• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 3070 Ti Rumored Specifications Appear

AleksandarK

Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
594 (0.55/day)
NVIDIA is slowly preparing to launch its next-generation Ampere graphics cards for consumers after we got the A100 GPU for data-centric applications. The Ampere lineup is getting more and more leaks and speculations every day, so we can assume that the launch is near. In the most recent round of rumors, we have some new information about the GPU SKU and memory of the upcoming GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 3070 Ti. Thanks to Twitter user kopite7kimi, who had multiple confirmed speculations in the past, we have information that GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 3070 Ti use a GA104 GPU SKU, paired with GDDR6 memory. The cath is that the Ti version of GPU will feature a new GDDR6X memory, which has a higher speed and can reportedly go up to 21 Gbps.

The regular RTX 3070 is supposed to have 2944 CUDA cores on GA104-400 GPU die, while its bigger brother RTX 3070 Ti is designed with 3072 CUDA cores on GA104-300 die. Paired with new technologies that Ampere architecture brings, with a new GDDR6X memory, the GPUs are set to be very good performers. It is estimated that both of the cards would reach a memory bandwidth of 512 GB/s. So far that is all we have. NVIDIA is reportedly in Design Validation Test (DVT) phase with these cards and is preparing for mass production in August. Following those events is the official launch which should happen before the end of this year, with some speculations indicating that it is in September.


View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (6.73/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
21 gbps on a 70ti o_O
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
1,104 (0.36/day)
Location
Romania
System Name "No name"
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Noctua U12P
Memory 16GB 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Ti
Storage Adata 512GB SSD, WD30PURX
Display(s) AOC CQ32G1
Case Segotep Halo 5
Audio Device(s) ALC Codec + Maudio AV32 and Fiio E10k + Audiotehnica TAD 400
Power Supply Seasonic G650 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Asus Strix MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
So RTX 3070 = ~RTX 2080 ? If the price is on par with a brand new RTX 2070 then it's gaming time starting this fall.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
7,958 (2.09/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703/?
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks./16Gb
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked/Rtx 2060
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
So, absolutely definitely a September paper launch with a dribble of cards until January/march.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
45 (0.36/day)
Only 2944/3072 CUDA cores on 7 nm die? This thing will have to be clocked way past 2 GHz in order to match/beat 2080TI (4352 CU). I'm hoping we're not in for another Turing like disappointment.

2.944/3072 shaders x 2 Ghz x 2 instructions per clock = 11.78/ 12.29 FP32 (float) performance... (RTX 2080TI FP32 = 13.45)

Either this thing can boost clocks higher than 2Ghz (+2.2Ghz), has +10% IPC gain, or we're f...ed.

GTX 670 was 6 % slower than GTX 590 ....... 40->28nm
GTX 770 was 51 % slower than GTX 690 ($1K GPU in 2012!) .......-> 28nm both
GTX 970 was 3% slower than GTX 780 TI ...... 28nm both
GTX 1070 was 12% faster than GTX 980TI 28nm .... 28nm ->14nm
RTX 2070 was 10% slower than 1080TI ...... 14->12 nm
RTX 3070 ? 2080TI ....... 12->10 nm or 12nm -> 7nm?


Are we in for another Turing moment? If my calculations stand, we might get 2080S level of performance for 500 bucks when Xbox X costs the same while offering similar TFlops horsepower.
Something's not right here. 3070(TI) being slower than 2080TI would just not be a worthy upgrade considering new consoles performance. Or Nvidia just don't care about PC gamers migrating to consoles?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
103 (0.18/day)
So RTX 3070 = ~RTX 2080 ? If the price is on par with a brand new RTX 2070 then it's gaming time starting this fall.
I was expecting something like the 1070 with performance similar to that of the 2080ti, given that they moved to a new node.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
122 (0.02/day)
rumored specs... grain of salt, i also saw an article talk about 8nm from samsung instead of 7nm because amd took all the allocation at tsmc? until its announced the hype train continues..
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,638 (2.20/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Definitely a lot of parts here that don't quite add up. Debuting a new type of memory on an xx70 Ti SKU? Expecting the same memory bandwidth on both SKUs despite the higher tier one having more advanced and faster clocking memory? Just a handful of shaders separating them?

Also, starting out with an xx70 Ti SKU in the lineup speaks to the price ladder extending higher yet again - adding rungs to the middle at launch isn't likely to push lower tier prices down, just push higher ones up. Hooray!

Also, mass production in August either means mass production of the die in August, which means 4-6 months before these hit the streets, or mass production of partner cards in August, which as noted above means some early cards might arrive 1-2 months after, no time to build up stocks, so availability will be bad for several more months.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
632 (0.25/day)
I still find it dubious there exists a memory type out there that no one has heard of before and that has speeds that match HBM2.
Even with GDDR5X there was something about it months before from Micron. You would thing there would be some proof of it's existance?

And would this be Nvidia exclusive with AMD using "regular" GDDR6?
Or does Nvidia think that AMD will use HBM2 and thus needs to have this special memory to compete?

I mean hey - if it turn out to be accurate - great. But i still have my reservations.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
251 (0.30/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i
Memory 16Gb CL14 Ripjaws V @3666MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD
Display(s) Korean Unbadged
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G703
Keyboard Crap!
So no additional memory bandwidth for the 3070 over the 2070?

I bet the price will go up though...
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
206 (2.31/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Either this thing can boost clocks higher than 2Ghz (+2.2Ghz), has +10% IPC gain, or we're f...ed.
Past rumors were indeed for more than 10% IPC gain.

But wait&see and big grains of salt seem to apply to most of the latest rumors...
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,354 (4.08/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Only 2944/3072 CUDA cores on 7 nm die? This thing will have to be clocked way past 2 GHz in order to match/beat 2080TI (4352 CU).
Who said it's supposed to beat a 2080ti ? The days of true generation improvements are over, for technical and business reasons.

HBM2 and HBM2E have the possibility to deliver more bandwidth, but you would have to have a lot of memory on board.
No, it's the other way around. The reason HBM is faster is because the bus width is very wide, you can connect a single module with a 1024 bit wide bus, GDDR6 chips are each connected with a measly 32 bit interface. You need far, far less chips with HBM than with GDDR6 or any other conventional memory type. Just to make a point, if you were to use the fastest HBM modules avaiable you'd only need two of them to get 920 GB/s, almost a TB/s.

HBM give less bandwidth per GB than GDDR6/6x
It doesn't even makes sense to think of it in terms of "bandwidth per GB". It's bandwidth per module and as explained above HBM is basically an entire order of magnitude superior in this regard.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
206 (2.31/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
You're new to this it seems. :)

FTFY. :p
Well, rumors/leaks from a few months ago were at least coherent with themselves.
Here I don't even understand the numbers. 21Gbs is what kind of speed, sounds more like bandwidth? 21GHz?
If it's 21GHz, why the final bandwidth is so low, only 512GB/s?
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,354 (4.08/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
If it's 21GHz, why the final bandwidth is so low, only 512GB/s?
Supposedly "it's up to". I don't think we'll see 21 Gbps any time soon.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,638 (2.20/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
The main thing that slow down HBM is the cost. HBM2 and HBM2E have the possibility to deliver more bandwidth, but you would have to have a lot of memory on board.

HBM2E can deliver 460 GB/s per 16 GB stack. Something similar to GDDR6 can deliver with 8 GB on a 256 bit bus on the Radeon RX 5700 XT

For a memory that already cost more per GB than GDDR6 and require a costly interposer instead of using printed circuit board, that make this memory way costlier than this.

That is the main reason. you can still get more bandwidth if you go with a 4 chips design like Vega64 cpu, but it would mean a 64 GB GPU.

HBM give less bandwidth per GB than GDDR6/6x
There's a significant misunderstanding here: HBM(2(E)) stacks are flexible in their sizing. A HBM2E stack can (IIRC) be 2-16GB (1-high to 8-high), without affecting the bandwidth of the stack (as that is determined by the controller die on the bottom of the stack, not the number of stacked chips). In other words you could get a ridiculous bandwidth 8GB HBM2e setup with four 2GB stacks, but you'd then need to be willing to pay the cost (more stacks is more expensive than taller stacks; more stacks requires more controllers and physical connections on the GPU/CPU die; more stacks requires a larger interposer). Something like the 8GB 2-stack Vega setup is a reasonable compromise, though any new product with something similar would likely use much faster memory as well.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
45 (0.36/day)
Who said it's supposed to beat a 2080ti ? The days of true generation improvements are over, for technical and business reasons.
GTX 670 was 6 % slower than GTX 590 ....... 40->28nm
GTX 770 was 51 % slower than GTX 690 ($1K GPU in 2012!) .......-> 28nm both
GTX 970 was 3% slower than GTX 780 TI ...... 28nm both
GTX 1070 was 12% faster than GTX 980TI 28nm .... 28nm ->14nm
RTX 2070 was 10% slower than 1080TI ...... 14->12 nm
RTX 3070 ? 2080TI ....... 12->10 nm or 12nm -> 7nm?

As you can see every time NGreedia went to double node density, we got around previous generation's xx80 TI level of performance. Why would anyone even consider buying 3070 if it offers 2080(S) level of performance for 500 bucks? Nvidia's 3070 GPU has to beat XBox X by a decent margin or many PC gamers will have hard time justifying the purchase and might skip Ampere or even decide to buy new console instead. For example, I own 3.5 yo 1080TI and I see no reason in upgrading to Ampere if it doesn't offer 2080TI level of performance for 500 bucks so Nvidia wouldn't see my money for another 2-3 years if performance isn't there. I don't know if that's in their best business interest.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
3,294 (1.66/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
794 (0.44/day)
Clearly our upgrade path is 3080Ti, so you get 46% more Cuda with 30% IPC async compute variable shader rate capable and 50% more power hungry, also 1TB s bandwidth In the case of the mythical GDDR6X. 1080Ti/2070S +80%.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,103 (1.13/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Newest rumor from Chiphell claims the upcoming 3080Ti (or the non Titan flagship equivalent) will boost 24GB of VRAM.


$1499 for lowest end 3080Ti would I dare say?
 
Top