• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PCIe 6.0 Specification Reaches Milestone, Remains on Track for a 2021 Release

Uskompuf

Staff member
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
1,448 (1.77/day)
PCI-SIG has recently confirmed that version 0.7 of the PCIe 6.0 Specification has been officially released to its members. The PCI-SIG organization has already ratified the PCIe 5.0 standard and plans to release the full PCIe 6.0 specification in 2021. PCIe 6.0 will bring the same doubling in data rates seen with previous generations of the standard including a 2x improvement over PCIe 5.0, 4x boost over PCIe 4.0, and an 8x increase in speeds over the common PCIe 3.0 standard.

The organization has been speeding up its timeline for new versions of the PCIe specification with PCIe 3.0 being released in 2010 followed by PCIe 4.0 in 2017, PCIe 5.0 in 2019, and with PCIe 6.0 expected in 2021. The PCIe 6.0 standard is designed to fulfill the needs of future devices in the PC and enterprise markets such as 800 Gb/s Ethernet cards. The earliest we can expect to see PCIe 6.0 devices in the PC market would be 2023 or 2024 depending on requirements.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
19,423 (5.93/day)
Location
USA
Seriously... Do we even need PCIe 6.0? No one is or has a reason to use PCIe 5.0 and we're only just getting into PCIe 4.0...

Hey Industry pundits:
DING DING DING!! This is your 2020 wake up call, let's work on things that actually NEED work and updating. SATA specs for example. Seriously, get on it!
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,821 (1.48/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Bro, you can never have too much of a speed , bandwidth, etc.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
195 (0.12/day)
how many redrivers and PCB layers will we need to support PCIe 6?

Just by supporting PCIe4 prices shot up. Image how high will they go when pcie6 comes into play.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
781 (0.37/day)
Location
Riverwood, Skyrim
System Name Storm Wrought | Blackwood (HTPC)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700x @stock | i7 2600k
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro WIFI m-ITX | Some POS gigabyte board
Cooling BQ Dark Rock Slim, BQ shadow wings 3 High Spd, stock 180mm |BQ Shadow rock LP + 4x120mm Noctua redux
Memory G.Skill Trident 2x8GB 3600MHz 14-15-16-30 | 2x4GB 2000MHz @1866
Video Card(s) Powercolor RX 6800XT Red Dragon | MSI LP GT 1030
Storage SX8200 Pro 1TB, 850EVO 500GB, 2 & 8TB Seagate Barracuda, LG Blu-ray | 120GB Sandisk SSD, 4TB WD red
Display(s) Samsung UJ590UDE 32" UHD monitor | LG BX 55"
Case Silverstone TJ08B-E | Custom built wooden case (Aus native timbers)
Audio Device(s) Onboard, Sennheiser HD 599 cans | Logitech z163's
Power Supply Corsair HX 750 | Corsair SF 450
Mouse Microsoft Pro Intellimouse| Some logitech one
Keyboard GMMK w/ Zelio V2 62g (78g for spacebar) tactile switches & Glorious black keycaps| Some logitech one
VR HMD HTC Vive
Software Win 10 Edu | Ubuntu 20.04
Benchmark Scores Look in the various benchmark threads
This isn't for home users, not even for prosumers. This is for data centre use only as they can always use more speed, especially for more storage and GPUs and alike. I doubt we're likely to see anything beyond PCI-e 5.0 for home users before 2030.
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
140 (0.02/day)
System Name HTPC
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard ASRock X570M Pro4
Cooling Aquacomputer Cuplex Kryros Delrin + Aquaduct 720XT
Memory Mushkin Ridgeback DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Waterforce WB RTX 2080Ti
Storage Crucial M1 500GB
Display(s) Philips 55POS9002/12 OLED TV
Case Silverstone Sugo SG11
Audio Device(s) FiiO D03k -> Pioneer A676 -> KEF iQ7
Power Supply Seasonic G550 PCGH Edition
Mouse MX Master
Keyboard Corsair K63 wireless Lapboard
how many redrivers and PCB layers will we need to support PCIe 6?

Just by supporting PCIe4 prices shot up. Image how high will they go when pcie6 comes into play.
Exactly my thoughts.
That they will go for doubling speed again was pretty much a given, but some info on how they plan to achieve it (QAM?) would have been appreciated.
Edit: Ok, the slide says PAM-4. Yeah that's actually feasible, more clock seemed kind of improbable.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
531 (0.13/day)
Location
Inside a mini ITX
System Name ITX Desktop
Processor Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro WiFi Z390
Cooling Arctic esports 34 duo.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC White PRO
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Intel SSD 660p
Case NZXT H200
Power Supply Corsair CX Series 750 Watt
Exactly my thoughts.
That they will go for doubling speed again was pretty much a given, but some info on how they plan to achieve it (QAM?) would have been appreciated.
Edit: Ok, the slide says PAM-4. Yeah that's actually feasible, more clock seemed kind of improbable.

Yup, it's still 16GHz Nyquist (same as PCIe 5.0) and uses PAM4 to double the bandwidth. Doubling the frequency is impractical on FR4.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
581 (0.85/day)
Even PCI-E 2.0 x16 is shown not to bottleneck hard current video cards lol and yet they keep coming with new ones :roll: .
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
5,921 (1.40/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling Custom Loop. Two 360ies + 280 rad. 8x Nidec Servo Gentle Typhoons. EK-Quantum Momentum monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) ASUS 1080 Ti SLI + water blocks
Storage Optane 900P + Samsung PM981 NVMe 1TB + 750 EVO 500GB+ 1TB 980PRO
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software Windows 11 insider
Everyone is just eyeballing the 16x speed, while most important are 1-2x ones like for peripherals including Ethernet switches. Pushing more through one line, thus greatly reducing costs.

Frequencies will be raised, it can work on SoC level also on interposer, the future lies there creating a stacked combos. We are not limited to classic motherboards on FR4. PCIe is everywhere actually. Is it a mobile phone or router or any other device having a SoC...

So basically, if you don't need it, that's your issue for not grasping the whole picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rei
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,309 (0.87/day)
Location
London, UK
Seriously... Do we even need PCIe 6.0? No one is or has a reason to use PCIe 5.0 and we're only just getting into PCIe 4.0...

Hey Industry pundits:
DING DING DING!! This is your 2020 wake up call, let's work on things that actually NEED work and updating. SATA specs for example. Seriously, get on it!

Troll news I guess hehe and is explicit for 2021 ehhe
 

Tigger

I'm the only one
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
15,372 (2.59/day)
System Name Dirty Fecker
Processor Intel I7 12700K 1.25vcore
Motherboard Asus Rog Strix Z690-A Gaming WiFi D4
Cooling EK 360 PE/EK 360 XE/AQ Ultitube 150 D5/Heatkiller IV/Byski full cover GPU block
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Dark Pro 2x16gb 4000 16-16-16-38 DR B 1.45v
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080TI Gaming 11GB Byski full cover water block +200 +575
Storage Silicon Power Gen3x4 256gb M.2, 2 x WD SN850 Gen4x4 1TB M.2, SanDisk PLUS 2TB sata ssd
Display(s) Dell S2721DGFA 27" 1440P 165hz LG Nano IPS 1ms G Sync
Case Lian Li o11 Dynamic XL Rog
Audio Device(s) Cambridge DacMagic 100/Onkyo CR-715/Cambridge Min12 speakers/yamaha Sub
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Viper
Keyboard Ducky One 2 Mini Cherry MX brown
Software Win 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores do they matter https://i.postimg.cc/Z5qyDfJC/20220421-021955.jpg
Only really any use for storage controllers
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
4,894 (1.46/day)
No not really not even for storage, PCIe 6.0 1x is the equivalent of PCIe 2.0 16x & you can imagine there aren't too many drives coming close to utilize that amount of bandwidth. The only exception is probably the upcoming Optane Gen 2 (gen 3?) drives which are fundamentally different from regular NAND.
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
339 (0.19/day)
let's work on things that actually NEED work and updating. SATA specs for example. Seriously, get on it!
For what reason, exactly? HDDs and ODDs are fine with current speeds.
SSDs are meant to be connected via PCIe, as it allows using protocol optimized for them (NVMe).

There's no point in maintaining and improving old tech when there's a better one already.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,306 (1.68/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
Seriously... Do we even need PCIe 6.0? No one is or has a reason to use PCIe 5.0 and we're only just getting into PCIe 4.0...
PCIe 4.0 took a long time to get the spec together.
PCIe 4.0 preliminary spec was in 2011 and final spec announced in June 2017. Same dates for PCIe 5.0 are June 2017 and May 2019.
For PCIe 6.0 preliminary spec was in June 2019 and this news is just the next version of it (updates are electrical spec and test chips data AFAIK). If it keeps being on track, the spec should be finalized in summer 2021.

When actual implementations in hardware happen is a different topic. Usually the first controllers or implementations take a few months to half a year from final spec.
Desktop and x86 CPUs will take longer, usually having to wait for a new platform generation. Whether or not newer versions are worth it for desktop is a matter of discussion and arguments for the foreseeable future, speed upgrades are awesome but the cost and complexity increases are also significant this time around.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
363 (0.11/day)
Seriously... Do we even need PCIe 6.0? No one is or has a reason to use PCIe 5.0 and we're only just getting into PCIe 4.0...

Hey Industry pundits:
DING DING DING!! This is your 2020 wake up call, let's work on things that actually NEED work and updating. SATA specs for example. Seriously, get on it!

PCIe 6.0 is mainly for servers where they could possibly saturate it. And Sata is dead, developing has stopped as HDD can't max out SATA3 and SSD are moving to PCIeX.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rei
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
3,419 (1.08/day)
Location
Right on Shitsown Rd, 8.378 miles to your house
System Name The Little One
Processor i5-8279u
Motherboard AZW Speed S
Cooling Fan w/heat pipes + side & rear vents
Memory 32GB Crucial DDR4-3200 (2x 16GB)
Video Card(s) Iris Plus 655
Storage WD Black SN750 2TB m.2 + WD 2TB external nvme
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" LCD's @1440p
Case Practically identical to a mac mini, just purrtier in slate blue, & with 3x usb ports on the front !
Audio Device(s) Yamaha ATS-1060 Bluetooth Soundbar & Subwoofer
Power Supply 65w brick
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shitzu turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores PDQ - all things considered !
hummm...what SIG is NOT telling you is that PCIe-891.62 is just around the corner, BUT, in the mean time, you will first HAVE to buy stuff that uses 4, 5, 6 and all the other versions before you can use it, hahahah ..:roll:..:cry:..:laugh:
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
412 (0.38/day)
I wouldn't be surprised if AMD and Intel didn't push PCIe 6.0 into mainstream around 2026-28 or so; building upon lessons learned from implementing them in the commercial/enterprise end (EPYC and Xeon).

AMD would definitely push it; given that their future vision for the Infinity Architecture partially scales with PCIe (more bandwidth for total heterogeneous computing), and given that their Zen archs are mostly uniform from the top-down. There's also the fact that AMD said they would pursue the leading edge, so it's likely that they will adopt it as soon as possible.

Intel would push it more to either try and remain ahead somewhere (like their original plan to skip PCIe 4.0 for 5.0 in 2020 before delays), or just to stay in sync with AMD given the bit of marketing brouhah that Ampere 4.0 marketing gave Intel and Intel mobo-makers, as well as in the highly competitive enterprise sector.

On the other end, with AMD having lit a fire under PCIe device makers towards faster components after pushing PCIe 4.0 into mainstream, and Intel supposedly aiming for mainstream PCIe 5.0 mid-late 2021 with AMD following late-2021 or early-2022, it wouldn't be all that surprising either if PCIe controllers continue to race towards PCIe 6.0 capability (instead of settling into a lull like during the PCIe 3.0 period). I feel though, that PCIe 6.0 will become the mainstay like PCIe 3.0 was. It'll take quite some time for tech to catch up to those speeds.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
612 (0.92/day)
Location
Bulgaria
I wouldn't be surprised if AMD and Intel didn't push PCIe 6.0 into mainstream around 2026-28 or so
If in this period mainstream exist. I think AMD will end evolution in mainstream with AM5 socket 2021-2025. Intel maybe just one year later. After that next "PC" will be just weak terminal to clouds like Stadia and other services. AMD maybe focused to HPC(servers, workstations, supercomputers) and car electronics. Maybe also will acompanies to mobile devices with GPU part of SoC's, like Exinos by Samsung.

The reason for stopping the development of even more powerful and productive mainstream components is that no one will need them. The latest models(in 2025) will be enough to meet all "home" consumer needs. And the prices of development and, respectively, the selling prices of the components after 2025 would be completely different from the usual ones for the mainstream.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
19,423 (5.93/day)
Location
USA
For what reason, exactly? HDDs and ODDs are fine with current speeds.
Oh wow! You need lay off whatever you're doing because no, they're not. SATA SSD's can run sooo much faster but the SATA bus holds them back.
SSDs are meant to be connected via PCIe, as it allows using protocol optimized for them (NVMe).
There's no point in maintaining and improving old tech when there's a better one already.
Opinion and a very poor one. M.2 slots are not cost effective means to connect multiple drives in a single system, SATA is. Then there's the concerns about space for 6 or 8 connectors on the motherboard. Just not going to happen with M.2. Then there is the drive cooling question, how would one do that with M.2, again cost and space effective? Hmm? The notion of SATA being "old tech" and therefore useless is beyond short sighted and narrow minded. It needs to be updated, not replaced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rei
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,306 (1.68/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
339 (0.19/day)
Oh wow! You need lay off whatever you're doing because no, they're not. SATA SSD's can run sooo much faster but the SATA bus holds them back.
In that particular sentence I've precisely mentioned HDDs and ODDs without SSDs. Please be more mindful when reading other's comments - you may be replying to something that hasn't been said.

Opinion and a very poor one. M.2 slots (...)
I though it's the SATA interface you actually want improved, but I see now it's mainly the form factor and connector count you're interested in.
I haven't used the "M.2" term - I've referred to PCIe as an interface. PCIe itself is flexible and fast enough to allow using single (x1) link for SSDs, and already be faster than SATA.
The tech is ready - there's simply no such connector to utilize only a singular lane.
And I think that's because there's no demand for it - either someone is fine with SATA limitations, or wants something much more, what requires more lanes (M.2 PCIe).

Some kind of a stop-gap may be using PCIe x1->M.2 adapters. Faster than SATA? Check. Have a free connector for it? Check... in most cases.

Then there's the concerns about space for 6 or 8 connectors on the motherboard. Just not going to happen with M.2.
It may happen if you consider vertical M.2 connectors ;)

The notion of SATA being "old tech" and therefore useless is beyond short sighted and narrow minded. It needs to be updated, not replaced.
Old tech doesn't mean "useless". I have no idea where you got that from.

It would much easier and cost effective to simply update existing specs.
You may want to read SATA-IO FAQ. Mentions why there's no speed bump and what are the goals for SATA specs now.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
19,423 (5.93/day)
Location
USA
In that particular sentence I've precisely mentioned HDDs and ODDs without SSDs. Please be more mindful when reading other's comments - you may be replying to something that hasn't been said.
I read what you said. Even HDD's burst mode functionality would benefit from SATA specs being updated. But I was specifically pointing out the SSD aspect because it is the main issue at hand with the current SATA spec limitations and you seemed to deliberately gloss over it.
I haven't used the "M.2" term - I've referred to PCIe as an interface.
It's still an M.2 variant slot regardless of the interface protocol.
It may happen if you consider vertical M.2 connectors
SATA connectors are much smaller and more space efficient.
Old tech doesn't mean "useless". I have no idea where you got that from.
Your statement directly implied it with statement "There's no point in maintaining and improving old tech when there's a better one already.".
 

Rei

Joined
Aug 1, 2020
Messages
656 (0.95/day)
Location
Guam
System Name 1 Desktop/2 Laptops/1 Netbook
Processor AMD Athon X2 64/Intel Pentium 997/Intel Pentium 4/Intel Atom
Motherboard EpoX ATX motherboard/Samsung/Toshiba/Lenovo
Cooling Stock
Memory 4 GB/4 GB/2 GB/2 GB
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce GTX 780 Ti/Intel HD Graphics/GeForce 4MX/Intel GMA
Storage 6+ TB Total
Display(s) HP Pavilion 14 Inch 1024x768@60Hz 4:3 Aspect Ratio CRT Monitor
Case None
Audio Device(s) Various
Power Supply Seasonic 500 Watt & VenomRX 500 Watt
Mouse Wayes Iron Man Wireless Mouse
Keyboard Rexus VR2 Wireless Keyboard
Software Win10 & WinXP SP3
Benchmark Scores It sucks...
Hey Industry pundits:
DING DING DING!! This is your 2020 wake up call, let's work on things that actually NEED work and updating. SATA specs for example. Seriously, get on it!
Oh wow! You need lay off whatever you're doing because no, they're not. SATA SSD's can run sooo much faster but the SATA bus holds them back.

Opinion and a very poor one. M.2 slots are not cost effective means to connect multiple drives in a single system, SATA is. Then there's the concerns about space for 6 or 8 connectors on the motherboard. Just not going to happen with M.2. Then there is the drive cooling question, how would one do that with M.2, again cost and space effective? Hmm? The notion of SATA being "old tech" and therefore useless is beyond short sighted and narrow minded. It needs to be updated, not replaced.
Well, according to SATA-IO's FAQ, here is what they claim: Doubling the native SATA speed would take too much time to catch up with the advancements in SSD technology, would require too many changes to the SATA standard & would result in a much greater power consumption compared with the existing PCI Express bus. As a widely adopted computer bus, PCI Express provides sufficient bandwidth while allowing easy scaling up by using faster or additional lanes.

While I do think that NVMe M.2 has replaced SATA as a boot drive bus but as a general storage PC bus, SATA is far from being replaced especially since much of legacy hardware is still supported. Though sooner or later, USB will eventually replace SATA once the software department could no longer support legacy systems.
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
12,698 (3.34/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Do we even need PCIe 6.0? No one is or has a reason to use PCIe 5.0 and we're only just getting into PCIe 4.0...
Fewer PCIe lanes should be a reason. If you quadruple PCIe bandwidth from what you're using now, then 16 lanes sounds like a whole lot more. Storage might only need a single PCIe lane and GPUs only 4. In that situation, 16 lanes sounds like more than enough. Cheaper chips could even have fewer PCIe lanes if they run faster, which makes for a smaller PCIe controller, fewer traces in the motherboard, and fewer pins/contacts on the CPU. Across the board, PCIe improves are a win. They just take time to be adopted in the consumer market.

A great example is the Radeon Pro 5600m in my laptop. It's only connected with 8 PCIe lanes at 3.0. Imagine if you only needed two lanes to do the same thing. Or even if you don't have wide adoption, what if Intel or AMD used it as the interconnect to their chipset/PCH. Then it starts sounding like a much better PCIe switch if it's 4 lanes to 20 lanes. It's just progress and there is nothing wrong with progress.

Edit: Also, you need a spec before you can implement it. This stuff takes time and doesn't happen overnight.
 
Top