Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by razaron, Apr 13, 2010.
heres some benchies of the 1090T.
I wonder what the 4-core was? maybe the 6-core with 2 cores disabled?
AMD can never come close to intel till they use same kind of technology. i7 uses triple channel and AMD uses 2channel. there is no point comparing those processors. Intel's memory transfer rate will be much higher because of 3channel and will easily outperform AMD no matter how many core they ADD
i hope they will learn from ATI that performance matters
price/performance is good but not everything...
My 920 still beats it in all those benchies. Which is nice for me but christ I'd think AMD's hex core would win.
Ill wait for something that's in a bit more English and from a trusted site before i judge on these new CPU's
That's not exactly right.
Tri-channel does lil to nothing in gaming and home apps.
I believe the performance clock vs clock compare to Phenom II is the same, it just this has 2 extra cores. I don't think there will be much change in the AMD 45nm CPUs.
All I care about is gaming
That is not really completely true. Like someone said, it doesnt factor much into everyday use. Show me some "good" benches with real world applications and I will pay more attention. Until then its just numbers.
Thanx for the news, but to me its Meh!
OH man this is not good at all . I just read this and well my Q9650 seems to be quite = to this ( over clocked of-course ) . I was expecting a much greater leap with the added cores than this . Maybe we are seeing some thing here ? Adding cores is not going to do it for AMD they need to get with it fast . I do not see this being the "Next big thing " from AMD . Just a repeat with added cores . i7 is still holding up as a huge obstacle for AMD to over come .
Wait for Bulldozer than we'll see what happens, 6 cores... 24 threads.... I my self wasn't to impressed with some of the benchmarks..... I did notice 4.2GHz @ 1.40v.... not bad at all but like the dude above was saying he's waiting for an english version and a more trusted review b4 really comenting on the x6
Well if this is cheaper than an i7 and is drop into am3 motherboards it is faster than a stock 920 which is badass. If it oc's just as well then it could be very successful.
I don't know what some of you are expecting, it's been known that these 6 cores are really no different from the current Phenom II's. The processors are prices accordingly. I doubt AMD cares about the big e-peen contest of processor performance when it makes so little difference anyways.
......my Q6600 beats in in the super pi 1m sad, i would think that the amd would win would get much lower time
I thought Super Pi is a 1 thread app? In that case its hardly surprising, seeing that X6 is just an X4 with 2 more cores.
oh i thought it was multi my mistake then
oh cool!! a chinese website!!!
Cannot be trusted! Must be a pirated processor that's why scores are this bad! J/k
they have a ton of f**king reviews on that site lol its amazing!!!
Heres another X6 review on there a more personal one
and some dude who DIY'd a Case for an ITX
I gonna go sign up!
You know some thing I never liked about AMD is this kinda crap ! They give them to one group of people and no one els ? WTF . Why is it some guy in china the only ones to get it first ? I really hate that about AMD . Why not let us have it first ? why is some kid in china getting them before ME ?!
Not only that but yeah they are from what I see not even worth it . quads are so under used right now , I think this is only going to be geared towards the server market not needed or even used in the desk top market .
This would be for E-peen status and really nothing more at all .
4.2GHz @ 1.40v is amazing... ^^ I need to find out how to make some quick cash.
Why should you get it and not some kid in china ?
Well why not ? Why does some kid in china need it first ? !
Separate names with a comma.