More details on Bulldozer leaked

[Duckula]

We got two screenshots and some details of the long-expecting Bulldozer processors thanks to a Chinese bloger with an alias Bulldozer.

CPU-Z screenshot:
http://news.mydrivers.com/Img/20110424/09504397.jpg

according to windows task manager, this is a six core processor with an OPN number of ZD282046W6K43.
http://news.mydrivers.com/Img/20110424/10065384.jpg

understanding bulldozer processors' OPN number:

table 12

table 13

table 14

table 15

table 16

table 17

table 18

table 19

Original artical(in Chinese): http://news.mydrivers.com/1/191/191828.htm

 

[cheesy999]

i think theres something weird here, who runs 16gb of ram on a 32bit system?

 

[bbmarley]

why pics take so so so so long to load from them links :/

 

[20mmrain]

I just sure hope that 1.4 volts at 2ghz speed is a lie.... because for shits sake SB can hit 4.5 ghz less than 1.3volts for most people

 

[Techtu]

Some of the figures in "Table 17" just look totally odd and give a sign of bullsh*t to me, like if that was to be true... it would surely work out best to buy one of the cheaper chips and use the "Boost".

 

[1Kurgan1]

Yeah, the boost numbers seem off.

 

[20mmrain]

Yeah I smell fakes.... either that or I smell the worst crap CPU in along time! Which actually makes me worried...Why only because of the silence from AMD. Either they are staying quiet because these things are the next best thing to sliced white bread.... or they are staying quiet because it is not as good as people think it is. Which this CPU started being designed in 2007 (Or something close to that) and it kept getting postponed and postponed..... which makes me think when it was being designed sure it would have been the absolute shit awesome CPU. But now things have changed. Just a theory of mine and I really really hope I am wrong. Intel really needs some competition again to knock them back down to size!

 

[Techtu]

Yeh... Maybe we're yet to see the true power of the GPU held within these which will make all the difference in alot of rigs to alot of people... but then that really isn't the desktop market isit.

 

[catnipkiller]

the 32 bit system and the boost numbers make this look fake

 

[streetfighter 2]

I don't know crap about card games, I just made that because Paint.NET is fun.

 

[Jmatt110]

http://img.techpowerup.org/110424/jf-amd950.jpg

I don't know crap about card games, I just made that because Paint.NET is fun.

It should be an uncommon, not common.

 

[crazyeyesreaper]

should be a Legendary card not uncommon after all how many AMD reps actually talk to ppl on forums.... all i can think of is JF AMD lol

 

[Jmatt110]

Legendaries can be uncommon. Legendary is a creature type, not a rarity.

 

[BarbaricSoul]

I'm calling bullshit. Reason I'm saying this is 2 reasons.

1- 1.4 volts for 2.8ghz?!?!?!?!?
2- In the first screenshot, we have task manager showing a 6 core cpu, yet according to the computers clock, two minutes later, we have CPU-Z showing 1 core/1 thread

 

[PopcornMachine]

I'm calling bullshit. Reason I'm saying this is 2 reasons.

1- 1.4 volts for 2.8ghz?!?!?!?!?
2- In the first screenshot, we have task manager showing a 6 core cpu, yet according to the computers clock, two minutes later, we have CPU-Z showing 1 core/1 thread

Yeah, looks like complete BS to me.

 

[wiak]

i think theres something weird here, who runs 16gb of ram on a 32bit system?

meybe he only had 32bit version or did test system on 32bit while taking screenshots

and it looks kinda fake to me ^^

 

[TheLaughingMan]

It should be an uncommon, not common.

That is the symbol for the Weatherlight set. They did not have color coded symbols in those days, so the rarity cannot be determined by simply looking at it.

Legendaries can be uncommon. Legendary is a creature type, not a rarity.

And no its not a creature type. You are both wrong.

 

[Jmatt110]

That is the symbol for the Weatherlight set. They did not have color coded symbols in those days, so the rarity cannot be determined by simply looking at it.

I only started playing in Alara

 

[TheLaughingMan]

I only started playing in Alara

I started playing in Fifth Edition of the core set. Actually retired and sold all my cards on Craig's List yesterday.

 

[1Kurgan1]

It should be an uncommon, not common.

Thats the Weatherlight set, they didn't use rarity colors in the set symbols then. They started that in Urza's Saga about 2 years after Weatherlight. So that card could be anywhere from Common to Rare.

And as I am posting this I see TLM already said that, MTG ftw!

I started playing in Fifth Edition of the core set. Actually retired and sold all my cards on Craig's List yesterday.

I am disappoint, and so is Marineborn.