- Joined
- May 12, 2006
- Messages
- 491 (0.07/day)
- Location
- A small crate floating in the Pacific..
Processor | Athlon64 X2 3800+ @ 2.6Ghz |
---|---|
Motherboard | BioStar TForce4 SLI (939) |
Cooling | Stock Opteron Heatpipe Cooler |
Memory | 4x512 Crucial BalistiX, @ DDR520, 2.5-3-3-8 |
Video Card(s) | ATI, x1900 AIW (600/620) |
Storage | 80GB SATA2, 320GB eSATA2 |
Display(s) | AGM 19" Widescreen LCD, 4ms |
Case | Aspire X-Dreamer (Black) |
Audio Device(s) | Auzentech: X-Meridan (Best Soundcard Ever) |
Power Supply | Rosewill 550W 2x12V |
Software | XP Professional X64 & Ubuntu 7.10 x86 |
With Ageia's card having already debuted and the graphics maker going nuts to save face, I have one question. In this multi-core processing world.. Why do we need a card to do physics?
I hope it's not a silly question, but wouldn't it makes sense to develop code to run on it's on thread on a cpu core it can reserve? After all, we're going to Quad core very soon... then 8 cores after that. (K8L on 4x4+) So why not just hand the work off to 1 or more of the CPU cores?
I hope it's not a silly question, but wouldn't it makes sense to develop code to run on it's on thread on a cpu core it can reserve? After all, we're going to Quad core very soon... then 8 cores after that. (K8L on 4x4+) So why not just hand the work off to 1 or more of the CPU cores?