• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

New Details On Intel's Upcoming 10-core Skylake-X i9 7900X Surface

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
1,511 (2.71/day)
Likes
1,339
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
#1
SiSoft Sandra is one of the best (and more common) sources for details on upcoming, as-of-yet-unreleased hardware details and characteristics. Now, details on one of Intel's upcoming Skylake-X parts have surfaced, which gives us some details on what are likely final specifications, considering how close we are to X299's accelerated release.

The processor in the spotlight is one of Intel's 10-core processors, the Core i9 7900X (which is erroneously reported by the software as the Core i7 7900X), Intel's 10-core CPU. While initial reports pegged this CPU at as running at clock speeds of 3.30 GHz base and with 4.30 GHz Turbo Boost, it would seem Intel's release silicon will leverage much higher stock speeds, with the reported values on this SiSoft report being a staggering 4.0 GHz base, and 4.5 GHz Turbo Boost. These are extremely high clock speeds for a ten-core part, but all the other details about the Core i9 7900X check out: there are 14,080 KB (13.75 MB) of shared L3 cache, 1 MB L2 cache per core (for a total of 10 MB), as well as a 175 W TDP. This difference in clock speeds (especially when you compare it to Ryzen's much lower clock speeds) are probably an indicator of not only architectural differences between both designs, but a statement on Intel's fabrication process capabilities. And as an added bonus, check the motherboard that was used: a juicy, as-of-yet-unknown, X299 Gigabyte AORUS Gaming 7. Two details of this magnitude in a single screenshot? It's clearly a case of having your cake and eating it too.



Source: Overclockers UA
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
270 (0.08/day)
Likes
99
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Gene VI
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 1866Mhz C9
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB
Display(s) Dell S2417DG
Case Corsair Obsidian 350D
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Cooler Master - Masterkeys Pro L RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
#3
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
4,734 (1.65/day)
Likes
2,076
#4
Right lol, it probably took them 3-4 years to develop this cpu.
Do you think Intel develop new CPU architectures overnight? :kookoo:

Ah ok I see what you mean, no of course not but they couold have easily revised initial clockspeeds to compensate for Ryzens arrival and performance overnight ;)
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
270 (0.08/day)
Likes
99
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Gene VI
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 1866Mhz C9
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB
Display(s) Dell S2417DG
Case Corsair Obsidian 350D
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Cooler Master - Masterkeys Pro L RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
#5
These cpu's have been years in the make and people saying this is all because of Ryzen need to get their heads checked.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
4,734 (1.65/day)
Likes
2,076
#6
That is what YOU are implying. These cpu's have been years in the make and people saying this is all because of Ryzen need to get their heads checked.
Go read the edit, I misunderstood what you meant but corrected it with an edited line underneath.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,197 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,721
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.5ghz1.525c NB2.44ghz Ht2.64ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 16Gb @1600 cas8
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Asus Dual OC gtx1060 6Gb
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far 6600 3dmark
#8
That is what YOU are implying. These cpu's have been years in the make and people saying this is all because of Ryzen need to get their heads checked.
If you think intel would have released this if Ryzen wasn't out, your mistaken.
A cpu would have been released but not at those speeds and likely no where near as soon.
Especially with so much kaby in channel.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,703 (2.24/day)
Likes
5,954
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) GTX1080ti (Heatkiller WB) @ 2Ghz core/1.5(12)Ghz mem
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp 27" (2560x1440)
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
#9
Quite a statement from Intel if true. 10 core at 4GHz stock.....

Ouch for AMD. My 1700X looks a bit poorly now. That being said. How much are these chips going to cost? £1500?
 

dorsetknob

"YOUR RMA REQUEST IS CON-REFUSED"
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
6,583 (1.39/day)
Likes
8,368
Location
Dorset where else eh? >>> Thats ENGLAND<<<
#10
These cpu's have been years in the make and people saying this is all because of Ryzen need to get their heads checked.
yes years in the planning and making But i expect AMD new CPU's Pushed up the launch date otherwise if Ryzen was not so good Intel would have not released this but given use a lesser upgrade (Enterprise would have had this instead )
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,197 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,721
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.5ghz1.525c NB2.44ghz Ht2.64ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 16Gb @1600 cas8
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Asus Dual OC gtx1060 6Gb
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far 6600 3dmark
#11
yes years in the planning and making But i expect AMD new CPU's Pushed up the launch date otherwise if Ryzen was not so good Intel would have not released this but given use a lesser upgrade (Enterprise would have had this instead )
Exactly , they sound good but realistically for the few and aimed to compete inadequately with Threadripper not Ryzen and i think that 175 watt tdp is conservative for this chip flat out:) so I don't think its That great a chip , too late imho, last year it would have looked great but i would call this intels pile-driver moment to be honest , its going to require quite a cooler.
When you reply that its ok to run hot and fast using loads of juice you better not have called my 8350 before for it;):):p
 

Solaris17

Creator Solaris Utility DVD
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
19,409 (4.25/day)
Likes
6,320
Location
Florida
System Name Venslar
Processor I9 7980XE
Motherboard MSI x299 Tomahawk Arctic
Cooling EKWB L360 R2.0
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080TI
Storage 2x HGST 3TB (RAID0) | 1x ADATA 128SSD (Cache) | 1x Drevo 256SSD | 1x 1TB 850 EVO | 1x 250GB 960 EVO
Display(s) 3x AOC Q2577PWQ (2k IPS)
Case Inwin 303 White (Thermaltake Ring 120mm Purple accent)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC 1220 on Audio-Technica ATH-AG1
Power Supply Seasonic 1050W Snow
Mouse Roccat Tyon White
Keyboard Ducky Shine 6 Snow White
Software Windows 10 x64 Pro
#12
(which is erroneously reported by the software as the Core i7 7900X
is it? do we actually have a spokesperson from Intel calling it I9?
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
709 (0.62/day)
Likes
849
System Name THE TERMINATOR
Processor Intel Core i7 980X @ 4.3 GHz (when becnching op to 4.77 GHz)
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D Premium
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 CPU cooler with 3 x Silverstone FM121 120 MM fans
Memory 12 GB DDR3 CORSAIR 1600 MHz TIMMINGS 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 GAMING
Storage Samsung 950 PRO 256 GB M.2 SSD, Crucial MX300 275 GB SSD, SAMSUNG EVO 850 GB SSD, WD 1 TB + 2 TB HDD
Display(s) 24" SAMSUNG
Case ANTEC TWELVE HUNDRED
Audio Device(s) ONBOARD
Power Supply THERMALTAKE TOUGHPOWER 1500 WATT
Mouse LOGITECH G700s
Keyboard LOGITECH G19s
Software WINDOWS 10 PRO 64 BITS
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/fs/13514527 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/2333033
#13
ho ho now we are talking som serious shit right there. Intels is not gonna sit back and watch ryzen take it all. 2017/2018 is really gonna be one of the most fun CPU releases in years. intel with pretty high clokke CPU´s with a desent amount of cores whle Ryzen comming with up to 16 cores. Now i just want to se some prices.

But seriously. If not for ryzen, i bet Intels clock speeds on skylake E had been lower to keep with in the TDP range of 130-140 watt they else tend to do. But i am not complaining.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
2,848 (0.79/day)
Likes
632
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Asrock Taichi
Cooling NH-C14
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 2 * Samsung 1 TB HD103UJ
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Logitech Performance MX
Software Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
#15
I'm pretty sure Intel already had this CPU developed and chose to keep it "under raps" in order to milk the costumers as much as possible by using the current architectures.

Then Ryzen happened ...

Intel was caught off guard because they never expected AMD would be able to improve so much in one go, so they started "counterattacking". But they can't launch a "new" product right away, as it takes time to build up inventory as well as motherboards for it and, even if they already had some, it would be a massive $ loss if they launched right away before selling a good chunk of the available current architecture's products to minimize the losses.
 

Solaris17

Creator Solaris Utility DVD
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
19,409 (4.25/day)
Likes
6,320
Location
Florida
System Name Venslar
Processor I9 7980XE
Motherboard MSI x299 Tomahawk Arctic
Cooling EKWB L360 R2.0
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080TI
Storage 2x HGST 3TB (RAID0) | 1x ADATA 128SSD (Cache) | 1x Drevo 256SSD | 1x 1TB 850 EVO | 1x 250GB 960 EVO
Display(s) 3x AOC Q2577PWQ (2k IPS)
Case Inwin 303 White (Thermaltake Ring 120mm Purple accent)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC 1220 on Audio-Technica ATH-AG1
Power Supply Seasonic 1050W Snow
Mouse Roccat Tyon White
Keyboard Ducky Shine 6 Snow White
Software Windows 10 x64 Pro
#16
I'm pretty sure Intel already had this CPU developed
Intel and AMD R&D departments have CPU lines naming conventions and tech roadmaps that span years. I dont understand how people seem to forget this ever ark change. They always insinuate that they just magic'd this shit up last month.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,197 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,721
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.5ghz1.525c NB2.44ghz Ht2.64ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 16Gb @1600 cas8
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Asus Dual OC gtx1060 6Gb
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far 6600 3dmark
#17
I'm pretty sure Intel already had this CPU developed and chose to keep it "under raps" in order to milk the costumers as much as possible by using the current architectures.

Then Ryzen happened ...

Intel was caught off guard because they never expected AMD would be able to improve so much in one go, so they started "counterattacking". But they can't launch a "new" product right away, as it takes time to build up inventory as well as motherboards for it and, even if they already had some, it would be a massive $ loss if they launched right away before selling a good chunk of the available current architecture's products to minimize the losses.
I agree except for the undelined bit about "milking the costumers" ,that doesn't sound like intels at all.:D
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
722 (0.28/day)
Likes
209
Location
A sad excuse of a country called Sudan.
System Name 192.168.1.1~192.16.1.100
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k
Motherboard Asus B85M-G
Cooling Corsair H60
Memory 20GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1080 OC.
Storage Samsung 850 Evo + lots of TBs of HDD storage.
Display(s) A Samsung S24D590 Primary + Philips 220E (sans two pixel-columns) secondary
Case Corsair Graphite 780T
Audio Device(s) On-Board
Power Supply Coolermaster 850V
Mouse Steelseries Sensei Raw
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software MS Win7 Ultimate X64 (Until it reaches EoL, anyway)
Benchmark Scores Me no know English. What bench mean? Bench like one sit on?
#18
So many numbers, yet missing the most important of 'em all: MSRP.
It matters little if it's a 20 Cores, 10 GHz beast but more expensive that half a healthy adult's organs!
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
784 (0.58/day)
Likes
330
#19
The amount of Intel hate in this forum is astounding.



is it? do we actually have a spokesperson from Intel calling it I9?
Exactly, "i9" is still just a rumor.
If the benchmark results are not faked, then the name is probably correct, since it's reported by the CPU.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,197 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,721
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.5ghz1.525c NB2.44ghz Ht2.64ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 16Gb @1600 cas8
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Asus Dual OC gtx1060 6Gb
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far 6600 3dmark
#20
The amount of Intel hate in this forum is astounding.




Exactly, "i9" is still just a rumor.
If the benchmark results are not faked, then the name is probably correct, since it's reported by the CPU.
I beg to differ on that it's an intel friendly forum for sure , everyone round these ways agrees if you're using a gtx 1080ti on a 1080p monitor an i7 7700k is still the best cpu to get and it likely still will be.:);):D
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
67 (0.03/day)
Likes
12
Location
USA
System Name White Lightning
Processor 6700K, 4.5GHz @ 1.29v
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X Gaming-7
Cooling EK and Watercool custom loop NB eLoop fans covering 12x120mm radiator area
Memory 16GB G.SKILL DDR4@3200
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080ti SC Black
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 500GB, (2)Crucial M500 480GB, WD Red 8TB
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 1440p G-SYNC
Case Thermaltake X9 Snow White w/Tempered glass
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Corsair K70 Lux RGB
Software Wi10 Pro 64-bit
#21
It looks like competition from AMD may showing itself from Intel. Hopefully they will price there new chips to compete with Ryzen so that we can move past the 4-core standard that the market has been stuck at.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
26,928 (6.37/day)
Likes
7,785
Location
Houston
System Name Team Blue
Processor 5960X@4.8 1.42v
Motherboard Asus X99M-WS
Cooling EK Supremecy EVO, MCR220-Stack+MCR220+MCR320, D5-PWM+EK X-RES 140
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's+ EVGA reference 1080Ti soon to be under water+GB 390 8GB
Storage Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX
Software W10P
Benchmark Scores Zoom zoom mofo
#22
Right lol, it probably took them 3-4 years to develop this cpu.
Skylake released in August of 2015, Skylake-E doesn't really change anything. What happened is intel raised their TDP cap to 175W and are selling CPU's at a higher clockspeed out of the box. This isn't something new and crazy it is the same CPU coming pumped from the factory to make sense for pricing.

Basically Intel got some AMD shit on their shoe and went awe hell nah.

But in reality this is likely to make up for the lower multicore performance. 4.0ghz across all 10 cores isn't exactly ground breaking, most of the 6950X's can do 4.4 on decent cooling
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
639 (1.82/day)
Likes
190
System Name My System
Processor Intel Core i5 3570k @ 4.4 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling ThermalTake Water 2.0
Memory 4x4 GB of Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon R9 380 with 4 GBs of RAM
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB SSD (https://www.techpowerup.com/ssdz/details/5163/)
Display(s) HP 2311x and Acer G206HQL
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound
Power Supply Corsair 750 Watt
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/678sbr
#23
I wonder what this means for folks who have already bought Ryzen-based systems or people who are planning on it. A base clock of 4 GHz is very good, especially for a processor with that many cores on-board. Compare this to the Ryzen R5 1600 with its base clock of 3.6 GHz and it doesn't look very good for AMD Ryzen. Ryzen really needs to up the base clocks in the next version or Intel is going to kill them once again.

Edit: Do I wait for this to come out and meanwhile save more money or do I simply bite the bullet and build a Ryzen-based system? The more I think about it the more I think I should wait.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
1,148 (1.64/day)
Likes
1,361
Location
AK, USA
Processor Core i7-4790K 4.4 GHz - 1.153 mV
Motherboard ASUS Z97-E/USB3.1
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu (SCKTT-1000)
Memory Crucial Ballistix 16 GB DDR3-1866 MHz @ 2200 MHz - 1.50 mV | 9-10-10-29, 2T
Video Card(s) XFX RS RX 480 GPU @ 1288 MHz - 1.040 mV from 1.175 | GDDR5 @ 2100 MHz
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB, SanDisk Ultra II 480 GB
Display(s) IP2362 OCed to 76Hz (Freesync supported over HDMI with CRU)
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 (on-board)
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse Kingston HyperX Pulsefire FPS
Keyboard Logitech K520
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
#25
I don't know if I'd use the word hate so much as being critical of the shenanigans each of these companies like to pull. They are for profit, no? Pretty sure their not running as a non-profit.