• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition 6 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
21,234 (3.52/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 2060 doesn't seem cheap at $349, but this new card has enough steam to beat AMD's RX Vega lineup at better pricing and with much better power/heat/noise. Actually, the RTX 2060 obsoletes much of NVIDIA's GeForce 10 Pascal stack, too.

Show full review
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
81 (0.03/day)
I've been refreshing tpu for this review, and definitely worth it, thanks!

For completeness, perhaps Adaptive Sync support could be mentioned.
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
277 (0.22/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
Fantastic design, relatively cool, quiet and potentially the cheapest one.
Seems like founders edition is the way to go for this one.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
217 (0.06/day)
Location
Pekanbaru - Riau - Indonesia - Earth - Universe
System Name My Best Friend...
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Motherboard Made By Xiaomi
Cooling Air and My Hands :)
Memory 3GB LPDDR3
Video Card(s) Adreno 510
Storage Sandisk 32GB SDHC Class 10
Display(s) 5.5" 1080p IPS BOE
Case Made By Xiaomi
Audio Device(s) Snapdragon ?
Power Supply 2A Adapter
Mouse On Screen
Keyboard On Screen
Software Android 6.0.1
Benchmark Scores 90339
finally, thanks a lot W1zz

Fantastic design, relatively cool, quiet and potentially the cheapest one.
Seems like founders edition is the way to go for this one.
for nvidia cards, I've always prefer founder endition since 6800 series .. really clean, neat and simple yet much elegant.

and good build quality too, no coile whine so far till my last GTX 760.

I'm eager to buy GTX1070, just waiting for the price is right for my wallet
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
277 (0.22/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
finally, thanks a lot W1zz



for nvidia cards, I've always prefer founder endition since 6800 series .. really clean, neat and simple yet much elegant.

and good build quality too, no coile whine so far till my last GTX 760.

I'm eager to buy GTX1070, just waiting for the price is right for my wallet
For the likes of 2080Ti I wouldn't go for the FE version simply because there are AIB cards with significantly better cooling performance and noise levels.
But for this one it's a different story.
the cooling solution seems completely sufficient and it will be selling at MSRP unlike the other FE cards.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
16 (0.01/day)
It's a solid performer for sure... but performance per dollar at the level of 2016 RX 470? Really, can We call it progress? AMD, were are You? We need competition, BAD!
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,771 (0.72/day)
Yeah it's a solid card alright. But how is frame times on higher resolutions, are they good enough for 1440p?
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
2,334 (0.67/day)
Location
US of A
System Name gaming
Processor Intel i7-9700k @ 4.9ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 3
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6G
Storage Crucial MX500, Western Digital 550N NVMe, Crucial P1 NVMe, SanDisk Ultra 3D, WD Blue 3D
Display(s) Dell - SE2717HR 27" IPS LED FHD FreeSync Monitor
Case Phanteks P400A w/ Noctua fans
Audio Device(s) Klipsch pro-media 2.1 speakers
Power Supply Seasonioc Focus Plus 650w
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G15 original
Software Win 10
Benchmark Scores i can finally play crysis
I know I'm in the minority but I thought (or hoped) it would be better or cheaper.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
256 (0.08/day)
I know I'm in the minority but I thought (or hoped) it would be better or cheaper.
you're not alone. This should be a $250 card at most. RTX at this level is useless (I would say for the 2070 as well) so that leaves price, which is the same as a 1070ti (today's prices, not when they launched ). Anyone remember when performance got pushed down lower tiers with each new generation? instead we see the 2060 at the same price as a 1070ti with more or less the same performance. This is a dark day for gamers when you apparently can no longer rely on better performance at lower tiers.

Going by their pricing i expect the 2050 (or whatever they'll call it) to be priced $250 and have the same performance as a 1060
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,800 (6.11/day)
Location
The Kitchen Table
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (34'' 3440x1440x)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
I know I'm in the minority but I thought (or hoped) it would be better or cheaper.
I think this is interesting - the card with OC is equal to a stock 1080, and it also jumps around a bit on performance, and if you look at the actual FPS, is it really such a leap forward from the about equally priced GTX 1070? With 3 years time having passed?

That said, I had actually expected the 2060 to end up a tad lower than it did. Its certainly not a bad card, but really just a baby step forward across a far too long period of time.

Either way great review once again and the number of titles being benched right now is simply incredible.

1546974701187.png
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
887 (0.35/day)
Location
somewhere
I think this is interesting - the card with OC is equal to a stock 1080, and it also jumps around a bit on performance, and if you look at the actual FPS, is it really such a leap forward from the about equally priced GTX 1070? With 3 years time having passed?

That said, I had actually expected the 2060 to end up a tad lower than it did. Its certainly not a bad card, but really just a baby step forward across a far too long period of time.

Either way great review once again and the number of titles being benched right now is simply incredible.

View attachment 114210
I hate to say it but AMD really isn't helping. RX Vega just didn't perform how it should have. If Vega 64 was 1080 Ti (as the chip was intended to perform) then the entire situation would be different I think. the *106 part has crept up the stack into the xx70 series because AMD just simply cannot compete at the high-end. NVIDIA is just one-upping themselves at this point.

I am sad. I just hope Navi/next-gen can save it. Or maybe it will fall to Intel to keep NVIDIA in check? At this point if i get some more money in the next few months I am seriously considering getting a RTX 2060. The performance is nice and I would really like to try RTX in BF5 and Metro Exodus. Shrug.

Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 2060 could be my next PC. Sorry Radeon :(
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
4,559 (1.78/day)
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Gigabyte x470 AORUS Ultra Gamin
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Team T-Force Vulkan DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2060 Super Armor OC
Storage Adata SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case Chieftec AL-01B-OP
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD)
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Zalman K500 modded (Gateron brown)
Software Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Awesome! Didn't expect reviews to happen 'till release date.
Thx, @W1zzard
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,800 (6.11/day)
Location
The Kitchen Table
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (34'' 3440x1440x)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
I hate to say it but AMD really isn't helping. RX Vega just didn't perform how it should have. If Vega 64 was 1080 Ti (as the chip was intended to perform) then the entire situation would be different I think. the *106 part has crept up the stack into the xx70 series because AMD just simply cannot compete at the high-end. NVIDIA is just one-upping themselves at this point.

I am sad. I just hope Navi/next-gen can save it. Or maybe it will fall to Intel to keep NVIDIA in check? At this point if i get some more money in the next few months I am seriously considering getting a RTX 2060. The performance is nice and I would really like to try RTX in BF5 and Metro Exodus. Shrug.

Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 2060 could be my next PC. Sorry Radeon :(
Absolutely true, I've been saying this ever since AMD announced they 'd focus on midrange. Its a loser's strategy.
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
277 (0.22/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
I hate to say it but AMD really isn't helping. RX Vega just didn't perform how it should have. If Vega 64 was 1080 Ti (as the chip was intended to perform) then the entire situation would be different I think. the *106 part has crept up the stack into the xx70 series because AMD just simply cannot compete at the high-end. NVIDIA is just one-upping themselves at this point.

I am sad. I just hope Navi/next-gen can save it. Or maybe it will fall to Intel to keep NVIDIA in check? At this point if i get some more money in the next few months I am seriously considering getting a RTX 2060. The performance is nice and I would really like to try RTX in BF5 and Metro Exodus. Shrug.

Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 2060 could be my next PC. Sorry Radeon :(

RTX 2070 performs closer to the 2080 than 1070 does to the 1080, memory configuration is also similar, so I don't understand why you are even caring about its chip being named "TU106". It doesn't matter.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
887 (0.35/day)
Location
somewhere
RTX 2070 performs closer to the 2080 than 1070 does to the 1080, memory configuration is also similar, so I don't understand why you are even caring about its chip being named "TU106". It doesn't matter.
It does matter because xx60 is now beating RX Vega 64, AMD's flagship. AIB cards will be toe-to-toe but the 2060 is doing it at half the power use and with less resources. I mean hell, even with the bloat from the RT cores and Tensors, it's still a smaller chip. I'm honestly going to wait till Lisa Su's keynote to see if they have an answer but I'm not holding my breath.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,041 (0.64/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Now look how prices will go down for vega&rx line of cards and later on 2060 going under 300$..
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
277 (0.22/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
It does matter because xx60 is now beating RX Vega 64, AMD's flagship. AIB cards will be toe-to-toe but the 2060 is doing it at half the power use and with less resources. I mean hell, even with the bloat from the RT cores and Tensors, it's still a smaller chip. I'm honestly going to wait till Lisa Su's keynote to see if they have an answer but I'm not holding my breath.
Even if AMD is going to be competetive on 7nm VS. Nvidia's 12nm offerings, it's nothing.
If AMD really wants to compete and put a serious pressure on nvidia they need to make a GPU that is at least 30% faster than Titan RTX for high-end offering.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,687 (1.43/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 3400G / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard Asus Prime B450M-A / HP 240 G5
Cooling AM3 Wraith + Spire v2 fan / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Colorful 2666@3466MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) Samsung S22F350 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 x64
Really solid normal performance, bad RT performance, as expected. If we can get the mentioned price, it's a nice card.

W1zzard, I know it's a bit soon, but can we expect a review of the 4GB GDDR5 variant? As the cheapest one, it will probably be the most sold one around here.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,456 (4.20/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Really solid normal performance, bad RT performance, as expected. If we can get the mentioned price, it's a nice card.

W1zzard, I know it's a bit soon, but can we expect a review of the 4GB GDDR5 variant? As the cheapest one, it will probably be the most sold one around here.
Looking at the list of announced cards, nobody has announced anything but 6GB GDDR6 models so far. Even Gigabyte who leaked that long list of models has nothing but 6GB GDDR6 models on their site.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,246 (0.95/day)
Even if AMD is going to be competetive on 7nm VS. Nvidia's 12nm offerings, it's nothing.

If AMD really wants to compete and put a serious pressure on nvidia they need to make a GPU that is at least 30% faster than Titan RTX for high-end offering.
AMD only needs to have comparable performance at a good price to become relevant again. Pushing beyond Nvidia would be great, but that looks like a fantasy at this point.

Look at the performance per watt and you'll see how bad it looks:
Turing is nearly twice as efficient per watt. Vega 64 (4096 core, 10.2-12.7 Tflop) is beaten by RTX 2060 (1920 core, 5.2-6.5 Tflop). It should be obvious to anyone how inefficient GCN really is at this point. Even the advantage of 7nm will not make up for this.
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
277 (0.22/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
AMD only needs to have comparable performance at a good price to become relevant again. Pushing beyond Nvidia would be great, but that looks like a fantasy at this point.

Look at the performance per watt and you'll see how bad it looks:
Turing is nearly twice as efficient per watt. Vega 64 (4096 core, 10.2-12.7 Tflop) is beaten by RTX 2060 (1920 core, 5.2-6.5 Tflop). It should be obvious to anyone how inefficient GCN really is at this point. Even the advantage of 7nm will not make up for this.

I know all of those things, my point is that even if AMD is competetive on 7nm against turing, they are not gonna win anything.
I'm pretty sure nvidia likes to move to 7nm as soon as possible, rumors say they will use Samsung's EUV solution which should reduce manufacturing costs.
 
Top