• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Microsoft's new picture format gaining momentum

Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
9,066 (2.09/day)
Likes
287
Location
My house.
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane @ 2.8GHz (224x12.5, 1.425V)
Motherboard Gigabyte sumthin-or-another, it's got an nForce 430
Cooling Dual 120mm case fans front/rear, Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro, Zalman VF-900 on GPU
Memory 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800
Video Card(s) Sapphire X850XT @ 580/600
Storage WD 160 GB SATA hard drive.
Display(s) Hanns G 19" widescreen, 5ms response time, 1440x900
Case Thermaltake Soprano (black with side window).
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Live! 24 bit (paired with X-530 speakers).
Power Supply ThermalTake 430W TR2
Software XP Home SP2, can't wait for Vista SP1.
#1
Microsoft, back in May, began promoting it's new "Windows Media Photo" standard, which has been since renamed HD Photo. Microsoft is very clear with it's ambitions: They want to replace JPEG as the primary format for pictures. While some would argue that overtaking JPEG as the most popular picture format is a bit overzealous, Microsoft has two figurative ace-in-the-hole's. The first is that Microsoft will be shipping it with Windows Vista. That means that people who use Windows Vista will be able to see HD Photo, regardless of the photo viewer. This isn't exactly the kind of thing you need to switch people to a picture format. So Adobe systems will patch Photoshop CS3 after it is released to support HD Photo. This will allow users to save their pictures in HD Photo. CNET editors call these methods "pervasive", but they could very well be effective. The picture below shows what the difference is between JPEG and HD Photo when talking about compression. The less color in the picture, the less distortion there is, so ideally a perfect compression would be pitch black.


Show full news post
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,069 (3.44/day)
Likes
17,977
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#2
mmm photoshop cs3
 

RickyG512

New Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2005
Messages
477 (0.11/day)
Likes
0
Location
Croydon, England
Processor E6600 @ 3.4ghz 60 degree load stock HSF 1.5v
Motherboard P5B vanilla 0806
Cooling All stock
Memory 2x 1GB geil @ DDR-2 850 4-5-5-12(7100 sis mem bench)
Video Card(s) Powercolour X1900XT 512MB 681/792
Storage c:250gb 16mb 7k2 d:320gb 16mb 7k2 both WD and Sata-II
Display(s) Acer 19" 8ms widescreen 1440x900
Case Thermaltake skull
Audio Device(s) X-Fi eXtreme music
Power Supply Enermax 620 liberty
Software xp pro sp2
#3
wat is jpeg-2000 in dat pic
 

pt

not a suicide-bomber
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,956 (2.08/day)
Likes
167
Location
Portugal
Processor AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 (Trinidad)
Motherboard ASUS F3Ka (ATI RS690M)
Cooling stock
Memory Nanya 2x1GB ddr2 667@5-5-5-15-2T
Video Card(s) ATI Mobility Radeon HD2600 512MB DDR2@ 580mhz/486mhz
Storage 160GB on laptop+250GB external
Display(s) ASUS 15.4
Case Asus Laptop F3Ka chassis
Audio Device(s) on-board
Power Supply 1:30minutes battery
Software "genui xp", 'cause i hated vista
#4

Benpi

New Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
415 (0.10/day)
Likes
3
Processor AMD X2 4400+
Memory 2G
Video Card(s) 7950 GX2
Storage 2x 74g 10000rpm Raid:0
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 widescreen
Software 3dmark06 score: 7650
#5
Just as long as it's compatible, I'm all for WMPhoto. The more efficient the better. I just hope that you can adjust Alpha in WMPhoto for web pages - if you can, it would be the future of Web images.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
6,885 (1.49/day)
Likes
1,501
System Name MY PC
Processor E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard Maximus Formula
Cooling D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card(s) HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Storage 2
Display(s) 24"
Case P180
Audio Device(s) X-fi Plantinum
Power Supply Silencer 750
Software XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmark Scores This varies from one driver to another.
#6
How long has this war been going on?
I thought I read something about changing jpeg back in 2001/2002?
 

Jannu

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
41 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
Location
Tallinn, Estonia
System Name Lenovo T61p
Processor Intel T7300 2GHz
Memory 2x2GB DDR2 SODIMM Kingston
Video Card(s) nVidia Quadro FX570M 128MB
Storage 100GB 7200rpm HDD
Display(s) 14.1" 1400x1050 SXGA
Software Vista Business x64
#7
How long has this war been going on?
I thought I read something about changing jpeg back in 2001/2002?
Well they have been developing it for 10 FRIGGIN YEARS!!
 

evil bill

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
369 (0.08/day)
Likes
14
Location
Scotland
System Name Main Rig | Second Rig
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Wolfdale E8200 @ 3.2Ghz | Pentium 4 530J 3.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P5KC @ 1,600Mhz FSB | Asus P5P800
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
Memory OCZ 4GB DDR2-800 (2x2GB) 5-4-4-15 | Corsair 1GB XMS DDR-400 (2 x 512MB)
Video Card(s) MSI NX8800GT 512MB Pre-OCd @ 660/950 | Powercolor X850 Pro 256MB AGP
Storage 500GB WD Caviar SATA300 | Hitachi Deckstar 80GB SATA
Display(s) LG 22" W2252TQ
Case Antec 900 | ATX Window case
Audio Device(s) Onboard High Definition Audio | Soundblaster Audigy SE
Power Supply Hiper 730W HPU-5M730-SE | Tagan 480W
Software Vista 64-bit SP1 | Windows 7 32-bit RC1
#8

xman2007

New Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
633 (0.15/day)
Likes
4
Processor E4300@ 3.0ghz
Motherboard Asus P5B
Cooling Arctic freezer
Memory 2gb supertalent ddrII 1000 5.5.5.15
Video Card(s) Inno 3d 8800gts 320mb
Storage Seagate 320gb
Display(s) 19" widescreen tft 5ms
Case Antec 900
Audio Device(s) X-fi Xtreme Audio
Power Supply Hiper 430w 30a dual rails
Software Vista Ultimate
#9
well if its better than jpeg why not show us the real jpeg and hd photo side by side instead of the physcadelic negatives, how can you say "oooooo thats better ?" because Micro$hit says the less colour the better, that could be the case but still not make a difference to the naked eye. wheres the real life comparison ?

micr0$ux :p
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,069 (3.44/day)
Likes
17,977
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#10
even if its a superiour format its success depends on widespread clients for it .. which means _all_ web browsers (including open source) have to support it

there have to be a wide range of authoring programs for it, not only cs3

and last the license has to be free, this almost killed gif several years back
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
5,196 (1.14/day)
Likes
296
Location
Kansas City, KS
System Name Dell XPS 15 9560
Processor I7-7700HQ
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1050/1080 Ti
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal
Case Razer Core
Audio Device(s) Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650
Mouse Logitech Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G910
#11
even if its a superiour format its success depends on widespread clients for it .. which means _all_ web browsers (including open source) have to support it

there have to be a wide range of authoring programs for it, not only cs3

and last the license has to be free, this almost killed gif several years back
Exactly.

Unless its simple/easy to get/access, universally usable (cough wmv? cough), it wont get far..
 

Nothgrin

New Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
145 (0.04/day)
Likes
5
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 C1 @ 3.83GHz
Motherboard Asus P5E64 WS Evolution 0802
Cooling Sunbeamtech CR-CCTF Core Contact Freezer 120MM + 400W TEC
Memory Corsair Dominator DDR3 1800(PC3 14400) 4GB
Video Card(s) BFG NVidia GTX 260 (216 SP)
Storage Seagate Cheetah 15K.5 SAS 300GB (x2) 15K.6 SAS 300GB (x1) + Adaptec 2405 SAS RAID Controller
Display(s) LG 24" W2452T + LG 23" W2353V
Case Thermaltake Armor VA8003BWS Black
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs X-Fi Professional Titanium
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 700W + 2x 400W 12V Meanwell Power Supplys
#12
The question is how are the file sizes affected by HD Photo. We all know the difference between HD DVD and DVD is huge so how will that affect the file sizes of a simple image? Will it be less than Bitmap which has no compression? or will it add in an Alpha value like Targas which make them even bigger?
 

XooM

New Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
468 (0.10/day)
Likes
7
Location
Close to FrozenCPU.com
Processor Athlon 64 3800 x2 Windosr @ 2.65 (and rising)
Motherboard BIOSTAR TForce 550
Cooling Custom Liquid (WMD20RLZT, Swiftech STORM, 2-302 w/ custom shroud, 2x sanyo denki)
Memory Patriot PDC22G5300LLK
Video Card(s) Sapphire x1900GT
Storage 1x maxtor 40gb, 2x hitachi T7K250 160gb drives RAID 0, 1x 160gb Spinpoint
Display(s) 2x 17" CRT (dells; one from 1998, one from 2001) at 1600x1200 each
Case Aspire X-SuperAlien
Audio Device(s) integrated
Power Supply Seasonic S12 600watt
Software WinXP SP2, Folding@Home, Battlefield2, etc
#14
because obviously jpeg's pervasiveness is all about its format superiority; other formats, like png, are clearly inferior.

GLHF MSFT.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,809 (2.59/day)
Likes
529
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Boddha Getta Boddha Getta Bah!
Processor AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.382
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory 2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 6870 980/1100
Storage WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Display(s) Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case NZXT White Switch 810
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 5.1
Power Supply NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Profession 64 Bit
#15
they are just out to rule the world I believe. I want great quality photos in lossless compression and small sizes
 

prime95

New Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
166 (0.04/day)
Likes
0
Processor Athlon 64 x2 AM2 4200+ @ 2.6ghz
Motherboard ECS KA3 MVP
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x 1GB Patriot 4-4-4-10 776mhz
Video Card(s) X1950XT 256MB Sapphire
Storage 250gb SATA 3gbs
Display(s) AG Neovo 19in Widescreen
Case Gigabyte Poseidon
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum
Power Supply Sparkle 550w
Software XP Professional SP2
#16
or higher data transfer speeds, huge a$$ photo sizes, and larger data capacity!
 

ex_reven

New Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
5,217 (1.27/day)
Likes
159
#17
they are just out to rule the world I believe. I want great quality photos in lossless compression and small sizes
i seriously doubt you can have either two of those together
they might be able to make the compression more efficient
but as size decreases, quality will ALWAYS go down track in some way shape or form

or higher data transfer speeds, huge a$$ photo sizes, and larger data capacity!
Seems a like a much better albeit more expensive option. But if the technology was developed and advertised to the wider population, it could be cost effective. Especially since people can usually make use of these advantages (faster connections, faster file access) in other ways that just their photo quality.
 

Nyte

New Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
181 (0.04/day)
Likes
34
Location
Toronto ON
Processor i7 x980
Motherboard Asus SuperComputer
Memory 3x 2GB Triple Channel
Video Card(s) 2x Tahiti
Storage 2x OCZ SSD
Display(s) 23 inch
Power Supply 1 kW
Software Win 7 Ultimate
Benchmark Scores Very high!
#18
As a person who has worked with Jpeg2000 decoding/encoding as well as reading IEEE publications on HD photo, I can safely say that Microsoft has done their research.

Although, I feel a bit bad for the JPEG committee... they spent a long time on Jpeg2000 (it's not a bad algorithm mind you, but HD photo is alot better).


The only downside to HD photo is that the quantization factor is specified directly by manufacturer, not by the user whereas in Jpeg2000 (and even Jpeg), you can control the quantization factor.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
2,549 (0.64/day)
Likes
344
Location
Illinois
Processor i7 2600k@4.6ghz
Motherboard MSI z68ma-ed55
Cooling Silentx Extreem 120mm
Memory 2x4gb XMS 7-8-7-20 1600
Video Card(s) HD6870
Storage 2x128gb Kingston Hyper-X (Raid0), 2x750gb RE3 (RAID1), 2x750gb RE3 (RAID1)
Display(s) Soyo 24", Gateway 22"
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini 6x120mm fans.
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Zalman 750w
Software Windows 7
#20
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
9,066 (2.09/day)
Likes
287
Location
My house.
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane @ 2.8GHz (224x12.5, 1.425V)
Motherboard Gigabyte sumthin-or-another, it's got an nForce 430
Cooling Dual 120mm case fans front/rear, Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro, Zalman VF-900 on GPU
Memory 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800
Video Card(s) Sapphire X850XT @ 580/600
Storage WD 160 GB SATA hard drive.
Display(s) Hanns G 19" widescreen, 5ms response time, 1440x900
Case Thermaltake Soprano (black with side window).
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Live! 24 bit (paired with X-530 speakers).
Power Supply ThermalTake 430W TR2
Software XP Home SP2, can't wait for Vista SP1.
#21
As a person who has worked with Jpeg2000 decoding/encoding as well as reading IEEE publications on HD photo, I can safely say that Microsoft has done their research.

Although, I feel a bit bad for the JPEG committee... they spent a long time on Jpeg2000 (it's not a bad algorithm mind you, but HD photo is alot better).


The only downside to HD photo is that the quantization factor is specified directly by manufacturer, not by the user whereas in Jpeg2000 (and even Jpeg), you can control the quantization factor.
Woah, you really know your stuff :).
 

kakazza

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
470 (0.11/day)
Likes
7
#22
I still love .png, lossless compression :)

WAY smaller when taking screenshots of your desktop with very few different colors without artifacts. For ingame-screenshots however (large amount of colors) it is bigger than jpeg.



I know there are lossless operations for jpeg, but I use png for screenshots of my desktop with CPU-Z and shit, as mentioned before, way smaller and no artifacts around text.



I like how it's hdpdemo.jpg ;)
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
26,567 (6.38/day)
Likes
7,468
Location
Houston
System Name Team Blue
Processor 5960X@4.8 1.42v
Motherboard Asus X99M-WS
Cooling EK Supremecy EVO, MCR220-Stack+MCR220+MCR320, D5-PWM+EK X-RES 140
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's+ EVGA reference 1080Ti soon to be under water
Storage Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX
Software W10P
Benchmark Scores Zoom zoom mofo
#23
I still love .png, lossless compression :)

WAY smaller when taking screenshots of your desktop with very few different colors without artifacts. For ingame-screenshots however (large amount of colors) it is bigger than jpeg.



I know there are lossless operations for jpeg, but I use png for screenshots of my desktop with CPU-Z and shit, as mentioned before, way smaller and no artifacts around text.



I like how it's hdpdemo.jpg ;)
:roll: i also like PNG the best :D but use jpeg for internet stuffs cause its just easier
 

XooM

New Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
468 (0.10/day)
Likes
7
Location
Close to FrozenCPU.com
Processor Athlon 64 3800 x2 Windosr @ 2.65 (and rising)
Motherboard BIOSTAR TForce 550
Cooling Custom Liquid (WMD20RLZT, Swiftech STORM, 2-302 w/ custom shroud, 2x sanyo denki)
Memory Patriot PDC22G5300LLK
Video Card(s) Sapphire x1900GT
Storage 1x maxtor 40gb, 2x hitachi T7K250 160gb drives RAID 0, 1x 160gb Spinpoint
Display(s) 2x 17" CRT (dells; one from 1998, one from 2001) at 1600x1200 each
Case Aspire X-SuperAlien
Audio Device(s) integrated
Power Supply Seasonic S12 600watt
Software WinXP SP2, Folding@Home, Battlefield2, etc
#25
i seriously doubt you can have either two of those together
they might be able to make the compression more efficient
but as size decreases, quality will ALWAYS go down track in some way shape or form
So you're telling me that when you zip or rar an archive chunks of data mysteriously vanish? that a FLAC-encoded audio file is, after all, not 100% lossless compared to the original wave file? :rolleyes: