• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA's Next-Generation Ampere GPUs to be 50% Faster than Turing at Half the Power

Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,785 (1.79/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
I bet that the "50% uplift" is in RTX ON performance while non RTX performance will remain the same in each segment.
That is the only plausible explanation for something like this, or more precisely: a 50% uplift in perf/W for RT operations. A 300% general perf/W increase in a single generation, even with a full node jump, is completely unheard of. Not going to happen for ordinary rasterized graphics. Period.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,117 (2.38/day)
Something doesn't sound right.

When moving to a smaller node, you either get X% higher performance @ the same power or same performance using Y% less power, but not both.
And this is a result of which fundamental law of physics?

There's no reason why Nvidia would offer the traditional +30% performance with new generation just based on architecture improvements and optimizations.
Sometimes there's also some power efficiency bonus (despite the same node).
7nm mean more cores.

Going straight to 7nm EUV means even higher efficiency gain than AMD got with Polaris -> Navi.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,804 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
I believe it's possible to gain 50% in performance. Going from the 12nm process to the 7nm process should increase the efficiency and allow for more cores/faster clocks for the same wattage as Turing uses.

I doubt that Nvidia will lower prices though. They won't have a reason to unless Intel comes out with something really good this year for competition. Also, if there are shortages for any reason then we can expect retailer gouging which will make prices higher than they should be for awhile after release.
But they are claiming 50% performance increase WHILE using 50% less power. It's perfectly believable to be either one ... but both @ the same time? Seriously doubt it.

EDIT

And this is a result of which fundamental law of physics?

There's no reason why Nvidia would offer the traditional +30% performance with new generation just based on architecture improvements and optimizations.
Sometimes there's also some power efficiency bonus (despite the same node).
7nm mean more cores.


Going straight to 7nm EUV means even higher efficiency gain than AMD got with Polaris -> Navi.
But they're not claiming 30%, are they? They could claim ... say ... 20% more performance @ 30% less power and it would be much more believable but 50% more performance @ 50% less power?

Seriously SERIOUSLY doubt this.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
4,444 (2.07/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
True. That's why I only focussed on the possibility of a 50% increase in performance for the same wattage as Turing. Having 50% increase in performance and 50% less watts used at the same time isn't possible imo.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
151 (0.05/day)
Why do you think nVidia wants to "surprise" all their customers in the absolute last second...

They don't want to cause panic to early before next gen release because they know the 2080Ti will drop to 1/3 of it's value instantly when they do their announcement

Don't give them the satisfaction... Sell your 2080Ti NOW!!!
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
344 (0.12/day)
AMD: release big navi
Nvidia: what shall we do? Lets spread news about the next gen to prevent ppl buying big navi.
i think we heard this every time new GPU is about to come out. the competitor starts spreading rumor to stop them from buying competitor product. sometimes i think company like AMD and nvidia does not really need to do this. because their fanboys will do the job for them for free. still remember when some people said you should hold back from getting GTX1080 because Vega will coming out in october 2016. they said there is shortage anyway with 1080 because of demand so you might just as well wait until october 2016.
 

Xex360

New Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
11 (0.03/day)
Finally we'll get the promised 2080ti, not the garbage we have now.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
60 (0.02/day)
nVidia is the new Intel , YOU WILL SEE . New gpus no cheaper , tiny faster becouse is no competition
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,025 (1.02/day)
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Talk of high-end Navi are rumours not from AMD so don't blame them!

Nvidia.... It's all BS Fu Nvidia!

Man this forum.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
332 (0.20/day)
Why is there no "UP TO" in the title here while there was in the Intel news?
I don't like intel but I hate double standards
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
582 (0.36/day)
If Nvidia skips 10nm, 7nm directly to 7+/6nm, the density is increased from 30 on 12/14/16nm to 77 Mtr/mm2 on 7+. 2080ti gets smaller 770 to 300mm2, drops 384 to 256 bit bus 16Gb buffer and 286 mm2, 4096 cuda, compensates with gpu clock speed. bigger chip with 6144 cuda around 429 mm2 so +50% perf is perfectly doable.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,785 (1.79/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Why is there no "UP TO" in the title here while there was in the Intel news?
I don't like intel but I hate double standards
Because the source (apparently) doesn't say "up to". They're just reporting on someone else's report, so conveying this accurately is a must, no matter if the information itself is accurate. If this was data TPU had sourced themselves, your complaint would be entirely valid, but in this case they're just the messenger and do not deserve to be shot.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,710 (4.23/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
I believe it's possible to gain 50% in performance. Going from the 12nm process to the 7nm process should increase the efficiency and allow for more cores/faster clocks for the same wattage as Turing uses.
You're not going to get 50% more clockspeed on 7nm, it's impossible. The only thing you'll get is more cores but the power wont change much.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
4,444 (2.07/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
You're not going to get 50% more clockspeed on 7nm, it's impossible. The only thing you'll get is more cores but the power wont change much.
I didn't say 50% faster clocks. I said a combination of faster clocks/more cores should allow for a 50% increase in performance for the same watts used as Turing.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,117 (2.38/day)
But they're not claiming 30%, are they? They could claim ... say ... 20% more performance @ 30% less power and it would be much more believable but 50% more performance @ 50% less power?
But based on what we've seen with Zen and Navi, would you say halving power draw is believable? Based on new node alone.
Remember this is 14nm -> 7nm EUV.
So it's analogous to what AMD has already shown with Zen2/Navi (DUV) + what they promise for this year.

I think it's quite feasible.

And now we get to the architectural improvements.
We know Nvidia can do +30% with each gen (every ~2 years). There's no reason why this wouldn't be true with Ampere.

So we now have something like +30% performance and -50% power draw. Not quite the +50%/-50%, but still not bad.

Except, as someone said above, the +50% may be taking into account a large boost in RTRT.
Of course RTRT is still a source of arguments today, but few years from now we'll just call it "gaming performance" - just like we stopped splitting 3D and 2D in the late 90s.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
332 (0.20/day)
Because the source (apparently) doesn't say "up to". They're just reporting on someone else's report, so conveying this accurately is a must, no matter if the information itself is accurate. If this was data TPU had sourced themselves, your complaint would be entirely valid, but in this case they're just the messenger and do not deserve to be shot.
Screenshot_20200103-143042.jpg
Screenshot_20200103-143127.jpg


Now, double standards or not?
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
826 (0.22/day)
System Name Desktop | Laptop
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600X| Intel Core i7 7700HQ
Motherboard X570 Phantom Gaming 4 | Neptune KLS HM175
Cooling GAMMAXX 400 Push-Pull | Twin fan, fin stack & heat pipes
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600MHz @ 16-16-16-36-1T | 16GB DDR4 2400MHz 17-17-17-39-2T
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Ti EX | GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Storage ADATA SX8200 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB + Seagate 2TB HDD | 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) 28" Asus PB287Q 3840x2160p | 17" IPS 1920x1080P
Case Thermaltake Urban S41 | Aspire V Nitro BE
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 750W | 150W
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma | Logitech MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Regardless of where the 50% uplift applies, I'm just glad I didn't buy into the RTX 2000 series
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
10,123 (1.97/day)
System Name Desktop / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 6700K @ 4.3GHz (1.180 V) / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz CL15 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 850 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p + 21.5" LG 22MP67VQ IPS 60Hz 1080p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX Onboard / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10
Ah, Cyberpunk 2077 Release date April 16 2020, recommended system requirements RTX30xx.....
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,785 (1.79/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
And now we get to the architectural improvements.
We know Nvidia can do +30% with each gen (every ~2 years). There's no reason why this wouldn't be true with Ampere.
Turing was nowhere near 30% perf/SM over Pascal. More like 10%. Any further gains came from more SMs and higher clocks.

But based on what we've seen with Zen and Navi, would you say halving power draw is believable? Based on new node alone.
Remember this is 14nm -> 7nm EUV.
So it's analogous to what AMD has already shown with Zen2/Navi (DUV) + what they promise for this year.
That sounds rather unlikely to me, though I'm no expert by any stretch of the imagination. The jump from 28nm to 16nm did not halve power for Nvidia, so going from 12nm to 7nm EUV doesn't sound likely to do so either. Beyond that they're moving between foundries (at least for some GPUs), so comparisons could be difficult.

It's not analogous to AMD's move from Vega on GloFo 12nm to Navi on TSMC 7nm either, as that is a completely new architecture with very significant efficiency improvements. You'd be better off looking at the Radeon Vega 64 vs. the Radeon VII, as those are very similar in design but on a new node with slightly bumped clocks, and that improved perf/W by < 30%.

Not really, no. The first is reporting on IPC, which is (at least supposed to be) an average number based on a number of tests. An "up to" number in this case could thus be 18%, 30% or 45% - it's impossible to know, as we only know the average. Look at SPEC testing, for example - gen-to-gen IPC (clock equalized) testing in that normally results in a wide array of performance differences. The other reports on one specific single data point with little context. Is this a high number, an average, or a low? We have no idea, but given that it's an officially released number from the company itself, it's logical to infer it to be above average to present the product in the best light.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
332 (0.20/day)
Turing was nowhere near 30% perf/SM over Pascal. More like 10%. Any further gains came from more SMs and higher clocks.


That sounds rather unlikely to me, though I'm no expert by any stretch of the imagination. The jump from 28nm to 16nm did not halve power for Nvidia, so going from 12nm to 7nm EUV doesn't sound likely to do so either. Beyond that they're moving between foundries (at least for some GPUs), so comparisons could be difficult.

It's not analogous to AMD's move from Vega on GloFo 12nm to Navi on TSMC 7nm either, as that is a completely new architecture with very significant efficiency improvements. You'd be better off looking at the Radeon Vega 64 vs. the Radeon VII, as those are very similar in design but on a new node with slightly bumped clocks, and that improved perf/W by < 30%.


Not really, no. The first is reporting on IPC, which is (at least supposed to be) an average number based on a number of tests. An "up to" number in this case could thus be 18%, 30% or 45% - it's impossible to know, as we only know the average. Look at SPEC testing, for example - gen-to-gen IPC (clock equalized) testing in that normally results in a wide array of performance differences. The other reports on one specific single data point with little context. Is this a high number, an average, or a low? We have no idea, but given that it's an officially released number from the company itself, it's logical to infer it to be above average to present the product in the best light.
Then then the title should've included words as : Claim or say ( Nvidia says, or claims) at worst, just like did in the Intel news.
Saying that IT WILL BE %50 FASTER this way is just wrong and biased.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
It will be very good but too expensive for the first couple of quarters,2020 may bring on some competition and price cuts.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
250 (0.43/day)
Personally, I don´t think that Nvidia will be very concerned with consumption, because it has been seen that AMD even with a new architecture and 7nm, is not brilliant in that regard.

I think they are more likely to try to keep the TDPs at or slightly below and pull performance to the max in that envelope. About 250W will probably remain normal for the Nvidia top-end card.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,771 (0.70/day)
Location
KL, Malaysia
System Name iCUE Rainbow PC* (WIP sheet for AMD Ryzen build)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600*
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F Gaming ATX*
Cooling Corsair Hydro H60 120mm AIO CLC* + HD120 RGB (3) + Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4 3200MHz*
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 Twin Fan 6GB GDDR6 (stock settings)
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD | Patriot Scorch 512GB M.2 PCIe SSD | Seagate Desktop 1TB SSHD
Display(s) LG 29WK600 29 inch WFHD IPS FreeSync (primary) + Dell U2417H 24 inch 1080p IPS (secondary)
Case Corsair iCUE 220T RGB Airflow w/ SP120 RGB PRO Fans (Black)* & Lighting Node CORE + RGB LED Strips.
Audio Device(s) ROG SupremeFX 8-Channel HD Audio CODEC S1220A* + Corsair VOID Stereo Headphones
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 750W 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB FPS Mouse (White)
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB Mechanical Keyboard (Cherry MX RGB Red Switches)
Software Windows 10 Professional x64 (November Update, v1909)
if Ampere really has a 50% gain over Turing in all benchmarks/real world use while using less power is a good thing. Problem here is many bought the "refreshed" RTX20 Series Super cards & GTX16 Series cards... so those folks might be at a loss-ish? That said, I wonder how the naming convention will be? RTX 22xx? or RTX 3xxx since it's an entirely new silicon? 2020 & 2021 will be an interesting year.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
5,621 (1.21/day)
System Name MightyX (MITX)
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X PBO
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory 16GB DDR4 3600 CL15
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 OC/UV
Storage Samsung 970 Evo m.2 NVME
Display(s) AOC AGON AG352QCX
Case Raven RVZ-01
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Zowie EC1-A
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
As always take the super early info with an enormous pinch of salt. 50% is a silly large number, possibly pulled from thin air to keep money in wallets for it instead of buying a competing product today, or it might represent a super outside shot at a best case scenario like RTX or using a new gen specific feature like VRS did for Turing over Pascal.

What is almost certain is that, the cards as a product stack should reasonably outperform their Turing counterparts, they should also present a reasonable performance per watt improvement, and a reasonable hardware ray tracing improvement. Prices... well who knows, if AMD can't keep up with their upper tier products expect much of the same.

I won't count on anything solid whatsoever until W1zzard (and other trusted sites) publish a review of an actual product. Hopefully in any case 2020 brings a compelling upgrade for a GTX1080 (I own) / vega 56/64 owners that isn't the halo product and has a competitive price to perf ratio.
 
Top