- Jan 8, 2017
- 8,226 (3.34/day)
|System Name||Good enough|
|Processor||AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge|
|Motherboard||ASRock B650 Pro RS|
|Cooling||2x 360mm Alphacool NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow|
|Memory||32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz|
|Video Card(s)||Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora|
|Storage||1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB|
|Display(s)||LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV|
|Case||Deepcool Matrexx 70|
New consoles are 10 GB for CPU+VRAM, your PC has 16 GB for CPU + 10 GB for VRAM, should be fine. Obviously no way to predict the future
Thing is though, consoles will use dynamic resolutions, checkerboarding and all sorts of compromises to get there. For someone wanting native 4K with highest settings, it is concerning.
A game requiring < 3.5GB of system memory and >10GB of VRAM sounds unlikely.
I don't think anyone is wondering whether or not a game is going to need more than 10 GB any time soon because they wont. Running them at 4K with everything maxed out will, most definitely cause >10GB usage quite soon.
I fully expect not a single complain from AMD fans
Dude you are the only guy that keeps talking about AMD here, give it up. You are as cringe worthy as ever with your intentional flaming.