• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI Calls Bluff on Gigabyte's PCIe Gen 3 Ready Claim

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
This is just a marketing strategy. Ivy bridge and pci-e 3.0 will work just fine on gigabyte motherboards.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
405 (0.08/day)
Likes
252
Location
New Taipei City, Taiwan
This is just a marketing strategy. Ivy bridge and pci-e 3.0 will work just fine on gigabyte motherboards.
So you're saying that I get 32GB/s bandwidth on a board with PCI express switches, wow :toast:

Because that completely defies logic.

If you mean, Gigabyte boards will never use Gen3 because the cards and CPU will have to switch down to Gen2 and by that way mean "support" then, sure, I believe you :)
 
Last edited:
Likes: heky

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
So you're saying that I get 32GB/s bandwidth on a board with PCI express switches, wow :toast:

Because that completely defies logic.

If you mean, Gigabyte boards will never use Gen3 because the cards and CPU will have to switch down to Gen2 and by that way mean "support" then, sure, I believe you :)
even pci-e 2.0 is just a marketing strategy, i mean in terms of real world performance :). Reality defies everything.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
Likes
1
lol Neliz you obviously an MSI employee, after finding this thread on google i had to join in.

How can you say Gigabytes boards wont work when there is no pcie3 cards yet.
But then your dismissing the news about uefi bios not working with ivy bridge immediately....

hmmm looks like I'm right Mr Dennis Achterberg Product Marketing Officer at MSI - Micro-star International CO., Ltd

http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennisachterberg
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
405 (0.08/day)
Likes
252
Location
New Taipei City, Taiwan
lol Neliz you obviously an MSI employee, after finding this thread on google i had to join in.

How can you say Gigabytes boards wont work when there is no pcie3 cards yet.
But then your dismissing the news about uefi bios not working with ivy bridge immediately....

hmmm looks like I'm right Mr Dennis Achterberg Product Marketing Officer at MSI - Micro-star International CO., Ltd

http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennisachterberg
1 wow,amazing Google skills
2, there are design rules for 22mm clue and Gen3 that were published long after those boards were designed and manufactured.
3, there are things called test boards and related measurement equipment that for instance Intel, NVIDIA and us use to verify boards, slots, cpu etc.
4, we haven't seen any signs during testing that a uefi update can't continue because there's only one chip. do you really really believe that Intel would want to do a recall on those millions of sandy bridge maonboards out there?

Sent from my HTC
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
405 (0.08/day)
Likes
252
Location
New Taipei City, Taiwan
4) Recall no that would never happen would it.......*Cough* B3 *Cough*
That was relatively early in the livecycle of Sandy Bridge with a non-fatal issue (though very bothersome.)

Business wise it also doesn't make sense for Microsoft to demand something of mainboards that would limit it only to the latest generation of compatible mainboards.

I.o.w. don't worry.
 

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
That was relatively early in the livecycle of Sandy Bridge with a non-fatal issue (though very bothersome.)

Business wise it also doesn't make sense for Microsoft to demand something of mainboards that would limit it only to the latest generation of compatible mainboards.

I.o.w. don't worry.
Recall is good just for Gigabyte :)). 22mm is quite big for a fabrication process for cpus, right?
 

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
1 wow,amazing Google skills
2, there are design rules for 22mm clue and Gen3 that were published long after those boards were designed and manufactured.
3, there are things called test boards and related measurement equipment that for instance Intel, NVIDIA and us use to verify boards, slots, cpu etc.
4, we haven't seen any signs during testing that a uefi update can't continue because there's only one chip. do you really really believe that Intel would want to do a recall on those millions of sandy bridge maonboards out there?

Sent from my HTC
AND... I haven't seen any signs during testing that my pci-e 3.0 GPU is not working with my Ivy Bridge processor on my Gigabyte motherboard better than on your MSI motherboard :banghead:
 

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
You haven't done testing and I've shown you screenshots.
what screenshots?

The screenshot with the gigabyte motherboard?


Let's make a bet: I bet that the first pci-e 3.0 gpu on the market will have the same performance in real world gaming on fake PCI-e 3.0 gigabyte motherboards as on your MSI real PCI-e 3.0 motherboard
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
405 (0.08/day)
Likes
252
Location
New Taipei City, Taiwan
How sweet, you've tested Gigabyte Motherboards :p. I wonder ... what happens when people from gigabyte will test your cards?
the cards are not ours :) they're from a third party providing boards for Gen3 testing :)

So all we did was get a gigabyte board, put a bios on it that gigabyte advertises and then see if it would actually work as advertised (and required by Intel.)
And you've seen the end result :)
 

dazz

New Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
14 (0.01/day)
Likes
5
One thing is to know it won't make a difference performance wise in games (but for how long?) and another thing is the flood of angry GB customers reporting seeing in GPU-Z their "PCIe 3.0 ready" slots running at half the speed they expected
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
Likes
1
That was relatively early in the livecycle of Sandy Bridge with a non-fatal issue (though very bothersome.)

Business wise it also doesn't make sense for Microsoft to demand something of mainboards that would limit it only to the latest generation of compatible mainboards.

I.o.w. don't worry.
Neliz the uefi issue is not about Microsoft, its about Ivy Bridge support.
So far the news sounds as if intel have made another mistake and UEFI needs a complete re-wipe which according to some news is only able to be done above service or end user level (so a recall or just a stuff it buy the next platform).

The UEFI issue you are talking about sounds like the "Windows 8 NEEDS UEFI" if your saying this is not the case please speak to your counterparts as they are saying you need UEFI for X86 hardware.

This is also incorrect only ARM platforms require UEFI for Win 8.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
405 (0.08/day)
Likes
252
Location
New Taipei City, Taiwan
The UEFI issue you are talking about sounds like the "Windows 8 NEEDS UEFI" if your saying this is not the case please speak to your counterparts as they are saying you need UEFI for X86 hardware.

This is also incorrect only ARM platforms require UEFI for Win 8.
I'll tell people from microsoft sending us these roadmaps! :)
 

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
the cards are not ours :) they're from a third party providing boards for Gen3 testing :)

So all we did was get a gigabyte board, put a bios on it that gigabyte advertises and then see if it would actually work as advertised (and required by Intel.)
And you've seen the end result :)
i will rephrase: I wonder ... what happens when people from gigabyte will test your MSI motherboards?
 

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
Our G3 boards? they'll get full PCI Express 3.0 x16.

How I know? Because Intel already tested and certified our boards.

Capiche?
So, explain me something. Gigabyte made that affirmation before final PCI-e 3.0 adjustments and before having a ivy bridge processor or a pci-e 3.0 GPU? right? Then why attack them?
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
405 (0.08/day)
Likes
252
Location
New Taipei City, Taiwan
So, explain me something. Gigabyte made that affirmation before final PCI-e 3.0 adjustments and before having a ivy bridge processor or a pci-e 3.0 GPU? right? Then why attack them?
Gigabyte made that explanation AFTER the final requirements were known.
They retroactively applied this to all older boards, hoping no one would notice. (fool customers, they're really good at it)

Gigabyte probably DOES have an 22nm CPU sample AND PCI-e 3.0 testing cards at the time of the announcement, otherwise they wouldn't have the G1.Sniperv2.

Is it clear for you this way?

(and no, I don't know dazz!)
 
Likes: heky

dazz

New Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
14 (0.01/day)
Likes
5
So, explain me something. Gigabyte made that affirmation before final PCI-e 3.0 adjustments and before having a ivy bridge processor or a pci-e 3.0 GPU? right? Then why attack them?
Because their advertisement of Gen.3 ready motherboards with just a BIOS update is misleading at best, and flat out fraudulent at worse
 

jfk1024

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
Because their advertisement of Gen.3 ready motherboards with just a BIOS update is misleading at best, and flat out fraudulent at worse
Let's wait and see what happens :p. It's better to wait until bulldozer and sandy bridge-e are released and forget about future proof motherboards :confused:
 
Top