• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA to Showcase its x86 Plans this NVISION?

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,502 (9.18/day)
Likes
17,520
Location
Hyderabad, India
#1
Team R21 of FiringSquad studied the credibility of a rumor on NVIDIA materializing its long-term processor plans. They said they would be surprised if NVIDIA didn't have an x86 plan chalked out at least at a very interior level. The Inquirer speculated earlier that NVIDIA could lift the covers from its x86 plans as early as some time this week, during the ongoing NVISION event. The credibility of this rumor is based purely on who's breeding it. Many point it to have been doing rounds during IDF.

Reality bites: NVIDIA lacks a regularized x86 license which has to be issued by Intel to be able to use x86 in their products. Any mass announcement at this point could cost them. NVISION however looks to be an ideal substrate for discussions on CUDA and NVIDIA's SoC (System on a Chip) plans.

Source: FiringSquad
 

candle_86

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
3,914 (0.97/day)
Likes
227
#2
well Nvidia might release x86 without Intel's premission using there own socket. All they have to do is build it in a clean room without using any of intels x86 code in it, if the built it 100% x86 compatabile in a clean room intel can't say shit
 

tigger

I'm the only one
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
10,476 (2.42/day)
Likes
1,673
System Name Black to the Core MKIV
Processor Intel I7 6700k
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming socket 1151
Cooling NZXT Kraken X61 280mm radiator
Memory 2x8gb Corsair vengeance LPX 2400 DDR4
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon R9 290 4gb ddr5
Storage Patriot Blast 120gb ssd Boot and WD10EADX-22TDHB0 1TB Data
Display(s) Dell 2408WFP 24" 1920x1200
Case Nzxt IS 340
Audio Device(s) Asus xonar dsx pci-e
Power Supply Corsair CX750
Mouse Logitech G502
Software Win 10 Pro x64
#4
So they cut intel off from sli,but expect a x86 license from them :laugh:
 

candle_86

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
3,914 (0.97/day)
Likes
227
#5
reread what i said, if they make a clean room x86 without using intel code, similar to how the team behind react OS is building a windows without any windows code.
 

Jansku07

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
171 (0.05/day)
Likes
24
Location
Finland
Processor 4000X2 @ 2,1Ghz w/ AC Freezer
Motherboard MSI K9AGM3-FD
Memory 2GB DDR2
Video Card(s) 3650 w/ 256MB GDDR3
Storage WD 320GB - 7200RPM
Display(s) DELL m991 /1024x768/ 85hz
Case resonating metal case
Power Supply FSP 350W -> 16A@12V
Software Vista Home Premium x86 SP2 FIN
Benchmark Scores oh noeees.
#7
That's gonna take a hell lotta work to make it happen. And even if they do, AMD and Intel will have over 10 year headstart in x86 business. Well competition is always good, so a third (I'm not counting Via) competitor would be good for customers.. Best luck!
So they didn't , they gave them sli . maybe they got x86 in return
Nvidia didn't give SLI to Intel, they gave it as a 30$ chip for the mobomakers. There's a big difference. And besides, x86 license is way more important than SLI-support.
 
W

wolf2009

Guest
#8
That's gonna take a hell lotta work to make it happen. And even if they do, AMD and Intel will have over 10 year headstart in x86 business.
If they manage to lure some key Amd and Intel designers, that headstart may be down to almost nothing.

Nvidia didn't give SLI to Intel, they gave it as a 30$ chip for the mobomakers. There's a big difference. And besides, x86 license is way more important than SLI-support.
To me and the consumer , it doesn't matter what they gave them, as long SLI is coming to Intel mobo's, which Intel was not allowed earlier. As far as I'm concerned Nvidia gave permission to Intel to put SLI on their mobo's, doesn't matter if they gave them a chip or a transistor.
 

Jansku07

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
171 (0.05/day)
Likes
24
Location
Finland
Processor 4000X2 @ 2,1Ghz w/ AC Freezer
Motherboard MSI K9AGM3-FD
Memory 2GB DDR2
Video Card(s) 3650 w/ 256MB GDDR3
Storage WD 320GB - 7200RPM
Display(s) DELL m991 /1024x768/ 85hz
Case resonating metal case
Power Supply FSP 350W -> 16A@12V
Software Vista Home Premium x86 SP2 FIN
Benchmark Scores oh noeees.
#9
To me and the consumer , it doesn't matter what they gave them
It does matter. Nvidia could have made SLI a software solution, so that you wouldn't be stuck with a hot 30$ chip.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
850 (0.21/day)
Likes
23
Location
USA
#10
well Nvidia might release x86 without Intel's premission using there own socket. All they have to do is build it in a clean room without using any of intels x86 code in it, if the built it 100% x86 compatabile in a clean room intel can't say shit
I won't argue it is possible but that is a lot of work and they better not code anything (even on their own) that looks like an Intel code or Intel will screw them.
To me and the consumer , it doesn't matter what they gave them, as long SLI is coming to Intel mobo's, which Intel was not allowed earlier. As far as I'm concerned Nvidia gave permission to Intel to put SLI on their mobo's, doesn't matter if they gave them a chip or a transistor.
I agree you have a point. Technically buy giving (...selling) the MFGs a chip Intel now has SLI on their chipsets.


Looking at the original source I guess we'll see what happens. (Nothing against you BTA, I'm talking about the Inquirer.)
 

candle_86

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
3,914 (0.97/day)
Likes
227
#11
I won't argue it is possible but that is a lot of work and they better not code anything (even on their own) that looks like an Intel code or Intel will screw them.

I agree you have a point. Technically buy giving (...selling) the MFGs a chip Intel now has SLI on their chipsets.


Looking at the original source I guess we'll see what happens. (Nothing against you BTA, I'm talking about the Inquirer.)
not true, if they record all the work and all the logs intel cant touch them there either. Also a modern GPU is 100% more complex than an x86 chip.
 

evil bill

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
369 (0.08/day)
Likes
14
Location
Scotland
System Name Main Rig | Second Rig
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Wolfdale E8200 @ 3.2Ghz | Pentium 4 530J 3.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P5KC @ 1,600Mhz FSB | Asus P5P800
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
Memory OCZ 4GB DDR2-800 (2x2GB) 5-4-4-15 | Corsair 1GB XMS DDR-400 (2 x 512MB)
Video Card(s) MSI NX8800GT 512MB Pre-OCd @ 660/950 | Powercolor X850 Pro 256MB AGP
Storage 500GB WD Caviar SATA300 | Hitachi Deckstar 80GB SATA
Display(s) LG 22" W2252TQ
Case Antec 900 | ATX Window case
Audio Device(s) Onboard High Definition Audio | Soundblaster Audigy SE
Power Supply Hiper 730W HPU-5M730-SE | Tagan 480W
Software Vista 64-bit SP1 | Windows 7 32-bit RC1
#12

candle_86

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
3,914 (0.97/day)
Likes
227
#13
a GPU has billions more transistors than a CPU, it also runs over a hundred parelle tasks at once. Now go find a CPU that does that?
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
2,807 (0.71/day)
Likes
230
Location
US
Processor Intel Q9400
Motherboard asus p5q-pro
Cooling Ultra120
Memory 6GB ddr2
Video Card(s) NVS 290
Storage 3TB + 1.5TB
Display(s) Samsung F2380
Case Silverstone Fortress FT02B
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi
Power Supply 750W PC P&C
Software win 7 ultimate 64bit
#14
If they do release CPU, it will not be soon, but it will add some competition that's for sure
and that should be good for us
 

evil bill

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
369 (0.08/day)
Likes
14
Location
Scotland
System Name Main Rig | Second Rig
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Wolfdale E8200 @ 3.2Ghz | Pentium 4 530J 3.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P5KC @ 1,600Mhz FSB | Asus P5P800
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
Memory OCZ 4GB DDR2-800 (2x2GB) 5-4-4-15 | Corsair 1GB XMS DDR-400 (2 x 512MB)
Video Card(s) MSI NX8800GT 512MB Pre-OCd @ 660/950 | Powercolor X850 Pro 256MB AGP
Storage 500GB WD Caviar SATA300 | Hitachi Deckstar 80GB SATA
Display(s) LG 22" W2252TQ
Case Antec 900 | ATX Window case
Audio Device(s) Onboard High Definition Audio | Soundblaster Audigy SE
Power Supply Hiper 730W HPU-5M730-SE | Tagan 480W
Software Vista 64-bit SP1 | Windows 7 32-bit RC1
#15
just pulling your leg matey - 100% seemed such a precise figure......;)


Maybe they already have an X86 license lined up, but they have managed to keep it quiet? Just because they are sabre rattling with each other public doesn't mean a backroom deal hasn't been done with Intel and Nvidia. Who knows what kind of confidentiality agreements could have been signed?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
1,992 (0.41/day)
Likes
970
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.85GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime X370-Pro
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200
Video Card(s) Galax GeForce GTX 1080 EXOC-SNPR
Storage 512GB Plextor M8PeG NVMe, 500GB Crucial MX200
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Roccat ISKU
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/j1yypa
#16
Well, has anyone considered that US$25 million deal with Transmeta at all?
They made x86 compatible CPUs without any x86 tech in them at all.
What if, nVidia use some more of their tech than was in the press release from a few weeks ago?
It's not impossible or improbable, if they really are working on a high(er)-end CPU, as Tesla can hardly be called high-end.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
297 (0.09/day)
Likes
36
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor Intel P4 531+ @ 3.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P5LD2-VM/C
Memory Kingston 2x512MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte NV8600GT 256MB
Storage WD 640GB
Display(s) ViewSonic 22"
Case Codegen 403
Audio Device(s) integrated Realtek 882
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
#17
a GPU has billions more transistors than a CPU, it also runs over a hundred parelle tasks at once. Now go find a CPU that does that?
That only means that GPU has many, tiny parts all doing the same job. Design of a CPU is far more complex than GPU. On other hand GPU design in simpler and it only has more components.

EDIT: Is x64 also licensed by Intel?
 

candle_86

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
3,914 (0.97/day)
Likes
227
#18
not true, a modern GPU is by far more complex, they do parrelle computing. They also do traditional CPU work as well, there is an FPU and an Interger inside a GPU. Add to that the shaders ect, and you get a complex chip. X86 can be implemented on a modern GPU if you where to program an x86 backend except a GPU would it alot faster.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
#19
hahaha, "GPU is by far more complex because i say so...."

FPU and Integer unit are not GPU exclusive, CPU architectures include them also, and other things more complex like a advanced branch predictor, memory disambiguation, variable instructions to fixed instructions decoders, out of order execution and a lot of other things that GPU doesnt have beacause they dont need to.

GPUs aren't general purposes units, in fact, they are very specific, only with a software layer that pass across CPU (CUDA) is general purposes tasks possible on the GPUs.

sorry my bad english :D
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
850 (0.21/day)
Likes
23
Location
USA
#20
not true, if they record all the work and all the logs intel cant touch them there either. Also a modern GPU is 100% more complex than an x86 chip.
Intel has a lot of money, if nothing else they would probably try to delay it by making them prove everything before they could release it.
87% of all statistics are made up on the spot...........
Thats like saying This statement is false. If what you say is true I have an 87% chance of it being false, but then it wouldn't be very true would it. LoL
Well, has anyone considered that US$25 million deal with Transmeta at all?
They made x86 compatible CPUs without any x86 tech in them at all.
What if, nVidia use some more of their tech than was in the press release from a few weeks ago?
It's not impossible or improbable, if they really are working on a high(er)-end CPU, as Tesla can hardly be called high-end.
Thats funny I kinda asked that question when that news post came up.
That only means that GPU has many, tiny parts all doing the same job. Design of a CPU is far more complex than GPU. On other hand GPU design in simpler and it only has more components.

EDIT: Is x64 also licensed by Intel?
I believe x64 was developed around 2000 by AMD and Intel/AMD traded techs. So technically would that mean that Nvidia would have to license x64 from AMD ??
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,830 (1.00/day)
Likes
281
Location
Netherlands
System Name HP z800 workstation
Processor Intel Xeon X5687 3,60ghz 12mb cache x2
Motherboard HP Z800
Cooling all on air
Memory 24gb ecc ram 1333mhz
Video Card(s) sapphire pulse RX 580 8gb
Storage 300gb harddisk and 1tb harddisk 128gb ssd OS 160gb pci-e ssd Fusion io drive
Display(s) Acer KA210HQ
Case HP z800 workstation case
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply HP z800 1100 watt
Mouse Drakonia Black
Keyboard Xtrust nameless?
Software Windows 7 ultimate 64bit, Luxion Keyshot 5, 3ds max 2016, fusion 360
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 11 p15601
#21
x86-64 is a 64-bit superset of the x86 instruction set architecture. Because the x86-64 instruction set is a superset of the x86 instruction set, all instructions in the x86 instruction set can be executed by central processing units (CPUs) that implement the x86-64 instruction set; therefore these CPUs can natively run programs that run on x86 processors from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and other vendors.

Historically, AMD has developed and produced processors patterned after Intel's original designs, but with x86-64, roles were reversed: Intel found itself in the position of adopting the architecture which AMD had created as an extension to Intel's own x86 processor line.

??

there was also a rumor that nvidia want to buy amd to get x86 but if the did it amd would't own the x86 license anny more nor nvidia can via amd
 

v1ch0

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
#22
x86-64 is a 64-bit superset of the x86 instruction set architecture. Because the x86-64 instruction set is a superset of the x86 instruction set, all instructions in the x86 instruction set can be executed by central processing units (CPUs) that implement the x86-64 instruction set; therefore these CPUs can natively run programs that run on x86 processors from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and other vendors.

Historically, AMD has developed and produced processors patterned after Intel's original designs, but with x86-64, roles were reversed: Intel found itself in the position of adopting the architecture which AMD had created as an extension to Intel's own x86 processor line.

??

there was also a rumor that nvidia want to buy amd to get x86 but if the did it amd would't own the x86 license anny more nor nvidia can via amd
NVidia buying AMD?!?! ABSOLUTELY impossible... At least EU won't allow it :D
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,809 (2.56/day)
Likes
529
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Boddha Getta Boddha Getta Bah!
Processor AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.382
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory 2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 6870 980/1100
Storage WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Display(s) Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case NZXT White Switch 810
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 5.1
Power Supply NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Profession 64 Bit
#23
that was a while back that rumor was going on and Intel, I think, threatened to pull the x86 license for AMD if happened. It didnt and I think we are all the better for it. Its possible Nvidia could make an x86 compatible pc chip, just like IBM compatible PCs, Chips and OS's back in the day. Id be interested in seeing performance numbers on one, to be sure.
 

brian.ca

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
71 (0.02/day)
Likes
14
#24
Does the complexity of CPU vs. GPU even matter? If someone develops a rocket engine 100x more complex and powerful than your normal car engine while keeping it small enough to fit under the hood it will still mean jack if to the general population if they don't have ready access to rocket fuel.

GPUs might be more complex and have x times more processing power but if it can't run operating systems and programs written for x86 does it really have any chance of being accepted when the latter is so firmly entrenched and has some seriously big money behind the effort to keep it as such and even spread it out further?