• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Possible Listings of AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X Surface in Online Stores

Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
148 (0.14/day)
The problem with AdoredTV is he's such an AMD fanboy he does AMD more harm than good. This is like the 3rd time his made-up numbers have been used by retailers or websites, and the effect will be disappointment when the real base/boost clocks are revealed closer to launch.

These numbers were made up in this 'leak' extravaganza video he made in December in an attempt to increase his Patreon subscribers. And it worked, it was one of his most popular videos ever. But he fabricated that whole chart. Come on lads; he claimed his 'source' gave him the prices of every single Ryzen 3000 CPU...in DECEMBER 2018. Laughable.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
49 (0.05/day)
I don't understand how lower thread count should have lower frequency both at stock and turbo compared to higher thread count according to these "possible listings"
It’s just the TDP. Higher core counts require higher TDP (125W or more). When not using all the cores, the higher TDP allows higher clocks.

Edit: in respect to your other comment, older CPUs had less cores and most of them were in use at all times.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
148 (0.14/day)
Well I was hoping this wouldn't end up on the FP :ohwell:
As fantastical as the claims are, this isn't the reason to diss them.
Um, yes it is. He's claiming the base clock on a Ryzen 3000 CPU will be almost as high as the BOOST clock on the previous generation. To make it even more fantastical, this 4.2Ghz base clock is apparently for the 16-core SKU!

So I can guarantee right now you won't see a 4.2Ghz base clock on any 3000-series CPU. We won't even see a 4.1Ghz or 4Ghz base clock. That's not how modern CPUs operate. If you think we will, let's make a bet.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,433 (1.09/day)
The problem with AdoredTV is he's such an AMD fanboy he does AMD more harm than good. This is like the 3rd time his made-up numbers have been used by retailers or websites, and the effect will be disappointment when the real base/boost clocks are revealed closer to launch.
I get that & you remember the claims about Zen before launch - it could never get close to Intel's IPC, if it does the clocks will be low. It exceeded both expectations, so it is possible that AMD is now trying to get them to clock high. At this point AMD is limited by the TSMC 7nm node, more than anything else. You could say that it's a matter of when, not if because I doubt even Intel matches their 14nm++ desktop clocks on smaller nodes.
So I can guarantee right now you won't see a 4.2Ghz base clock on any 3000-series CPU. We won't even see a 4.1Ghz or 4Ghz base clock. That's not how modern CPUs operate. If you think we will, let's make a bet.
Alright, let's do.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
31 (0.04/day)
Location
Spain
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700
Motherboard Asrock AB350 Pro 4
Memory 16 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 (@2933)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 1070 FE
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 512 GB
Display(s) 3 x HPZR24w 1920x1200
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D
Power Supply EVGA 600B
Software Windows 10 Home
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,041 (4.67/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
The problem with AdoredTV is he's such an AMD fanboy he does AMD more harm than good. This is like the 3rd time his made-up numbers have been used by retailers or websites, and the effect will be disappointment when the real base/boost clocks are revealed closer to launch.

These numbers were made up in this 'leak' extravaganza video he made in December in an attempt to increase his Patreon subscribers. And it worked, it was one of his most popular videos ever. But he fabricated that whole chart. Come on lads; he claimed his 'source' gave him the prices of every single Ryzen 3000 CPU...in DECEMBER 2018. Laughable.
You people just can't contain yourself, why does someone always has to show up and stir the shit with this fanboy crap. Stop with this garbage, we don't need it here.

Nice profile picture by the way.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
449 (0.22/day)
Processor delidded i7-8700K @ 5.1Ghz + NB @ 4.9Ghz 1.408V / 1.104V IO 1.152V SA + Koolance CPU-380i
Motherboard Asrock Z370 Taichi P4.00
Cooling HWlabs Nemesis GTS 360 and GTX 240 / 3x Gentle Typhoon AP-15 1850 RPM / 3x EK Vardar / SC600 pump
Memory 2x8GB 2133Mhz OEM SK Hynix RAM (dual ranks AFR) @ 3500Mhz 16-18-18-36-360-2T 1.408V with 60mm fan
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + universal waterblock underclock @ 1721Mhz 0.8V 12488 mem(140W during gaming)
Storage WD Blue 1TB + Optane 32GB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Dell S2716DG A08 2560 x 1440 144Hz (fixed deep sleep , fixed coronas , fixed color banding)
Case NZXT H440 White modded front and top panel for better airflow.
Power Supply Corsair HX 750W 80+ Silver
Software Windows 10 1607 Aniversary Update build 14393.2214
Benchmark Scores 1838 FIDE rating.
Ryzen 9 get wraith spire ?! Enough salt.

9.jpg
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,629 (1.70/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
There will be no Ryzen 3000 desktop CPU with a 4.2Ghz base clock or within 200Mhz of that frequency, that's the bet. £10 worth of Bitcoins do you?
I guarantee there will be, what would be the point otherwise if they had the same base and boost as the 2*** series
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,380 (2.24/day)
The rumored CPU specs mentioned here have been around since January. I don't know why people are so excited now.

If those specs are real, ryzens going to destroy intel
I still think we should expect more from moderators. But maybe I'm old.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
214 (0.05/day)
Location
Saigon city
System Name Kurise PC
Processor i7 5820k 4,7ghz / Ryzen 1700x 4ghz / 8700k
Motherboard Asus X99 deluxe / MSI x370 gaming pro carbon / z370i strix
Cooling EK evo, xspc slim 360 rad, D5 pump, dual alpha cool GPU mono block, dual xspc 240 radiator, DDC 18w
Memory Crucial sport white 16gb x 8 128gb 2666mhz/ Crucial sport white 16gb x 4 64gb 2933 / ddr4 chinese 32
Video Card(s) GTX 1080Ti SLI / HP gtx 1080 SLI 1850/1520 / 2080ti ref
Storage Lite on 512GB x 3 / Plextor m2 256gb / samsung 970 evo
Display(s) AOC I2769Vm, AOC U3477PQU, AOC I2769Vm / Koios 40''/ eizo EV2730QFX 1:1
Case Xigmatek Elysium / Corsair 750D / Bitfenix prodigy M
Audio Device(s) creative blaster ZX / Blaster ZXR / Blaster x7 lmt + burson v5i upgraded
Power Supply Be Quiet 1200 / Thermaltake toughpower 1200w / chinese 750w sfx PSU
Mouse Asus Echelon/ steelseries black ops II/ james donkey
Keyboard Cm storm quickfire pro / Fire rose steampunk kb/ corsair k70
Software Windows 10
the 3200g and 3400g still 4c/4t and 4c/8t i highly doubt that the 3700 3800 will be 16 cores , the maximum i guess is around 10 to 12 cores with higher clock speed.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
148 (0.14/day)
I guarantee there will be, what would be the point otherwise if they had the same base and boost as the 2*** series
The boost yes, we can expect 4.5-4.7Ghz but you don't just jack up the base clock when it's totally unnecessary.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,433 (1.09/day)
There will be no Ryzen 3000 desktop CPU with a 4.2Ghz base clock or within 200Mhz of that frequency, that's the bet. £10 worth of Bitcoins do you?
No bitcoins, Paypal? Just to confirm ~ no 3xxx SKU will have a base clock of 4GHz or above :toast:
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,041 (0.97/day)
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz Zxr
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Lol so many ryzen/ryzen+ gonna be sold on ebay soon.
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
198 (0.27/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
A minimum of 15%~ per-core improvment (Better IPC + Higher clocks) across all different workloads seems fine to me and is what I'm expecting, 5GHz or not.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
7,165 (4.28/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2680 10c/20t 2.8GHz @ 3.0GHz
Motherboard Asrock X79 Extreme 11
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory G. Skill 16Gb (4x4Gb) 2133Mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 710
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
The numbers don't add up to me, 3700X has a 50% increase in core count OVER THE 2700x for less than 20% increase in TDP.
If anything, AMD should retain current core count and increase clocks using increased efficiency to retain the TDP as it is now.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
712 (0.86/day)
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) aune x1s
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Qpad MK80
It’s just the TDP. Higher core counts require higher TDP (125W or more). When not using all the cores, the higher TDP allows higher clocks.

Edit: in respect to your other comment, older CPUs had less cores and most of them were in use at all times.
That's not my point tho.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,041 (4.67/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
The numbers don't add up to me, 3700X has a 50% increase in core count OVER THE 2700x for less than 20% increase in TDP.
The 8 core sample showed by AMD seems to be a 65W part or thereabouts and it matched the 9900K meaning the clock speeds couldn't have been anemic. The TDP headroom is there and let's not forget how liberal AMD/Intel/Nivida have been with their TDP ratings in the past either.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
472 (0.35/day)
Location
In the middle of nowhere
System Name Scrapped Parts, Unite !
Processor i5-2500 @ 3.3 Ghz//Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz
Motherboard GA-H67MA-USB3-B3// P35 Neo2-FR
Cooling Stock
Memory 10 GB DDR3 1333 // 3 GB DDR2
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GeForce GTX1060 Vulcan U 6G // ASUS ENGT 220 1GD3
Storage Hitachi 500 GB, Sony 1TB, KINGSTON 400A 120GB // Samsung 160 GB
Display(s) HP 2009f
Case Xigmatek Asgard Pro // Cooler Master Centurion 5
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply OCZ ModXStream Pro 500 W
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Minesweeper 30fps, Tetris 40 fps, with overheated CPU and GPU
no need to diss AdoredTV, if you dont trust/like him no need to turn this thread into attacking other people,
that said with this picture is real or not we do not know, its only few months away, one can speculate/analyze anything they want
one can simply look back at history, the leaker/alleged product before current product launch see if the it was indeed accurate or not
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
8,841 (5.17/day)
Location
Too Long to fit in a single line here.
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
This is what we've been waiting for.

IF AMD can push out boost with these clocks, Intel is done for a good while in the consumer desktop segment. From top to bottom. They won't have anything in the entire stack that is better. And they can't surpass it either because they've already capped out on clocks too.

AMD now gets a potential CPU with much better boost tech at a much lower power ceiling and peak power draw, while being an efficient baseclock CPU at the same time. Sprinkle extra cores/threads on top plus all the other minor perks they have... yep. Time to switch, at last.

Tthe rumored CPU specs mentioned here have been around since January. I don't know why people are so excited now.
Because rumors could be true.
 
Last edited:

0x6A7232

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
11 (0.50/day)
They are not. They're just using the same made-up numbers from that AdoredTV video in December. I called him out on that video as a 4.2Ghz base clock on 16 cores is laughable and whoever made it up doesnt know much about CPUs.
You, my friend, are looking to have some DELECTABLE tears to harvest at launch. Because ending your statement with "doesn't know much about CPUs" is a very sharp two edged sword, as it means if you are wrong, you know very little about CPUs.
So, if these numbers are right, will you eat your hat? Pretending they are proved accurate, what would be your response?
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
7,165 (4.28/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2680 10c/20t 2.8GHz @ 3.0GHz
Motherboard Asrock X79 Extreme 11
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory G. Skill 16Gb (4x4Gb) 2133Mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 710
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
….is a very sharp two edged sword, as it means if you are wrong, you know very little about CPUs.
Or his knowledge is based on current standards, which can and will change in the future. That does not mean he is wrong.
 
Top