...He is not saying two different things. Not at all.
Fudzilla (Fuad more specifically) has a long and cherished history of stating this and that, often with opposite meaning.
It is NOT good journalism at all. Using sources to cover all bases and printing opinions on it that change each day is not good journalism. It's called backtracking and he does it most of the time. His main problem is that he often states "opinion A" one day and then "opinion B" the next day - both being his ever changing opinion. It's a tech website, not a blog. Big difference.
He also rarely links articles so we are meant to take what he says as some sort of commandment from his techy gods with no 'proof'.
No, Fuad is not a good journalist.
You can believe he is if you want, that is your opinion.
Proper Objective Journalism:
I have evidence A (truth or not it doesnt matter.) I print an article and say "A is so".
Next day i come across evidence B. I then should print an article stating that in contrast to my recent info i have received this new info which states B. I conclude to my honoured readers that there is no clear cut evidence until we see it.
Fuad doesn't do this. It's either "A" one day or "B" the next. With a slight twist of green.