• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Announces GeForce MX150 Laptops: Supercharged For Work and Play

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,050 (2.19/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Remember that MX150 mobile graphics card we covered recently? NVIDIA has just let the cat out of the bag, with an announcement that seemingly confirms the specs we were expecting. NVIDIA is selling this mobile GPU's space as the expected IGP-upgrade, citing up to 3x superior performance-per-Watt compared to previous-generation Maxwell-based GeForce 940MX laptops. In other words, GeForce MX150 enables thinner laptops that run applications faster while sipping less power.





NVIDIA says that MX150 graphics fly through photo editing tasks, cropping, resizing and enhancing photos up to 2.5x faster than integrated GPUs. Editing, remastering and rendering in popular GPU-accelerated applications is also up to 4x faster than on a basic laptop equipped solely with integrated graphics. NVIDIA is positioning its new GeForce MX150 laptops as up to 4x faster than basic laptops with integrated graphics in popular online games. Specs-wise, it retains the GT 1030's 384 CUDA cores (the same as the 940MX), bringing 16 nm tech to entry-level graphics (the 940MX leveraged the 28 nm process.) These are now solely paired with GDDR5 memory, whereas the 940MX could paired with GDDR5 or GDDR3, and most of its graphics performance increases come from the higher clocks allowed by NVIDIA's Pascal architecture, as well as the increase in ROPs that transition entails.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,086 (3.94/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor AMD 3200G
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Stock
Memory Adata 8Gb 2133Mhz DDR4
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Playing catch up to APU's.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
16,204 (3.11/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 2600x
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling AMD Wraith Spire I think
Memory 2 x 8GB G-skill Aegis 3000 or somesuch
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case Some old Antec
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + slightly modded Sony DR-ZX302
Power Supply Fractal Design Effekt 400W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell Sk3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
Playing catch up to APU's.
Surpassing them, actually, if it's indeed a GT1030.

The name is confusing though. If it's essentially a GT1030, why not call it that, or GT10whatever and use the current naming scheme for their other products?
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.22/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Surpassing them, actually, if it's indeed a GT1030.

The name is confusing though. If it's essentially a GT1030, why not call it that, or GT10whatever and use the current naming scheme for their other products?
Perhaps we're getting a sneak peak of a new naming scheme.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.50/day)
I think the naming is because they wanted to stay away from the comparasions against their GTX1050/1050ti offers. "Oh is just a 1030, way weaker than 1050 and 1050ti for gaming". With a MX150 naming and on cheaper laptops, is more like "it has the new MX150 budget graphics that run League of Legends and Dota 2 with good frames! and it is good for photoshop aswell!"

That´s my assumption, I could be completly wrong

Still, this is a very good GPU compared to the previous low budget offerings. Look at power consumption and performance added compared to 940mx
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
2,196 (1.23/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
Surpassing them, actually, if it's indeed a GT1030.

The name is confusing though. If it's essentially a GT1030, why not call it that, or GT10whatever and use the current naming scheme for their other products?
That would not be confusing enough.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
528 (0.41/day)
Still, this is a very good GPU compared to the previous low budget offerings. Look at power consumption and performance added compared to 940mx
Where do you see any concrete numbers other than typical marketing BS?

940MX is Maxwell 1.0 and MX150 is Pascal, both have the same number of CUDA cores (384). We know that Pascal can outperform Maxwell mostly because of the higher clocks (1050 Ti vs 950). We know that the desktop version of GT1030 uses 30W at at 1468 MHz, that 940MX uses 15-25W at 1242 MHz. This card should thus be like ~20% faster than the GDDR5 version of 940MX and it would use ~20W. Very good? No. Slightly better? Yes. Much better power consumption? Maybe 1.5X perf/watt, but there is no chance that number is 3 unless the MX150 is slower than 940MX ...
 
Last edited:

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
16,204 (3.11/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 2600x
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling AMD Wraith Spire I think
Memory 2 x 8GB G-skill Aegis 3000 or somesuch
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case Some old Antec
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + slightly modded Sony DR-ZX302
Power Supply Fractal Design Effekt 400W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell Sk3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
Where do you see any concrete numbers other than typical marketing BS?

940MX is Maxwell 1.0 and MX150 is Pascal, both have the same number of CUDA cores (384). We know that Pascal can outperform Maxwell mostly because of the higher clocks (1050 Ti vs 950). We know that the desktop version of GT1030 uses 30W at at 1468 MHz, that 940MX uses 15-25W at 1242 MHz. This card should thus be like ~20% faster than the GDDR5 version of 940MX and it would use ~20W. Very good? No. Slightly better? Yes. Much better power consumption? Maybe 1.5X perf/watt, but there is no chance that number is 3 unless the MX150 is slower than 940MX ...
One good thing is its GDDR5 only (finally). I'm actually excited for reviews! If they manage to put them in €~500 laptops, that would be amazing.

What I'm really excited about though is Zen APUs.

All this builds on these things being put into <14" laptops, obviosly.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.50/day)
Where do you see any concrete numbers other than typical marketing BS?

940MX is Maxwell 1.0 and MX150 is Pascal, both have the same number of CUDA cores (384). We know that Pascal can outperform Maxwell mostly because of the higher clocks (1050 Ti vs 950). We know that the desktop version of GT1030 uses 30W at at 1468 MHz, that 940MX uses 15-25W at 1242 MHz. This card should thus be like ~20% faster than the GDDR5 version of 940MX and it would use ~20W. Very good? No. Slightly better? Yes. Much better power consumption? Maybe 1.5X perf/watt, but there is no chance that number is 3 unless the MX150 is slower than 940MX ...
Tell me how many laptops had the gDDR5 version. 95% of them had DDR3. The performance gap will be very good, don´t need numbers just look at the specifications and arch. Also with such improvement and only consuming 30w compared to the previous 20w, is good aswell. The way you talk make it seem this gpu isn´t that better than a 940mx when in reality it will basically rape it. Its performance will be very similar to a 750ti. Not an amazing card by any means, but still the most used card on Steam (according to their hardware stats), and until recently was the best budget card. It is decent enough specially for budget laptops. And let´s not forget how high Pascal can clock, something people keep forgetting. A GTX1060 on Laptop has 1600mhz clocks, but the card is constantly at 1800mhz with Gpu boost. Same will happen with this MX150
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
528 (0.41/day)
Tell me how many laptops had the gDDR5 version. 95% of them had DDR3.
Not a single word in those slides says they are comparing MX150 to DDR3 version of 940MX.

The way you talk make it seem this gpu isn´t that better than a 940mx when in reality it will basically rape it.
If we compare it to 940MX with DDR3 it's going to be max 40% faster, if we compare it to GDDR5 version it is probably 20% faster. And remember, I'm speculating that they will go for 20W TDP, if they go lower, the performance difference will get smaller.

Its performance will be very similar to a 750ti.
Even the desktop version of 1030 can't match 750 Ti.


And let´s not forget how high Pascal can clock, something people keep forgetting. A GTX1060 on Laptop has 1600mhz clocks, but the card is constantly at 1800mhz with Gpu boost. Same will happen with this MX150
Desktop 1030 max boost is 1468 MHz it could be much lower for the mobile GPU especially if they are aiming for max perf/watt.

Stop overhyping this card. Thanks!
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.50/day)
Not a single word in those slides says they are comparing MX150 to DDR3 version of 940MX.



If we compare it to 940MX with DDR3 it's going to be max 40% faster, if we compare it to GDDR5 version it is probably 20% faster. And remember, I'm speculating that they will go for 20W TDP, if they go lower, the performance difference will get smaller.



Even the desktop version of 1030 can't match 750 Ti.




Desktop 1030 max boost is 1468 MHz it could be much lower for the mobile GPU especially if they are aiming for max perf/watt.

Stop overhyping this card. Thanks!
You sure? Better take a look at a legit benchmark comparison. The card is almost same as a gtx750ti, loosing in some games for 3% to 5% and raping it on DX12 titles. And it wrecks RX550 aswell. So yeah, considering the price tag and power consumption, the hype is justified. Worth mentioning its overclock capabilities aswell, easy as moving a slider to the right on MSI afterburner. The card has good temperatures. Is a very good budget card, I keep saying it. And almost no laptop had the 940mx gddr5 version, market needed a low budget GPU badly, for laptops. This is an actual improvement in every aspect.

Also let´s not forget the 4k streaming capabilites of Pascal. GPU on laptops aren´t for gaming purposes only.

 
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
234 (0.07/day)
Location
A country of Vast Meadows and Picturesque Forests
System Name SUPPRESSOR Mk IV
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X @stock (PBO + XFR > any manual OC)
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling EK CoolStream PE360 @front w/ 3x NB B12-P; Eisblock XPX; Eisbecher D5 250; Eispumpe VPP755;
Memory G.Skill Trident Z LGBT (B-die) 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3000MHz CL14 @3466 CL14 (F4-3000C14D-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 w/ EK-FC RGB Nickel + EK CoolStream PE360 @top + PowerLink
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SSD x2; +FreeNAS in Node 304 w/ 4x6TB Seagate IronWolf 3.5" HDD
Display(s) NEC PA241W @1200p; Dell U2412M @1200p; Dell U2413 @1200p; LG 65SJ950V @2160p
Case Fractal Define 7 Black /w Dark TG; +2x Be Quiet Shadow Wings 120mm at bottom
Audio Device(s) Yamaha AG06; UR28M; SB X-Fi Elite Pro; Yamaha HS7; Sennheiser HD 650; HyperX Cloud; AKG C214
Power Supply XFX XTS2 1000W (P1-1000-XTS2) (Seasonic PD platform)
Mouse Zowie EC1-A; +Akasa Mouse Pad TXL 1000x500mm
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro (Red Cherry MX)
Software Windows 8.1 Pro x64; / ForceWare 385.41
MX150? Makes me remember MX440 :D
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
430 (0.36/day)
One good thing is its GDDR5 only (finally). I'm actually excited for reviews! If they manage to put them in €~500 laptops, that would be amazing.

What I'm really excited about though is Zen APUs.

All this builds on these things being put into <14" laptops, obviosly.
It would indeed, though it seems unlikely.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,754 (0.77/day)
...

Desktop 1030 max boost is 1468 MHz it could be much lower for the mobile GPU especially if they are aiming for max perf/watt.

...
Well that's not true, max boost is never marketed. That is marketed boost clocks which are not the same as max boost clock set in bios. One can get max boosts out by taking off limiting factories like temperature and power limits and look where clocks are in 3D application. Which I believe W1zzard does in his graphics card reviews. I.E. latest GTX1050ti review(marketed boost clock for gtx1050ti is 1392 MHz which gpu-z pic shows in that review):
Maximum overclock of our sample is 2240 MHz on the memory (28% overclock) and +279 MHz to the GPU's base clock, which increases maximum Boost from 1746 MHz to 2025 MHz (16% overclock).
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
2,196 (1.23/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
Not a single word in those slides says they are comparing MX150 to DDR3 version of 940MX.
Not sure if serious.
1060 was 25% faster than 480, according to nVidia slides.
Not sure which mem either of the cards was supposed to use, though.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
4,540 (1.66/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name Nemesis
Processor Intel Core i7-2600K
Motherboard Asrock Z68 Pro3
Cooling Cryorig C7
Memory 16GB DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Storage Sandisk 120GB SSD, 3x Kingston A400 480GB SSD, 500GB & 320GB HDDs
Display(s) Viewsonic VA2465S-3 & HP LA2306x w/ Arctic Z2 gen3
Case Phanteks Eclipse P400S
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Audigy2 ZS
Power Supply Kolink Modular 600W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Top