• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Rushing in Stopgap HD 7970 Competitor This February?

Do NVIDIA's maneuvers hold you back from buying the readily-available Radeon HD7970?

  • Yes

    Votes: 35 43.8%
  • No

    Votes: 45 56.3%

  • Total voters
    80

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,960 (8.46/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD's Radeon HD 7970 seems to have ruffled a few feathers at NVIDIA and it looks like the green team doesn't want too much market exposure for it. A fairly-reliable source at ChipHell learned that NVIDIA's GeForce "GTX 680" part could be launched some time in February. The source says that this part could be competitive with the HD 7970, though not exactly NVIDIA's fastest next-generation GPU in the works. So it has to be something other than the GeForce Kepler 110, that's reportedly slated for March-April. At least the tiny pieces of specifications trickling out seem to reinforce this theory. Graphics cards based on this part apparently have 2 GB of memory, and its core clock speed is reported to be 780 MHz.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Gtx560x2? Gtx585?
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,412 (1.03/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Jill-Sandwich
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8 Core 16 thread @ Stock / PBO On 3.6Ghz - 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Bequiet Shadow Rock LP 120mm / 2x 120mm Slim Silverstone fans
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700 XT 8GB Nitro+ @ 2Ghz
Storage 512GB Adata XPG SX8200 Pro M.2 NVMe / 2TB Samsung 2.5in HDD
Display(s) LG 4K Ultra HD Smart 50inch TV
Case Silverstone Raven RVZ03 RGB Case
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD Audio / HDMI Audio Via GPU
Power Supply Corsair SFX 600W Gold Rated PSU
Mouse CoolerMaster Masterkeys Lite L RGB Mem-Chanical Combo
Keyboard CoolerMaster Masterkeys Lite L RGB Mem-Chanical Combo
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do em anymore. :(
I might just hold off with the HD7970 for now ^_^
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
1,549 (0.37/day)
Location
Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
System Name Toaster!
Processor Intel Core i7 5930k @ stock
Motherboard ASUS x99 Deluxe
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE CPU Cooler (Blue). Stock on GPU.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 @ 2750mhz
Video Card(s) MSI 980 Ti Gaming 6GB
Storage Samsung 850 series 512GB SSD
Display(s) AOC D2757Ph 27" 3D IPS Widescreen LED Monitor + Viewsonic VX2753MH 27 Inch + Benq 27''
Case Corsair Obsidian 900D
Audio Device(s) ASUS ROG Phoebus 7.1 + Logitec X530 speakers. Sennheiser GSP 350 7.1 Gaming Headset
Power Supply Antec High Current Pro Platinum 1300W Modular Power Supply
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard Corsair K70.
Software ALL HAIL WINDOWS 10.
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6805248
Hold off until the 680 comes out. Wait for price drop!

Might have to go ATI again this series although I wanted to try Nvidia... Nvidia will come out overpriced and ATI will once again drop prices...

EDIT: The retarded battle continues
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,311 (0.72/day)
Location
Essex Jct, VT
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 Aurorus Elite
Cooling Stock
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / Samsung EVO 860 500GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) AOC G2590FX
Case NZXT H500 Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
I might just hold off with the HD7970 for now ^_^
I don't see why anyone wouldn't wait. If the HD7970 is the only thing on the market, the price is inflated since it faces no competition. Once Nvidia releases some options, and AMD gets the rest of their line out, the prices will stabalize and you will have time to find the best card in terms of Price\Performance in this round. Jumping on the HD7970 right away risks overpaying for a potentially underperforming product. Plus, GPU's get better with Driver releases, so buying a card right at launch tends to be problematic...

Looks like Nvidia are having issues... (just an observation)
By what reasoning? They are waiting until they are adequately stocked and able to replace their current offerings, I see no "issues" with this. Nvidia has nothing to lose by waiting. AMD rushed their cards out just to get some form of revenue going into the new year.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
749 (0.20/day)
Location
Netherlands
System Name gaming system
Processor 2600k @ 4.2 ghz
Motherboard MSI Z77 MPower
Cooling Thermalright ultra extreme 120 rev.C w/noctua NF-S12B push/pull
Memory 16gb corsair vengeance 2400 c11 @1.5 v/
Video Card(s) GB gtx670 WF3x sli @1080/1372/6660(core/boost/mem)
Storage 2x samsung 850evo 250gb raid 0 ,2tb wdblack, 3TB wd purple
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster P2770FH, asus VH242t/19" lg 1440x900
Case fractal design r4
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair HX1050
Mouse Razer abyssus
Keyboard corsair k70
Software Windows 10 pro x64
Also nvidia doesn't want a papet launch and that a good thing!
I can wait
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,286 (0.67/day)
Location
Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name Chachamaru-III | Retro Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K | Intel Pentium II 450MHz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TZ77XE4 (Intel Z77 Chipset) | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset)
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X, case fully populated
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ares 1600MHz (2x8GB) [30 10-10-10] | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce 1070 Gaming Z, Intel HD 4000 (for secondary monitors) | 3dfx Voodoo3 3000
Storage 250GB SK hynix SSD (OS), Toshiba 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam), Samsung 1TB (Personal Files)
Display(s) Samsung 2443BWT-1 24" @1920x1200, Dell 1708fp 17" @1280x1024 & Eizo FlexScan L887 20" @1600x1200
Case Antec Three Hundred Two | Beige box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z (Speakers), Sound Blaster Audigy 2 (Headphones) | Sound Blaster AWE64
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC
Mouse Razer DeathAdder | Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A
Keyboard GAMDIAS Hermes Ultimate | Dell AT102W
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE
TBH, I'd rather nVIDIA waited until they were ready before releasing. Don't want another Fermi mk1 fiasco...
 

JrRacinFan

Served 5k and counting ...
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
19,684 (4.19/day)
Location
Youngstown, OH
System Name Gamer :Server and SOHO Server
Processor Ryzen 3600 : Ryzen 1700 @ 3.6Ghz
Motherboard Giga X470 Aorus : Biostar X370 GT5
Cooling Stock : Liquid cooled
Memory 2x8GB Tforce Vulcan 3200 : 2x4GB Viper Elite 2667
Video Card(s) MSI RX580 Armor OC @ 1.47Ghz/1.85Ghz: XFX R5 220
Storage Toshiba 256GB NVME HGST 2TB : WD 10TB + WD 3TB + HGST 2TB + 480GB OCZ Trion 150
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2457-MHD 23.6" + Sceptre 24" : headless
Case CM Masterbox RGB: DIYPC D480-W White Window
Audio Device(s) Radeon HDMI : Onboard
Power Supply HCG 850W Bronze : Tt 775W Modular
Mouse Tt Challenger : None
Keyboard Rosewill Neon : None
Software Windows 10: Zorin 12.3
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
1,549 (0.37/day)
Location
Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
System Name Toaster!
Processor Intel Core i7 5930k @ stock
Motherboard ASUS x99 Deluxe
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE CPU Cooler (Blue). Stock on GPU.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 @ 2750mhz
Video Card(s) MSI 980 Ti Gaming 6GB
Storage Samsung 850 series 512GB SSD
Display(s) AOC D2757Ph 27" 3D IPS Widescreen LED Monitor + Viewsonic VX2753MH 27 Inch + Benq 27''
Case Corsair Obsidian 900D
Audio Device(s) ASUS ROG Phoebus 7.1 + Logitec X530 speakers. Sennheiser GSP 350 7.1 Gaming Headset
Power Supply Antec High Current Pro Platinum 1300W Modular Power Supply
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard Corsair K70.
Software ALL HAIL WINDOWS 10.
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6805248
By what reasoning? They are waiting until they are adequately stocked and able to replace their current offerings, I see no "issues" with this. Nvidia has nothing to lose by waiting. AMD rushed their cards out just to get some form of revenue going into the new year.
I just heard somewhere Nvidia was having trouble with power consumption/heat on this series that's all.

Probably should've quoted it... But I can't find it.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,412 (1.03/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Jill-Sandwich
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8 Core 16 thread @ Stock / PBO On 3.6Ghz - 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Bequiet Shadow Rock LP 120mm / 2x 120mm Slim Silverstone fans
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700 XT 8GB Nitro+ @ 2Ghz
Storage 512GB Adata XPG SX8200 Pro M.2 NVMe / 2TB Samsung 2.5in HDD
Display(s) LG 4K Ultra HD Smart 50inch TV
Case Silverstone Raven RVZ03 RGB Case
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD Audio / HDMI Audio Via GPU
Power Supply Corsair SFX 600W Gold Rated PSU
Mouse CoolerMaster Masterkeys Lite L RGB Mem-Chanical Combo
Keyboard CoolerMaster Masterkeys Lite L RGB Mem-Chanical Combo
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do em anymore. :(
I don't see why anyone wouldn't wait. If the HD7970 is the only thing on the market, the price is inflated since it faces no competition. Once Nvidia releases some options, and AMD gets the rest of their line out, the prices will stabalize and you will have time to find the best card in terms of Price\Performance in this round. Jumping on the HD7970 right away risks overpaying for a potentially underperforming product. Plus, GPU's get better with Driver releases, so buying a card right at launch tends to be problematic...
I'm really tight with money right now bro, I want the card bad but gotta make do without ^_^
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
2,799 (0.74/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name My Gaming System
Processor Intel i7 4770k @ 4.4 Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Impact (ITX)
Cooling Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 8 Gb
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ti SC
Storage Samsung SSD EVO 120GB - Samsung SSD EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case Bitfenix Prodigy
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Home Primeum
The way this sounds is that we have another GTX 480 on the way. Not the monster GTX 780 we have all heard about. Everything is showing that this will not be the big "Worlds fastest GPU we have heard about"
If you ask me if this is true the HD 7970 will still have a leg up. The odds are (like the GTX 480) this GPU will be a rushed version that runs way too hot and does not have the whole chip unlocked. If it is able to beat the HD7970 it will be barely and we will have another HD5870 vs GTX 480 competition on our hands.
I also think if this move turns out to be true that Nvidia's GTX 780 part is still a lot further off than April and closer to fall 2012 like we originally heard about.
This is all just speculation..... but also looking at history I think I might be on to something hear.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
3,159 (0.89/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name _JP_'s Daily Driver
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14 + NM-AM4 + NF-P14r
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Trident Z (F4-3200C16D-16GTZB)(Hynix)
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 280X Gaming
Storage HyperX Savage 240GB + KC300 240GB + 750EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG Flatron W2361V 23'' FHD
Case NOX Blaze
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlasterX AE-5
Power Supply Corsair TX650M
Mouse Microsoft Comfort Mouse 4500
Keyboard Logitech Media Keyboard (PS/2)
Software Windows 10 x86-64 (1809)
Rushing is rarely a good idea. Especially in this market. Let's see what comes out of it.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,286 (0.67/day)
Location
Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name Chachamaru-III | Retro Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K | Intel Pentium II 450MHz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TZ77XE4 (Intel Z77 Chipset) | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset)
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X, case fully populated
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ares 1600MHz (2x8GB) [30 10-10-10] | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce 1070 Gaming Z, Intel HD 4000 (for secondary monitors) | 3dfx Voodoo3 3000
Storage 250GB SK hynix SSD (OS), Toshiba 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam), Samsung 1TB (Personal Files)
Display(s) Samsung 2443BWT-1 24" @1920x1200, Dell 1708fp 17" @1280x1024 & Eizo FlexScan L887 20" @1600x1200
Case Antec Three Hundred Two | Beige box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z (Speakers), Sound Blaster Audigy 2 (Headphones) | Sound Blaster AWE64
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC
Mouse Razer DeathAdder | Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A
Keyboard GAMDIAS Hermes Ultimate | Dell AT102W
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE
Not the monster GTX 780 we have all heard about.
Why does everyone seem to think it's going to be the 780? I've heard nothing so far that would make me draw that conclusion.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.71/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
This is probably GK104. I think all the confusion comes from the fact that some media talks about Kepler as in GK110, and only GK110, just like they said Fermi to refer to GF100, almost constantly forgetting that GF104/106/etc. were Fermi cards too.

It may also be essentially true this time around. GK110 may actually be the only 100% Kepler part, while the smaller chips are Fermi-Kepler hybrids. Or maybe simply Fermi based cards, with different amount of shaders/rops/tmu.

For example due to the description by chiphell, this could easily be a "GF104 based" (SM with 48 SP) card with 1 extra GPC. Final specs:

576 SP
96 TMU
32 ROP
256 bit - coupled with 5000+ Mhz GDDR5, it could offer enough bandwidth without becoming a massive bottleneck.

I just heard somewhere Nvidia was having trouble with power consumption/heat on this series that's all.

Probably should've quoted it... But I can't find it.
A 5 euro bill here says you heard it at Semiaccurate, or from somewhere quoting it.

The way this sounds is that we have another GTX 480 on the way. Not the monster GTX 780 we have all heard about. Everything is showing that this will not be the big "Worlds fastest GPU we have heard about"
If you ask me if this is true the HD 7970 will still have a leg up. The odds are (like the GTX 480) this GPU will be a rushed version that runs way too hot and does not have the whole chip unlocked. If it is able to beat the HD7970 it will be barely and we will have another HD5870 vs GTX 480 competition on our hands.
I also think if this move turns out to be true that Nvidia's GTX 780 part is still a lot further off than April and closer to fall 2012 like we originally heard about.
This is all just speculation..... but also looking at history I think I might be on to something hear.
Makes no sense at all. Honestly, do people really think that Nvidia can't release a card 20% faster than previous generation, especially considering how troublesome was the previous generation?

Like I'm saying in any related post in the hopes of people gaining some common sense. GF110 is a 3 billion transistor chip and it's close to 4.3 billion transistor Tahiti performance wise (in fact it's just as fast clock for clock). Nvidia does not need to add GPGPU stuff that costs many transistors, unlike AMD that added 1:2 SP : DP ratio, 1D shaders, memory management stuff. Fermi already had all of this, Kepler is mostly evolutionary rather than revolutionary, so do people really expect Nvidia to release a 4-5 billion transistor chip that can hardly compete with their own previous generation? Really?

Also GTX780 name makes little sense. Granted GTX680 doesn't make a lot of sense for the upper mid-range/performance chip, but AMD made that move first with HD68xx and it's following suit with HD7xxx, so maybe Nvidia is just adjusting. Marketing guys are like that. GK110 will probably be named GTX690.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
Location
Glossop, UK
System Name Wolf Command
Processor 6700K
Motherboard EVGA Z170 FTW
Cooling EK Custom GPU block + Corsair H60
Memory 16Gb DDR4 3000 Corsair Vengence
Video Card(s) Sapphire Fury X Custome WC
Storage 1x Samsung M.2 128Gb, 1x Intel 256Gb M.2 1x Seagate 500Gb Hybrid
Display(s) Dell 2417H
Case S340
Audio Device(s) OB
Power Supply EVGA 750W
Software Windows 10
TBH its going to have to either be a new cooler 580 which clocks higher with less power else everyone will just laugh at it, even IF it is faster...

The 7970 has combined performance and power saving like never before. Nvidia now have to compete on two fronts not just performance.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.26/day)
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
I just heard somewhere Nvidia was having trouble with power consumption/heat on this series that's all.

Probably should've quoted it... But I can't find it.
Technically, you're correct that Nvidia is "having trouble"....IF AND ONLY IF you compare them to AMD's offering(s). But there's actually some improvement in that aspect for Kepler compared to Fermi.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
2,799 (0.74/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name My Gaming System
Processor Intel i7 4770k @ 4.4 Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Impact (ITX)
Cooling Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 8 Gb
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ti SC
Storage Samsung SSD EVO 120GB - Samsung SSD EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case Bitfenix Prodigy
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Home Primeum
This is probably GK104. I think all the confusion comes from the fact that some media talks about Kepler as in GK110, and only GK110, just like they said Fermi to refer to GF100, almost constantly forgetting that GF104/106/etc. were Fermi cards too.

It may also be essentially true this time around. GK110 may actually be the only 100% Kepler part, while the smaller chips are Fermi-Kepler hybrids. Or maybe simply Fermi based cards, with different amount of shaders/rops/tmu.

For example due to the description by chiphell, this could easily be a "GF104 based" (SM with 48 SP) card with 1 extra GPC. Final specs:

576 SP
96 TMU
32 ROP
256 bit - coupled with 5000+ Mhz GDDR5, it could offer enough bandwidth without becoming a massive bottleneck.



A 5 euro bill here says you heard it at Semiaccurate, or from somewhere quoting it.



Makes no sense at all. Honestly, do people really think that Nvidia can't release a card 20% faster than previous generation, especially considering how troublesome was the previous generation?

Like I'm saying in any related post in the hopes of people gaining some common sense. GF110 is a 3 billion transistor chip and it's close to 4.3 billion transistor Tahiti performance wise (in fact it's just as fast clock for clock). Nvidia does not need to add GPGPU stuff that costs many transistors, unlike AMD that added 1:2 SP : DP ratio, 1D shaders, memory management stuff. Fermi already had all of this, Kepler is mostly evolutionary rather than revolutionary, so do people really expect Nvidia to release a 4-5 billion transistor chip that can hardly compete with their own previous generation? Really?

Also GTX780 name makes little sense. Granted GTX680 doesn't make a lot of sense for the upper mid-range/performance chip, but AMD made that move first with HD68xx and it's following suit with HD7xxx, so maybe Nvidia is just adjusting. Marketing guys are like that. GK110 will probably be named GTX690.
I never said they couldn't.... (and the HD7970 is not always just 20% faster I own two trust me. Sometimes much more.) what I am saying is that they are struggling. They shouldn't had any problem with releasing the GTX 580 correct the first time either but they did. Instead we got the GTX 480 which wasn't that much faster and ran hot as hell. Again we are in the same situation..... a new architecture Nvidia is releasing, AMD again released first, So Nvidia is rushing. Hey I love Nvidia.... it just seems to me this is what is going on.
As a matter of fact I remember having a similar argument with you last time. Right before the GTX 480 released. Look what happened.
Look I hope your right because that means I will have two more video cards to play with very soon. But it just seems like Deja Vu
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
Location
Glossop, UK
System Name Wolf Command
Processor 6700K
Motherboard EVGA Z170 FTW
Cooling EK Custom GPU block + Corsair H60
Memory 16Gb DDR4 3000 Corsair Vengence
Video Card(s) Sapphire Fury X Custome WC
Storage 1x Samsung M.2 128Gb, 1x Intel 256Gb M.2 1x Seagate 500Gb Hybrid
Display(s) Dell 2417H
Case S340
Audio Device(s) OB
Power Supply EVGA 750W
Software Windows 10
IMHO its starting to look a lot like intel vs amd but the other way around with AMD the top dog.

I'm an ATI man but I have nothing against Nvidia. I just ATi as i'm familiar with them.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.26/day)
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
IMHO its starting to look a lot like intel vs amd but the other way around with AMD the top dog.
For the AMD v. Nvidia battle to look like Intel v. AMD, and with Nvidia "losing", Nvidia first have to release high-end cards that only competes with AMD's mid-range cards. Then those high-end cards must be priced roughly the same as AMD's high-end cards as well. Nvidia also have to start making their drivers worse than they are right now.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,242 (1.22/day)
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
I think GTX680 will be another fail like GTX480 and GTX590.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.71/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
I never said they couldn't.... (and the HD7970 is not always just 20% faster I own two trust me. Sometimes much more.) what I am saying is that they are struggling. They shouldn't had any problem with releasing the GTX 580 correct the first time either but they did. Instead we got the GTX 480 which wasn't that much faster and ran hot as hell. Again we are in the same situation..... a new architecture Nvidia is releasing, AMD again released first, So Nvidia is rushing. Hey I love Nvidia.... it just seems to me this is what is going on.
As a matter of fact I remember having a similar argument with you last time. Right before the GTX 480 released. Look what happened.
Look I hope your right because that means I will have two more video cards to play with very soon. But it just seems like Deja Vu
Fermi and Kepler is like comparing apples to oranges* and who exactly says that Nvidia is having troubles or that they are late? No one really knows crap about this generation from Nvidia. The only bad news are originating at Semiaccurate and related sites, as always have (with different outcomes), and according to them, the chips that are going to be released in February-April timeframe have not even been taped out yet, which means that they will not release it until 2013, ha... ha... ha... Really don't assume anything you've read, not even good things and remember the days prior to 8800 too for your "Deja Vu" argument. All I'm saying is that there's as much of an evidence for Kepler being very good as there is for Kepler being a bad chip. And even the "bad" GF100 was faster than GTX295.

Everyone seems to prefer the doom and gloom version, so I'm just offering the other side of the coin, for balance and some common sense.
So following that logic of seing things from a wider perspective, they are NOT rushing anything from what I can tell, not with this chip anyway. The plan, at least according to rumors, has always been to release the performance part first and that's what they are doing. They want to release when there's enough stock to warrant a hard launch and that's what they are doing. Where's HD7970 really? Sure it's been officially released, but can you easily find one in stores? Nope. Where's HD7950? To me it looks like the one rushing was AMD, while Nvidia might be just stockpiling. Even with 6 months lead with HD5870, AMD didn't sold much more 40 nm cards than Nvidia by the time that generation ended. IN the worst case scenario, releasing second, but with a faster product ended up paying up (also take Quadro and Tesla into account). Why should they rush and try to release sooner when they don't need to?

*Fermi (mostly GF100) looked bad when compared to AMD offerings at the time, but it was a chip that added a lot of GPGPU stuff, and a lot of tesselation power. Sorry to bring the same argument again, but please look at Tahiti for a second. 4.3 billion transistor and only 30% faster than Cayman, 2.7 billion. Also only 50% faster than Cypress with more than double the transistors. GPGPU is goddamn expensive and Tahiti is as much of a proof as Fermi was back then. But think about that again. GTX580 is what Nvidia tried 2 years ago, on a new and problematic 40nm node. They tried a chip that is within 20% performance of Tahiti, 2 years ago, in a process that allows half the ammount of transistors as 28nm. That is why GF100 failed, but it did pay off in the end.
 
Last edited:

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
15,925 (3.60/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
This does indeed sound like the GK104 that's been mooted recently. Should be interesting.
 

treboRR

New Member
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
62 (0.02/day)
System Name My Rig
Processor I7 2600K @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7 B3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X @ 1610MHz 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) 2xMSI GTX 580 Lightning @ SLI
Storage 2x HDD for data and 1xSSD OCZ Agility 3 128GB
Display(s) Benq XL2410T @ 120Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) SB Titanium OEM
Power Supply Corsair HX1050
Software Windows 7 64x
Fermi and Kepler is like comparing apples to oranges* and who exactly says that Nvidia is having troubles or that they are late? No one really knows crap about this generation from Nvidia. The only bad news are originating at Semiaccurate and related sites, as always have (with different outcomes), and according to them, the chips that are going to be released in February-April timeframe have not even been taped out yet, which means that they will not release it until 2013, ha... ha... ha... Really don't assume anything you've read, not even good things and remember the days prior to 8800 too for your "Deja Vu" argument. All I'm saying is that there's as much of an evidence for Kepler being very good as there is for Kepler being a bad chip. And even the "bad" GF100 was faster than GTX295.

Everyone seems to prefer the doom and gloom version, so I'm just offering the other side of the coin, for balance and some common sense.
So following that logic of seing things from a wider perspective, they are NOT rushing anything from what I can tell, not with this chip anyway. The plan, at least according to rumors, has always been to release the performance part first and that's what they are doing. They want to release when there's enough stock to warrant a hard launch and that's what they are doing. Where's HD7970 really? Sure it's been officially released, but can you easily find one in stores? Nope. Where's HD7950? To me it looks like the one rushing was AMD, while Nvidia might be just stockpiling. Even with 6 months lead with HD5870, AMD didn't sold much more 40 nm cards than Nvidia by the time that generation ended. IN the worst case scenario, releasing second, but with a faster product ended up paying up (also take Quadro and Tesla into account). Why should they rush and try to release sooner when they don't need to?

*Fermi (mostly GF100) looked bad when compared to AMD offerings at the time, but it was a chip that added a lot of GPGPU stuff, and a lot of tesselation power. Sorry to bring the same argument again, but please look at Tahiti for a second. 4.3 billion transistor and only 30% faster than Cayman, 2.7 billion. Also only 50% faster than Cypress with more than double the transistors. GPGPU is goddamn expensive and Tahiti is as much of a proof as Fermi was back then. But think about that again. GTX580 is what Nvidia tried 2 years ago, on a new and problematic 40nm node. They tried a chip that is within 20% performance of Tahiti, 2 years ago, in a process that allows half the ammount of transistors as 28nm. That is why GF100 failed, but it did pay off in the end.

WOW u really hit the nail! Really good point of view! I like!:toast:
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
2,058 (0.58/day)
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / iJayo
Processor R5 1600/ R7 3700X
Motherboard Asrock AB350 Pro4 / Asus Rog Strix B450-F gaming
Cooling Cryorig M9 / Noctua NH-D14
Memory G skill 16 Gigs ddr4 / 16 gigs PNY ddr4
Video Card(s) MSI r9 270 / Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 512 Scandisc M.2 ssd 2 x 1tb seagate hdd 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s) 42" Nec retail display monitor/ 42" Nec retail display monitor
Case Pink Enermax Ostrog / Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Tempered Glass edition
Audio Device(s) Altec Lansing Expressionist Bass/ M-Audio monitors
Power Supply Corsair450 / Be Quiet Dark Power Pro 650
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Zalman Knossos
Keyboard corsair k95 / Corsair K63 wireless
Software Window 10 pro / Windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
The stop gap gotta have an incredible low price otherwise ...whats the point. Everyone will just wait. Better idea is to release super overclocked current gen cards at deep dis,ounts. Make amds new seem close to thier current gen. Down side is it gives off a were not prepared vibe
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,413 (2.01/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
Why do so many folk have to put on either red or green socks to discuss this? Even someone saying, "I'm just pointing out facts" is tending to lean to one side.

When NV paper launched the 480 they were ridiculed by many (as it was already running late). AMD have near enough paper launched the 7970 as availability is low for many brands. Also, the GTX 580 as it is is what, 12-13 months old?
People talk as if Nvidia is down and that couldn't be farther from the truth. They still have a card that performs within -5 to 30% (review & game dependant) of a card that is a year later and on a far smaller production node.
Think about it for a second. The GTX 580 was launched in retail December 2010 on a 40nm node. It runs fairly cool for it's performance and without too much noise. Now we are a year later, with a production size that is 30% smaller than 40nm (for the maths bastards out there 40-28=12 and 12/40 =0.3) and it performs about 0-30% better, again situation dependant.

Do people really have such red coloured vision that they believe NV can't release a 28nm card that will equal the 7970 in performance and not run hot?
GF100 was resurrected by GF110. Some compute functionailty (what Ben's talking about) was dropped and it resulted in a manageable 512 core card.

To counter Ben though the original rumours suggested a bottom up launch for NV to get the process right. The last time I checked, the Kepler behemoth gpu isn't scheduled to arrive until 2013. GK 104 is the card for now (a high end but not top end single card).

But folk are also then forgetting AMD do plan a dual Tahiti card in Q1 2012 which will be enormously powerful..and expensive.

So, to summarise, just lets wait and see what happens. We have two tech companies still vying to be the best, so let them fight it out and we'll all benefit.

And yes, my 7970 purchase plans are now on hold (was waiting for water blocks anyway!).
 
Top