Please Try: AIDA64 Bench Results Lookup Tools

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Hey guys! Finally they are here!
I've been working on this for more than a year, and after many versions I think now they are finally ready to go!
I posted two threads to introduce them but unfortunately nobody replied and I was rather sad...
Here I'll make a new introduction:

These two tools are made to help us easily look up AIDA64 cache & memory benchmark and GPGPU benchmark results of different models.​

This is what they look like:​

In the latest (today's) version, for the cache tool there are 260+ models included; and for the GPGPU tool there are 400+ models included, which are separated into 5 categories: CPU, mCPU, GPU, iGPU, and mGPU, but VRAM read or write is not included because it is strongly affectly by PCIe bandwidth. For example, PCIe 4.0 x16 will be halved when running at 3.0 x16 or 4.0 x8, and I have no way to know this, so I decided to not include those data.
Those data is very carefully collected, so you can trust it.

How to use:​

In both tools there is a combobox at the top, from which we can choose models, like this:​

At the left bottom side there is a checkbox. It shows whether the data is done by myself, like this:​

At the right bottom side, there is a button and a hyperlink.​

Report is for feedback, for example, if you find anything wrong or suspicious, or if you have something that's not collected in here, you can click Report and send an E-mail to me. I'll check it as soon as I receive it. Thanks a lot for your support.
Compare is for comparison but they have different functions in the two tools. In the cache tool, you'll get blue-coloured stats of current selected model and they'll stay there until you click Clear. During that period you can select other models and make comparison between them. In the GPGPU tool, you'll get a small window with the stats of current selected model and they won't shut until you shut them or the main window is shut.

And of course...​

This is non-profit. But I have full copyright and I don't expect any reverse engineering. I just want to contribute to the community.

Download:​

See in the attachments. Previously each file was larger than 8 MB so they can't be uploaded but now they can.
@W1zzard Hi! Can we get them into our Download section?

Can I get some replies?​

Suggestions? Questions? Anything you want to say to me...

@ibace Hey man the files are here

 

[QuietBob]

Thanks a lot for sharing your tools with us! This database will be very useful in comparing different architectures and CPUs/GPUs across multiple generations. I've downloaded both utilities and will check them out.
I appreciate your hard work

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Thanks a lot for sharing your tools with us!
I appreciate your hard work

Thanks a lot bro! Your support means a lot!

I forgot something up there. Yes I will keep updating those things. Looking forward to some more data (especially the old classic models)!

 

[Solaris17]

How is this data collected? These numbers can be skewed by thousands just having background programs open.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

How is this data collected? These numbers can be skewed by thousands just having background programs open.

Yeah that can be a major concern. I only collect data from snapshots and I would compare multiple times on the same model to make sure the data is accurate. I'll also calculate to verify it if necessary.
And yes some data can be wrong (due to different PC conditions), but as samples get big enough, errors would be corrected. I have corrected plenty already.
In all, yes, it could be inaccurate, but don't have to worry too much because I've been doing carefully enough.

 

[delshay]

How is this data collected? These numbers can be skewed by thousands just having background programs open.

That's correct. In-order to get any real-world benchmark it needs to done without an OS. ie bootable external hardware.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

That's correct. In-order to get any real-world benchmark it needs to done without an OS. ie bootable external hardware.

But this is AIDA64 results... This doesn't help with any academic studies. Just to provide a comparison for overclocking and other things.
I believe when people run those tests, they would kill background workload as much as possible.
If those were not enough, there's a Report hyperlink to click, just send me what you find wrong.

@Solaris17 @delshay I think you miss my point.
I'm no professional. This thing doesn't serve any professional or academic studies.
All it does is to provide a reference for overclocking or just checking if hardware is good.

 

[Deleted member 185158]

Neat tool for base line comparisons. Lots of useful GPU information, seems accurate.

Could use better organization of the lists. Scrolling 400+ GPUs might take a minute to find a particular one.

Other than that, good job!

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Could use better organization of the lists. Scrolling 400+ GPUs might take a minute to find a particular one.

Thanks a lot!
Yeah I've been struggling to figure out a good way to organise the list. Currently it follows this rule:
1. Type: CPU and mCPU in front, GPU and mGPU at back; iGPU in front of its own CPU
2. Brand: AMD, Intel and Nvidia
3. Generation and market segment: older and lower in front, newer and higher at back

I'll keep optimising

 

[Deleted member 185158]

Thanks a lot!
Yeah I've been struggling to figure out a good way to organise the list. Currently it follows this rule:
1. Type: CPU and mCPU in front, GPU and mGPU at back; iGPU in front of its own CPU
2. Brand: AMD, Intel and Nvidia
3. Generation and market segment: older and lower in front, newer and higher at back

I'll keep optimising

Maybe separate drop downs.
Like one for AMD, Intel and NV.
Same for CPU makes too. At least split them up a little.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Maybe separate drop downs.
Like one for AMD, Intel and NV.
Same for CPU makes too. At least split them up a little.

Yes, very nice idea. I'll check if there's a way to do that lol

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

update v2.5.22.1129
1. optimised for better organisation
2. added some models

And once again, if you doubt this, just don't download it; if you use it, just trust me.
This serves no academic or research purposes. Anyone who has used AIDA64 would know that these stats would vary but only probably a one-digit difference. It provides a reference when you overclock your devices. @Solaris17 @delshay I don't appreciate what you said up there.

 

[Solaris17]

Can I get some replies?​

Suggestions? Questions? Anything you want to say to me...

@Solaris17 @delshay I don't appreciate what you said up there.

Then dont invite comments. It's alright bro feedback is a part of development, your skin will get thicker eventually.

Besides:

How is this data collected? These numbers can be skewed by thousands just having background programs open.

I didnt say anything insidious. Try not to look for problems where there arent any.

Enjoy your project.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

I didnt say anything insidious. Try not to look for problems where there arent any.

Ah, sorry. I thought you didn't trust the data. So now we don't have misunderstanding anymore. Thanks.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Hi fellas!
I'm happy to say that I've managed to combine the two parts into one exe file. You click this exe file and two windows (the previous two separate tools) will pop out.
Now with the latest data added, it's version 3.0.

Some changes from 2.5.22.1129:
1. Fixed some error and updated some stats;
2. Added RTX 4060 Laptop, Core i9-13980HX, etc.
3. Minor changes of model list.

Feel free to try it!
Any advice is welcome.
@W1zzard hey bro would you consider putting this into our download section from this version?

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.0.23.218
Icon renewed, minor changes to the source code
A better Compare button

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.2.22.225
1. *important* A brand new comparison function for GPGPU tool (took me a week to make it work)
2. Added some new models and updated some models

 

[D007]

Hey, this is great! Thanks man.
I’ve spent like a week fine tuning my memory, it will be nice to see how it compares.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Hey, this is great! Thanks man.
I’ve spent like a week fine tuning my memory, it will be nice to see how it compares.

Nice to know this tool works!
But I also realise that the data collected are somewhat the best combinations, so when our rigs don't go that extreme we won't get results that high. Well, for reference mainly.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.3.23.310
1. For those CPUs that have locked multiplier but are overclocked by increasing base clock, a note "(OC)" is added to their model names;
2. In GPGPU comparison window, a bitmap replaces the "x" in the last version;
3. Re-tested some models and their data has been updated;
4. Added some models.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.3.23.415
1. Added RTX 4070, Ryzen 7 7800X3D, etc.
2. Updated some models.

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.3.23.426
Added some models

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.3.23.505
1. *Fix: Some INT64 in GPGPU of some models were tested in 32-bit OS, and thus they were inaccurate. They were retested in 64-bit OS.
2. Added some models

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.3.23.507
1. i7-13650HX and RTX 4060 Laptop (and OCed) tested by myself
2. Corrected some data
3. Added Ryzen 9 7940H

 

[Sabotaged_Enigma]

Version 3.3.23.601
1. *Added and re-tested some models.
2. Now in GPGPU tool, for CPUs that have locked multiplier, an OC label is added to the end of their names if they are overclocked by increasing base clock.
3. List order optimisation.
4. Source code optimisation.