• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Old Socket 775 user need help.

Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,312 (0.64/day)
Likes
715
Location
Switzerland
System Name Keep spending on me
Processor i7 4790K ( 4.4 Ghz stock )
Motherboard Maximus VII Impact z97
Cooling Corsair H90 140mm AIO
Memory 2x8 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL GTX 1060
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 960 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) AOC G2460 G-Sync 1080p
Case Cooler Master Mastercase 3
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX II Impact
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Software Win 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores Gaming at high performance is my priority
#1
Lately there are many hardware upgrades,and I know very well that I should change some things in my system "big things" !


So guys help me to understand because I have an old CPU and motherboard...


Give me a test or a site that verifies the fact that my CPU and chipset are the bottleneck to my video card.

I need to know this to have a good reason to make an improvement to my system.

Frankly, this is enough for me and i wil do for the next months.

See my system specs. :cool:
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,800 (2.23/day)
Likes
3,786
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Working on it ;)
Processor I7-4790K
Motherboard MSI Z97
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) Intel IGP (Dedicated GPU TBD)
Storage WD 320 / 500KS / 500KS / 640KS / 640LS / 640LS / 640LS / 1TBFAEX and a NAS with 2x2Tb WD Black
Display(s) 24" DELL 2405FPW
Case Rosewill Challenger
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750 (love it)
Mouse Logitech G5
Software Win 7 Pro
#2
Look at my specs... I'm perfectly happy and have been playing Crysis at 1920x1200 max settings. I have no need to upgrade.

If you upgrade to SB, you're going to notice the system overall is much faster on boot and loading applications. Other than that for games, you won't notice much except better benchmark numbers.

That's my $0.02

Edit: If you crunch, program and compile, you will notice a difference, but nothing related to a GPU bottleneck.
 

JrRacinFan

Served 5k and counting ...
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
19,666 (5.01/day)
Likes
4,754
Location
Youngstown, OH
System Name Gamer :Server and Android BuildBox
Processor i7 3930k: Xeon e5-2660
Motherboard MSI X79A-GD45 Plus : Generic
Cooling Liqid cooled: CM 212+
Memory Klevv Neo 2x4Gb 1866 @ 1600 CL9 : 2x8Gb Vengeance 1600 cl9
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 950 SC : XFX R5 220
Storage HGST 2TB + 480GB OCZ Trion 150 : Seagate 1TB SSHD + WD 3TB + 2x HGST 2TB
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2457-MHD 23.6" : headless
Case DIYPC D480-W White Window : Bitfenix Comrade
Audio Device(s) nVidia HDMI : Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 500b : Tt 775W Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate+Manjaro 16.06: Ubuntu Server 16.10

InnocentCriminal

Resident Grammar Amender
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
6,477 (1.38/day)
Likes
844
System Name BeeR 6
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K*
Motherboard ASUS Maximus V Gene (1155/Z77)
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Samsung Green 1600MHz DDR3**
Video Card(s) 4GB MSI Gaming X RX480
Storage 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD
Display(s) 27" Samsung C27F591FDU
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini
Power Supply Corsair HX750W
Software 64bit Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores *@ 4.6GHz **@ 2133MHz
#4

JrRacinFan

Served 5k and counting ...
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
19,666 (5.01/day)
Likes
4,754
Location
Youngstown, OH
System Name Gamer :Server and Android BuildBox
Processor i7 3930k: Xeon e5-2660
Motherboard MSI X79A-GD45 Plus : Generic
Cooling Liqid cooled: CM 212+
Memory Klevv Neo 2x4Gb 1866 @ 1600 CL9 : 2x8Gb Vengeance 1600 cl9
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 950 SC : XFX R5 220
Storage HGST 2TB + 480GB OCZ Trion 150 : Seagate 1TB SSHD + WD 3TB + 2x HGST 2TB
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2457-MHD 23.6" : headless
Case DIYPC D480-W White Window : Bitfenix Comrade
Audio Device(s) nVidia HDMI : Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 500b : Tt 775W Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate+Manjaro 16.06: Ubuntu Server 16.10
#5
The Bit-Tech link doesn't mention any Core 2 processors there Jr.
Correct me if I am wrong though, could easily go between Anandtech and get a rough estimate of what you're looking at.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
4,001 (1.32/day)
Likes
1,652
Location
Sarasota, Florida, USA
System Name Awesomesauce 4.3 | Laptop (MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro-023)
Processor Intel Core i7-5820K 4.16GHz 1.28v/3GHz 1.05v uncore | Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WiFi LGA2011-v3| Stock
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 w/ 2x EK Vardar F4-120ER + various 120/140mm case fans | Stock
Memory G.Skill RJ-4 16GB DDR4-2666 CL15 quad channel | 12GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix A8G Gaming GTX 1080 @ 2075/1368 boost | NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB +200/+500 + Intel 530
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 500GB + Seagate 3TB 7200RPM + others | Kingston 256GB M.2 SATA + 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) Acer G257HU 1440p 60Hz AH-IPS 4ms | 17.3" 1920*1080 60Hz wide angle TN notebook panel
Case Fractal Design Define XL R2 | MSI
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | Realtek with quad stereo speakers and subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Platinum | 19.5v 180w Delta brick
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores GTX 1080 please?
#6
With my testing of a Pentium Dual Core E6600 (a 3.06GHz/2MB Wolfdale) on a G41 DDR3 platform and a PT880 DDR2 platform, I have determined that it bottlenecks a GTX 550 Ti (even when overclocked to 3.8GHz) in TF2, although that game is extremely biased towards CPU usage.

However, you have a 4GHz Q9650 and DDR3 so you're still very well off. In TF2 it would probably bottleneck the 580 with Multicore Rendering enabled, but you would have over 60 FPS so not really a bottleneck. I had a 955BE @ 4GHz/DDR3 1800 which is comparable and it did handle games at 60FPS with an HD 5770, however I don't think even with a 6950 it would be able to hold 120FPS in TF2. I think with VSYNC off my 4.5GHz 2600K and 6950 do 150-230FPS in the game, and my AMD system could only do about 90-110 if I recall. I don't have any hard evidence, though, but considering my AGP rig with that 955BE @ 3.6, 4GB DDR2 800 and a 3850 AGP is getting 60 easily my 5770 could probably be written off as being fast enough to do at least 120FPS in TF2.
 
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
394 (0.16/day)
Likes
158
Processor i7 4770k @ 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Asrock z97 Extreme6
Cooling Watercooled
Memory 16GB @ 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
Case Cooltek W2
#7
I noticed with my Q6600 @ 3.4 + GTX 470 system I couldn't get 100% GPU utilization in BFBC2 at the time. SB came out and i upgraded then it was a constant 100% usage. V sync off obviously

What do you get in games?
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.91/day)
Likes
680
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
#8
What is a bottleneck, 1FPS? Maybe 3FPS? Get real. A Core2Quad @ 4Ghz will handle any GFX card quite easily :cool:

Shit even a quad @ 3.6Ghz is plenty fast

if you got $$$ to burn and an itch to scratch go ahead and upgrade otherwise you'll be fine with what you got, maybe bump the GFX card if necessary ;)

Just my $0.02 of course :eek:
 
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
374 (0.16/day)
Likes
131
Location
Netherlands
Processor Core i5 4690K @ 3.5 GHz \\ C2Q Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 SLI \\ Asus P5K Deluxe
Cooling Thermaltake Water 3.0 Performer \\ Xigmatek Dark Knight
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x 4GB \\ Corsair XMS2 2x 2 GB
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE GTX 970 G1 Gaming v1.1 (Hynix) \\ Sapphire HD 6850
Storage Kingston SV200, 3 TB Seagate 7200.14 \\ 2x 320 GB WD Blue
Display(s) LG 24MP56HQ
Case Corsair Carbide 200R Windowed \\ CM 690
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150 \\ Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply Adata HM850 \\ Corsair HX520
Mouse Logitech G602, SteelSeries Sensei Raw Frostblue, Corsair M65
Keyboard Logitech Media Keyboard Elite
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 \\ Windows 7 Ultimate x64
#9
This may help: http://www.madshrimps.be/articles/a...cking-Memory-Timings-and-More/9#axzz1a2BN96UY

Madshrimps.be compares the following cpus: AMD 965BE/1090T@4ghz, Intel QX9650@4Ghz, Intel i760@4ghz and Intel 920/950 and 970@4Ghz (no 4.050 Ghz Q9650, but I guess it's pretty close to that QX9650 that's clocked at 4.0 Ghz). The C2Q is slower than the Nehalems as shown in the tests, but it's still faster than the Phenom II X4 965 that's also clocked at 4.0 Ghz. I think you can play most games fine with a 4.0 Ghz Q9650 and GTX580, but if you really want maximum performance, especially getting the most out of the GTX 580 in games, then perhaps consider an upgrade to an Ivy Bridge (DDR3 ram is still quite cheap now).
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,312 (0.64/day)
Likes
715
Location
Switzerland
System Name Keep spending on me
Processor i7 4790K ( 4.4 Ghz stock )
Motherboard Maximus VII Impact z97
Cooling Corsair H90 140mm AIO
Memory 2x8 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL GTX 1060
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 960 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) AOC G2460 G-Sync 1080p
Case Cooler Master Mastercase 3
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX II Impact
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Software Win 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores Gaming at high performance is my priority
#10
Look at my specs... I'm perfectly happy and have been playing Crysis at 1920x1200 max settings. I have no need to upgrade.

If you upgrade to SB, you're going to notice the system overall is much faster on boot and loading applications. Other than that for games, you won't notice much except better benchmark numbers.

That's my $0.02

Edit: If you crunch, program and compile, you will notice a difference, but nothing related to a GPU bottleneck.


Yes my focus are in-games performances, but a i like the faster boot is comfortable too.

If i improve the graphics card i get the same results as core i7 2700 ? Bahh GPU's :shadedshu now they change almost every year !

Me too crysis runs smoothly but when i look at panoramas that include all the moving elements of the scenario i notice a little drop in framerate.



Thanks !! Very helpful, It seems more 'strong in the calculation of applications that do not interest me.

But I note with sadness that in games lost against the new CPU's.

The Bit-Tech link doesn't mention any Core 2 processors there Jr.

:confused:

@ Animal - if you're happy with you rig but have the upgrade itch, why not improve your case/internal aesthetics (if applicable)?

Cooling is already good, maybe my wateblock that old OCZ hydroflow :shadedshu.

I could make something much better, i had the sapphire enzotech but began to leak water for a crack in copper.

My CPU does not reach even 50 degrees below 4 GHz in all bench/games.

I'm participating in an auction for a alienware case with defective motherboard and power supply, but of course i am only interested in for the case !

I hope to win the auction :rolleyes:

So then you see something that you improve in my system ?
 
Last edited:

Huddo93

New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
299 (0.13/day)
Likes
57
Location
Perth, WA, Australia
System Name Gaming Rig
Processor i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus Z77 Deluxe-V
Cooling Corsair H100
Memory RipjawsX 8GB @ 2133MHz 11-11-11-30
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX670 SC @ 1300MHz core
Storage OCZ Vertex 4 256GB + 1TB Samsung HDD
Display(s) 23" LG W2343T
Case Corsair 650D
Power Supply Corsiar AX-850
#11
I ran a Q9650 @ 4GHz for a couple years just up until recently. I was only running a GTX275 as my GPU though. When I upgraded to Sandy Bridge (2600K) I saw zero diffrence in FPS in any of my games, the only exception to this was World of Warcraft when I got higher FPS while sitting in main cities. In saying this, I was not on the X48 chipset, but instead on the X38. So I was not able to DDR3 memory which would make a fairly large difference I'd say.

So in my opinion you should still be able to hold out another generation before thinking about a upgrade due to bottle necking.
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
15,314 (4.00/day)
Likes
4,724
Location
US
Processor 2500k \ 3770k
Motherboard ASRock Z68 \ Z77
Memory Samsung low profile 1600
Video Card(s) XFX 6770 \ XFX R9 290X
Storage Intel 80Gb (SATA2) WD 250Gb \ Team SSD+Samsung Evo 250Gb+500Gb+ 2xCorsair Force+WD250GbHDD
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ Toshiba HDTV 1080P
Case HTPC400 \ Thermaltake Armor case ( original ), With Zalman fan controller ( wattage usage ).
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V475 \ Marantz SR5008 Tannoy Mercury MKII Paradigm 5SE + Tannoy Mercury F4
Power Supply PC&Power 750w \ Seasonic 750w MKII
Mouse MS intelimouse \ Logitech G700s + Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ ROCCAT MK Pro ( modded amber leds )
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
#12
Was only a month or so i was running a Q9550 and tell ya the truth if you want best bang for the dollar don't bother upgrading.

Sure systems more responsive games play the same or a little better. So ya system would be able hold it's own in current games.

I think your system might be holding the Graphics card down a little but pointless buying a i5\7 as your games should be running perfectly fine already. Although depending one what your doing 8GB might help the system out.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,312 (0.64/day)
Likes
715
Location
Switzerland
System Name Keep spending on me
Processor i7 4790K ( 4.4 Ghz stock )
Motherboard Maximus VII Impact z97
Cooling Corsair H90 140mm AIO
Memory 2x8 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL GTX 1060
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 960 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) AOC G2460 G-Sync 1080p
Case Cooler Master Mastercase 3
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX II Impact
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Software Win 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores Gaming at high performance is my priority
#13
I noticed with my Q6600 @ 3.4 + GTX 470 system I couldn't get 100% GPU utilization in BFBC2 at the time. SB came out and i upgraded then it was a constant 100% usage. V sync off obviously

What do you get in games?
I had that CPU Q6600 with x38 chipset, i can tell you that i get almost the same results of the current CPU medium/low models.

And I keep my CPU at 4 GHz are enough to limit.

You need an upgrade to take all the power of your GPU.

The only CPU socket 775 which is still mentioned in some reviews, are mine and mostly the extreme QX9650.





What is a bottleneck, 1FPS? Maybe 3FPS? Get real. A Core2Quad @ 4Ghz will handle any GFX card quite easily :cool:

Shit even a quad @ 3.6Ghz is plenty fast

if you got $$$ to burn and an itch to scratch go ahead and upgrade otherwise you'll be fine with what you got, maybe bump the GFX card if necessary ;)

Just my $0.02 of course :eek:

True i am a strong supporter of this ! And now i have not even even the money available for a upgrade :eek:

But remember that my system now has 5 years of life that concerns me that sooner or later dies.

Although to keep up with the times I had to increase the overlcock to 4 GHz.

Before I was on 3.6 ghz for many years.








This may help: http://www.madshrimps.be/articles/a...cking-Memory-Timings-and-More/9#axzz1a2BN96UY

Madshrimps.be compares the following cpus: AMD 965BE/1090T@4ghz, Intel QX9650@4Ghz, Intel i760@4ghz and Intel 920/950 and 970@4Ghz (no 4.050 Ghz Q9650, but I guess it's pretty close to that QX9650 that's clocked at 4.0 Ghz). The C2Q is slower than the Nehalems as shown in the tests, but it's still faster than the Phenom II X4 965 that's also clocked at 4.0 Ghz. I think you can play most games fine with a 4.0 Ghz Q9650 and GTX580, but if you really want maximum performance, especially getting the most out of the GTX 580 in games, then perhaps consider an upgrade to an Ivy Bridge (DDR3 ram is still quite cheap now).
Thanks, you have explained my current situation.


Well guys have cleared most of my doubts about it. Should i lower my "upgrade fever"
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
849 (0.28/day)
Likes
300
Location
Argentina (South America)
System Name Classy Gal
Processor i7 2600K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3
Cooling CM Hyper 212 plus
Memory 16GB Kingston Hyper X
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX1070 FE
Storage 2x120GB Vertex 3 - 1x1TB WD
Display(s) LG 23" 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Cosmos S
Audio Device(s) Creative SB Titanium HD
Power Supply Seasonic M12II 750W
Software Win10 / Linux Mint
#14
I used a GTX570 with a Q9550, now i upgraded to a i7 2600k.

It depends to much on the game. I notice most of them runs more smoothly with the i7.

One example of bottlenecking: I play pCARS (pre-Alpha, release date Q1 2013 http://www.wmdportal.com/projects/cars/) and with max graphics and 64 AI cars on track the Q9550 won't cut it, i get 30FPS, with the i7 it never drops below 70fps no matter what, using the same GTX570.

The C2Q is still quite good though, it's not like the games won't run on it, it's just not as good as today i5, and i7 CPUs
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,312 (0.64/day)
Likes
715
Location
Switzerland
System Name Keep spending on me
Processor i7 4790K ( 4.4 Ghz stock )
Motherboard Maximus VII Impact z97
Cooling Corsair H90 140mm AIO
Memory 2x8 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL GTX 1060
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 960 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) AOC G2460 G-Sync 1080p
Case Cooler Master Mastercase 3
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX II Impact
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Software Win 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores Gaming at high performance is my priority
#15
I used a GTX570 with a Q9550, now i upgraded to a i7 2600k.

It depends to much on the game. I notice most of them runs smoothly with the i7.

One example of bottlenecking: I play pCARS (pre-Alpha, release date Q1 2013 http://www.wmdportal.com/projects/cars/) and with max graphics and 64 AI cars on track the Q9550 won't cut it, i get 30FPS, with the i7 it never drops below 70fps no matter what, using the same GTX570.
Nice example, here is these things that feed my concerns.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,800 (2.23/day)
Likes
3,786
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Working on it ;)
Processor I7-4790K
Motherboard MSI Z97
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) Intel IGP (Dedicated GPU TBD)
Storage WD 320 / 500KS / 500KS / 640KS / 640LS / 640LS / 640LS / 1TBFAEX and a NAS with 2x2Tb WD Black
Display(s) 24" DELL 2405FPW
Case Rosewill Challenger
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750 (love it)
Mouse Logitech G5
Software Win 7 Pro
#16
Yes my focus are in-games performances, but a i like the faster boot is comfortable too.

If i improve the graphics card i get the same results as core i7 2700 ? Bahh GPU's now they change almost every year !

Me too crysis runs smoothly but when i look at panoramas that include all the moving elements of the scenario i notice a little drop in framerate.
You may notice a perciptible improvement, but I doubt by very much. Probably the biggest gain is the remarkable memory throughput on SB. Is it worth laying out $500+ to upgrade CPU MB and MEM? Me, I don't think so. However, I do have my sights set on Ivy Bridge for the fall and winter of this year.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
4,001 (1.32/day)
Likes
1,652
Location
Sarasota, Florida, USA
System Name Awesomesauce 4.3 | Laptop (MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro-023)
Processor Intel Core i7-5820K 4.16GHz 1.28v/3GHz 1.05v uncore | Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WiFi LGA2011-v3| Stock
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 w/ 2x EK Vardar F4-120ER + various 120/140mm case fans | Stock
Memory G.Skill RJ-4 16GB DDR4-2666 CL15 quad channel | 12GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix A8G Gaming GTX 1080 @ 2075/1368 boost | NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB +200/+500 + Intel 530
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 500GB + Seagate 3TB 7200RPM + others | Kingston 256GB M.2 SATA + 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) Acer G257HU 1440p 60Hz AH-IPS 4ms | 17.3" 1920*1080 60Hz wide angle TN notebook panel
Case Fractal Design Define XL R2 | MSI
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | Realtek with quad stereo speakers and subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Platinum | 19.5v 180w Delta brick
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores GTX 1080 please?
#17
If you start playing a lot of DX11 games (which love memory bandwidth) then you may want to upgrade. Stick with your current rig until you notice your CPU being used 100% without 100% GPU utilization and bad framerates. I'd just put some money aside and do a nice leap straight to Ivy Bridge when the time is right.