1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Settles GPU Price Fixing Class Action Case, Offers to Pay $850,000

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Sep 29, 2008.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,422 (1.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Following the legal class action case filled in December of 2006 in California (if I remember right) which alleged that "Nvidia and ATI conspired to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize prices of graphics processing chips and cards.", NVIDIA yesterday offered a settlement agreement detailed in an 8-K form that was filed on September 24th. The Agreement calls for NVIDIA to pay $850,000 into a $1.7 million fund, AMD/ATI must pay the remaining $850,000. The class includes anyone who bought a graphics card directly from either ATI or NVIDIA's websites in the US between 4th December 2002 and 7th November 2007. Purchases of both ATI and NVIDIA cards from other retailers or online vendors does not count. NVIDIA will also pay $112,500 to the plaintiffs who brought the case to court, in exchange for a dismissal of all claims and appeals they made. Read the full 8-K form here. There's still no official response from AMD/ATI.

    Source: EDGAR ONLINE
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. thraxed Guest

    Think every corporation is guilty of this, and we wonder why the economy is screwed.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,229 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    i think because this first time we see price fight like this between ati and nvidia the 4xxx and gtx2xx
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2008
  4. DEFEATEST

    DEFEATEST

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    409 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    44
    It's funny because in the newest PC Gamer there is a page about 3/4 of the way through the book that is a legal notice about the lawsuit. Very difficult to understand and I wasnt sure what it was until now! Man was it weird seeing something like that in PC Gamer.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. iStink

    iStink New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    648 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    So what does this mean for the people who bought video cards? Will they get a part of that 1.7 million? It seems to me greed is all over the place here; with Nvidia and ATI, and now with the people who brought this case to court. Instead of pushing for more money, they settled knowing they'd get a nice big paycheck out of it and not really giving two shits about anyone else.
     
  6. Nyte New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    181 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Toronto ON
    I can't believe that this actually went through... considering that nearly half of the plaintiffs claims about the price fixing during "secret" meetings aren't true at all.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    9,564 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,593
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    WTF?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  8. Apocolypse007

    Apocolypse007 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    614 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    76
    Location:
    New Sewickley, PA
    My thoughts exactly, I've purchased several cards since 2002, but all have been from newegg. Who actually buys off of the official site?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809 (2.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    548
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    There are some who do obviously. I think they need to reimburse everyone who's bought a card from an etailer with the price fixing. Obviously Sapphire isnt going to give you an hd 2900 XT for 299 when ATI probably charged it 299 to begin with.

    EDIT: I realize that would be a lot of money, so maybe a free card or something.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. devguy

    devguy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,238 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    SoCal
    It looks to me that it didn't go through. Nvidia simply settled before this could further blow up in there face. $850G is nothing compared to what could have happened with a very swayed jury. Basically, Nvidia paid the $850G to a fund and $112.5G to the plaintiffs to STFU.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. Darkrealms

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    850 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Location:
    USA
    Agreed, but it would take everyone of those companies that we had purchased from being served as well. I don't see that happening.
    Probably paying the people the difference would be cheaper than a new card (unless you want an 8400?? LoL).
    Sorry management, your bonus this year will be a little smaller . . . LoL
    In a way this gets Nvidia out of the light before this fully blows up. Now these greedy fools will spend all their time going after ATI (AMD) and probably try pinning them in court.

    Pitty there were no good intentions with those people involved in the lawsuit. Just a get rich quick mindset : (
    I'd rather see a company fined by the government than people like this fighting things. And in my opinion thats sad.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. cloaker New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    25 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Where is this money going to?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. Apocolypse007

    Apocolypse007 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    614 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    76
    Location:
    New Sewickley, PA
    if its a class action lawsuit (and it is) it goes to the customers hurt by the price fixing. However, you will only get compensation if you bought directly from ATI/Nvidia's websites, not other electronic retailers
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,662 (2.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    and then when they fail they want a bail out
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  15. dalekdukesboy

    dalekdukesboy

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    865 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    206
    thankfully the "bailout" I assume your referring to failed in the congress so there is no bailout of the banks, but I agree with your tone that obviously can apply to any business/corporation that bail outs are a bad idea, economies and free markets fix themselves given time, whether it's the bank market, or the video card gamers market...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. iStink

    iStink New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    648 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    ok so lets say I did buy from ATI's website. How much can I get? Definitely not as much as the people who brought this case up and then decided to say F--- you to everyone else by taking the settlement.
     
  17. dalekdukesboy

    dalekdukesboy

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    865 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    206
    besides...why is NVIDIA plastered all over this...ATI is also half guilty as well, this whole friggon story and how it is presented is ridiculously biased, only difference is Nvidia had to pay 100k+ to the plaintiffs as well, otherwise BOTH ATI and NVIDIA were as guilty of this price fixing and so on. I'm not a fanboy of either really so if this were the other way around and ATI's name was plastered all over it and Nvidia only briefly mentioned I'd think it was just as crappy a story in its presentation. I'll rewrite headline as it should read..." Nvidia and ATI settle suit, both offer to pay 850k to fund"
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. roofsniper New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    42 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    it was nvidia's agreement that they offered if ati will accept it. and
    ati hasn't accepted it yet.
     
  19. zithe

    zithe

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,166 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    485
    Location:
    North Chili, NY
    No really... There are people who could sell their house and pay that off. (California lol)

    Some punishment. Awful glad, though.
     
  20. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    9,564 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,593
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Ummm... LAWYERS.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  21. insider Guest

    LMAO, pocket change to both companies, it would be like us paying $0.50 to avoid a hefty fine. :roll:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  22. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1 The Exiled Airman

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    18,570 (4.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,540
    you just hate the fact that Nvidia was wrong doing. But beyond that, Companies really don't have Control unless if the Card goes below the MSRP, otherwise the Other Companies can sell it for as much as they like.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)