• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Phenom II (Vs. i7 and C2Q) gaming benchmarks

Sonido

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
356 (0.08/day)
Location
USA
System Name Sonido
Processor E6600 @ 3.20 GHz (1600 FSB)
Motherboard abit IX38 QuadGT
Cooling Tt SpinQ (load @ 29c)
Memory TopRam SpeedRAM A.K.A "El Cheapo" @ 800 MHz
Video Card(s) Diamond HD 4870 (@ Stock)
Storage Primary: 500 GB WD
Display(s) 32" Samsung 1080p HDTV
Case Antec Twelve hundred (Modded Tri-cool fans)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply 700W Rocketfish
Software Vista\7\Linux\Hackintosh
This is quite interesting. pcgameshardware.com has done some gaming benchmarks with these CPU's. I'm quite impressed with Deneb's performances. It almost matches the i7's 940 scores! It's a Phenom II 940 vs. i7 940 vs. C2Q 9550. The most interesting thing, however, is not how well Phenom II scales against i7's 940, but how C2Q 9550 scales with i7's 940.

*Note*: The Intel platform is on DDR3, while the AMD is on DDR2. Also, this Phenom II is an ES. The final product's scores could be totally different (good or bad).



The first thing I noticed here was how great the Phenom II works here. I also noticed that the i7 didn't have that much of lead against it's last gen cousin.



In regards to the results above, I would say the same. It seems that if you currently have a C2Q there's really no need for an upgrade just yet. Unless, you're Fit. :toast: Hardware Junkie's UNITE!



Here is where you can see Intel's QPI really come into play. Even though the Phenom II is doing extremely well, Intel's interface of 6.4 GHz is really showing it's potential. HyperTransport 3.1 has already been ratified. It provides 3.2 GHz (6.4 Bi-directional) with performance pretty much even with QPI. (I will make a new post for this info, as it is quite interesting for those who want to upgrade to AM3.)



Again, Intel's QPI mixed in with DDR3 shows it's power, but Phenom II is doing incredibly well. I'm glad to say AMD has finally gotten off their asses, even if it's a bit late.



I believe this is totally due to the DDR3 setup. As even the C2Q beats out the i7's current flagship the 940. (There isn't an incredible amount of a lead by the i7 to begin with, but it is enough to edge out the C2Q gen.)

Overall, I would say that the up and coming Phenom II will most certainly be one to look out for, being able to hold it's own against Intel's current flagship and proven C2Q. The Intel i7 940 is looking to be a beast, boasting an incredible 6.4 GHz link. If you have a C2Q 9000 series CPU, you can hold out until Sandy Bridge is out by 2H-3Q '09, or just go AMD ;)

Don't forget to leave some thanks.
 
Last edited:

J-Man

New Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
2,248 (0.45/day)
Location
Oakham, UK
System Name Watercooled beast
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.02GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage Formula X48
Cooling Swiftech Apogee GTZ, Black Ice GTX Xtreme 480, EK 250 Rev 2, EK 4870 X2, MCP655, 1/2" Tygon Tubing
Memory 4GB DDR2 OCZ @ 1066MHz 2.1V
Video Card(s) HIS ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 800 on core, 1000 on memory (overclocked in CCC)
Storage 500GB Maxtor Diamondmax 22 SATA II 32MB Cache
Display(s) Samsung 24" SM245B
Case SilverStone TJ07 black/windowed version
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Fatal1ty + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W Modular
Software Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit Retail
The new line of AMD's still suck. Intel are just greatness.
 

ShadowFold

New Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
16,918 (3.51/day)
Location
Omaha, NE
System Name The ShadowFold Draconis (Ordering soon)
Processor AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 2.8ghz
Motherboard ASUS M4A87TD EVO AM3 AMD 870
Cooling Stock
Memory Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX ATi Radeon HD 5850 1gb
Storage Western Digital 640gb
Display(s) Acer 21.5" 5ms Full HD 1920x1080P
Case Antec Nine-Hundred
Audio Device(s) Onboard + Creative "Fatal1ty" Headset
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 650w
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
Benchmark Scores -❶-❸-❸-❼-
Wow that is amazing. Considering how much cheaper an AMD platform is compared to an i7 platform. I am so glad I just ordered a DFI 790GX :D
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
2,253 (0.46/day)
System Name HOMECOMPUTER
Processor Intel i9 - 9900k @ 5.1Ghz - 1.31v
Motherboard Asux ROG Maximus XI Hero Wifi
Cooling ek supremacy evo full nickle, 2xEK 360 Radiators, ek d5 pump/res combo, ek full cover 2080ti block
Memory 16GB DDR 3600 Trident Z RGB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080TI
Storage 1xWD black NVME 500GB, 1xSamsung 970 Evo Plus NVME 1TB
Display(s) 2 Dell Gaming 27" 1440P Gsync
Case Lian LI PC-011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Evga P2 1200Watt
Mouse Zowie FK1+
Keyboard Corsair Strafe rgb silent
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores i'm working on that
this is good news hope this isn't smeared like some of the other benchies out there, i'm really looking forward to the p2 940 i want one reall bad lol

although they're running the benches in some of these at higher res, could skew the bench given a gpu possible bottleneck, but hey whatever the numbers look good even at high res, it shows some competition with a much lower pricetag hopefully.
 

Sonido

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
356 (0.08/day)
Location
USA
System Name Sonido
Processor E6600 @ 3.20 GHz (1600 FSB)
Motherboard abit IX38 QuadGT
Cooling Tt SpinQ (load @ 29c)
Memory TopRam SpeedRAM A.K.A "El Cheapo" @ 800 MHz
Video Card(s) Diamond HD 4870 (@ Stock)
Storage Primary: 500 GB WD
Display(s) 32" Samsung 1080p HDTV
Case Antec Twelve hundred (Modded Tri-cool fans)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply 700W Rocketfish
Software Vista\7\Linux\Hackintosh
The new line of AMD's still suck. Intel are just greatness.

Apparently, I should of put up more hi-res images as you cannot see the potential of the Phenom II's. I'm not saying it will trump the i7's, in fact I think both are great. But, like I said, there's no point in upgrading from a Q9xxx to a current i7. I just think Deneb is what will bring AMD from the slums. Hopefully, this won't turn out to be another Barcelona.

Wow that is amazing. Considering how much cheaper an AMD platform is compared to an i7 platform. I am so glad I just ordered a DFI 790GX :D

Sweet! How much did it run out? I'm going AM3 probably in 2H of '09. My rig is still going strong.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,102 (8.06/day)
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Hero X WiFi
Cooling Deepcool 360 AIO, ID Cooling Frostflow 240
Memory 32GB G.Skill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3070
Storage SSD's
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Yamaha AG03, Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro, ModMic
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse PCMR Model O
Keyboard GMMK
Software Windows 10 Enterprise
The new line of AMD's still suck. Intel are just greatness.

Don't make empty comments such as this. Did you even look at the graphs? Don't you find it suprising that PII actually beats a Core i7 with Crysis?!!
 

ShadowFold

New Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
16,918 (3.51/day)
Location
Omaha, NE
System Name The ShadowFold Draconis (Ordering soon)
Processor AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 2.8ghz
Motherboard ASUS M4A87TD EVO AM3 AMD 870
Cooling Stock
Memory Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX ATi Radeon HD 5850 1gb
Storage Western Digital 640gb
Display(s) Acer 21.5" 5ms Full HD 1920x1080P
Case Antec Nine-Hundred
Audio Device(s) Onboard + Creative "Fatal1ty" Headset
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 650w
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
Benchmark Scores -❶-❸-❸-❼-
Sweet! How much did it run out? I'm going AM3 probably in 2H of '09. My rig is still going strong.

157$ after shipping. Got a DFI LanParty Dark 790GX. I would go AM3 but I don't think I could afford a board+DDR3.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
3,637 (0.79/day)
Location
California
I will wait for heavily multi-threaded games, and application before I say anything.

Maybe the upcoming game Empire Total Wars.
 

J-Man

New Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
2,248 (0.45/day)
Location
Oakham, UK
System Name Watercooled beast
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.02GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage Formula X48
Cooling Swiftech Apogee GTZ, Black Ice GTX Xtreme 480, EK 250 Rev 2, EK 4870 X2, MCP655, 1/2" Tygon Tubing
Memory 4GB DDR2 OCZ @ 1066MHz 2.1V
Video Card(s) HIS ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 800 on core, 1000 on memory (overclocked in CCC)
Storage 500GB Maxtor Diamondmax 22 SATA II 32MB Cache
Display(s) Samsung 24" SM245B
Case SilverStone TJ07 black/windowed version
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Fatal1ty + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W Modular
Software Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit Retail
Don't make empty comments such as this. Did you even look at the graphs? Don't you find it suprising that PII actually beats a Core i7 with Crysis?!!
I took a look but only a LITTLE better then the 920 and only 1-2 frames better then my Q9550. Seems my current quad will be fine for a while and still be getting the same frames as a 920/Phenom X4
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (4.61/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
Don't make empty comments such as this. Did you even look at the graphs? Don't you find it suprising that PII actually beats a Core i7 with Crysis?!!

I didn't find it surprising. For multithreaded things that can't use 8 cores, the HT actually makes it slower. It ends up mixing together Virtual cores with physical ones, due to the way Windows assigns the cores. Turn off HT, and the results are very different.
 

PaulieG

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
12,084 (2.36/day)
Location
Don't call it a comeback
Processor Ryzen 5600x 4.5ghz 1.19v/Ryzen 3600x 4.34ghz 1.27v
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix B550-F/Asus Tuf Gaming B550M Plus
Cooling EK AIO 240/ Noctua NH-U12S
Memory 32 GB Corsair Dominator Elite DDR4000 16-18-18-38 1.39v/16 Mushkin Redline DDR4000 16-19-19-39 1.39v
Video Card(s) HIS 5700XT/Gigabyte Aorus Radeon Rx 580
Storage Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe 500GB/WD Black M.2 NVMe 500GB
Display(s) Acer 1080p 22"/Samsung 22" 1080p
Case Corsair 4000D/Dark Flash DLM21 Mesh mATX
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 850G/Enermax 650w Semi Modular
Mouse Generic Black wireless
Keyboard Generic Black wireless
Software Win 10
Actually I'm quite amazed with these results. Can't wait to get that 945 BE ES...just a few more days. :)
 

1Kurgan1

The Knife in your Back
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
10,419 (2.33/day)
Location
Duluth, Minnesota
System Name My Comp | Fiancees Comp
Processor i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k
Motherboard MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3
Cooling Watercooled
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC
Storage 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB
Display(s) Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G
Case CM Storm | CM Elite 430
Audio Device(s) Creative Recon 3D PCIe
Power Supply Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s
Keyboard Logitech G901 | Logitech G105
Software Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403
I took a look but only a LITTLE better then the 920 and only 1-2 frames better then my Q9550. Seems my current quad will be fine for a while and still be getting the same frames as a 920/Phenom X4

For the same price, so going by your first statement that would make me think anything in that price range sucks, including your proc?
 

CDdude55

Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
8,178 (1.64/day)
Location
Virginia
System Name CDdude's Rig!
Processor AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s) XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s) ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s) Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1
Only a couple of frames apart, still happy to see AMD competing, nothing earth shattering tho:) still happy with my QX6700 for gaming.

Core 2's should still be smoking for gaming for years to come.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.53/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
Are these being dug up again!? Seriously I swear I've seen them before and just like before I want to ask the question:

How is it impressive when the clocks are different? Are we supposed to be impressed by stock procs? :confused:
 

Sonido

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
356 (0.08/day)
Location
USA
System Name Sonido
Processor E6600 @ 3.20 GHz (1600 FSB)
Motherboard abit IX38 QuadGT
Cooling Tt SpinQ (load @ 29c)
Memory TopRam SpeedRAM A.K.A "El Cheapo" @ 800 MHz
Video Card(s) Diamond HD 4870 (@ Stock)
Storage Primary: 500 GB WD
Display(s) 32" Samsung 1080p HDTV
Case Antec Twelve hundred (Modded Tri-cool fans)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply 700W Rocketfish
Software Vista\7\Linux\Hackintosh
Don't make empty comments such as this. Did you even look at the graphs? Don't you find it suprising that PII actually beats a Core i7 with Crysis?!!

He's trying to fight the Bat! His relation to this thread is way off. I wanna know where did the i7's 920 come from..

157$ after shipping. Got a DFI LanParty Dark 790GX. I would go AM3 but I don't think I could afford a board+DDR3.

DDR3 is going to go down coming the end of this month. Since DDR2 is becoming cheaper and cheaper, DDR3 has to compete by lowering it's prices as well. Not to mention that DDR3 is becoming mainstream.

I will wait for heavily multi-threaded games, and application before I say anything.

Maybe the upcoming game Empire Total Wars.

Current games are barely doing multiprocessing; And the ones that do are only two threads. I doubt we will see that many games that utilize 4 threads, not to mention 8.

I took a look but only a LITTLE better then the 920 and only 1-2 frames better then my Q9550. Seems my current quad will be fine for a while and still be getting the same frames as a 920/Phenom X4

I see what you are trying to say, but that comment was totally unnecessary. It barely had any relation to what I posted.
 

1Kurgan1

The Knife in your Back
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
10,419 (2.33/day)
Location
Duluth, Minnesota
System Name My Comp | Fiancees Comp
Processor i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k
Motherboard MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3
Cooling Watercooled
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC
Storage 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB
Display(s) Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G
Case CM Storm | CM Elite 430
Audio Device(s) Creative Recon 3D PCIe
Power Supply Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s
Keyboard Logitech G901 | Logitech G105
Software Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403
How is it impressive when the clocks are different? Are we supposed to be impressed by stock procs? :confused:

Because not everyone OC's, I know a lot of gamers who just leave their proc's and videocards as they sit. If you buy something good off the bat, the OC will help, but isn't needed by all to get 3-4 fps more.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
211 (0.04/day)
Location
Flint, MI
Processor Intel Core i7-870 @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte P55A UD4P
Cooling CoolIT Water Cooling solution
Memory 2x2GB Kingston Hyper X DDR3 1600MHz cas 8
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 580
Storage WD 320GB x2 in raid0
Display(s) Samsung 2253BW 22" Widescreen
Case APEVIA X-JUPITER Black
Audio Device(s) Creative Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
Power Supply OCZ modXtreme 700W modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Iv always preferred AMD, but I like having beastly setup and AMD couldint offer that after the rapeage of C2D and C2Q. This P2 940 is competing with a $500 intel processor! price/performance AMD will beat Intel this gen. (at least for a lil) because you will now get an unlocked multiplier CPU at 1/3 price of intel's unlocked multiplier, with reasonable competition.

AMD(ATi) beat nVidia in cards (finally) and they will beat intel for processors (hopefully)
 

Sonido

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
356 (0.08/day)
Location
USA
System Name Sonido
Processor E6600 @ 3.20 GHz (1600 FSB)
Motherboard abit IX38 QuadGT
Cooling Tt SpinQ (load @ 29c)
Memory TopRam SpeedRAM A.K.A "El Cheapo" @ 800 MHz
Video Card(s) Diamond HD 4870 (@ Stock)
Storage Primary: 500 GB WD
Display(s) 32" Samsung 1080p HDTV
Case Antec Twelve hundred (Modded Tri-cool fans)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply 700W Rocketfish
Software Vista\7\Linux\Hackintosh
Are these being dug up again!? Seriously I swear I've seen them before and just like before I want to ask the question:

How is it impressive when the clocks are different? Are we supposed to be impressed by stock procs? :confused:

Yes and no--these speeds were chosen by AMD and Intel as optimal frequencies for these processors (not to say just in terms of performance and TDP... but things like future expansion of the line main, low, and high end versions as well). These processors are pretty much at the same freq (.07 MHz isn't going to do squat) and performing closely. You are correct, Binge. Scaling might be a different thing, but, you've seen the speeds Phenom II can hit. Even if it scales worst than i7's, it can hit a higher freq to hopefully match it.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
211 (0.04/day)
Location
Flint, MI
Processor Intel Core i7-870 @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte P55A UD4P
Cooling CoolIT Water Cooling solution
Memory 2x2GB Kingston Hyper X DDR3 1600MHz cas 8
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 580
Storage WD 320GB x2 in raid0
Display(s) Samsung 2253BW 22" Widescreen
Case APEVIA X-JUPITER Black
Audio Device(s) Creative Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
Power Supply OCZ modXtreme 700W modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
3,170 (0.68/day)
Location
North Chili, NY
System Name Woot!:D
Processor Intel Core i5 4690k
Motherboard AsRock z97 Extreme3
Cooling Stock
Memory 16GB 1333 DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780
Storage 240GB Intel SSD 2TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Cintiq 21UX 1600x1200, LG 23" 1920x1080
Case Thermaltake v6
Power Supply EVGA 850 B2
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
Don't make empty comments such as this. Did you even look at the graphs? Don't you find it suprising that PII actually beats a Core i7 with Crysis?!!

I find it amazing that the old phenom did, too...
 

Sonido

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
356 (0.08/day)
Location
USA
System Name Sonido
Processor E6600 @ 3.20 GHz (1600 FSB)
Motherboard abit IX38 QuadGT
Cooling Tt SpinQ (load @ 29c)
Memory TopRam SpeedRAM A.K.A "El Cheapo" @ 800 MHz
Video Card(s) Diamond HD 4870 (@ Stock)
Storage Primary: 500 GB WD
Display(s) 32" Samsung 1080p HDTV
Case Antec Twelve hundred (Modded Tri-cool fans)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply 700W Rocketfish
Software Vista\7\Linux\Hackintosh
I didn't find it surprising. For multithreaded things that can't use 8 cores, the HT actually makes it slower. It ends up mixing together Virtual cores with physical ones, due to the way Windows assigns the cores. Turn off HT, and the results are very different.

Not entirely false, but there's no actual virtual core. It's the extra ALU Intel thinks is really needed. With it off, you might actually get the same performance results. The thing is that, if Windows assigns 4 ALU's from two cores instead of one from each one, you can get a bottleneck. According to Intel, the redesign of HT with backside fixed that issue.
 
Last edited:

PaulieG

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
12,084 (2.36/day)
Location
Don't call it a comeback
Processor Ryzen 5600x 4.5ghz 1.19v/Ryzen 3600x 4.34ghz 1.27v
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix B550-F/Asus Tuf Gaming B550M Plus
Cooling EK AIO 240/ Noctua NH-U12S
Memory 32 GB Corsair Dominator Elite DDR4000 16-18-18-38 1.39v/16 Mushkin Redline DDR4000 16-19-19-39 1.39v
Video Card(s) HIS 5700XT/Gigabyte Aorus Radeon Rx 580
Storage Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe 500GB/WD Black M.2 NVMe 500GB
Display(s) Acer 1080p 22"/Samsung 22" 1080p
Case Corsair 4000D/Dark Flash DLM21 Mesh mATX
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 850G/Enermax 650w Semi Modular
Mouse Generic Black wireless
Keyboard Generic Black wireless
Software Win 10
OK, I'm going AMD here, but don't kid yourself people. The PII is not a i7 killer. It will match Penryn, or maybe slightly better. It will be a good VALUE compared to Intel. Oh, and lets not turn this thread into a fanboy flame war. Let's just be happy that maybe...just maybe, AMD offered a processor worth buying this generation.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.53/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
Because not everyone OC's, I know a lot of gamers who just leave their proc's and videocards as they sit. If you buy something good off the bat, the OC will help, but isn't needed by all to get 3-4 fps more.

The i7 are marketed as enthusiast chips x58 is an enthusiast chipset. I've gotten more than 3-4 fps with my OC. People who do not OC will buy something OCed by a company for them if they really are gamers without the know-how. If there are just some careful kids who would not OC stuff their parents paid for MAYBE, but even as a kid 3.0GHz vs 2.8GHz would not be the same. But wait... I just forgot something! None of this matters because any kid without the access to OC his computer is probably in the same school system as the kid that can afford the XBox360, so he'll most likely own a console because that's what the little sh*ts talk about all day with their Gears of War and Halo.

::EDIT:: sorry Paul... someone reposted these scores... I had to comment.
 

PaulieG

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
12,084 (2.36/day)
Location
Don't call it a comeback
Processor Ryzen 5600x 4.5ghz 1.19v/Ryzen 3600x 4.34ghz 1.27v
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix B550-F/Asus Tuf Gaming B550M Plus
Cooling EK AIO 240/ Noctua NH-U12S
Memory 32 GB Corsair Dominator Elite DDR4000 16-18-18-38 1.39v/16 Mushkin Redline DDR4000 16-19-19-39 1.39v
Video Card(s) HIS 5700XT/Gigabyte Aorus Radeon Rx 580
Storage Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe 500GB/WD Black M.2 NVMe 500GB
Display(s) Acer 1080p 22"/Samsung 22" 1080p
Case Corsair 4000D/Dark Flash DLM21 Mesh mATX
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 850G/Enermax 650w Semi Modular
Mouse Generic Black wireless
Keyboard Generic Black wireless
Software Win 10
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
3,637 (0.79/day)
Location
California
Not entire false, but there's no actually virtual core. It's the extra ALU Intel thinks is really needed. With it off, you might actually get the same performance results. The thing is that, if Windows assigns 4 ALU's from two cores instead of one from each one, you can get a bottleneck. According to Intel, the redesign of HT with backside fixed that issue.

It's a known issues with Windows.

The Windows don't understand there are HT or Not, What it see are, 8 cores.
And that's mean if your game/application support 2 threads, it will run on 1 core only.

I'm getting tired with all these benchmark, and I already saw this days/weeks ago, someone else posted them here.

Soon, Phenom II will come out, we will know soon.
 
Top