• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI Rolls Out MAG Optix G27C4 1500R Curved Monitor with 165Hz Refresh Rate

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
43,064 (8.00/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
MSI today rolled out the MAG Optix G27C4 27-inch curved gaming monitor. With a more acute curvature of 1500R (compared to the prevelant 1800R monitors), the Optix G27C4 boasts of 165 Hz refresh-rate and support for AMD FreeSync. The Samsung-sourced VA panel offers Full HD (1920 x 1080) resolution, 1 ms response-times, 178°/178° viewing-angles, and an anti-glare surface treatment. Display inputs include DisplayPort 1.2a (needed for FreeSync), and two HDMI 1.4a ports. The panel also offers blue-light reduction, and flicker-free LED backlighting. Measuring 611.5 mm × 225.4 mm × 457.9 mm (WxDxH), the monitor weighs around 5.4 kg. The company didn't reveal pricing.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,101 (1.22/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
1,374 (0.36/day)
Location
Romania
System Name "No name"
Processor Ryzen 2700X 50Th Anniversary Edition
Motherboard B450 Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Noctua U12P
Memory 16GB 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 6600 XT Powercolor Fighter
Storage Adata 512GB SSD, WD30PURX
Display(s) AOC CQ32G1
Case SilentiumPC Signum SG1V EVO TG ARGB
Audio Device(s) ALC Codec + Maudio AV32 and Fiio E10k + Audiotehnica TAD 400
Power Supply Seasonic G650 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Asus Strix MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
AV Panel.... but its a HD monitor, QHD would have been better.
Pushing 165 fps in 1440p, not even a 2080 Ti can do that in AAA games with high settings. In E-sports and old games in doable.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Messages
193 (0.12/day)
Pushing 165 fps in 1440p, not even a 2080 Ti can do that in AAA games with high settings. In E-sports and old games in doable.

Not sure why every AAA need 144hz+...
games like divison2 , overwatch , CS go, Call of duty,,,,mostly FPS,TPS, racing only need 120Hz +

games like assassin creed, tomb raider..etc dont need high fps
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
4,071 (3.32/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x16 GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 Rev E
Video Card(s) RTX3080 Ti FE
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB273GP
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster G6 | Fidelio X2 | Sennheiser 6XX
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 300
Keyboard MK Typist (Kailh Box White)
Pushing 165 fps in 1440p, not even a 2080 Ti can do that in AAA games with high settings. In E-sports and old games in doable.
Nobody's saying you have to play it on ULTRA.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
1,374 (0.36/day)
Location
Romania
System Name "No name"
Processor Ryzen 2700X 50Th Anniversary Edition
Motherboard B450 Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Noctua U12P
Memory 16GB 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 6600 XT Powercolor Fighter
Storage Adata 512GB SSD, WD30PURX
Display(s) AOC CQ32G1
Case SilentiumPC Signum SG1V EVO TG ARGB
Audio Device(s) ALC Codec + Maudio AV32 and Fiio E10k + Audiotehnica TAD 400
Power Supply Seasonic G650 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Asus Strix MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
So why do you get a 1440p monitor for gaming, if you can't max out the settings ? medium settings in 1440p don't look as good as ultra settings in 1080p.
TW Warhammer 2 is my favourite game toghether with Witcher 3 in the last 5 years. If i play on Ultra in 1440p (that means most settings turned to max, except shadows, AA, DOF and water reflections) i get about 50-55 fps. In Extreme settings (MSAA 2x, extreme shadows, DOF and water reflections on) i get about 50-55 fps in 1080p. But since my monitor is a 1440p @144Hz, 1080p scaling looks worse than at native resolution. So yes i keep the settings down a bit, to achieve 50-60 fps in this game.

The only real upgrade would be a 2080 Ti, but it costs about 4 x my 1070 Ti on the second hand market, and that is money i don't have to spend on hardware.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
4,343 (3.54/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Freesync/G-Sync compatible has kind of killed the need for higher-refresh monitors now; Most twitch games have enough latency elsewhere in the input:response loop that reducing the frame time alone adds negligible benefit.

Back in the V-Sync days it was really useful to have a higher refresh rate. 165Hz would have meant that dropping every other frame would still result in an acceptable 82Hz/82fps - and dropping two frames would have rendered at 55Hz/55fps.

These days its a moot point. The pixel response of these panels is in the 10ms range anyway and the concept of dropped frames halving your framerate and doubling your input lag doesn't exist with VRR. On a 144Hz VRR display, getting 135fps just drops your refresh rate by 9Hz, rather than doubling the latency/lag and halving your framerate.

Everyone will have a different perception of what is fast enough, but I think with IPS and VA panels having a realistic average response of around 10ms, 100Hz is enough. On a TN panel with 3-5ms, there's a case to be made for 240Hz displays still, preferably with backlight strobing to eke the last bit of motion clarity out of the display. I think 1080p and specifically on non-AAA games is a requirement here because regardless of the resolution there aren't many games that even an overclocked 9900K can handle at 240fps.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
687 (0.35/day)
So why do you get a 1440p monitor for gaming, if you can't max out the settings ? medium settings in 1440p don't look as good as ultra settings in 1080p.
TW Warhammer 2 is my favourite game toghether with Witcher 3 in the last 5 years. If i play on Ultra in 1440p (that means most settings turned to max, except shadows, AA, DOF and water reflections) i get about 50-55 fps. In Extreme settings (MSAA 2x, extreme shadows, DOF and water reflections on) i get about 50-55 fps in 1080p. But since my monitor is a 1440p @144Hz, 1080p scaling looks worse than at native resolution. So yes i keep the settings down a bit, to achieve 50-60 fps in this game.

The only real upgrade would be a 2080 Ti, but it costs about 4 x my 1070 Ti on the second hand market, and that is money i don't have to spend on hardware.

Absolutely right. I saw maybe a Linus video back to the GTX 1080Ti I think, where they were showing it can't do 4K 60 fps, then lowered settings to medium-high. Why the hell would I turn down settings to medium? Just to get higher resolution?
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
10,223 (3.63/day)
Absolutely right. I saw maybe a Linus video back to the GTX 1080Ti I think, where they were showing it can't do 4K 60 fps, then lowered settings to medium-high. Why the hell would I turn down settings to medium? Just to get higher resolution?

because even 1440p with lower settings looks crisper. and also 4k requires almost no MSAA to look crisp.

1080p you need 4x MSAA, sometimes 8x. 1440p is fine with 2x MSAA, and 4K most of the time you can get by without it and it still looks better than 1080p with 8x MSAA by a large margin. to my eyes anyway
 
Top