1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Readies the GeForce GT 1030 to Compete with Radeon RX 550

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 20, 2017.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,577 (9.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,148
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    With the Tuesday (18/04) launch of the Radeon RX 550 at US $79, the market for IGP-replacement discrete GPUs sprung back to life. NVIDIA is preparing to address the market with the new GeForce GT 1030 graphics card, based on its "Pascal" architecture. The SKU will be based on the new 14 nm "GP108" silicon, and could feature up to 512 CUDA cores, and up to 2 GB of GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit wide interface.

    With tiny board and electrical footprints, one can expect the chip to rely on the PCI-Express slot entirely for its power, and come in low-profile and fan-less designs. It could feature an up-to-date I/O, including HDMI 2.0b and DisplayPort 1.4, which its predecessor, the GT 730 lacks. The company could formally announce the GT 1030 around mid-May, 2017.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Expreview
     
    silentbogo says thanks.
  2. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    3,925 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    937
    How will this compare with an iGPU found on the latest CPUs?
     
  3. Toothless

    Toothless

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2014
    Messages:
    4,590 (3.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,410
    Location:
    Washington, USA
    That's a beefy little thing.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. Ferrum Master

    Ferrum Master

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,651 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,136
    Location:
    Rīga, Latvia
    Why it is not low profile by default?
     
    qubit says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. IceScreamer

    IceScreamer

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    188 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    Croatia
    Green PCB, oh hell yes.
     
  6. Komshija

    Komshija

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    Messages:
    517 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    380
    Location:
    Croatia
    If Nvidia GT 1030 will have similar performance to RX 550, it will be much more powerful than Intel's HD 630 (Kaby Lake) considering that RX 550's performance is approximately equivalent to Radeon HD 7790 and GTX 650 Ti Boost.
    Intel HD 630 has slightly better performance than Nvidia GT 635 and Radeon HD 7570.
     
    kruk says thanks.
  7. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,301 (3.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,101
    Oohhhh I want reviews on both of these. There better not be any DDR3 versions.
     
    john_ says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  8. john_

    john_

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Messages:
    1,039 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    494
    Location:
    Athens, Greece
    Considering we are talking about Nvidia, this could have been a rebranded Fermi/Kepler/Maxwell mess under one unique model number(like GT 730). Thankfully it's a Pascal? That's nice. Probably this explains why AMD gone with an 128bit data bus in the RX 550 model. They knew they would have competition.
     
    xorbe says thanks.
  9. P4-630

    P4-630 The Way It's Meant to be Played

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    8,031 (1.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,528
    Location:
    Vinewood
    But....Does it run Crysis? :D.........
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2017
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. jabbadap

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    Messages:
    526 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    It's quite bit faster, 512 shaders means the same amount as old gtx750(which is like 15% faster than fastest iris pro) but the clocks are a lot higher. I would say performance to be close to gtx750ti.

    That pic is just for illustration, Pascal does not have analog vga outputs.
     
  11. blibba

    blibba

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    863 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    207
    Location:
    London, UK
    The 8800 Ultra, the top uber-high end card at the time of Crysis's release, had:
    • 128 shaders at 1500MHZ (vs. 512 at presumably ~1200?)
    • 768MB GDDR3 memory (vs 2GB GDDR5)
    • An effective 2160MHZ over a 384-bit bus (vs. an effective speed of 6GHZ+ over a 128-bit bus)
    A surprisingly close comparison, but yeah, it'll run Crysis, probably very comfortably, although possibly not maxed out at >1080p :D
     
    P4-630 says thanks.
  12. Tartaros

    Tartaros

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    244 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Madrid, Spain
    We need another extremely beautiful yet bad optimized game for modern jokes. Even low end cards can run crysis now, how disappointing. Where are you crytek?
     
  13. NeDix!

    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    22 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    wait ... 79 usd for the RX 550 ? its that real ? i mean the RX 460 99 usd (MSRP) and its the double of RX 550, in other hand good to see this kind of cards.
     
  14. Basard

    Basard

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    978 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    234
    Location:
    Oshkosh, WI
    Reminds me of one of them old VW Beatles that they make new in Mexico.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU
  15. P4-630

    P4-630 The Way It's Meant to be Played

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    8,031 (1.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,528
    Location:
    Vinewood
    Wasn't it Brasil?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. jabbadap

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    Messages:
    526 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    Hmm I'm not quite sure what he mean, but last new old beetle were made in Mexico 2003. Brazilian Beetle "Fusca" manufacturing ended in 1996.
     
    Basard and P4-630 say thanks.
  17. notb

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2016
    Messages:
    518 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    Location:
    Warsaw, Poland
    RX460 is an entry-level gaming card and in some variants (e.g. ASUS STRIX) can easily pull almost 100W.

    Both RX550 and GT1030 are not gaming cards. They're IGP replacements for systems without such "luxury" (Ryzen, Intel HEDT and so on). That's something we haven't seen since Kepler.

    On the NVIDIA side we can basically expect passively-cooled (or almost noiseless), single-slot cards using under 30W. It's hard to say what AMD will offer, but if it's on par with the Radeon Pro they make for Apple, it'll be a decent competitor.
     
  18. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    382 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35

    Of course they are gaming cards doh. There is cheaper tat if you just want a display output that are not good for gaming.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. 3rold

    3rold

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    125 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    44
    Location:
    Augsburg, Germany
    Judging by the specs this card could be as powerful as GTX 750 Ti but use ~35W. That's a great deal if you ask me. It should be a great bargain for lower end PCs which just want to casually play a game. or HTPCs
     
  20. jabbadap

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    Messages:
    526 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    x16 low profile power by pcie spec is 25W max, Nvidia might want to get it close to that by cutting the perf a bit. But that's probably just for oems, for retail your estimation might be quite correct.
     
  21. notb

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2016
    Messages:
    518 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    Location:
    Warsaw, Poland
    I think the most recent chip falling into that description would be GT730 and yes - you can still buy these cards easily. But they are becoming slightly old by now.
    Just the simplest example: GT730 supports a up to 3840x2160, so it could struggle with modern multi-monitor setup. GTX1050 supports 4 times as much.

    Also the efficiency improved a lot. You can find a passively cooled GT730, but it could get to high temperatures under load.
    Based on what other Pascal cards can do, the GT1030 could be passively cooled by default (and really cool with that ;)). This is important.
    Basically, we're getting back to a point where a "productivity" card can look like it used to 20 years ago:
    [​IMG]
    It's obviously a single-slot card and the heatsink is covering memory (most cards didn't have that).

    By comparison, this is a passively cooled GT730:
    [​IMG]

    I remember only one single-slot passive card from GT7xx era - Zotac GT 710. AFAIK it needed a decent air circulation.
     
  22. xorbe

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,542 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    528
    So there's a gap wrt missing GTX 1040?
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2017
  23. jabbadap

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    Messages:
    526 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    Uhm yeah there's a lot of gaps against amd, Nvidia has to respond to radeon 520, radeon 530, (maybe upcoming RX 540 desktop although by specs it's same as RX 550 desktop) and RX 550.
     
    xorbe says thanks.
  24. notb

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2016
    Messages:
    518 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    Location:
    Warsaw, Poland
    The *40 cards were named GT, not GTX. :)

    Honestly, hard to say.
    AMD decided to revive a whole lineup of cheap Radeons for their Ryzen lineup - basically like it used to be before IGP became ubiquitous.
    We'll see what will happen. I don't think Intel will remove IGP from it's cheaper models, so the market for such cards will be much smaller than it used to.

    But think about it. Some of these cards will be designed to work with high-end CPUs (Ryzen 7, Intel HEDT) in productivity rigs.
    I think we could see some "pro" models - with relatively weak chips, but good features and high quality (also for the cooling solutions).
    The Radeon Pro 460 in latest MacBook Pro can support 2x5K or 4x4K (beside the built-in 2880x1800). Check if you desktop gaming monster can do that. :)
    I think we could use a passively cooled, single-slot card that can support multiple high-resolution monitors for some CAD or graphic editing environment (Matrox-style :)). That should sell well - even for a fairly large price.
     
  25. TheinsanegamerN

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    Messages:
    712 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    240
    X16 is 75 watt. Low profile is in reference to the card, the slot is the same, unless some dolt OEM decides to limit things (looking at you dell)
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)