- Joined
- Jan 31, 2005
- Messages
- 2,053 (0.29/day)
- Location
- Denmark
System Name | Commercial towing vehicle "Nostromo" |
---|---|
Processor | 5800X3D |
Motherboard | X570 Unify |
Cooling | EK-AIO 360 |
Memory | 32 GB Fury 3666 MHz |
Video Card(s) | 4070 Ti Eagle |
Storage | SN850 NVMe 1TB + Renegade NVMe 2TB + 870 EVO 4TB |
Display(s) | 25" Legion Y25g-30 |
Case | Lian Li LanCool 216 v2 |
Audio Device(s) | B & W PX7 S2e |
Power Supply | HX1500i |
Mouse | Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition |
Keyboard | Scope II 96 Wireless |
Software | Windows 11 23H2 |
I have done som initial/basic OCing ..... and a thing is jumping in my eyes....
I can get a higher OC with 2 x 2 GB mem than with 4 x 4 or 8 x 8 GB .... why is that so?
Or is it alone a question Corsair vs. Kingston?
I have tried various configurations (multiplier, voltages, timings and so on.....) and everytime the low mem config wins..........
Specs:
FX 4100 BE (AMD)
KÜHLER H2O 920 (Antec)
Crosshair IV Formula (BIOS 3027 BETA)(ASUS)
4x4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz Venegance (Corsair)
2x2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz HyperX Genesis (Kingston)
Vertex3 120 GB (OCZ)
GTX580 GV-N580UD-15I (Gigabyte)
TruePower Quattro 1000 W (Antec)
With 2x2 GB HyperX I can reach 4.45 GHz (19 x 235 @ 1.49v) MEM (1567MHz)
With 2x4 GB Venegance I only can 4 GHz (18.5 x 221 @ 1.52v) MEM (1473 MHz)
I can get a higher OC with 2 x 2 GB mem than with 4 x 4 or 8 x 8 GB .... why is that so?
Or is it alone a question Corsair vs. Kingston?
I have tried various configurations (multiplier, voltages, timings and so on.....) and everytime the low mem config wins..........
Specs:
FX 4100 BE (AMD)
KÜHLER H2O 920 (Antec)
Crosshair IV Formula (BIOS 3027 BETA)(ASUS)
4x4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz Venegance (Corsair)
2x2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz HyperX Genesis (Kingston)
Vertex3 120 GB (OCZ)
GTX580 GV-N580UD-15I (Gigabyte)
TruePower Quattro 1000 W (Antec)
With 2x2 GB HyperX I can reach 4.45 GHz (19 x 235 @ 1.49v) MEM (1567MHz)
With 2x4 GB Venegance I only can 4 GHz (18.5 x 221 @ 1.52v) MEM (1473 MHz)