- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 2,902 (0.80/day)
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS |
| Cooling | Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock |
| Memory | Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz |
| Video Card(s) | MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB |
| Storage | Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB |
| Display(s) | Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24" |
| Case | Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2 |
| Audio Device(s) | Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus |
| Power Supply | Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2 |
| Mouse | Razer Abyssus |
| Keyboard | CM Storm QuickFire XT |
| Software | Ubuntu |
Based on which benchmarks?
Nvidia is claiming 35-45% performance gains, even if the average is closer to ~30%, this would be a significant improvement. This is still excellent in a historical perspective.
More like "paper launching" Vega20 for the professional market. The shipped quantities will be very low and this will not be a consumer card.
Even at 7 nm, AMD can't compete with Pascal at 16 nm.
AMD's upcoming Navi is targeting "Vega level performance" in mid- to late 2019.
Nvidia have no choice other than launching Turing on "12 nm", the alternative would be to postpone it for one more year.