• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

NVIDIA Plans Two New SKUs Based on GK106

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,334 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
A little later this month, NVIDIA plans to launch the GeForce GTX 660, its first desktop GPU based on the 28 nm GK106 silicon. The GTX 660 carries NVIDIA's ASIC codename GK106-400. An internal document detailing other SKUs based on the GK106 in the works, was leaked to the web. According to a 3DCenter.org report, the two ASIC codenames GK106-250 and GK106-200 described in the document could be new SKUs.

Show full news post
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
3,113 (1.16/day)
Likes
1,553
System Name The "Oh shit we have competition"
Processor Core i7 8700K @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Ultra Gaming
Cooling Custom WC & 240MM Rad
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666Mhz 16GB
Video Card(s) Palit Jetstream GTX 1080 OC 8GB
Storage 5TB HDDs + 1TB SSDs
Display(s) U2713HM + 2433T + XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Mouse The almighty Logitech G400
Keyboard Cougar 600K Cherry-MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Pro
#2
Now that will fill the weird gap...
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
435 (0.17/day)
Likes
214
Location
Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
System Name AntiChrist
Processor Core i7 3770K at 4.2 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty Z77
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory G.Skill TridentX 8 GB DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) 2 x Asus NVIDIA GTX 670 DC2T in SLI
Storage Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB (System Drive)
Display(s) Downgraded to 1080p :)
Case bitfenix colossus (windowed version)
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-850TXV2UK
#4
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#5
...with recycled benchmark scores on older drivers for most cards, on a bevy of outdated games. Very helpful [/sarcasm]
You're a little late anyhow, the TT article has already been done to death- surprisingly enough in the GTX 660 news articles (namely here and here)
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
520 (0.18/day)
Likes
161
System Name SKY OC
Processor i3-6100 4.6GHz
Motherboard Z170 FATAL1TY K4/D3
Cooling TPC-612
Memory Trident X 2400CL9
Video Card(s) HD 7850 CFX
Storage Vector 150
Case HAF XB
Power Supply Capstone 550M
#6
What I get out of this:

GK106 yields bad.

GDDR5 cheap.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
435 (0.17/day)
Likes
214
Location
Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
System Name AntiChrist
Processor Core i7 3770K at 4.2 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty Z77
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory G.Skill TridentX 8 GB DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) 2 x Asus NVIDIA GTX 670 DC2T in SLI
Storage Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB (System Drive)
Display(s) Downgraded to 1080p :)
Case bitfenix colossus (windowed version)
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-850TXV2UK
#7
...with recycled benchmark scores on older drivers for most cards, on a bevy of outdated games. Very helpful [/sarcasm]
They did the same with 670.

"The GEFORCE GTX 670 is just an awesome video card that is going to be a serious headache for AMD. The performance of the video card is really quite crazy and the fact that this is the second option for NVIDIA when it comes to single GPU video cards is bad for AMD when it has no issue competing with their strongest option; the HD 7970"

Their results were later confirmed by other review sites when NDA lifted. I consider it as "helpful". I expect the same with 660 review.

Could you please point me to a better gtx660 review right now ? Thanks in advance.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
541 (0.26/day)
Likes
113
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor Intel | AMD
Motherboard INVALID| X399
Cooling 2 Heatpipes | EK
Memory 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | 32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 | MI25 / Vega Frontier | Tesla K
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB
Display(s) 15,5" / 27" LEDTV | No Display
Case Black & Grey
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Silverstone 850W | Unrated PSU
Software LinuxMint KDE | XFCE
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
#8
where is GTX670ti anyone? Nvidia's Ti naming make me laugh...
why the hell on earth they make a such weird names like that.. *Le me sigh
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#10
They did the same with 670.
Their results were later confirmed by other review sites when NDA lifted. I consider it as "helpful". I expect the same with 660 review
TT's review was somewhat more favourable than most other review sites -largely due to game selection. TT also did the same with the 660 Ti - and according to their tests the 660Ti bests the HD 7950 in 65% of benchmarks, and of ~ half the benchmarks it "loses", it does so by a solitary frame per second. Most other sites have the 660Ti and 7950 pretty much even at 1920x1080/1200 with the 7950 pulling ahead at 2560x1440/1600 (including W1zz's TPU benches I might add)
Could you please point me to a better gtx660 review right now ? Thanks in advance.
That's kind of the point. TT jumps the gun pretty much pissing on every other sites chips...then buys page clicks by bleating on about Nvidia's bias towards them, while trying to make a case for Official sample = NDA, while obtaining a sample under the counter =/= NDA.
I doubt you'll find many supporters of this site, or any other enthusiast site (TT aside) that are happy to publicize/condone TT's methodology tbh....but each to their own.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2011
Messages
124 (0.05/day)
Likes
17
Location
UK
#11
Thing is though - TT have been pretty much spot on for the last 4 or 5 cards they have released `early` , so simply saying `old drievrs or old games` doesnt quite cut it - you can say the same if you like for tomshardware or anand or H or any of them that review equipment; they dont retest older cards with the latest drivers each and every time something new and shiny comes along - time is the factor , when it takes 3 or 4 hours at least to get a good and average set of benchmark reuslts in.
 
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
538 (0.15/day)
Likes
146
System Name HTPC whhaaaat?
Processor 2600k @ 4500mhz
Motherboard Asus Maximus IV gene-z gen3
Cooling Noctua NH-C14
Memory Gskill Ripjaw 2x4gb
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080 FTW @ 2037/11016
Storage 2x512GB MX100/1x Agility 3 128gb ssds, Seagate 3TB HDD
Display(s) Vizio P 65'' 4k tv
Case Lian Li pc-c50b
Audio Device(s) Denon 3311
Power Supply Corsair 620HX
#12
They did the same with 670.

"The GEFORCE GTX 670 is just an awesome video card that is going to be a serious headache for AMD. The performance of the video card is really quite crazy and the fact that this is the second option for NVIDIA when it comes to single GPU video cards is bad for AMD when it has no issue competing with their strongest option; the HD 7970"

Their results were later confirmed by other review sites when NDA lifted. I consider it as "helpful". I expect the same with 660 review.

Could you please point me to a better gtx660 review right now ? Thanks in advance.
First, read this review or even just this page...Hopefully you will see how sad marketing makes me.

http://hardocp.com/article/2012/08/23/galaxy_gtx_660_ti_gc_oc_vs_670_hd_7950/3

TLDR:

The point is that 1568 (1344 + 224 sfu)/1792 equals 87.5%...EXACTLY THE SAME AS 1120/1280 (660 vs 7870). Does a 670 compete with 7950 at similar clocks? This is fairly clearly shown to be not the case.

1195/1316 = 90.8%. That means the radeon should be be 3-4% faster on paper if limiting factor is the shader core. In reality, it is 2-3% faster, within a percent or two I would call margin of error. The 7870 has no tdp/clock limitations, while 660 very well may (150w tdp, bigger die, faster memory granted on a smaller bus). Even if it doesn't, the ipc makes it immaterial. Have I beaten this horse dead-enough yet?


I would like to note 1300mhz is not a typical overclock (you can look at TPUs results across a gamut of cards...or the gpureview.com sample across all launch reviews), and 1195 is. Tdp/powertune is 200w for both cards, but the greater memory (probably ~20w) may often hold the core clock back on 7950 vs 670. Bandwidth is immaterial for the 7950 because of the wider bus, even for 670 the bandwidth (some cards will clock higher)the overclock is sufficient to feed the shaders because (afaict given performance) the sfus use the internal cache. GK104 is natively very efficiently well-designed for the clocks of high-end memory vs. the 28nm process and 225w. I still fail to see how that efficiency is worth 100-200$ more...although one could quibble on card form-factor/power consumption/noise are.

Again, there is a ROP bottleneck slightly above 1792 shaders (7950/680)...or roughly >6SMX or 20 CUs/24 (but really 32 for AMD) ROPs when talking practical configurations. 7970 is a pretty value-less card unless you are doing gpgpu or need the small usable ipc difference (~3%) and higher tdp allowance for clock potential similar to the 670/680 (which may net you a another 5%). It has 2048 shaders and the wide bus because when it is clocked to >1100mhz 2048 shaders can use more than 256-bit/7gbps for compute, while also securing it will always be the fastest 32 ROP part per clock. It also doubles as a buffer for getting acceptable yields on a 1792sp part (the most efficient)...unlike gk104 which does that natively, hence we get less-efficient (core) salvage parts and this clockspeed game and nvidia charges you a pretty penny for the parts that all work.

Point being, you have the right to believe what you want and that is fine...but in this case it makes you look ill-informed...or exactly what nvidia thrives on...and I continue to wish people knew better.

Anyway...655 and 650 = probably stock-clocked to equal 7850 and 7770. 650 should be better than 7770, if barely, and 655 is a wildcard only because 7850 is such a funky product (some have low voltage and no voltage control, others bios locked at 1050mhz etc while others have none of those quirks...655 @ 1200 [average for 1.175v] = 7850 @ 1050). I stand by that whatever replaces the 7700 will be clocked to beat these parts; the top model will probably have similar ipc to 655 with higher stock clock, the lesser model more ipc than 650 and a lower clock. I still think ~-900-925mhz and ~1075-1100mhz will be the pro and xt spots going up the lineup for 8000, which would line up well against these cards.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
3,113 (1.16/day)
Likes
1,553
System Name The "Oh shit we have competition"
Processor Core i7 8700K @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Ultra Gaming
Cooling Custom WC & 240MM Rad
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666Mhz 16GB
Video Card(s) Palit Jetstream GTX 1080 OC 8GB
Storage 5TB HDDs + 1TB SSDs
Display(s) U2713HM + 2433T + XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Mouse The almighty Logitech G400
Keyboard Cougar 600K Cherry-MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Pro
#13
lol.
TT's reviews are pathetic.
Old drivers, pathetic set of benchamrks - old games, old versions of them
No overclock, no overclocked performance really. No power consumption or noise.
No super high resolutions, no multimonitor setups, and the list goes on and on.
It is funny how the site with the worst reviews gets them first
it makes us, reviewers feel good about holding and releasing the "wow" effect of users responsing to the review and it's results. No worries when it comes to TT.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
8,506 (2.34/day)
Likes
2,072
Location
Kansas City
System Name The Dove Box Rev 2.0
Processor I7 5930k
Motherboard Asus X99
Cooling Custom water loop
Memory 4 x 4GB 3000 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) 2x MSI 780 Ti's in SLI
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 PCIe SSD, 2x1TB WD Blacks, 1.2TB NAS
Display(s) 27" Asus 144Hz
Case Enermax Fulmo GT
Audio Device(s) ON BOARD FTW
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 850W
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Win 10 64x
#14
First, read this review or even just this page...Hopefully you will see how sad marketing makes me.

http://hardocp.com/article/2012/08/23/galaxy_gtx_660_ti_gc_oc_vs_670_hd_7950/3

TLDR:

The point is that 1568 (1344 + 224 sfu)/1792 equals 87.5%...EXACTLY THE SAME AS 1120/1280 (660 vs 7870). Does a 670 compete with 7950 at similar clocks? This is fairly clearly shown to be not the case.

1195/1316 = 90.8%. That means the radeon should be be 3-4% faster on paper if limiting factor is the shader core. In reality, it is 2-3% faster, within a percent or two I would call margin of error. The 7870 has no tdp/clock limitations, while 660 very well may (150w tdp, bigger die, faster memory granted on a smaller bus). Even if it doesn't, the ipc makes it immaterial. Have I beaten this horse dead-enough yet?


I would like to note 1300mhz is not a typical overclock (you can look at TPUs results across a gamut of cards...or the gpureview.com sample across all launch reviews), and 1195 is. Tdp/powertune is 200w for both cards, but the greater memory (probably ~20w) may often hold the core clock back on 7950 vs 670. Bandwidth is immaterial for the 7950 because of the wider bus, even for 670 the bandwidth (some cards will clock higher)the overclock is sufficient to feed the shaders because (afaict given performance) the sfus use the internal cache. GK104 is natively very efficiently well-designed for the clocks of high-end memory vs. the 28nm process and 225w. I still fail to see how that efficiency is worth 100-200$ more...although one could quibble on card form-factor/power consumption/noise are.

Again, there is a ROP bottleneck slightly above 1792 shaders (7950/680)...or roughly >6SMX or 20 CUs/24 (but really 32 for AMD) ROPs when talking practical configurations. 7970 is a pretty value-less card unless you are doing gpgpu or need the small usable ipc difference (~3%) and higher tdp allowance for clock potential similar to the 670/680 (which may net you a another 5%). It has 2048 shaders and the wide bus because when it is clocked to >1100mhz 2048 shaders can use more than 256-bit/7gbps for compute, while also securing it will always be the fastest 32 ROP part per clock. It also doubles as a buffer for getting acceptable yields on a 1792sp part (the most efficient)...unlike gk104 which does that natively, hence we get less-efficient (core) salvage parts and this clockspeed game and nvidia charges you a pretty penny for the parts that all work.

Point being, you have the right to believe what you want and that is fine...but in this case it makes you look ill-informed...or exactly what nvidia thrives on...and I continue to wish people knew better.

Anyway...655 and 650 = probably stock-clocked to equal 7850 and 7770. 650 should be better than 7770, if barely, and 655 is a wildcard only because 7850 is such a funky product (some have low voltage and no voltage control, others bios locked at 1050mhz etc while others have none of those quirks...655 @ 1200 [average for 1.175v] = 7850 @ 1050). I stand by that whatever replaces the 7700 will be clocked to beat these parts; the top model will probably have similar ipc to 655 with higher stock clock, the lesser model more ipc than 650 and a lower clock. I still think ~-900-925mhz and ~1075-1100mhz will be the pro and xt spots going up the lineup for 8000, which would line up well against these cards.
I dont think you understand how to use the TL;DR....
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2011
Messages
124 (0.05/day)
Likes
17
Location
UK
#15
lol.
TT's reviews are pathetic.
Old drivers, pathetic set of benchamrks - old games, old versions of them
No overclock, no overclocked performance really. No power consumption or noise.
No super high resolutions, no multimonitor setups, and the list goes on and on.
It is funny how the site with the worst reviews gets them first
it makes us, reviewers feel good about holding and releasing the "wow" effect of users responsing to the review and it's results. No worries when it comes to TT.
except that TT have been right the last 4 or 5 times.


carry on fail trolling - it makes you look even more stupid
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
3,113 (1.16/day)
Likes
1,553
System Name The "Oh shit we have competition"
Processor Core i7 8700K @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Ultra Gaming
Cooling Custom WC & 240MM Rad
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666Mhz 16GB
Video Card(s) Palit Jetstream GTX 1080 OC 8GB
Storage 5TB HDDs + 1TB SSDs
Display(s) U2713HM + 2433T + XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Mouse The almighty Logitech G400
Keyboard Cougar 600K Cherry-MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Pro
#16
I am not the one who troll (wtf trolling has to do with anything here?), i just mentioned a list of facts about the review - aren't they truth?
what is exactly right? right in what? in the games that no one even play today? 4 year old FarCry2?
I want benchmarks in BF3, in Crysis2 and all other new games with new and rellevant drivers. That is not hard.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2011
Messages
124 (0.05/day)
Likes
17
Location
UK
#17
your first line ` TT reviews are pathetic` - they are only pathetic if they are badly wrong - and they are not.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
3,113 (1.16/day)
Likes
1,553
System Name The "Oh shit we have competition"
Processor Core i7 8700K @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Ultra Gaming
Cooling Custom WC & 240MM Rad
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666Mhz 16GB
Video Card(s) Palit Jetstream GTX 1080 OC 8GB
Storage 5TB HDDs + 1TB SSDs
Display(s) U2713HM + 2433T + XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Mouse The almighty Logitech G400
Keyboard Cougar 600K Cherry-MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Pro
#18
No, they are pathetic for giving information witch a lot of it is irrelevant for most users. And also - not giving a lot of important information as mentioned above.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2011
Messages
124 (0.05/day)
Likes
17
Location
UK
#19
so now , because YOU do not like how something is reviewed because of YOUR list , its then pathetic? some people dont care about overclocking , or multi monitors or power consumption - they care about if it works when they plug it in on the 19" screen.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,546 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,908
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
#20
so now , because YOU do not like how something is reviewed because of YOUR list , its then pathetic? some people dont care about overclocking , or multi monitors or power consumption - they care about if it works when they plug it in on the 19" screen.
ANd some people do care, like he does.

He's entitled to his opinion, and there is no point arguing about it. Might as well just say "I disagree", and leave it at that.

Frankly, I tend to agree with him, but to me it's fine if you enjoy TT's reviews. Many do not, as evidenced by the site's traffic. :p
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,944 (1.13/day)
Likes
1,379
System Name The Sheriff / The Deputy
Processor 2500K / G4560
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / Intel stock
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 8 GB Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 960 SSC / Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti LP
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / Samsung SyncMaster T220
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/Senn HD518
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100/ Mionix Avior 7000
Keyboard Sidewinder
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
#21
some people dont care about overclocking , or multi monitors or power consumption - they care about if it works when they plug it in on the 19" screen.
Those people don't read reviews.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,725 (0.71/day)
Likes
203
Location
So. Cal.
#22
Their results were later confirmed by other review sites when NDA lifted. I consider it as "helpful". I expect the same with 660 review.
Tweak Town.com that was their "pre-released" 5 day early (un-authorize card), which has a boost clock of 994Mhz, while the released reference is at 980Mhz. :rolleyes:

On to this mangle mess... Let's see if I can break-it out better than btarunrs’ irreconcilable way of enlightening us… it can be made rational!
650 on the GK-107 2-SMX 128-bit for $140 that probably won’t beat a 7750
650 Ti on GK106-200 3-SMX (of 5) with 128-bit $160 but can’t reach a 7770
655 with a GK106-250 4-SMX (of 5) 128-bit for what $180 and par with a 7770
660 GK106 5-SMX 192-bit like a 7850 but at $210

Yep, lots and lot's of geldings to "off-load" to the unsuspecting that can’t muddle through the mud.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
4,984 (1.76/day)
Likes
1,551
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
#23
Im surprised they arent all called 660 either GT GTX GTI GS, SE, TDI or something, they are actually different:eek:, wont that confuse fans:p
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
419 (0.19/day)
Likes
116
Processor Intel i7-3820 @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X79-UD7
Cooling Thermaltake Water Pro 2.0
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Leadtek GeForce GTX 670 Reference
Storage Intel SSD530 120GB OS/BOOT, various mechanical drives for storage
Display(s) 2x Dell U2311H
Case Lian-Li PC-V1000
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence ST
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Modular 600W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
#24
No, they are pathetic for giving information witch a lot of it is irrelevant for most users. And also - not giving a lot of important information as mentioned above.
How is the information irrelevant? You won't get exact data on how the reviewed card performs in the most up-to-date titles, but you do get an idea of how it performs relative to other cards that you are familiar with. And those cards you probably know well enough to gauge where the new boy stacks up.

When it's not possible to re-test some of the old hardware (because you returned the card to whoever lent it already), it makes sense to keep data from an old test. TPU uses an even more outdated version of Heaven (2.0) compared to TT (2.5), but nobody complains about it.