• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

OCZ the First SSD Manufacturer to Announce Successful Transition to 2X nm NAND Flash

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,502 (9.18/day)
Likes
17,520
Location
Hyderabad, India
#1
OCZ Technology Group, Inc., a leading provider of high-performance solid-state drives (SSDs) for computing devices and systems, today announces it is the first SSD manufacturer to successfully complete the transition to 2Xnm NAND flash-based storage solutions with the goal of significantly driving down the cost of client SSDs.

“OCZ is constantly exploring ways to not just advance solid state drive design but also make the technology more affordable, while maintaining high performance and reliability standards” said Ryan Petersen, CEO of OCZ Technology Group. “We are excited to complete the transition to the next generation 2Xnm NAND components which reiterates our strategy of producing high performance SSDs at the most attractive price point available for consumer applications.”



As the industry transitions to a 2Xnm fabrication process, OCZ remains focused on delivering a high-performance solution at a lower price point, continuing to pave the way for SSDs to become more accessible to the complete range of consumers, and to ultimately replace traditional mechanical hard drives over the next few years.

OCZ continues to lead the way by reducing the cost of SSDs by the use of 2Xnm technology, but will continue to offer the older flash technology in select SSD products with a higher price per gigabyte. OCZ’s 2Xnm?based SSDs carry the same warranty as the earlier 3Xnm versions, and it is the Company’s objective is to continue to deliver the very best balance of affordability, performance, and capacity to ensure an optimal computing experience.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
10,241 (2.28/day)
Likes
2,107
Location
Granite Bay, CA
System Name Big Devil
Processor Intel Core i5-2500K
Motherboard ECS P67H2-A2
Cooling XSPC Rasa | Black Ice GT Stealth 240 | XSPC X2O 750 | 2x ACF12PWM | PrimoChill White 7/16"
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance LP Arctic White 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ACX SC
Storage Intel 520 Series 180GB + WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) HP ZR30W 30" 2650x1600 IPS
Case Corsair 600T SE
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX | Sennheisser PC350 "Hero" Modded | Corsair SP2500
Power Supply ABS SL 1050W (Enermax Revolution Rebadge)
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro w/ Media Center
Benchmark Scores Ducky Year of the Snake w/ Cherry MX Browns & Year of the Tiger PBT Keycaps | Razer Deathadder Black
#2
Pair one with a Sandforce 2000 chip and I'm sold.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,160 (0.33/day)
Likes
236
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
#3
Its successful except for all the people complaining that 25nm nand drives are slower than 34nm nand drives. Lot of drama on the ocz forum about it.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,231 (1.47/day)
Likes
664
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
#4
ok hold a sec. advice im was ready to order revodrive, should i wait
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,160 (0.33/day)
Likes
236
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
#5
ok hold a sec. advice im was ready to order revodrive, should i wait
Its not really an issue with the revo its still lightening fast, but the 6GB/s vertex 3's are being released in the next few weeks with similar speeds. If you're keen on a pci-e card ssd i wouldnt worry about the 25nm nand thing.
 

zads

New Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
66 (0.02/day)
Likes
3
Location
San Jose, Ca
Processor Q9450 @ 3.2 Ghz, 1.225V
Motherboard ASUS P5K-VM
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-S1283
Memory 6GB DDR2-800
Video Card(s) Nvidia 8800GS 384MB
Storage 32GB SSD and 500GB HDD
Display(s) Dual 22" Samsung LCDs
Case Antec Mini P180 Black
Power Supply 600W Modular; Ultra Products
#6
lol @ OCZ marketing BS.
"First to complete transition to 25nm"?
Nope.
 
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
176 (0.06/day)
Likes
25
Processor Core i7 @ 3.5GHz stock voltage
Motherboard MSI Eclipse
Cooling Noctua NH-12P SE
Memory 6 GB 1066MHz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX260 @ 701/1506
Storage Raptor 74 GB
Display(s) NEC MultiSync 2080UX+
Power Supply Corsair HX620
Software Win7
#7
Decent review here:
http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_vertex_2_25nm_review_oczssd22vtxe60g

There has to be reason Intel sat on those chips for a few months. In my opinion, they either had a stockpile of the old chips, or there was a serious manufacturing problem. Most of the speed reduction seems to come from the fact the chips are half the size so for the same size, the previous generation have twice the channels. Knowing the 25 nm has much less write cycles, the speed reduction is just the tip of the iceberg.

As to OCZ's marketing BS, I can't say it better than the conclusion at Storagereview:

"The problem we have with this particular situation is that any choice to make an informed buying decision was taken away when OCZ sold and advertised these models as identical through online retailers. Both list the same 285MB/s read and 275MB/s write speeds, the same three year warranties, and the same retail price. What the average buyer doesn't know is that depending on which model they get, one is up to 49% slower than the other and has only 66% of the rated write-cycles. There are other complaints as well, such as having a 5GB smaller capacity. Considering both models are sold as being 60GB; one being formatted with 55.8GB of space with the other having only 51.2GB is a huge difference. All that said, at least the 25nm version held up well in our real world benchmarks.

Overall there is no question that OCZ messed up with the way they handled the introduction of 25nm flash with their consumer SSD line. Listing these drives as different models, changing the rated speeds, mentioning the lower expected life-span, and even changing the pricing would have let buyers know what they were getting in to. Instead they took the approach that no one would notice... well we did and plenty of their own buyers did too."


So there you go "The first SSD manufacturer to successfully fool the customers about the 2x nm transition"
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
10,241 (2.28/day)
Likes
2,107
Location
Granite Bay, CA
System Name Big Devil
Processor Intel Core i5-2500K
Motherboard ECS P67H2-A2
Cooling XSPC Rasa | Black Ice GT Stealth 240 | XSPC X2O 750 | 2x ACF12PWM | PrimoChill White 7/16"
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance LP Arctic White 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ACX SC
Storage Intel 520 Series 180GB + WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) HP ZR30W 30" 2650x1600 IPS
Case Corsair 600T SE
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX | Sennheisser PC350 "Hero" Modded | Corsair SP2500
Power Supply ABS SL 1050W (Enermax Revolution Rebadge)
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro w/ Media Center
Benchmark Scores Ducky Year of the Snake w/ Cherry MX Browns & Year of the Tiger PBT Keycaps | Razer Deathadder Black
#8
Well after reading that, I think it's safe to say that I'm staying away from OCZ from now on.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
133 (0.03/day)
Likes
7
#9
Decent review here:
http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_vertex_2_25nm_review_oczssd22vtxe60g

There has to be reason Intel sat on those chips for a few months. In my opinion, they either had a stockpile of the old chips, or there was a serious manufacturing problem. Most of the speed reduction seems to come from the fact the chips are half the size so for the same size, the previous generation have twice the channels. Knowing the 25 nm has much less write cycles, the speed reduction is just the tip of the iceberg.

As to OCZ's marketing BS, I can't say it better than the conclusion at Storagereview:

"The problem we have with this particular situation is that any choice to make an informed buying decision was taken away when OCZ sold and advertised these models as identical through online retailers. Both list the same 285MB/s read and 275MB/s write speeds, the same three year warranties, and the same retail price. What the average buyer doesn't know is that depending on which model they get, one is up to 49% slower than the other and has only 66% of the rated write-cycles. There are other complaints as well, such as having a 5GB smaller capacity. Considering both models are sold as being 60GB; one being formatted with 55.8GB of space with the other having only 51.2GB is a huge difference. All that said, at least the 25nm version held up well in our real world benchmarks.

Overall there is no question that OCZ messed up with the way they handled the introduction of 25nm flash with their consumer SSD line. Listing these drives as different models, changing the rated speeds, mentioning the lower expected life-span, and even changing the pricing would have let buyers know what they were getting in to. Instead they took the approach that no one would notice... well we did and plenty of their own buyers did too."


So there you go "The first SSD manufacturer to successfully fool the customers about the 2x nm transition"
Damn, i bought one of these drives two weeks ago and only have 51.2 gb and the speeds are lower than they should be.. pffff very nice OCZ fffuuuu
 
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
176 (0.06/day)
Likes
25
Processor Core i7 @ 3.5GHz stock voltage
Motherboard MSI Eclipse
Cooling Noctua NH-12P SE
Memory 6 GB 1066MHz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX260 @ 701/1506
Storage Raptor 74 GB
Display(s) NEC MultiSync 2080UX+
Power Supply Corsair HX620
Software Win7
#10
My guess is the smaller space is a result of the new process having less write cycles, so the manufacturer has to provision more spare space. Double FFFUUUU.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 22, 2010
Messages
496 (0.18/day)
Likes
45
Location
Portsmouth,UK
Processor Core i7 950 @ 4.025GHz 1.3125V
Motherboard Asus Rampage III Extreme
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory G.SKill PI Silver Edition 6GB Kit 1600MHz 3- Channel (@1403MHz 7-7-7-20)
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 480 835 Core/1670 Shader/1900 Memory
Storage Primary: Velociraptor 300GB,Secondary:Caviar Black 500GB,External:WD Elements 500GB ,SG 300GB
Display(s) LG W2261VP 22" full HD LCD @ 1920 x 1080 via HDMI
Case HAF 932 default fan setup + 120mm Akasa Apache + 2 x 120mm Noctua NF-P12 Vortex
Audio Device(s) On Board 7.1
Power Supply Hiper 880W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64
Benchmark Scores 3dMark Vantage GPU:21754 / CPU:66169 / Total:P26141 3dMark11 P5857
#11
Decent review here:
http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_vertex_2_25nm_review_oczssd22vtxe60g

There has to be reason Intel sat on those chips for a few months. In my opinion, they either had a stockpile of the old chips, or there was a serious manufacturing problem. Most of the speed reduction seems to come from the fact the chips are half the size so for the same size, the previous generation have twice the channels. Knowing the 25 nm has much less write cycles, the speed reduction is just the tip of the iceberg.

As to OCZ's marketing BS, I can't say it better than the conclusion at Storagereview:

"The problem we have with this particular situation is that any choice to make an informed buying decision was taken away when OCZ sold and advertised these models as identical through online retailers. Both list the same 285MB/s read and 275MB/s write speeds, the same three year warranties, and the same retail price. What the average buyer doesn't know is that depending on which model they get, one is up to 49% slower than the other and has only 66% of the rated write-cycles. There are other complaints as well, such as having a 5GB smaller capacity. Considering both models are sold as being 60GB; one being formatted with 55.8GB of space with the other having only 51.2GB is a huge difference. All that said, at least the 25nm version held up well in our real world benchmarks.

Overall there is no question that OCZ messed up with the way they handled the introduction of 25nm flash with their consumer SSD line. Listing these drives as different models, changing the rated speeds, mentioning the lower expected life-span, and even changing the pricing would have let buyers know what they were getting in to. Instead they took the approach that no one would notice... well we did and plenty of their own buyers did too."


So there you go "The first SSD manufacturer to successfully fool the customers about the 2x nm transition"
subbed to read this after Im back from work.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
1,238 (0.31/day)
Likes
168
Location
SoCal
Processor AMD Phenom II 1055T @ 3.6ghz 1.3V
Motherboard Asus M5A97 EVO
Cooling Xigmatek SD1284
Memory 2x4GB Patriot Sector 5 PC3-12800 @ 7-8-7-24-1T 1.7V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 7950 DD @ 1100/1350 1.185V
Storage OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2x7200.12 500GB Raid1
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 27" LCD 1440p @ 120hz
Case Cooler Master 690M
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Enermax Liberty 620W Eco Edition
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 / Ubuntu 12.04 x64
#12
At least they realized that they goofed up: Link
 

zads

New Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
66 (0.02/day)
Likes
3
Location
San Jose, Ca
Processor Q9450 @ 3.2 Ghz, 1.225V
Motherboard ASUS P5K-VM
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-S1283
Memory 6GB DDR2-800
Video Card(s) Nvidia 8800GS 384MB
Storage 32GB SSD and 500GB HDD
Display(s) Dual 22" Samsung LCDs
Case Antec Mini P180 Black
Power Supply 600W Modular; Ultra Products
#13
My guess is the smaller space is a result of the new process having less write cycles, so the manufacturer has to provision more spare space. Double FFFUUUU.
Well this isn't the actual reason (the real reason is related to the larger die capacity and fewer dies per drive), but less capacity is less, nonetheless.
 
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
176 (0.06/day)
Likes
25
Processor Core i7 @ 3.5GHz stock voltage
Motherboard MSI Eclipse
Cooling Noctua NH-12P SE
Memory 6 GB 1066MHz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX260 @ 701/1506
Storage Raptor 74 GB
Display(s) NEC MultiSync 2080UX+
Power Supply Corsair HX620
Software Win7
#14
I forgot that with Sandforce 1 die goes for parity.
 
Last edited:

Undead46

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
256 (0.10/day)
Likes
22
Location
USA, Texas
Processor i7-2600K @ 4.5GHz - 1.335VCore
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution (B3)
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws X 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 2133MHz 7-11-8-27-1N (F3-12800CL6D-4GBXH)
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6950 (Unlocked)
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 120GB SSD (OS & Games), 500GB WD Caviar Blue, 250GB WD Caviar Blue
Display(s) Dell 23" U2311H IPS Monitor
Case Cooler Master HAF X Full Tower
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 7 Professional - 64bit
#15
How do I know if my SSD is affected?
It's showing 53.5GB free of 111GB.
I bought mine from Newegg on 12/23/10.
OCZ Vertex 2 OCZSSD3-2VTX120G 3.5" 120GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

Do I RMA?
 
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
176 (0.06/day)
Likes
25
Processor Core i7 @ 3.5GHz stock voltage
Motherboard MSI Eclipse
Cooling Noctua NH-12P SE
Memory 6 GB 1066MHz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX260 @ 701/1506
Storage Raptor 74 GB
Display(s) NEC MultiSync 2080UX+
Power Supply Corsair HX620
Software Win7
#16
How do I know if my SSD is affected?
It's showing 53.5GB free of 111GB.
I bought mine from Newegg on 12/23/10.
OCZ Vertex 2 OCZSSD3-2VTX120G 3.5" 120GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

Do I RMA?
No, you got the original 34nm version.
 
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
5,167 (1.63/day)
Likes
944
Processor Intel Core i5-3570K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI
Cooling Corsair A70 (Passive)
Memory Samsung 8GB MV-3V4G3D/US
Storage Samsung PM841 256GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case BitFenix Prodigy (Arctic White)
Power Supply FSP Zen 400 (Fanless)
Software OS X 10.9.1 Mavericks
#17
At least they realized that they goofed up: Link
Only after being exposed by a tech site with concrete evidence, which is quite pathetic (though not uncommon). They tried to deny the issue and now I'm denying them my money.