• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

New NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Pictures Hit The Web

Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
2,799 (0.76/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name My Gaming System
Processor Intel i7 4770k @ 4.4 Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Impact (ITX)
Cooling Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 8 Gb
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ti SC
Storage Samsung SSD EVO 120GB - Samsung SSD EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case Bitfenix Prodigy
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Home Primeum
I am just speculating.... But according to some info like Chip Hell and other places I get info from (Including some of my own sources)... I could see it playing out something similar to this.

Nvidia will release the GTX 680 followed by the normal cards that follow GTX 670/660 so on (690 in may) We will see the GTX 685/780 in August. (Depending on how late it releases is what it will be called.)

AMD will release the HD7990 (Which will have lower clocks in order to run cooler) They will also continue to release the rest of their cards.... 7670/7650/7570 and so on.....Later around the same time Nvidia releases their GTX 685/780 AMD will release “Tenerife” which will be either the 7980 or 8970.

I get this from Knowledge with some own personal connections as well as info off the web. I could be completely wrong... I am just putting together pieces.

http://www.guruht.com/2012/03/amd-tenerife-hd-79807990-graphic-card.html

http://www.chiphell.com/thread-382393-1-1.html
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.90/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
It is very sad that a new generation of cards with new arch and considerably smaller node bring so little in performance for so much money. I don't expect this to be more than 30-35% faster than a GTX580 and I shouldn't care if it's the "performance" chip inside.
 

NHKS

New Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
596 (0.20/day)
if the price indeed turned out as 549$, I would be disappointed. nvidia have a real opportunity of winning customers if they price it within 500$. It would also make AMD think twice before they price a single GPU card above 500$.
Yes, 28nm yields are an issue now but it is not like these 'high-end' cards are going to see 'large' demand for AMD & nvidia, its the mid-range cards 200-300$ that see most of the demand. So, good yields or not, I feel it is unfair for both companies to raise the price points of their high-end cards. Hopefully, they will bring the prices down as the yields improve.

meme_nvidia.JPG
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,681 (1.10/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
It is very sad that a new generation of cards with new arch and considerably smaller node bring so little in performance for so much money. I don't expect this to be more than 30-35% faster than a GTX580 and I shouldn't care if it's the "performance" chip inside.
I think part of that is from them trying to reduce power consumption vs the prior gen, and not going all out just for performance. The other part is probably immature drivers since both have done big architecture changes.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
1,142 (0.25/day)
Location
Repentigny, QC, CANADA
System Name CTG Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 2600x @ 4ghz
Motherboard Asus Strix x470-F
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S
Memory 2x 8gb Corsair LPX 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1070 OC
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 250gb | WD Blue 1TB M.2
Display(s) MSI Optix MAG27C | Asus vg248qe
Case Fractal Design C TG
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Z PCI-E
Power Supply eVGA SuperNova 750w G2
Mouse Corsair Glaive RGB
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Well well, if it's more faster, We will see a drop on HD7k, which is good for us :)

I don't like buying a card over 350, well I'll still wait, and see :)

Can't wait for next week.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,311 (0.73/day)
Location
Essex Jct, VT
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 Aurorus Elite
Cooling Stock
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / Samsung EVO 860 500GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) AOC G2590FX
Case NZXT H500 Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
It is very sad that a new generation of cards with new arch and considerably smaller node bring so little in performance for so much money. I don't expect this to be more than 30-35% faster than a GTX580 and I shouldn't care if it's the "performance" chip inside.
It's also a ~320mm^2 chip versus the ~520mm^2 of the GTX580, and is rumored to be on par for the HD7970 (a fellow 500mm^2+ chip). All things considered, I think it's a pretty solid offering if all the rumors hold up.

Well well, if it's more faster, We will see a drop on HD7k, which is good for us :)
No we won't. This is duopoly economics. GTX680 will be priced just above or at the price of HD7970 depending on if it performs as well or slightly better. I wouldn't expect prices to budge very much.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
15,925 (3.65/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
So, if the GK104 is being branded a GTX 680 and the dual version GTX 690, what's the GK100/GK110 gonna come in as? GTX 685?
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,681 (8.51/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
so, if the gk104 is being branded a gtx 680 and the dual version gtx 690, what's the gk100/gk110 gonna come in as? Gtx 685?
gtx 780.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
2,654 (0.59/day)
System Name panda
Processor 6700k
Motherboard sabertooth s
Cooling raystorm block<black ice stealth 240 rad<ek dcc 18w 140 xres
Memory 32gb ripjaw v
Video Card(s) 290x gamer<ntzx g10<antec 920
Storage 950 pro 250gb boot 850 evo pr0n
Display(s) QX2710LED@110hz lg 27ud68p
Case 540 Air
Audio Device(s) nope
Power Supply 750w superflower
Mouse g502
Keyboard shine 3 with grey, black and red caps
Software win 10
Benchmark Scores http://hwbot.org/user/marsey99/
Will GK104 be competition to HD 7900 series? Yes. Will that cause a price-war leading to happier consumers? Resounding NO.
which should result in us not buying and turning to the authorities to point out the price fixing.

which we wont :|

are you thinking they will bastardise the 110 core to fill that range out like they are with this too?

after what they did with the 580 core they could do imo.
 

Mindweaver

Moderato®™
Staff member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
6,946 (1.79/day)
Location
Charleston, SC
System Name Sechs / AMDHasRyzen
Processor i7 5820k @ 4.5ghz / Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard X99S GAMING 7 / GIGABYTE B450 AORUS M
Cooling CORSAIR Hydro Series H100i Extreme / Stock cooler
Memory G.Skill DDR4 2800 16GB 4x4GB / CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) PNY Quadro K2000 / EVGA RTX 2070 Black
Storage Samsung 850 PRO 256GB SSD /Intel 240gb, corsair 120gb SSD, 3x 1 tb s storage
Display(s) 2x Acer G276HL 27" 1080p / 3x Acer 22" Nvidia surround
Case Phanteks “Enthoo Pro series”/ Cooler Master Storm Scout
Audio Device(s) Azalia Realtek ALC1150 / Realtek ALC1220
Power Supply Corsair CXM CX600M / Corsair 600w
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma / Razer DeathAdder
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow Ultimate /
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 / Windows 10 Pro x64
I don't see why anyone would buy any video card at those prices to play console ports? I had to say it... hehehe
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,825 (1.31/day)
Processor Core I7 3770K@4.8Ghz
Motherboard AsRock Z77 Extreme
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory 12Gb G.Skill Sniper
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1070 FTW 2150/2240
Storage Sandisk SSD + 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200
Display(s) IPS Asus 26inch
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Xonar DG
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G2
Software Windows 10/Windows 7
I don't see why anyone would buy any video card at those prices to play console ports? I had to say it... hehehe
too bad your right:shadedshu
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
5,614 (1.53/day)
Location
San Diego, CA
System Name White Boy
Processor Core i7 3770k @4.6 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
Cooling CORSAIR H100
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB @ 2177
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 680 CLASSIEFIED @ 1250 Core
Storage 2 Samsung 830 256 GB (Raid 0) 1 Hitachi 4 TB
Display(s) 1 Dell 30U11 30"
Case BIT FENIX Prodigy
Audio Device(s) none
Power Supply SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W Modular
Software Windows Pro 7 64 bit || Ubuntu 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores 2017 Unigine Heaven :: P37239 3D Mark Vantage
Can't wait to see how one of these performs!
 

NHKS

New Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
596 (0.20/day)
I don't see why anyone would buy any video card at those prices to play console ports? I had to say it... hehehe
Although its frustrating to know, what you say is true for most games.. but not all games(engines) are & will be console ports.. there is reason to believe that some developers like DICE are making efforts to make full use of Microsoft's DirectX features.. one good example is "DirectCompute" API that is used in some games (ex:BF3 , Metro 2033) for enhancing visuals with 'ambient occlusion', 'DOF', etc.. and these enhancements cannot be handled by consoles, IGPs & APUs.. but can realise the full potential of performance GPUs

so, there is hope that more developers will try to make use of the true potential in discrete performance GPUs :cool:
 

SuperSonic X 316

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
40 (0.01/day)
Location
Chicago, IL
Processor Intel i5 3570k
Motherboard ASUS MAXIMUS V GENE
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Performa
Memory G.Skill Sniper 8GB (2x4GB)
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 Vapor-X 2GB
Storage Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) ASUS VH226H
Case Cooler Master 690 II Advanced
Power Supply Zalman ZM-600HP
I don't see why anyone would buy any video card at those prices to play console ports? I had to say it... hehehe
Heh, this is why I still don't know if I want to jump on one of these cards at full price yet.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
1,142 (0.25/day)
Location
Repentigny, QC, CANADA
System Name CTG Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 2600x @ 4ghz
Motherboard Asus Strix x470-F
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S
Memory 2x 8gb Corsair LPX 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1070 OC
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 250gb | WD Blue 1TB M.2
Display(s) MSI Optix MAG27C | Asus vg248qe
Case Fractal Design C TG
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Z PCI-E
Power Supply eVGA SuperNova 750w G2
Mouse Corsair Glaive RGB
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
It's also a ~320mm^2 chip versus the ~520mm^2 of the GTX580, and is rumored to be on par for the HD7970 (a fellow 500mm^2+ chip). All things considered, I think it's a pretty solid offering if all the rumors hold up.



No we won't. This is duopoly economics. GTX680 will be priced just above or at the price of HD7970 depending on if it performs as well or slightly better. I wouldn't expect prices to budge very much.
well, if it's really price at 549 ononline, it will be the price of the HD7970, so if it outperform, there will be a price drop.

But actually, we don't know the performance. If it's 15-20% faster, the HD7970 will need to go down for sure.

Instead yes, this is not good for us as the price is higher.
 

Mindweaver

Moderato®™
Staff member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
6,946 (1.79/day)
Location
Charleston, SC
System Name Sechs / AMDHasRyzen
Processor i7 5820k @ 4.5ghz / Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard X99S GAMING 7 / GIGABYTE B450 AORUS M
Cooling CORSAIR Hydro Series H100i Extreme / Stock cooler
Memory G.Skill DDR4 2800 16GB 4x4GB / CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) PNY Quadro K2000 / EVGA RTX 2070 Black
Storage Samsung 850 PRO 256GB SSD /Intel 240gb, corsair 120gb SSD, 3x 1 tb s storage
Display(s) 2x Acer G276HL 27" 1080p / 3x Acer 22" Nvidia surround
Case Phanteks “Enthoo Pro series”/ Cooler Master Storm Scout
Audio Device(s) Azalia Realtek ALC1150 / Realtek ALC1220
Power Supply Corsair CXM CX600M / Corsair 600w
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma / Razer DeathAdder
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow Ultimate /
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 / Windows 10 Pro x64
Although its frustrating to know, what you say is true for most games.. but not all games(engines) are & will be console ports.. there is reason to believe that some developers like DICE are making efforts to make full use of Microsoft's DirectX features.. one good example is "DirectCompute" API that is used in some games (ex:BF3 , Metro 2033) for enhancing visuals with 'ambient occlusion', 'DOF', etc.. and these enhancements cannot be handled by consoles, IGPs & APUs.. but can realise the full potential of performance GPUs

so, there is hope that more developers will try to make use of the true potential in discrete performance GPUs :cool:
Ok from your statement above you would pay those high prices to play a game you might get from a developer that caters to consoles? I hate to tell you but even DICE started to back track before release... Oh and the last time I checked my 5850's in CF have the latest Microsoft DirectX features... and play all of those games just fine... So, again why would anybody pay these prices that there current cards can handle? You could argue that hey you can go to a single card, but but.. wait my GTX480 that I only paid $219 plays all of these games just fine as well... Err if we listened to NVIDIA - The Way it's meant to be played we would all go buy a fu*kn console... [/rant]
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
3,389 (0.63/day)
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name RiseEN Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @ stock
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X370 GAMING X AM4
Cooling Corsair H115i PRO RGB, 280mm Radiator, Dual 140mm ML Series PWM Fans
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 580 8GB Nitro+ SE
Storage Corsair Force MP500 480GB M.2 (OS) + Force MP510 480GB M.2 (Steam/Games)
Display(s) Asus 27" (MG278Q) 144Hz WQHD 1440p + 1 x Asus 24" (VG245H) FHD 75Hz 1080p
Case Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Gaming Case
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries 5Hv2 w/ ASUS Xonar DGX PCI-E GX2.5 Audio Engine Sound Card
Power Supply Corsair TX750W Power Supply
Mouse Razer DeathAdder PC Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G15 Classic Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro - 64-Bit Edition
Benchmark Scores I'm the Doctor.
So this new card has similarities in performance. The HD 7970 wins a few and the GTX 680 wins others. What happens to the Hot, Loud but Kick Ass performance NV?

The performance of the GTX 680 is somewhere around Radeon HD 7970 as it wins in some games and benchmarks and loses in others. Of course, these are all results that came from Nvidia so we'll hold our judgement until we see some reviews.
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26308-nvidia-gtx-680-pixellized-in-more-detail
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.64/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
c**ts so basically this was earmarked as as mid range with GK104 being high, though now this is their high range of the 6 series? knew the 50% improvement on like for like basis was to good to be true, so I will now wait for 7 series :banghead:
 

NHKS

New Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
596 (0.20/day)
Ok from your statement above you would pay those high prices to play a game you might get from a developer that caters to consoles? [/rant]
No, and in fact I am totally disappointed seeing the price speculation of the GTX680 @ 550$.. I was hoping nvidia to price the GK104 competitively.. we all know that GK104 means a mid-to-high range gpu.. since GK100 has nt seen light we get the 104 branded as GTX680 at the price of GK100(?), which is just unfair of nvidia.. GK104 should have got the GTX660 branding like GF114 was GTX560Ti.. and so u can find my 'meme' for nvidia under my earlier comment..:p

EDIT:to futher support my view on GK104 being a mid-range > http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26310-nvidia-aims-for-record-quarter (Massive margins on GK104)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.90/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
These are meant for enthusiasts, a very small community who want to spend whatever it takes to have the high-end. Even if a 150$ card can play any of the games out there at decent framerates with decent settings on a decent monitor, if you want higher resolutions, multi-monitor setups and 60 FPS at least, even a 350$ card will choke. So that's why we have these prices.

Now the problem is that there's not enough of a performance jump for the money in lower segments as witnessed by the recent AMD offerings and I don't see Nvidia improving on this given the price and the estimated performance of their top card. So what I'm saying is that basically we pay the same amount of money for the same performance as last gen or we have to pay much more for a jump in performance. That's the catch here and not the fact that the top cards cost 550$.
 

bmwmaster

New Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
51 (0.01/day)
I only hope it will support 3 Display connection to one card....................
580 GTX only supports 2, and i have to do SLi for 3 Screens :-(
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
3,389 (0.63/day)
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name RiseEN Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @ stock
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X370 GAMING X AM4
Cooling Corsair H115i PRO RGB, 280mm Radiator, Dual 140mm ML Series PWM Fans
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 580 8GB Nitro+ SE
Storage Corsair Force MP500 480GB M.2 (OS) + Force MP510 480GB M.2 (Steam/Games)
Display(s) Asus 27" (MG278Q) 144Hz WQHD 1440p + 1 x Asus 24" (VG245H) FHD 75Hz 1080p
Case Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Gaming Case
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries 5Hv2 w/ ASUS Xonar DGX PCI-E GX2.5 Audio Engine Sound Card
Power Supply Corsair TX750W Power Supply
Mouse Razer DeathAdder PC Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G15 Classic Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro - 64-Bit Edition
Benchmark Scores I'm the Doctor.
c**ts so basically this was earmarked as as mid range with GK104 being high, though now this is their high range of the 6 series? knew the 50% improvement on like for like basis was to good to be true, so I will now wait for 7 series :banghead:
I don't like this one bit. It's as though we have no more competition, just collaborative hardware pricing or should I say price fixing.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
1,917 (0.66/day)
Location
Sydney NSW, Australia
System Name Белая коробка | Alienware 13R3 | Asus T300 Chi | Synology DS416 w/ 4X6TB WD Red | Huawei P10
Processor Intel i7-7700k @ 4.8GHz | Intel i7-7700HQ
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z270G | Dell/Alienware thing
Cooling Bequiet! Dark Rock TF | Double fan
Memory G.Skill 2X8gb Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000mhz | DDR4 2X8GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) Galax GeForce GTX 1080 HOF 8GB | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 500GB, Crucial MX200 500GB, 1X WD 4TB Black | 256gb M.2 SSD, 512GB Intel 600p M.2
Display(s) LG 27UD68 & BenQ FP241W (ANCIENT!) | 13" 1080p IPS & Sony X7000E 49" 4K HDR TV
Case InWin 301 (white) | Alienware 13R3
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | onboard sound -Onkyo 808 Receiver
Power Supply InWin Classic Series 900W | Dell 180W brick
Mouse Razer Mamba Wireless (2018) | Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G810 / Corsair K63 Wireless-Lapboard | Red Square OLD SCHOOL TKL - Gateron Blue
Software Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores 2018 BMW 125i F20 LCI-2 | M-Sport | Sunset Orange | Shadow Line | Sunroof
sounds like fermi story again. Top end card having troubles, therefore cores have to be shut-down/disabled in it. Except this time it seems to be bad yields rather than crazy ass out of control temperatures. so looks like the 780 will be the upgrade of the 680 like the 580 was of the 480. Can't wait till the fully enabled 780 then!
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
252 (0.08/day)
Location
Malaysia
Processor Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.1 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8H61-M LX (B3)
Cooling Intel stock HSF
Memory 2x 4GB Kingston DDR3 @ 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Radeon HD 6750 OC
Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA 3
Display(s) HP W2072a 20"
Case Cooler Master Elite 430 Black
Audio Device(s) Integrated (Realtek ALC887)
Power Supply Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 500W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64
@Mindweaver I think this kind of cards are very useful to Let's Play-ers on Youtube. They play lots of games, so this is useful to them. Just look at the system spec from most of the LP-ers, my god..

Edit: They also play the games on max setting, so it kinda makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
396 (0.14/day)
Location
USA
My main problem with the rumors of the 680 come primerally in performance/watt. AMD made the 7xxx series all bout performance/watt compared to the last generation, yet while Nvidia was doing worse than AMD last year at performance/watt, and AMD's entire focus this year was to bolster better performance/watt, Nvidia is claiming to have done better... yet Kepler uses shrunk CUDA cores, which Fermi which is known for power inefficiency was the first to implement.
Also, there are rumors that Nvidia is pushing two to three times the transistors on a die size half that of the 580, yet by geometry alone that is impossible without a 3d transistor layout.

Simply put- we don't know which rumors may be true and which are not. While Nvidia did announce earlier they were "disappointed" with GCN, there is nothing which says they truly are. There is no proof to the point, merely a single statement.

Which should AMD cards prove faster, then all it would do is mean that Nvidia was trying to do was keep AMD cards from selling as much as they could. If kepler is so good, why the NDA? Nvidia should be touting benchmarks and proclaim how great their card is, not hide and let rumors abound about their card.

Because of this fact I believe that the 79xx-killer rumors are likely going to be down-turned. By the rumored architecture design, it should prove to be similar to the 7870 in most respects. And the 7870 outperforms the 7970 in Crysis 2. Which also means that AMD likely has driver issues (big surprise?) with the 79xx series.

However, the main thing I am doubting on is the performance/watt, so we'll see how it turns out. All these rumors just play to Nvidia by making people who would otherwise buy AMD now wait until kepler is released to make a decision, which means that AMD won't have quite as high 2st quarter profits. Also note that Nvidia has the NDA held until near the end of the 2st quarter? Seeing as the NDA ends on the 22nd, and the 2nd quarter ends on the 31st. Oh and that means that most people won't hear the news until the end so that means that Nvidia gets to keep AMD profits down.

Think about it. If Kepler is a flop, then this gives Nvidia a little more buffer until they're able to get their mobile cards out, where they have deals with OEMs in place and they're able to start making profit, without loosing too much to AMD in the performance desktop end.
 
Top