the Series X creates quite a rift in performance. Targeting One X's 6TF or going for 8TF would make a lot more sense.
You do know 4k requires roughly 4x the GPU power vs 1080p and 1440(at 30 fps) is within the 3x less power (4/12) that differentiates them.

By keeping the exact same everything else (with reduced memory again because that'd directly tied to resolution) they can offer. Slower cost lower resolution version without compromising the experience of series x owners.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,604 (4.13/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i5-9600KF
Motherboard NZXT N7 Z370 Black
Cooling Cooler Master 240 RGB AIO / Stock
Memory Thermaltake Toughram 16GB 4400MHz DDR4 or Gigabyte 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 or Adata 8GB 2133Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus Dual 1060 6GB
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,143 (4.03/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
This is a horrible idea and it will cripple game development across all platforms. Developers will be forced to adhere to the CPU/RAM limits of the weaker consoles, meaning the games will be as complex as the weaker consoles allows. The GPU situation can be dealt with easily but having a lower clocked CPU with less cores potentially and less RAM will ruin progress with this generation.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
so the small xbox will have graphics equal to x1x, more powerful cpu, better ram and disk, lower power usage and ray tracing (I assume). and it's targetting 1080p players who want to experience all that without paying for 4k . it does make sense. also polaris-to-rdna comparison could probably be quite different than rdna-to-rdna2 so the small xbox might as well be better in graphics than x1x
4TFlops * 1.4 = 5.6TFlops
I used 50% for Polaris vs RDNA2.
If It's meant just for 1080p players, then the potential buyers are mainly with older TV, because I hardly can believe many people would buy a new TV with only FullHD resolution when the price difference is not very big.
 
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
60 (1.54/day)
System Name Main PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard ASUS X570 Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
Cooling EKWB X570 VIII Hero Monoblock, Corsair HYDRO X 2080 Ti block & XD5 pump/res, Heatkiller IV SB block
Memory 2x 2x16GB 3200-14-14-14-34 G.Skill Trident RGB (OC: 3600-14-14-14-28)
Video Card(s) PNY GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC
Storage Corsair Force LE SSD 500GB, Fusion IoDrive 2 1TB, Huawei HSSD 2TB
Display(s) 1x Dell U2913WM 2560x1080 75Hz, 1x BENQ XL2411Z 1920x1080 100Hz, 1x Acer XB1 xb271hu 2560x1440 144Hz
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser HD599, Blue Yeti
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB MK2
Software Windows 10 Pro 2004
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R20: 5086 MC, 498 SC CPU-Z 17.01.64: 5788.9 MC 521.5 SC
This is a horrible idea and it will cripple game development across all platforms. Developers will be forced to adhere to the CPU/RAM limits of the weaker consoles, meaning the games will be as complex as the weaker consoles allows. The GPU situation can be dealt with easily but having a lower clocked CPU with less cores potentially and less RAM will ruin progress with this generation.
It uses the same CPU...
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,143 (4.03/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
If the difference in price will be only $100, then the stronger one is a better one in my opinion. It's more futureproof with much stronger GPU and more RAM.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,509 (2.16/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Even if so it will have less memory.
But these consoles allocate memory dynamically between the CPU and GPU, and the high end concoles will use a lot as VRAM due to their high resolutions. Running at 1080p or 1440p with lower texture quality will easily overcome this, and won't affect development for the higher end consoles whatsoever.

If the difference in price will be only $100, then the stronger one is a better one in my opinion. It's more futureproof with much stronger GPU and more RAM.
There's no way the price difference will be only $100 with a GPU ⅓ the performance and less memory. If this is true it is clearly a value play, likely aiming for $300 or possibly even less.
 
Top