• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Sued by Company Behind Big Samsung and Broadcom IP Dispute Wins

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
36,956 (8.66/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
NVIDIA has been patent-trolled sued over patent-infringement by Xperi, parent company of Invensas Corporation and Tessera Advanced Technologies. Xperi alleges that NVIDIA violated five of its U.S. patents, bearing numbers 5,666,046; 6,232,231; 6,317,333; 6,849,946; and 7,064,005, which mainly deal with the physical and electrical innovations behind packaging of NVIDIA GPUs (mating of the die with a substrate that has a ball/pin-grid that interfaces with the PCB). NVIDIA designs the GPU die and hands over its packaging requirements to TSMC. The Taiwanese semiconductor fabrication giant oversees both the manufacturing of the GPU die, as well as its packaging. Despite this technicality, Xperi alleges that NVIDIA is responsible for the design of the overall GPU, including its package, and must answer for its wrongdoing.

Xperi is not your average back-alley IP hoarder technology inventor. The San Francisco-based company won IP disputes with several semiconductor giants, including Samsung Electronics and Broadcom. In both cases, Xperia won settlements, making it a giant-killer given its roughly $1.2 billion-market cap. In his Q1 2019 Earnings Call, Xperi CEO Jon Kerchner stated "...Today we filed a lawsuit against NVIDIA for patent infringement. We believe that NVIDIA is using our patent semiconductor technology in certain of its CPUs and processors and we have been speaking with NVIDIA for several years about taking a patent license. We ultimately could not reach an agreement and we felt that we needed to take this action to defend our intellectual property rights. We filed the case in Delaware Federal Court asserting 5 patents."



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
7,165 (4.22/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2680 10c/20t 2.8GHz @ 3.0GHz
Motherboard Asrock X79 Extreme 11
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory G. Skill 16Gb (4x4Gb) 2133Mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 710
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
You say Patent troll, I say smart business.
Nvidia dropped the ball and missed the opportunity to renew or purchase the patents in question, so sad, too bad.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,367 (1.58/day)
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard asus z170i pro gaming
Cooling ekwb custom loop for cpu/gpu running on d5 and 480 rad
Memory 2*16gb ddr4-2400
Video Card(s) msi geforce gtx 1080 ti aero
Storage 250gb 950 pro, 2*500gb samsung 850 evo
Display(s) asus pg279q, eizo ev2736w
Case thermaltake core p5
Power Supply seasonic platinum 660
Mouse logitech g700
Keyboard corsair k60
Links from Tom's Hardware article:
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/5666046 - Reference voltage circuit having a substantially zero temperature coefficient
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/US-6232231-B1 - Planarized semiconductor interconnect topography and method for polishing a metal layer to form interconnect
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/US-6317333-B1 - Package construction of semiconductor device
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/US-6849946-B2 - Planarized semiconductor interconnect topography and method for polishing a metal layer to form interconnect
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/US-7064005-B2 - Semiconductor apparatus and method of manufacturing same

Considering they got settlements out of Samsung and Broadcom, Xperi is likely to win. On the other hand, Nvidia is no slouch either. Reading the patents, I really have to wonder if these are that unique - some of these seem to be somewhat close to common sense. On the other hand, Samsung had a patent license agreement which expired, a bit after that Xperi sued them. The win against Broadcom did not come too easily either.

Edit:
Tessera has been to courts with a lot of players in the field. Among others they sued AMD in 2005 who settled in 2013.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
3,068 (0.58/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MVII
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.85GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime X370-Pro
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200
Video Card(s) Galax GeForce GTX 1080 EXOC-SNPR
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 500GB Crucial MX200, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/h01zlr
You say Patent troll, I say smart business.
Nvidia dropped the ball and missed the opportunity to renew or purchase the patents in question, so sad, too bad.
If a company doesn't make any products or create new innovations, but rather make all their money from buying patents from third parties and then use them to sue companies that are using similar technology, then they're a patent troll. This seems to a clear case of a patent troll in action.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
4,509 (1.44/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor Intel 5960X @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3
Cooling Custom Loop. 360+240 rads.
Memory 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 2966MHz 16-17-17-35
Video Card(s) ASUS 1080 Ti FE + water block
Storage Optane 900P + Samsung PM981 NVMe 1TB + 750 EVO 500GB
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10 insider
If a company doesn't make any products or create new innovations, but rather make all their money from buying patents from third parties and then use them to sue companies that are using similar technology, then they're a patent troll. This seems to a clear case of a patent troll in action.
It almost is modern mafia like... asking for protection money lol or else :D

These things are actually sad.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,367 (1.58/day)
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard asus z170i pro gaming
Cooling ekwb custom loop for cpu/gpu running on d5 and 480 rad
Memory 2*16gb ddr4-2400
Video Card(s) msi geforce gtx 1080 ti aero
Storage 250gb 950 pro, 2*500gb samsung 850 evo
Display(s) asus pg279q, eizo ev2736w
Case thermaltake core p5
Power Supply seasonic platinum 660
Mouse logitech g700
Keyboard corsair k60
In this case, I am not sure if Xperi is patent troll or not. The company does seem to be doing R&D or has been doing significant R&D in the semiconductor packaging field, making it a valid (not a patent troll) patent holder. The history from last decade or so, on the other hand, has a lot of IP acquisitions.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
3,068 (0.58/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MVII
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.85GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime X370-Pro
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200
Video Card(s) Galax GeForce GTX 1080 EXOC-SNPR
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 500GB Crucial MX200, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/h01zlr
In this case, I am not sure if Xperi is patent troll or not. The company does seem to be doing R&D or has been doing significant R&D in the semiconductor packaging field, making it a valid (not a patent troll) patent holder. The history from last decade or so, on the other hand, has a lot of IP acquisitions.
Xperi seems to be a holding company of some kind, with the R&D being done at wholly owned subsidy Invensas, which kind of still makes them a patent troll. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xperi
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,367 (1.58/day)
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard asus z170i pro gaming
Cooling ekwb custom loop for cpu/gpu running on d5 and 480 rad
Memory 2*16gb ddr4-2400
Video Card(s) msi geforce gtx 1080 ti aero
Storage 250gb 950 pro, 2*500gb samsung 850 evo
Display(s) asus pg279q, eizo ev2736w
Case thermaltake core p5
Power Supply seasonic platinum 660
Mouse logitech g700
Keyboard corsair k60
Xperi seems to be a holding company of some kind, with the R&D being done at wholly owned subsidy Invensas, which kind of still makes them a patent troll. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xperi
Subsidiary is still effectively part of a company. R&D is ongoing, their patents hold up and are not without merit. Their lawsuits do not appear to be frivolous either. While we may disagree on whether company focusing on gathering (whether by R&D or acquisition) IP rights has a valid business case or good ethical standpoint, the general perception of a patent troll implies stupid patents, generally bought for cheap and indiscriminate and frivolous lawsuits. This does not seem to be the case here.

I mean, I do not like the way this looks but when I try to look at this objectively, Xperi does not necessarily qualify as a patent troll.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
137 (0.04/day)
Location
North-Rhine-Westphalia
Processor IvyBridge Xeon E3-1230v2 8 Threads
Motherboard B75
Cooling Arctic FreezerXtreme
Memory 2x 8GB DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) GTX 960 2GB
Storage 256GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p 32" TV
Audio Device(s) USB Headset
Power Supply beQuiet F1 600W 80+Gold
Mouse yes
Keyboard yes
Software Win10
We need more global free common IP

i bet some day i get sued over patent-infringement for "using a round thing as a wheel" whoever holds that patent

Anyone who harasses a court with such a trolling, should be expropriated.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
3,068 (0.58/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MVII
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.85GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime X370-Pro
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200
Video Card(s) Galax GeForce GTX 1080 EXOC-SNPR
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 500GB Crucial MX200, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/h01zlr
I mean, I do not like the way this looks but when I try to look at this objectively, Xperi does not necessarily qualify as a patent troll.
You might be right. They seem to be in the same boat as Rambus and similar companies though. They use fringe cases to sue companies.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
939 (0.19/day)
Processor 2500K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair A70
Memory 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1600 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) eVGA GTX 470
Storage Crucial m4 128GB + Seagate RAID 1 (1TB x 2)
Display(s) Dell 22" 1680x1050 nothing special
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W
Software Windows 7 64bit Pro
We need more global free common IP

i bet some day i get sued over patent-infringement for "using a round thing as a wheel" whoever holds that patent

Anyone who harasses a court with such a trolling, should be expropriated.
We do have global free common IP..... after the patent expires. Those who invent require some kind of protection against the theft of their work or else what's the point? For the greater good?? Let's see how well that greater good pays for future R&D. In fact, there are times when a company will seal their IP in a time stamped envelope and not patent (called trade secrets). That way they don't have to worry about making their property public; however, they also can't sue over any infringement in that case either. In some one tries to patent that trade secret, the original company can then prove with their sealed and dated envelope in the courts that they were first but now the cat is out of the bag and if a patent is sought it will granted starting with the date on the envelope (the start of the patent date may have changed since I was last in the loop). But to worried about being sued over "using a round thing as a wheel" is either at best being completely naïve on how the patent system works and what happens when they expire or at worst trying to use scare tactics and OMG..... it's so outlandish!!!!
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
170 (0.05/day)
NVIDIA also used wood screws to fake their 'new video card' presentation a few years back and got away with it (not even a fine from what I remember) so I'm amazed someone actually won against them.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
395 (0.18/day)
The most disgusting thing about all patents litigations is that the actual people/teams behind the patents don't get anything off these litigations.

And they say slavery has long been abolished.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
939 (0.19/day)
Processor 2500K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair A70
Memory 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1600 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) eVGA GTX 470
Storage Crucial m4 128GB + Seagate RAID 1 (1TB x 2)
Display(s) Dell 22" 1680x1050 nothing special
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W
Software Windows 7 64bit Pro
The most disgusting thing about all patents litigations is that the actual people/teams behind the patents don't get anything off these litigations.

And they say slavery has long been abolished.
Oh please.... they get a salary, likely health benefits, 401k matching. Some companies even have programs that provide bonuses for granted patents. Now if the company was trying to take the patent rights from something the employee did on their own free time and with no supporting effort by the company, its property, or its resources then that argument holds merit. However, comparing it to slavery???? No one is forcing those employees to work at that company. I'm pretty sure if they weren't being paid, they wouldn't show up and no one would come tracking them down to force them to come work. Just because a company tries to protect its property does not make it evil.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,009 (3.02/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
NVIDIA also used wood screws to fake their 'new video card' presentation a few years back and got away with it (not even a fine from what I remember) so I'm amazed someone actually won against them.
Nobody won. They are currently being sued.

And what does wooden screws on a presentation have to do with anything? Heck even new cars teased at some auto shows are only mock-ups, especially the concept cars. I consider that to be the same category.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2015
Messages
503 (0.35/day)
Patents is now an industry in itself, so it must make profit.

Well, maybe not necessarily make profit (Uber, Lyft), but at least have the potential appearance to anyways.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
1,102 (0.35/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Ratchet
Processor Ryzen 1700X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom Loop, Ek blocks 280mm Rad
Memory 16gb TridentZ RGB DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) 1x ASUS STRIX RX480 OC(flashed to 580)
Storage JBOD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar STX II
Power Supply Seasonic X-series Gold 850W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10
We do have global free common IP..... after the patent expires. Those who invent require some kind of protection against the theft of their work or else what's the point? For the greater good?? Let's see how well that greater good pays for future R&D. In fact, there are times when a company will seal their IP in a time stamped envelope and not patent (called trade secrets). That way they don't have to worry about making their property public; however, they also can't sue over any infringement in that case either. In some one tries to patent that trade secret, the original company can then prove with their sealed and dated envelope in the courts that they were first but now the cat is out of the bag and if a patent is sought it will granted starting with the date on the envelope (the start of the patent date may have changed since I was last in the loop). But to worried about being sued over "using a round thing as a wheel" is either at best being completely naïve on how the patent system works and what happens when they expire or at worst trying to use scare tactics and OMG..... it's so outlandish!!!!
"Those that invent" does Xperi fall into that category.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
939 (0.19/day)
Processor 2500K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair A70
Memory 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1600 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) eVGA GTX 470
Storage Crucial m4 128GB + Seagate RAID 1 (1TB x 2)
Display(s) Dell 22" 1680x1050 nothing special
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W
Software Windows 7 64bit Pro
"Those that invent" does Xperi fall into that category.
According to the US Patent and Trademark Offices they do: patents # 5,666,046; 6,232,231; 6,317,333; 6,849,946; and 7,064,005. Once those have expired, everyone and anyone can use that IP freely.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
652 (0.39/day)
we have been speaking with NVIDIA for several years about taking a patent license. We ultimately could not reach an agreement and we felt that we needed to take this action to defend our intellectual property rights.
I felt a little sorry for Nvidia until I read that lol, no excuse.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
9,038 (5.21/day)
Location
Too Long to fit in a single line here.
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
You say Patent troll, I say smart business.
Nvidia dropped the ball and missed the opportunity to renew or purchase the patents in question, so sad, too bad.
You know what that reminds me of? Kids in elementary school that quickly take your seat the moment you got up from it, yelling 'na-na-na nananana'

I felt a little sorry for Nvidia until I read that lol, no excuse.
No excuse? What if the licensing fee they asked for was ridiculously high? Which is usually the case... "here's an offer you must refuse"

The real question that should be asked, and that goes for the entire US patent system really, is 'how does this help the creator / society / the economy'. The answer is that these companies help nobody but themselves and they have nothing to show for it. They don't do anything with the technology or patent except swing it around to sue others. These companies are a straight up cancer that should be eradicated, its a dynamic of utter waste of time and resources. The only winners are the lawyer firms and a few whales.

White collar mafia indeed.

Reading the patents, I really have to wonder if these are that unique - some of these seem to be somewhat close to common sense.
This is exactly what's wrong with the patent 'business' in the US. In history it has happened countless times that in the same age people get to similar ideas, simply because its logical, or a natural evolution of things and ideas. Should that be patented, or is it as you put it very well: 'common sense'. The fact you can even get things like 'rounded corners' patented is a massive fail in the first place. It means the system needs adjustment.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
1,102 (0.35/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Ratchet
Processor Ryzen 1700X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom Loop, Ek blocks 280mm Rad
Memory 16gb TridentZ RGB DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) 1x ASUS STRIX RX480 OC(flashed to 580)
Storage JBOD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar STX II
Power Supply Seasonic X-series Gold 850W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10
According to the US Patent and Trademark Offices they do: patents # 5,666,046; 6,232,231; 6,317,333; 6,849,946; and 7,064,005. Once those have expired, everyone and anyone can use that IP freely.
That's the problem. It shouldn't be allowed to purchase a patent and then have free reign to sue anyone and everyone. That privilege should be reserved for the original patent holder. If a company purchases patent(s) to be considered and innovator they then have to actually produce a product.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
22 (0.01/day)
Location
Saint Louis, Missouri USA
That's the problem. It shouldn't be allowed to purchase a patent and then have free reign to sue anyone and everyone. That privilege should be reserved for the original patent holder. If a company purchases patent(s) to be considered and innovator they then have to actually produce a product.
That sounds like an actual solution I would be for. What's to say TSMC being a veteran in this business didn't develop their own tech independently? It is after all a Taiwan company manufacturing in China. What about Taiwanese patents TSMC has? International agreements on IP and trade come into play.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
7,165 (4.22/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2680 10c/20t 2.8GHz @ 3.0GHz
Motherboard Asrock X79 Extreme 11
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory G. Skill 16Gb (4x4Gb) 2133Mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 710
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
That's the problem. It shouldn't be allowed to purchase a patent and then have free reign to sue anyone and everyone. That privilege should be reserved for the original patent holder.
Patents are proof of ownership, if the original owner died, the patent shouldn't end there.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
1,102 (0.35/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Ratchet
Processor Ryzen 1700X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom Loop, Ek blocks 280mm Rad
Memory 16gb TridentZ RGB DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) 1x ASUS STRIX RX480 OC(flashed to 580)
Storage JBOD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar STX II
Power Supply Seasonic X-series Gold 850W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10
What's to say TSMC being a veteran in this business didn't develop their own tech independently? It is after all a Taiwan company manufacturing in China. What about Taiwanese patents TSMC has? International agreements on IP and trade come into play.
I believe that is a real problem faced today. Afaik, the same patent has to be and are filed in every country/region a that protections are desired.

Patents are proof of ownership, if the original owner died, the patent shouldn't end there.
In that scenario Estate rules would apply and a named inheritor would succeed as the 'original' patent' holder. In the event that there isn't an inheritor or inheritor wants nothing to do with it and sells it. My suggestion comes into play and burden of proof falls on the party acquiring the patent that they have an actual use for the patent other than as a legal weapon to extort money from others. This way patents could only be used as originally intended as proction and only protection.
 
Last edited:
Top