• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler 2 GB

Joined
Jan 9, 2008
Messages
621 (0.17/day)
Likes
67
Processor INTEL Core i5-2500K - 4.4GHZ
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 (REV 3.0) LGA 1155
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE GTX 980
Storage SAMSUNG 840 EVO 1 TB x 2 + 2xWD6400AAKS RAID 0
Display(s) LG 34UM65 (2560x1080)
Case CORSAIR 650D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850
Mouse CORSAIR Raptor M45
Keyboard CORSAIR K70
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Wasn't sure if this had been brought up yet, but it says FXAA has been added as an option in the control panel?

Does this mean it can now be forced in all DX9/10/11 games? I know before they had an option in Nvidia's control panel, but it was only for OpenGL.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
160 (0.07/day)
Likes
41
Location
Ardabil, Iran
Processor Core i5 4690K
Motherboard Asrock Z97 Pro4
Cooling Stock
Memory 8 GB DDR3
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 580
Storage 850 Evo 120 Boot Drive
Display(s) 2236VWA
Case CM Elite 334
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Green 1350W
Software Windows 10 Pro
Wasn't sure if this had been brought up yet, but it says FXAA has been added as an option in the control panel?

Does this mean it can now be forced in all DX9/10/11 games? I know before they had an option in Nvidia's control panel, but it was only for OpenGL.
and also, which of the outlined features will be supported by older generation cards (such as fermi, gt200, g80)
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,088 (0.23/day)
Likes
360
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor Phenom II x4 BE 970-3.6 Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) MSI HD6850 Cyclone;860/1100 Mhz
Storage SSD-840 pro 128 Gb;Seagate 500Gb;WD-1Tb
Display(s) Samsung 2032BW
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Cooleer Master RP M520
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win7 64bit sp1
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
that's true. I threw away a bunch of HD 2000 class cards last year. and yes, it hurt.
HD 3000 will be next this year
don't throw them better donate for making free pc for poor people's kids....
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,725 (0.71/day)
Likes
203
Location
So. Cal.
I feel somewhat sorry for those who already got the 7970
I don't if they've used and enjoyed it for say most all of Jan, Feb and now 3 weeks in March that's 10 weeks or $5 a week.

While today you'd supposedly trail by approximately 5% in a few of the most demanding titles @1920x where it really matters (those approx 60Fps or less). So if you don't play Batman, Civilization, or Dragon Age it really becomes moot. It is BF3 that really mattered most... 7970 buyer has played for 10 weeks and today they feel like the lost 10% in average Fps that alway the nature of this bussiness. Though in some tests we see the minimums for GTX680 while good aren't spectacular as 10%, and it's those low-points that matter more when it actual game play. And that's where "Turbo Boost" took the advantage especially BF3 and the untapped omph in a GK104, but they needed Turbo Boost to find it. Nvidia knew BF3 was the only game they had to really make the most supearlative, and on that front the spent the time/money and really worked the profiles of the "clock speed nanny" to really shine. Will they be able to cost PCB and the components that are need for that on a $400 GK104?

There’s a lot of talk about efficiency, and on the pure watts/Fps it very good, but in actual gaming consumption it's like 3% more efficient across the spectrum of actual gaming titles, which yield say 5% in Fps (verse a 7970) while exceptionally remarkable against previous GTX580. That's again all "clock speed nanny"

When GTX580 plummeted in price a few weeks back that was a clear sign the 680 was going to overwhelm the 580. I feel sorry for the GTX580 buyer who thought it was a deal for $420, while needing to work some huge rebate... they may hurt the worst. :twitch:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
7,693 (2.07/day)
Likes
1,772
Location
Chicago
System Name DarkStar
Processor i5 3570K 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 3
Cooling Apogee HD White/XSPC Razer blocks
Memory 8GB Samsung Green 1600
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 670 4GB
Storage 2 x 120GB Samsung 830
Display(s) 27" QNIX
Case Enthoo Pro
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 760
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard Ducky Pro MX Black
Software Windows 8.1 x64
-----Original Message-----
From: Jensen H Huang
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 9:48 AM
To: Employees
Subject: Kepler Rising

Today, the first Kepler - GTX 680 - is on shelves around the world!

Three years in the making. The endeavor of a thousand of the world's best engineers. One vision - build a revolutionary GPU and make a giant leap in efficient-performance.

Achieving efficient-performance, great performance while consuming the least possible energy, required us to change our entire design approach. Close collaboration between architecture-design-VLSI-software-devtech-systems, intense scrutiny on where energy is spent, and inventions at every level were necessary. The results are fantastic as you will see in the reviews.

Kepler also cultivated a passion for craftsmanship - nothing wasted, everything put together with care - with a goal of creating an exquisite product that works wonderfully. Let's continue to raise the bar and establish extraordinary craftsmanship as a hallmark of our company.

Today is just the beginning of Kepler. Because of its super energy-efficient architecture, we will extend GPUs into datacenters, to super thin notebooks, to superphones. Not to mention bring joy and delight to millions of gamers around the world.

I want to thank all that gave your heart and soul to create Kepler. You've created something wonderful.

Congratulations everyone!

Jensen
Anandtech
 
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
4,090 (1.17/day)
Likes
766
Location
Iowa, USA
System Name FUTURE CUBE!
Processor intel Core i5 6600k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X-Gaming 7
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE BK
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 3000 Mhz C15 32GB 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aorus 1080 Ti
Storage 2x M.2 Samsung Evo 250GB/500GB / WD Blue 500GB / 2x RAID1 Toshiba P300 3TB
Display(s) Samsung C24FG70 1080p 144hz Quantum Dot/ASUS VH226H 1080p 21.5"
Case "THE CUBE" Custom built, pure Red Alder wood
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Core3D/ Logitech Z-2300 200 watts/ Beyerdynamic DT 880
Power Supply Seasonic X Gold 650W
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Because of its super energy-efficient architecture
How is it super efficient? It should consume less power than it does.
It has smaller bus, less shaders, less memory. and it only wins in peak, Max and Blue-ray, but I guess it is still faster and it does win Max power by a bit. I would say its Efficient, but not Super.



But thats me just being picky I still want this card!! My 2x 4850 comes in at almost 50%:cry: of this GTX 680 in Relative performance.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
6,201 (1.67/day)
Likes
982
System Name Phantom Skylake
Processor Intel i5 6600k @ 4.5GHZ w/ Corsair H80i CPU AiO w/Corsair 120mm SP120 RBG fan
Motherboard Asus z170-A
Cooling 4x120mm Corsair SP120 RBG fans
Memory G.skill DDR4 3200MHz 2x4GB (Soon to be Corsair Vengeance RBG)
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCUII GTX 980 STRIX
Storage Samsung 960 EVO m.2, Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 2TB backup, 16TB Synology DS1515+ RAID-5
Display(s) Acer Predator 34" 3440x1440
Case Corsair 570x RBG Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Corsair Void Wireless RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX750w Professional Series
Mouse Logitech G602s
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 x64 Professional
Benchmark Scores Coming Soon
W1z, is there any chance you can do a test with WoW at 1920x1200 with all the bells and whistles? (there is a DX11 option)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
7,693 (2.07/day)
Likes
1,772
Location
Chicago
System Name DarkStar
Processor i5 3570K 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 3
Cooling Apogee HD White/XSPC Razer blocks
Memory 8GB Samsung Green 1600
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 670 4GB
Storage 2 x 120GB Samsung 830
Display(s) 27" QNIX
Case Enthoo Pro
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 760
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard Ducky Pro MX Black
Software Windows 8.1 x64
I would say its Efficient, but not Super.
Though this is Nvidia and the word "efficient" was never even in their vocabulary before! :D
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,129 (4.56/day)
Likes
3,697
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
Def nice clock's! bta already posted a link to that yesterday IIRC. Also you wont see any end user's getting that high, best we/they can hope for is what ever the DOC paramater's allow :eek:

Plus that was done with the add on VRM pwr board ;)
yeah well Evga SC+ signature varient of the 680 will have 8+6 pin power design, but then 5 phase PWM, Evga FTW will have 8 phase pwm, and then the Classified will have 13 phase I think. So those cards shoudl be able to clock pretty damn well assuming the cooling is adequete
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
123 (0.06/day)
Likes
14
Woohoo Radeon HD7970 out the door, and GTX680sli in lol. Pretty pumped and I hope the drivers are better, as this 7970 in CF was giving me a headache one problem after another.


:nutkick:
 

Baam

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
93 (0.03/day)
Likes
18
Location
Trucker..so all over
Processor AMD FX-8120@4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Thermalright Venomous X Black
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB
Video Card(s) ATI 5850 crossfire
Case COOLER MASTER HAF 912
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi
Power Supply Antec TPQ-850
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
New card looks great. Might be time for me to go Nvidia. As of now, price performance, this card kills the 7970.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
168 (0.08/day)
Likes
19
Location
In the Ether...probably eating cheetos atm.
System Name Surprising Mini Duece
Processor i3-550 3.2ghz/core (nice little gamer, 98% games = dual core code only)
Motherboard ASUS P7H55M-LE
Cooling Cooler Master Vortex
Memory 8GB Patriot Signature Series 1.5v DDR3 1333Mhz w/ spreaders.
Video Card(s) Old slugger ... EVGA 8800GTS 640Mb SC edition. Soon to be retired.
Storage Segate Sata II 64mb cache 1TB single platter.. fast but chirpy lol
Display(s) 1x Asus VS247h-p 2ms LOVE IT, 1x Sceptre 22" Naga 2ms, 1x 20inch Samsung Syncmaster
Case Aerocool QX-2000 .. my latest project
Audio Device(s) Onboard HD
Power Supply Seasonic x650 Gold! Primo 105Celisius Jap cap wonder.
Software Whatever I can pirate ;) lol jk .. Windows 7 legit license
Benchmark Scores LOL I still get rock steady 57-60FPS in Skyrim on medium settings no AA on this 5 year old video car
Remember the brilliant RV770? This is history repeating with Nvidia as the one with the clever architecture.

GTX680 = Tahiti. So either card is worth buying in terms of performance. The reason to buy Kepler would be the better price, lower power consumption (i.e. GPU produce less heat energy), CUDA, fancy AA. As for features that were unique to ATI is also now available in NV, eyefinity and the lean/low power consuming architecture. I hope NV will never make another barbarian/joule guzzler GPU again.

This is really the perfect achievement from Nvidia! This is definitely a worthy buy, lets see if this will ignite the price war. I'll definitely get one when the price is a bit better than they are now.

What I seriously love about this card is that it is able to keep up despite being lean and consumes less power. Moreover, for once, this chip does not have a heat spreader like previous NV cards. This makes the job of adding water block a lot easier. When I mod my 560TI to water cooling, it was quite annoying that the spreader was in the way. I end up drilling holes and a whole lot of custom mod to get it to work.

The dynamic clocking system is a good feature. I actually tried my own custom dynamic clocking on my 4890. It worked but everytime the clock changes, there is a noticeable halt. This is similar to the problem faced by Kepler now. See the last paragraph:
http://techreport.com/articles.x/22653/9
Hopefully future drivers will fix this up because I hate those inconsistent framerate.
- Tahiti = Fermi which was out way sooner. Correction, Tahiti = improved Fermi, Kepler = improved Fermi / Tahiti hybird... more or less.
- Idk why people are trying to hold on the 4 screen things since you could 4 independent ever since 1st gen iSeries H55 chipset... IGD+PEG at same time 2 on board 2 on card.. and you could 3 way for Nvidia in the lesser known MDT series or the 2win on a single card. Yes the Kepler is a better improvement on this but it's not like 4 monitors was not possible on the Nvidia side.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
359 (0.17/day)
Likes
61
I don't if they've used and enjoyed it for say most all of Jan, Feb and now 3 weeks in March that's 10 weeks or $5 a week.

While today you'd supposedly trail by approximately 5% in a few of the most demanding titles @1920x where it really matters (those approx 60Fps or less). So if you don't play Batman, Civilization, or Dragon Age it really becomes moot. It is BF3 that really mattered most... 7970 buyer has played for 10 weeks and today they feel like the lost 10% in average Fps that alway the nature of this bussiness. Though in some tests we see the minimums for GTX680 while good aren't spectacular as 10%, and it's those low-points that matter more when it actual game play. And that's where "Turbo Boost" took the advantage especially BF3 and the untapped omph in a GK104, but they needed Turbo Boost to find it. Nvidia knew BF3 was the only game they had to really make the most supearlative, and on that front the spent the time/money and really worked the profiles of the "clock speed nanny" to really shine. Will they be able to cost PCB and the components that are need for that on a $400 GK104?

There’s a lot of talk about efficiency, and on the pure watts/Fps it very good, but in actual gaming consumption it's like 3% more efficient across the spectrum of actual gaming titles, which yield say 5% in Fps (verse a 7970) while exceptionally remarkable against previous GTX580. That's again all "clock speed nanny"

When GTX580 plummeted in price a few weeks back that was a clear sign the 680 was going to overwhelm the 580. I feel sorry for the GTX580 buyer who thought it was a deal for $420, while needing to work some huge rebate... they may hurt the worst. :twitch:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/16
in this review the hd7970 did better than kepler and was well in the 80fps range, which is wierd if you ask me

also look at this
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/17
hd7970 is dominating in compute, so while kepler is a bit more efficient in games it happens to be for the price of compute(but i would take that with a grain of salt as this review about compute isnt extensive enough)
but dang this round it looks like both amd and nvidia are kinda switching places! or more or less becoming very similar

EDIT: also i just realized this test is using an i7 920 while the other is using an intel sandy bridge extreme, the difference between the 2 is interesting
and here the driver used is 11.12, any reason why you didnt use catalyst 12.2 w1zz? since i believe thats the one that adds support to hd7970(im assuming because they dont make a great difference and the release hd7970 results are being compared with kepler)
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
151 (0.07/day)
Likes
12
NVIDIA should release a version of this card which doesn't have GPU Boost and with which we can change the base clocks. GPU Boost is useless.
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
7,693 (2.07/day)
Likes
1,772
Location
Chicago
System Name DarkStar
Processor i5 3570K 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 3
Cooling Apogee HD White/XSPC Razer blocks
Memory 8GB Samsung Green 1600
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 670 4GB
Storage 2 x 120GB Samsung 830
Display(s) 27" QNIX
Case Enthoo Pro
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 760
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard Ducky Pro MX Black
Software Windows 8.1 x64
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,286 (0.93/day)
Likes
528
Location
Burlington, VT
Processor Intel i5-2500k
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD65
Cooling Deep Cool Gammax 400
Memory 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) Acer GD235HZbid 120hz LCD
Case Rosewill Challenger Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 650W 650-TX
Software Windows 10
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/16
in this review the hd7970 did better than kepler and was well in the 80fps range, which is wierd if you ask me

also look at this
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/17
hd7970 is dominating in compute, so while kepler is a bit more efficient in games it happens to be for the price of compute(but i would take that with a grain of salt as this review about compute isnt extensive enough)
but dang this round it looks like both amd and nvidia are kinda switching places! or more or less becoming very similar

EDIT: also i just realized this test is using an i7 920 while the other is using an intel sandy bridge extreme, the difference between the 2 is interesting
and here the driver used is 11.12, any reason why you didnt use catalyst 12.2 w1zz? since i believe thats the one that adds support to hd7970(im assuming because they dont make a great difference and the release hd7970 results are being compared with kepler)
In the exact page you linked the GTX680 beats the HD7970 in 2/3 resolutions. The HD7970 only wins at 1920x1200, and at that res it's only ahead by 1fps, which is well within the MoE. By your logic I could point to the bottom chart (1680x1050) and say "oh look, the GTX570 is faster than the HD7970!" As for Compute, it's 50/50. Half the time it runs about as well as the 580, half the time it runs like a 560Ti. As long as the GTX680 can perform in games, it's a winner in my book (especially being smaller, less power hungry, quieter, and cooler than the HD7970).

As for the test bench, this has come up every review. W1z has done several benchmarks proving the OCed i7-920 is not holding back the setup. While SB is technically faster, when testing GPU's it's largely irrelevant. The difference even in the most CPU-bound game he runs (SC2) was only a few percentage points.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
533 (0.20/day)
Likes
101
Processor Intel Core I5 2500K @ 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V
Cooling Zalman CNPS 9900Max
Memory Corsair Vengeance & Kingston Black 4x4GB DDR3 1600 Mhz
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Dual-X OC R9 280X 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata 3 / Ultrastar 2TB / Seagate 2TB
Display(s) Samsung UN32EH5300 / LG 39LN5700
Case Lian Li PC-K63
Power Supply OCZ ZT 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64 Bits
Talking about head to head o/c versus o/c:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-680-sli-overclock-surround,3162-11.html
"Overall, it’s pretty easy to see that AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 has more to gain from an aggressive overclock than Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 680. It’s a little disappointing, then, that the Catalyst Control Center driver tops out at 1125/1575 MHz."
It would be interesting to see, two msi lightnings of this puppies(gtx680, hd7970) voltage tweaked and tested.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
1,696 (0.68/day)
Likes
542
System Name TeraUltima 7
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K @4Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Pro3-M
Cooling DeepCool Ice Berg Pro "Black Edition"
Memory Kingston Hyper X 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Super JetStream
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB SSD + 1TB Seagate HDD
Display(s) LG 23MP68VQ-P IPS 75HZ 23" MONITOR
Case Aerocool Dead Silence Black Edition Cube
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC892 7.1 HD Audio
Power Supply OCZ Stealth X Stream II 600W
Mouse Logitech G400S | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech G800V Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9470441
GTX 680, currently selling in our place at 686 USD, wtf
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
4,375 (0.92/day)
Likes
1,508
Location
Canuck in Norway
System Name Hellbox 3.0(same case new guts)
Processor i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1
Cooling TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)AC Cuplex Kryos CPU Block/Noctua
Memory 2x8GB Corsair Vengance Pro 2400
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X Fury (Unlocked to Fury X)
Storage WD Caviar Black SATA 3 1TB x2 RAID 0 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue
Display(s) ASUS MG279Q 1440 IPS 144Hz FreeSync
Case TT Kandalf L.C.S.
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050W 80+ Gold
Mouse G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard G19s
Software Win 10 Pro x64
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
1,696 (0.68/day)
Likes
542
System Name TeraUltima 7
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K @4Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Pro3-M
Cooling DeepCool Ice Berg Pro "Black Edition"
Memory Kingston Hyper X 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Super JetStream
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB SSD + 1TB Seagate HDD
Display(s) LG 23MP68VQ-P IPS 75HZ 23" MONITOR
Case Aerocool Dead Silence Black Edition Cube
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC892 7.1 HD Audio
Power Supply OCZ Stealth X Stream II 600W
Mouse Logitech G400S | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech G800V Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9470441
i-im sorry to hear that >.<
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
168 (0.08/day)
Likes
19
Location
In the Ether...probably eating cheetos atm.
System Name Surprising Mini Duece
Processor i3-550 3.2ghz/core (nice little gamer, 98% games = dual core code only)
Motherboard ASUS P7H55M-LE
Cooling Cooler Master Vortex
Memory 8GB Patriot Signature Series 1.5v DDR3 1333Mhz w/ spreaders.
Video Card(s) Old slugger ... EVGA 8800GTS 640Mb SC edition. Soon to be retired.
Storage Segate Sata II 64mb cache 1TB single platter.. fast but chirpy lol
Display(s) 1x Asus VS247h-p 2ms LOVE IT, 1x Sceptre 22" Naga 2ms, 1x 20inch Samsung Syncmaster
Case Aerocool QX-2000 .. my latest project
Audio Device(s) Onboard HD
Power Supply Seasonic x650 Gold! Primo 105Celisius Jap cap wonder.
Software Whatever I can pirate ;) lol jk .. Windows 7 legit license
Benchmark Scores LOL I still get rock steady 57-60FPS in Skyrim on medium settings no AA on this 5 year old video car
Talking about head to head o/c versus o/c:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-680-sli-overclock-surround,3162-11.html
"Overall, it’s pretty easy to see that AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 has more to gain from an aggressive overclock than Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 680. It’s a little disappointing, then, that the Catalyst Control Center driver tops out at 1125/1575 MHz."
It would be interesting to see, two msi lightnings of this puppies(gtx680, hd7970) voltage tweaked and tested.
Lol I love these so called "fair" assessments ... they will over clock the 7970 to make it fair with the GTX 680 yet fail to mention the 1GB advantage of the 7970 cards lol. If they wanted to make it completely "fair" just to compare clock for clock, they'd find a way to nerf the extra 1GB of ram the 7970 has lol ... I know that probably can't be done but still not exactly "fair".

PS... combining post so no double posting.

Wow. I don't know if it's been said yet but prices are already dropping on GTX 560 cards... CompUSA shows all 560 cards from at least 6 manufactures just all went to @$164.99-$169.99 when previously at $179.00-$199.00. GTX 560 ti seems to be dropping a small $5.00 per card as well. Hope it keeps dropping :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
359 (0.17/day)
Likes
61
In the exact page you linked the GTX680 beats the HD7970 in 2/3 resolutions. The HD7970 only wins at 1920x1200, and at that res it's only ahead by 1fps, which is well within the MoE. By your logic I could point to the bottom chart (1680x1050) and say "oh look, the GTX570 is faster than the HD7970!" As for Compute, it's 50/50. Half the time it runs about as well as the 580, half the time it runs like a 560Ti. As long as the GTX680 can perform in games, it's a winner in my book (especially being smaller, less power hungry, quieter, and cooler than the HD7970).

As for the test bench, this has come up every review. W1z has done several benchmarks proving the OCed i7-920 is not holding back the setup. While SB is technically faster, when testing GPU's it's largely irrelevant. The difference even in the most CPU-bound game he runs (SC2) was only a few percentage points.
yes im aware and i agree, what i meant to say is that kepler in this setup ties with hd7970 in civilization, while in wizz's review the hd7970 was way behind, thats the point i was trying to make. and i assumed the cpu had something to do with it, tho the interesting bit is, kepler performed the same pretty much on both benchmarks(except in 1680x1050) while the hd7970 caught up in the anandtech review and was on par with kepler. one thing i just noticed is that wizz used 4xAA, anand was using 4xMSAA

as for the compute, what i was trying to say is that hd7970 is much more consistent in its performance in compute, while the gtx680 definitely seems to have its weak points, with the fluid simulation being on top, and half the benches being all the way down, and on of them being within the top but pretty close to the tahiti its hard to even consider it a total Win (in that specific becnhmark)
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
4,375 (0.92/day)
Likes
1,508
Location
Canuck in Norway
System Name Hellbox 3.0(same case new guts)
Processor i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1
Cooling TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)AC Cuplex Kryos CPU Block/Noctua
Memory 2x8GB Corsair Vengance Pro 2400
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X Fury (Unlocked to Fury X)
Storage WD Caviar Black SATA 3 1TB x2 RAID 0 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue
Display(s) ASUS MG279Q 1440 IPS 144Hz FreeSync
Case TT Kandalf L.C.S.
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050W 80+ Gold
Mouse G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard G19s
Software Win 10 Pro x64
i-im sorry to hear that >.<
So am I. The only major part I kept from my old PC was the GFX card waiting for this gen of cards to surface. But the ridiculous prices have pretty much put my "final upgrade" on hold and hope competition forces prices down...:shadedshu
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
168 (0.08/day)
Likes
19
Location
In the Ether...probably eating cheetos atm.
System Name Surprising Mini Duece
Processor i3-550 3.2ghz/core (nice little gamer, 98% games = dual core code only)
Motherboard ASUS P7H55M-LE
Cooling Cooler Master Vortex
Memory 8GB Patriot Signature Series 1.5v DDR3 1333Mhz w/ spreaders.
Video Card(s) Old slugger ... EVGA 8800GTS 640Mb SC edition. Soon to be retired.
Storage Segate Sata II 64mb cache 1TB single platter.. fast but chirpy lol
Display(s) 1x Asus VS247h-p 2ms LOVE IT, 1x Sceptre 22" Naga 2ms, 1x 20inch Samsung Syncmaster
Case Aerocool QX-2000 .. my latest project
Audio Device(s) Onboard HD
Power Supply Seasonic x650 Gold! Primo 105Celisius Jap cap wonder.
Software Whatever I can pirate ;) lol jk .. Windows 7 legit license
Benchmark Scores LOL I still get rock steady 57-60FPS in Skyrim on medium settings no AA on this 5 year old video car
yes im aware and i agree, what i meant to say is that kepler in this setup ties with hd7970 in civilization, while in wizz's review the hd7970 was way behind, thats the point i was trying to make. and i assumed the cpu had something to do with it, tho the interesting bit is, kepler performed the same pretty much on both benchmarks(except in 1680x1050) while the hd7970 caught up in the anandtech review and was on par with kepler. one thing i just noticed is that wizz used 4xAA, anand was using 4xMSAA

as for the compute, what i was trying to say is that hd7970 is much more consistent in its performance in compute, while the gtx680 definitely seems to have its weak points, with the fluid simulation being on top, and half the benches being all the way down, and on of them being within the top but pretty close to the tahiti its hard to even consider it a total Win (in that specific becnhmark)
LOl sorry thought you were someone repling to my post above originally... I'll let this post stand though cause it's relevant to your post. Of course we're gonna see some fallout spins from the AMD side. All the single card benches and most the 2way SLI benchs that I have seen have the GTX 680 beating the 7970 on BF3 but some with good margin and others just barely. I haven't really looked at the other game benches cause wow, so much to read through atm and swamped. As far as 4xAA and 4xMSAA yeah the MSAA is more taxing on FPS I believe. There could be other small factors contributing to the inconsistencies in the GTX 680 reviews. One of course could be that each review uses a different test bench setup. Not sure what could be going on there; BUT, I did see a reivew where they compared 3way and 4way SLI to 3 and 4 xfire and it seems like something happens in BF3 to the GTX680 with 3 and 4 sli setups... The xfire seemed to beat it miserrably with scalability in 4way SLI being almost non-exsistent. Seems like the GTX 680 losses it's scalability after 3 cards. I'm wondering if this is a driver problem... I havn't had a chance to read more about it yet. Any thought ?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
359 (0.17/day)
Likes
61
LOl sorry thought you were someone repling to my post above originally... I'll let this post stand though cause it's relevant to your post. Of course we're gonna see some fallout spins from the AMD side. All the single card benches and most the 2way SLI benchs that I have seen have the GTX 680 beating the 7970 on BF3 but some with good margin and others just barely. I haven't really looked at the other game benches cause wow, so much to read through atm and swamped. As far as 4xAA and 4xMSAA yeah the MSAA is more taxing on FPS I believe. There could be other small factors contributing to the inconsistencies in the GTX 680 reviews. One of course could be that each review uses a different test bench setup. Not sure what could be going on there; BUT, I did see a reivew where they compared 3way and 4way SLI to 3 and 4 xfire and it seems like something happens in BF3 to the GTX680 with 3 and 4 sli setups... The xfire seemed to beat it miserrably with scalability in 4way SLI being almost non-exsistent. Seems like the GTX 680 losses it's scalability after 3 cards. I'm wondering if this is a driver problem... I havn't had a chance to read more about it yet. Any thought ?
yea man exactly, thats what was confusing me, and i tried spotting the differences but still cant put my hand on what is going on, but owell in general the 680 has an edge in gaming on single gpu, but its pretty close in my opinion
as for scaling yea i saw something like that, and it said that the inconsistent clocks on 4 different cards or so make the scaling very difficult to achieve(remember usualy sli and xfire setups clock according to the lowest card in the bunch, in this case each card clocks differently) so if thats the case im assuming future drivers might disable dynamic clocking(thats the easy solution) or find some clever way to sort it out and i know nvidia's drivers team is pretty talented and can eventually do it, but i could be wrong as i know very little about this issue other than what i read in the article I saw